Cisco Identity Services Engine has enhanced organizational security for entities by strengthening network access control, improving authentication processes, and facilitating compliance with regulations. It integrates with existing systems for seamless device management, reduces operational overhead, and increases cyber resilience by restricting unauthorized access. It aids in managing guest access, supports the implementation of Zero Trust, and centralizes control over network resources, offering a streamlined approach to cybersecurity and infrastructure management across diverse environments.

Sparx Enterprise Architect is chosen for its cost-effectiveness, features, and usability over pricier or less intuitive alternatives.

Users evaluated options like Rational Doors, Rational Rose, MagicDraw, Orbus, Aris, Visio, BizzDesign, Archimate, MEGA HOPEX, Visual Paradigm, Sybase Power Designer, and Eclipse Modeling. They favored Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect due to its affordability and comprehensive features for UML modeling, finding other tools expensive or lacking ease of use or integration. Archimate support with Sparx was a key consideration for some users.

Users favored SailPoint for its performance and features over contenders like Aveksa, Oracle, Okta, and dismissed Broadcom and Dell.

Users explored Aveksa, Oracle, RSA, NetIQ, SAP, Saviynt, IBM, CA, Microsoft, Dell, ForgeRock, One Identity, Okta, Centrify, and EmpowerID. SailPoint Identity Security Cloud excelled in features like governance, time-to-market efficiency, and supporting both cloud and on-premises models. Compared to alternatives, it stood out in complex user access scenarios and offered a straightforward initial setup. Many found competing options less comprehensive, facing issues with performance, functionality, support, and pricing flexibility.

Users chose Cisco ISE for integration, stability, and features, favoring it over other options within a Cisco ecosystem.

Users explored various alternatives before choosing Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), including Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, and Forescout. Many preferred ISE for its integration with existing Cisco infrastructure and its superior functionality. Some considered Aruba and Fortinet, yet found ISE to integrate better with their systems. They appreciated Cisco's robust support. While cost was a factor, ISE's compatibility and features often outweighed cheaper options. Many relied on Cisco's reputation and familiarity with their ecosystem.

Enterprises chose Ubiquiti UniFi Switches for cost-effectiveness, easy management, and user-friendly interface over complex alternatives like Cisco.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches are quickly deployed by one network engineer, with ease and expertise enhancing configuration and management.

Organizations prefer Ubiquiti UniFi Switches on-premises for security, using hybrid cloud for flexibility; public cloud adoption is minimal.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches offer flexible setup, varying in complexity, with strong community support despite occasional configuration challenges.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches' customer service is inconsistent, making many users rely on community forums for effective support.

{"quote":"Overall, I rate Ubiquiti UniFi switches nine out of ten.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"However, without evaluating other products, they may not be suitable for large companies.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"I would recommend Ubiquiti UniFi switches to others, especially for smaller environments.","score":"8"}

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches boost network capabilities with PoE, facilitating connectivity in educational, office, and small business environments.

{"quote":"While we are satisfied with its use in small environments, other products may be needed in very large companies with more than 30 users.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"They are suitable for environments with around ten to 20 people.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"8"}

{"quote":"I would like to see improvements in their PBX-related features. The current setup is closed and does not allow for integration with non-Ubiquiti VoIP devices or providers outside their ecosystem.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"3"}

{"quote":"I would recommend Ubiquiti UniFi switches to others, especially for smaller environments.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"9"}

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches offer scalability and ease for small to medium businesses but may face challenges in large enterprises.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches offer reliable, cost-effective networking with centralized management, cloud control, and seamless integration for businesses.

9.75

Users have been employing Ubiquiti UniFi Switches for periods varying from three months to over a decade.

Consider Ubiquiti UniFi Switches for small businesses due to user-friendly features, affordability, but check availability and security needs.

6.5

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches need enhanced reliability, support, security, pricing, integration, and user interface for better advanced networking performance.

Businesses explored Cisco, Aruba, and Ubiquiti UniFi switches, balancing cost, complexity, and availability for reliable connectivity solutions.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches offer cost-effective, reliable solutions with easy deployment and valuable analysis tools for small to medium enterprises.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches provide cost-effective network solutions with no licensing fees, appealing to small and medium-sized businesses.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches are stable and reliable, with performance varying by configuration, environment, and occasional hardware issues.

{"quote":"The PoE functionality works perfectly.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The switches are stable and there have been no outages.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I have no experience with larger environments.","score":"3"}

{"quote":"While we are satisfied with its use in small environments, other products may be needed in very large companies with more than 30 users.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Ubiquiti offers good cost-effectiveness yet might not be favoured by all resellers due to the lack of commissions.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The setup cost is reasonable, but there are companies in the business pushing more expensive solutions.","score":"8"}

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches offer efficient remote management, cost savings, enhanced connectivity, and improved performance, especially in hospitality.

{"quote":"For them to enter the PBX business, they should adopt a more open standard to allow wider compatibility.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The current setup is closed and does not allow for integration with non-Ubiquiti VoIP devices or providers outside their ecosystem.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"I would like to see improvements in their PBX-related features.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"We have not had any outages, and they have a standard interface that has evolved to support both their standard and other PoE standards in recent years.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Additionally, the firmware can be updated, allowing the switch to adapt to new rules.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"They are software-configured and offer many PoE ports.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"One of the most valuable features of Ubiquiti UniFi switches is their graphical interface and plug-and-play capability.","score":"9"}

<p>Ubiquiti UniFi Switches are noted for their reliable operation and robust control capabilities at a reasonable cost. They support Layer 3 and boast good scalability. Deployment is seamless, yet pricing, scalability, and customer service need enhancement, as support relies on email. Documentation requires improvement, particularly for configurations. Security features are basic, and supply issues hinder availability. Addressing these areas will enhance their appeal for tech buyers.</p>

We use Ubiquiti UniFi switches for small networks, valuing their graphical interface and plug-and-play capability. Though reliable, they need better PBX integration to support non-Ubiquiti VoIP devices. Previously, we used Netgear and found Ruckus too costly.

Before using Ubiquiti UniFi Switches, many used Cisco, Netgear, HP, Brocade, and Juniper. Cisco and Netgear were frequently mentioned due to their technical capabilities. Some appreciated Ubiquiti for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly UI, while others highlighted challenges with Cisco's complexity and Netgear's scalability. Transitioning to Ubiquiti was often driven by ease of management, centralized control, and affordability. Users from various environments, including Meraki and Aruba, found Ubiquiti's features suitable for their needs.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches are considered cost-effective without additional licensing costs, offering a simple setup with a one-time purchase. They are generally more affordable compared to high-end brands like Cisco and Aruba, making them suitable for small to medium-sized businesses. While the pricing is competitive, some perceive it as more expensive than TP-Link or D-Link. Users appreciate the lack of ongoing fees, with equipment being a solid investment for those prioritizing cost efficiency over brand prestige.

<p>Ubiquiti UniFi Switches surpasses its competitors by offering exceptional scalability, seamless integration with UniFi products, and advanced management features that enhance network performance for efficient enterprise-level networking solutions.</p>

<p>Ubiquiti UniFi Switches have issues with power supply stability and technical support could be improved.</p><p>The VPN technology is difficult for beginners, and the solution requires a lot of technical information for setup.</p><p>The product lacks advanced security options like packet filtering and access control.</p><p>The warranty offered is limited, and there's an issue with the frequent end-of-life actions on products.</p><p>The pricing is considered high, and there are suggestions for improvement in cost and scalability.</p>

The technical support for Ubiquiti UniFi Switches varies. Many rely on community forums for assistance due to challenges reaching official support. Some find the support satisfactory, rating it 6-8 out of 10. Delays in responses and limited availability of phone support are noted. Users often find online resources helpful but lack comprehensive guides like those of other companies. Some report successful interactions with support, while others face limitations and seek self-reliant solutions.

Most individuals manage Ubiquiti UniFi Switches deployment themselves, indicating that the process is straightforward. Companies utilize either in-house teams or consultancy for implementation, with some needing only a single person if they have sufficient expertise. Many have adopted a self-reliant approach due to acquired knowledge, while larger organizations occasionally enlist external vendors. Deployment typically requires network engineers above entry-level for configuration. Completion time varies from minutes to a couple of days, depending on complexity.

Users describe Ubiquiti UniFi Switches's initial setup as mostly straightforward, though complexity varies with configuration needs. Installation time ranges from a few minutes to several days, influenced by network size and features like VLANs. Experienced users find it easy, especially if familiar with networking. Despite some bumps, the process benefits from robust community support. Simplified setups are often compared to plug-and-play, requiring minimal staff and offering flexibility with deployment and management.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches are valued for their one-time investment cost, offering reliable performance and comprehensive analysis tools. Users find its software updates and seamless integration advantageous for enterprise deployment. Although some users have preferences for other brands, they appreciate the ease of deployment and management, especially in comparison to the time-intensive setup of Cisco. They note improved user management and backup capabilities, contributing to a favorable return in areas where size does not determine importance.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches' customer service and support is generally rated positively, with an estimated score range of 7 to 9 out of 10.

Many users are opting for on-premises deployment when implementing Ubiquiti UniFi Switches. A smaller group is choosing hybrid cloud to manage their systems. A few prefer using public cloud deployment. The predominant choice is for on-premises while hybrid cloud serves as a secondary preference. Public cloud is selected by the least amount. This highlights a clear trend toward traditional deployment with a significant interest in hybrid solutions for enhanced flexibility.

<p>Ubiquiti UniFi Switches are known for their reliability and stability, often not requiring attention for years.</p>
<p>They offer quick deployment and centralized management features, simplifying network administration.</p>
<p>Ubiquiti UniFi Switches support advanced features like port security and Power over Ethernet (PoE) capabilities.</p>
<p>The price point of Ubiquiti UniFi Switches is considered very reasonable for their features and performance.</p>
<p>The switches are scalable, making them suitable for both small and large network environments.</p>

Feedback suggests that Ubiquiti UniFi Switches generally exhibit strong stability and reliability. Users commend them for consistent performance without major issues and offer high ratings. Some note challenges related to environmental factors, hardware exchanges, and specific setups exceeding data capacity. A few instances of instability are linked to network environments or extreme conditions. Overall impressions highlight stable functionality, particularly in controlled settings, with occasional concerns addressed effectively through maintenance and updates.

Users advise others to choose Ubiquiti UniFi Switches for their ease of use, reliability, and affordability, particularly for small to medium enterprises. They highlight the importance of testing in lab settings for high-speed or specialized requirements and emphasize consideration of cloud management costs. The switches perform well with open systems and offer stability, though improvements in cybersecurity and support are desired. Users find the web interface beneficial for network management and suggest training for a smooth transition.

Power supply and stability issues hinder Ubiquiti UniFi Switches, requiring improvements. Users face challenges with complex management interfaces and slow consoles. Enhanced technical support and competitive pricing are necessary. Limited security features and frequent firmware updates create inconvenience. Better documentation and easier setup are needed, with improved distribution in regions like India. Enhanced compatibility with diverse devices and advanced network management features would benefit users.

Users have employed Ubiquiti UniFi Switches for a range of three months to over ten years.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches are praised for centralized management via the Cloud Key UniFi controller, user-friendly interfaces, reliability, open technology framework, and competitive pricing. Features like graphical interfaces, plug-and-play capability, easy VLAN setup, port management, and integration with other Ubiquiti devices are highly valued. Users find it scalable, stable, and cost-effective with excellent control and remote management capabilities, making it ideal for small to medium-sized businesses.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches are used for local networks, supplying power to access points, VoIP devices, VPN, Wi-Fi support, VLAN creation, and enhancing network availability. Users implement them for office environments, security, small and large installations, LAN extension, logistics scanning, video conferencing, and surveillance. These switches facilitate wireless infrastructure, network management, and client services. They are favored for their price, usability, and integration with Ubiquiti access points and devices.

Users evaluated Tradenet, D-link, Huawei, Cisco, NETGEAR, TP-Link Omada, Aruba, and Ruckus before opting for Ubiquiti UniFi Switches. Cisco was often considered but found costly, requiring extensive manual configuration. D-link, TP-Link Omada, and Aruba were also explored. Pricing and the ecosystem benefits were significant factors leading to the choice of Ubiquiti UniFi. Ruckus and Cisco were deemed expensive, and NETGEAR is being considered without settled decisions.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches provide scalable options suitable for small to medium-sized organizations. They support deployments ranging from a few to hundreds of users. Users report satisfactory performance, especially in environments with fewer than 500 connections. Some highlight limitations with larger enterprise setups and emphasize compatibility with other brands for core network needs. Overall, the switches are considered effective and offer features conducive to expanding network infrastructures.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches enhance remote management across offices in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria. They offer flexibility, improving configuration speed and network management with plug-and-play and reliable wireless access. Advanced features like VLAN management and Spanning Tree Protocol enable efficient troubleshooting. They support remote client services, reducing on-site visits. In the hospitality sector, they boost Wi-Fi performance. UniFi Switches lower failure rates, operating costs, and enhance connectivity and operational efficiency by 19%.

Most organizations deploying Dell PowerScale prefer on-premises setups, with fewer opting for private or hybrid cloud solutions.

Users switched to Dell PowerScale for better scalability, management, integration, and future-proofing compared to previous storage solutions.

Dell EMC and integrators facilitate PowerScale deployment, facing challenges, with varying customer support levels and ProDeploy Plus services.

Dell PowerScale setup complexity varies; seasoned users manage easily, while newcomers may need assistance for a smoother integration.

Dell PowerScale efficiently manages large unstructured data, offering scalability and secure handling for sectors like healthcare, media, and research.

Dell PowerScale support is generally effective, but experiences variability in responsiveness, especially with initial and first-line contacts.

{"quote":"Better solutions are available, however, they tend to be more expensive.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it an eight out of ten.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Dell PowerScale is stable, user-friendly, and easily integrates with other systems.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it an eight out of ten. Better solutions are available, however, they tend to be more expensive.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"6"}

{"quote":"Dell provides support within four hours, and they always fulfill their promises.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"9"}

7.0

7.75

{"quote":"Despite being more expensive than Huawei, it is stable and most enterprises accept the price due to its stability.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Most enterprises prefer to go with Dell.","score":"8"}

Dell PowerScale offers scalable storage, easily integrates, and supports enterprise growth, efficiently managing extensive and unpredictable data demands.

PowerScale is scalable and reliable, but requires planning and knowledgeable partners for optimal enterprise and SMB implementation.

Dell PowerScale is lauded for its scalability, seamless data management, high performance, and user-friendly interface enhancing efficiency.

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) usage varies greatly, typically lasting from under one year to up to fifteen years.

Dell PowerScale needs improvements in pricing, cloud integration, usability, performance, security, support, and better handling of small files.

7.5

Dell PowerScale offers exceptional reliability and minimal downtime, with high uptime and low management needs even during challenges.

Dell PowerScale is cost-efficient, scalable, simplifies management, and offers positive ROI through centralized, energy-efficient data control and performance.

Dell PowerScale offers justifiable pricing with features and management ease, making it a competitive long-term investment.

Users chose Dell PowerScale for its scalability, integration ease, intuitive interface, and reliable support over alternatives like IBM and NetApp.

7.5

Dell PowerScale streamlines storage management, boosts efficiency, integrates seamlessly, and optimizes infrastructure for improved productivity and resource allocation.

{"quote":"Dell provides support within four hours, and they always fulfill their promises.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The pricing of Dell solutions is higher than that of Huawei.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Dell PowerScale offers high scalability and stability as well, making it a valuable solution for enterprises.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"Additionally, it integrates easily with other systems.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"It's easy to monitor everything, and the interface is user-friendly.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"It is stable and very user-friendly.","score":"8"}