After evaluating multiple options for features and support, users selected Broadcom Clarity for its robust project management capabilities.

Users considered alternatives like HP PPM, SAP PPM, Microsoft Project, Primavera, PTC, and JIRA but chose Broadcom Clarity for its comprehensive features, scalability, and ease of integration. The preference was due to robust portfolio management, quick adaptability, support alignment, and long-term planning compatibility. Many found Broadcom Clarity to offer more flexibility and customization, aligning well with specific organizational needs and supporting managed service provider plans efficiently.

FortiGate NGFW is preferred for its feature balance, user-friendly interface, and seamless integration despite being costlier than Sophos.

Users considered various alternatives to FortiGate Next Generation Firewall including Barracuda, Sophos, Palo Alto, Cisco, Check Point, WatchGuard, SonicWall, and Cyberoam. Many found FortiGate to be user-friendly, cost-effective, and robust with strong hardware and stable configuration. Its integration with networking infrastructure and better security technology were highlighted positively. While some alternatives like Palo Alto and Cisco offered advanced features, FortiGate's manageability and pricing made it appealing.

SUSE collaborated with an in-house team to deploy SUSE NeuVector in one day, involving three engineers and technical assistance.

{"quote":"However, I found that the support in Egypt was not very qualified, and there was a need to upgrade to a higher support layer to solve my issues.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"2"}

Organizations use both Public Cloud and On-premises for SUSE NeuVector, adapting based on specific infrastructure needs.

SUSE NeuVector enhances security with advanced features including vulnerability management, automation, CI/CD integration, and ISO certification facilitation.

SUSE NeuVector setup varied in ease and time, requiring more expertise as environmental complexity and cluster numbers increased.

{"quote":"The solution includes many features, not only for container and client security but also for scanning nodes, networks, and vulnerabilities.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"8"}

4.85

SUSE NeuVector's scalability supports multiple clusters, appealing to enterprises and earning high user ratings from seven to nine out of ten.

Users have interacted with SUSE NeuVector for periods ranging from two months to three years, demonstrating its diverse application use.

Organizations use SUSE NeuVector for Kubernetes security, enabling vulnerability management, compliance, and integration with CI/CD workflows and cloud platforms.

SUSE NeuVector needs improved VM support, documentation, and integration, with enhanced cloud, monitoring, and security features for hybrid environments.

SUSE NeuVector's customer service is helpful and responsive, though support complexity and variability in Egypt are noted.

SUSE NeuVector offers powerful, cost-effective security integration despite setup challenges; documentation needs improvement for smoother use.

{"quote":"I found that the support in Egypt was not very qualified, and there was a need to upgrade to a higher support layer to solve my issues.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The enterprise version of Prisma has the option to import CVEs from different sources, providing more flexibility.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The technical support provided by SUSE in Egypt includes a technical engineer specific for our POC.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"It scans the network from east to west and north to west.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The solution includes many features, not only for container and client security but also for scanning nodes, networks, and vulnerabilities.","score":"9"}

SUSE NeuVector is generally stable with high ratings, though some users experience initial issues resolved with support.

{"quote":"Using a node port instead of a cluster IP is less ideal when implementing federation features between two clusters and could be improved.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"One area for improvement is NeuVector's ability to import CVEs from different sources.","score":"8"}

Enterprise buyers found SUSE NeuVector's pricing mixed, with some benefiting from deals, while support incurs extra costs.

I explored NeuVector for container security, appreciating its features for scanning nodes, networks, and vulnerabilities. However, improvements are needed in importing CVEs and using cluster IPs for federation between clusters compared to Prisma Cloud.

<p>SUSE NeuVector offers straightforward setup and deployment with favorable pricing. It excels in run-time security and broad security coverage, featuring valued capabilities like image scanning and anti-malware. However, it lacks support for virtual machines in IaaS environments and requires improvements in documentation, monitoring, reporting, development pipeline integrations, infrastructure scanning, DevSecOps visibility, and security protection rules. Buyers should consider these factors when evaluating SUSE NeuVector for robust risk management.</p>

<p>NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines, affecting IaaS VMS compatibility.</p><p>The documentation requires improvement.</p><p>Monitoring and reporting features need enhancement.</p><p>Integrations and visibility across the DevSecOps pipeline should be increased.</p><p>Container image scanning and security protection rules need enhancement.</p>

<p>SUSE NeuVector surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive real-time container security, seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, and advanced visibility and compliance features, ensuring robust protection and streamlined operations for cloud-native environments.</p>

Enterprise buyers of SUSE NeuVector often experience varied pricing, with licensing fees paid annually. Costs can be influenced by internal sponsorships, with some reporting a three-year cost of around 4 million South African rand, including top-tier support. While some find the base cost low, others note additional charges for support. SUSE NeuVector offers an open-source model requiring payment for support, impacting overall cost assessments.

The initial setup of SUSE NeuVector varies in difficulty. Some find it straightforward, especially with a prepared environment, while others face challenges with integration and documentation, needing custom scripts. Deployment duration ranges from 30 minutes to several weeks, often dependent on project complexity and environment readiness. Teams need multiple members for deployment, and larger setups might require extensive time and resources. Ratings for ease of deployment differ, reflecting varied experiences with the setup process.

Several teams implemented SUSE NeuVector, utilizing both in-house and SUSE's technical assistance. Three engineers participated in the deployment, successfully completing it within a day. SUSE's technical engineers supported the process during a proof of concept.

<p>Initial setup of SUSE NeuVector is straightforward and simple.</p>

<p>SUSE NeuVector offers a competitive pricing advantage.</p>

<p>Risk management capabilities in SUSE NeuVector are impressive.</p>

<p>Image scanning and anti-malware features in SUSE NeuVector are highly valuable.</p>

<p>Run-time security is a valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector.</p>

Customers express satisfaction with SUSE NeuVector's technical support, noting responsiveness and knowledge. While many agree the support is good, some highlight complexities in accessing proper assistance and emphasize the necessity of engaging the right personnel to resolve issues. In Egypt, users faced challenges with support quality, suggesting the need for a more advanced support tier. Nonetheless, support quality is often rated highly, receiving a nine out of ten by some users.

SUSE NeuVector's customer service and support is rated positively with a range of 4 to 5 out of 5.

Users advise others to use SUSE NeuVector on-premises with SUSE to simplify integration and match cluster capabilities with version requirements. They acknowledge installation challenges and bugs but appreciate its powerful features, ease of operation, and integration with security solutions. Although documentation needs improvement, it offers competitive pricing and performance. They recommend it for container scanning due to its excellent support but suggest adding more features for enterprise integration. Overall, ratings range from five to ten out of ten.

SUSE NeuVector deployment is divided between Public Cloud and On-premises. Multiple users prefer Public Cloud, and an equal number opt for On-premises, indicating a balanced preference among these models.

Users have engaged with SUSE NeuVector for a range of two months to three years.

SUSE NeuVector is generally stable according to multiple accounts. Several entities report a high level of stability, rating it nine out of ten. Some instances noted initial issues that were resolved with NeuVector team's support. Although a few experienced instability, rating it four out of ten, most did not encounter bugs or crashes. Stability impressions suggest reliability, with one group noting it as highly stable, despite not being in production yet.

SUSE NeuVector lacks support for IaaS VMs, needs easier setup and improved documentation. Users desire better monitoring, broader integrations, and enhanced image-scanning capabilities. Increased visibility in DevSecOps pipelines is sought along with more security rules and a better approach to CVE imports. Enhancing the federation feature using a cluster IP and expanding cloud capabilities are essential. Seamless integration in hybrid environments is necessary to enrich the development pipeline further.

SUSE NeuVector offers valuable features such as vulnerability management, informative UI, and seamless CI/CD integration. It provides automation, advanced learning, and ISO certification checks. Users appreciate its simple deployment, risk capabilities, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Key functionalities include image scanning, anti-malware, and run-time security. It ensures comprehensive security with container, client, node, and network scanning. Users benefit from its ability to import CVEs from various sources, enhancing flexibility and compliance efforts.

Organizations primarily use SUSE NeuVector for container security with Kubernetes, focusing on vulnerability management and policy compliance. They employ it for scanning infrastructure, integrating with CI/CD pipelines, and automating network behavior analysis. It is used both on-premise and in the cloud, often with Amazon AWS. Additionally, it provides asset protection, monitors long-term events, and ensures application communication security. Users integrate it with GitLab for enhanced security measures.

Impressions suggest SUSE NeuVector is highly scalable, supporting multiple clusters and efficient scaling of scanners for numerous pods. It is valued for its scalability possibilities, with clients mostly at the enterprise level. Plans to expand usage are common, indicating a strong capacity for growth. Ratings for scalability range from seven to nine out of ten, highlighting its commendability and potential for future feature exploration.

UiPath Orchestrator was preferred for scalability, user-friendliness, and stability over other automation tools like Aiwozo and Power Automate.

UiPath Orchestrator's support is satisfactory and knowledgeable, but response times and documentation need improvement, with ratings six to nine.

Various groups, aided by consultants and IT teams, implemented UiPath Orchestrator, addressing security and installation needs.

{"quote":"The price of UiPath Orchestrator is about six on a scale from one to ten and needs improvement.","quality_score":"4","sentiment_score":"4"}

{"quote":"The installation of UiPath Orchestrator took maybe one day.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"The technical support is about eight out of ten for UiPath Orchestrator.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"6"}

{"quote":"I would rate the scalability around seven out of ten with UiPath Orchestrator.","quality_score":"5","sentiment_score":"5"}

UiPath Orchestrator cloud setup is easy, quick, and requires minimal configuration, while on-premises deployment may need technical expertise.

UiPath Orchestrator optimizes RPA workflows for industries by managing robots, automating tasks, and ensuring resource efficiency.

Many choose on-premises deployment for UiPath Orchestrator, while others opt for the flexibility of the public cloud.

UiPath Orchestrator requires interface, code, and dashboard improvements, enhanced support, AI integration, flexible processes, and increased market visibility.

{"quote":"The major issue is with the application according to the new version of the UI.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"2"}

{"quote":"UiPath Orchestrator has eliminated the need for human operation, enhancing our automation process.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

2.75

UiPath Orchestrator is highly scalable, praised for flexibility across sizes, favoring cloud for superior scalability, despite configuration needs.

8.0

UiPath Academy boosts understanding and scalability, enhancing efficiency with user-friendly deployment, but setup can be complex.

UiPath Orchestrator simplifies task automation with centralized management, enhanced security, AI features, and efficient data processing capabilities.

7.5

Users report quick ROI with UiPath Orchestrator, citing efficiency and savings, though some find financial benefits unclear.

7.5

UiPath Orchestrator users have diverse experience levels, ranging from a few months to over eight years.

UiPath Orchestrator offers flexible pricing, often viewed as costly compared to competitors, with annual fees and potential additional costs.

UiPath Orchestrator is highly reliable with minor issues, achieving stability ratings of 8-9, varying by hardware.

UiPath Orchestrator enhances efficiency by automating processes, managing bots, and providing insights despite rising licensing costs.

7.0

{"quote":"The price is about six on a scale from one to ten and needs improvement.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"We have developed our engineering and written it ourselves, so it becomes a problem.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The major issue is with the application according to the new version of the UI.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The focus on repeat application automation is valuable.","score":"8"}

We use UiPath Orchestrator primarily for regular application automation and data reporting. While its focus on repeatable automation is valuable, the newer UI version presents challenges. I'm uncertain of the ROI and haven't explored alternative solutions.

Users previously engaged with Python, Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Aiwozo, Power Automate, ABBYY, and various Microsoft technologies. Python presented complexity before switching to UiPath Orchestrator, which offered simplicity and scalability. Automation Anywhere and Power Automate provided integration but required extensive learning. Blue Prism and Aiwozo had efficient functionalities. UiPath Orchestrator was favored for its user-friendly interface, comprehensive capabilities, scalability, and leadership in RPA. Users also explored in-house solutions before adopting UiPath Orchestrator.

<p>UiPath Orchestrator streamlines automation management with capabilities like deploying, scheduling, and executing bots across environments. It features a centralized dashboard for enhanced operational efficiency and robust asset management. The platform excels in high-volume data processing and integrates with corporate environments via centralized login and Active Directory. However, it requires improvements in code management and cost competitiveness, alongside better business intelligence integration and credential management. Expanding promotional activities could boost its visibility.</p>

<p>UiPath Orchestrator needs to conduct more promotional activities and webinars, improve code management for Studio, and refine the credential vault for better process categorization and functionality.</p><p>Integration with reporting tools and classic solutions, along with robust monitoring and reporting capabilities such as BI integration and Salesforce integration, are essential for enhancing UiPath Orchestrator.</p><p>UiPath Orchestrator's frequent and rapid changes in interface and functionality pose a challenge, requiring improvements in deployment and architecture aspects.</p><p>The process of connecting to licenses is challenging, and integrating with other vendors often results in configuration errors, while limiting certain deployment scenarios and enforcing best practices would be beneficial.</p><p>High licensing costs are a significant concern; a reduction could make UiPath Orchestrator more competitive, encouraging more organizations to opt for it.</p>

UiPath Orchestrator surpasses its competitors by providing robust automation capabilities including centralized control, real-time analytics, and seamless scalability, empowering businesses to efficiently manage complex robotic processes with unmatched speed and reliability.

UiPath Orchestrator pricing varies, with many finding it expensive yet reasonable depending on specific needs. Organizations often face high initial setup costs but benefit from bundled options and maintenance without extra charges. Costs may decrease as deployment increases. Pricing structures can include standalone or bundled models, with additional licenses needed for advanced features. Larger enterprises might benefit from economies of scale. Customers sometimes compare it unfavorably to lower-cost alternatives such as Microsoft Power Automate.

Customer service and support of UiPath Orchestrator is rated between 3 and 4 out of 5 based on the overall feedback.

UiPath Orchestrator's initial setup is generally straightforward, especially with its cloud version. The deployment can be completed quickly, often within a few days. Technical skills are beneficial for understanding the architecture and configurations, particularly for on-premises installations. While some find the deployment process easy, others may face challenges, such as infrastructure preparation and configuration issues. Training and support materials are helpful for new users, making learning to use the tool manageable.

Several users reported diverse approaches for UiPath Orchestrator implementation. Some consulted experts during setup, while others completed deployment internally. Technical teams often managed the process in-house, engaging IT specialists for security guidance. Information departments also participated in implementing UiPath Orchestrator.

Users observe a return on investment with UiPath Orchestrator after a few weeks to a month. It enhances efficiency and reliability, justifying initial costs with long-term benefits. Automating tasks during peak periods reduces overtime, improving efficiency. Cost savings include 20,00,000 plus from transaction processing over four to five years depending on the number of bots used. Some users are uncertain about financial benefits for their company.

UiPath Orchestrator customer service and support are generally seen as efficient and responsive, but users identify occasional delays in response time. Support staff are knowledgeable, though access to the right personnel can be tricky. Some concerns exist regarding SLAs and documentation quality. Users rate support six to nine out of ten, noting prompt assistance when using production licenses. There is a call for faster issue resolution, especially in critical situations.

<p>UiPath Orchestrator features efficient logs, asset management, and monitoring capabilities which enhance operational efficiency.</p>
<p>It includes user-friendly reporting and data analysis tools, which are particularly useful for business applications.</p>
<p>The deployment and scheduling of automated bots across different environments such as virtual machines are highly effective.</p>
<p>UiPath Orchestrator offers scheduling, queue management, and centralized login features that streamline processes for various user roles.</p>
<p>Its queue system supports processing of large data volumes simultaneously, increasing task handling efficiency.</p>

Most users are adopting an on-premises deployment for UiPath Orchestrator, reflecting a focus on control and security. Some prefer the public cloud, emphasizing flexibility and scalability.

Users advise others to take advantage of UiPath Academy for training, utilize cloud features to simplify infrastructure, and adopt Orchestrator for effective bot deployment and management. They suggest considering alternatives for smaller projects due to cost. Many find UiPath Orchestrator user-friendly and beneficial for improving efficiency and integrating with numerous tools. They recommend understanding use cases well and planning for scalability. Centralized management and features like integration with SolarWinds and API usage greatly enhance operational efficiency.

Usage of UiPath Orchestrator ranges from a few months to eight years.

UiPath Orchestrator needs improvements in code management, credential handling, UI flexibility, and automation for exceptional scenarios. Users find the licensing process complex, and there are issues integrating with third-party tools. Pricing is considered high, and there's demand for enhanced AI features. There are challenges with document accuracy and installation complexity. Multiple users express a need for better support, dashboards, and customization options for seamless operations and ease of use.

UiPath Orchestrator is consistently rated as stable, with evaluations generally between eight and nine out of ten. Users deem it more stable than other tools, although some rare occurrences like timeouts and system crashes are noted. Many find it reliable, with some mentioning stability depends on proper setup or their machine's condition. Stability scores of eight and nine out of ten are common, reflecting confidence in its performance.

UiPath Orchestrator's most valuable features include its user-friendly interface, comprehensive logs, centralized data management, and robust scheduling capabilities. Organizations appreciate its easy deployment across environments, efficient queue management, and secure asset handling. They find the monitoring, reporting, and data collection functionalities essential. The platform's AI features and modern folder structure enhance workflow automation, making UiPath Orchestrator preferred for managing bots and facilitating RPA processes effectively and efficiently.

UiPath Orchestrator is recognized for scalability, supporting both small and large organizations. Ratings mostly range from seven to ten out of ten, indicating confidence in its ability to scale. Some users note the necessity for specific configurations to maximize effectiveness. The cloud version is considered highly scalable compared to on-premise. Companies from different sizes utilize it, though some emphasize the need for better connectors to enhance flexibility across varying automation needs.

UiPath Orchestrator is primarily used for managing, monitoring, and optimizing RPA workflows. Companies utilize it for automating website processes, supply chain management, invoice handling, and document understanding. It assists in scheduling, provisioning, and deploying bots, whether attended or unattended, and is used across various industries. Users engage with the tool for logging, configuring machines, running robot tasks, generating reports, and managing assets while leveraging features like Action Center and Test Suite.

UiPath Orchestrator aids organizations through reduced manual tasks, efficient deployment, scheduling, and executing of automated bots across varied environments. Enhancements in asset management and centralized dashboards boost operational efficiency by providing actionable insights. Integration with other tools strengthens automation strategies, improving workflow by streamlining transaction management. Concerns include licensing costs. Manual operations are minimized, elevating overall process automation.

{"quote":"They can currently scale up to 50 petabytes, which is massive.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"8"}

7.5

7.75

2.6

{"quote":"There are challenges with the operation cost and upgrading process, which is disruptive, especially with the node.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"2"}