Meraki MS Switches offer simple setup, quick deployment, and cloud management, requiring minimal expertise and personnel.

Meraki MS Switches enable cloud-based network management for easy connectivity in various environments, ideal for small to mid-sized businesses.

Meraki MS Switches provide centralized management, ease of use, scalability, and efficient troubleshooting through a cloud-based dashboard.

Meraki MS Switches are scalable for SMBs, easily expandable, suitable for mid-market, but may face enterprise limitations.

{"quote":"Additionally, we rely on 100% remote configuration.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"One of the most valuable features of Meraki MS Switches is its precise traffic analytics capabilities, allowing us to query the system for any place at any time.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"8"}

Users appreciate Meraki MS Switches for user-friendliness and reliability, highlighting flexibility, internet needs, pricing, and feature suggestions.

Meraki MS Switches face high pricing, cloud dependency, limited features, and users want better scalability, support, and customization.

{"quote":"I would recommend using Meraki MS Switches as it is good equipment, sturdy, and works well.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"There are compatibility issues with certain Power over Ethernet (PoE) devices, which we would like to see resolved.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"4"}

{"quote":"One of the most valuable features of Meraki MS Switches is its precise traffic analytics capabilities, allowing us to query the system for any place at any time.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"8"}

7.589053

Meraki MS Switches provide network stability and management cost savings, but return times vary due to cloud transition challenges.

Meraki MS Switch usage spans from one month to twelve years among users.

Meraki MS Switches provide strong cloud management but may be costly for small businesses due to subscription-based licensing.

8

Meraki MS Switches are praised for their stability, reliability, and performance, with occasional minor issues during updates.

Users favored Meraki MS Switches for their stability, manageability, and reputation over more affordable alternatives like Huawei or Extreme.

{"quote":"We faced issues following firmware updates, which we now handle by performing updates outside of working hours.","score":"8"}

Meraki MS Switches optimize network efficiency with centralized management, improved security, remote access, and automatic updates for organizations.

{"quote":"The solution is stable, but there is always room for improvement.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Cisco's tech support is pretty good, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.","score":"7"}

<p>Meraki MS Switches offer easy setup, cloud-based management, and exceptional technical support, enhancing user confidence and network control. They streamline operations and IT administration, yet reliance on a stable internet connection and high pricing might deter some users. The need for annual licensing and limitations in high-end functions affect their appeal for larger enterprises. Scalability issues persist, especially in distribution switches and PoE models, despite adaptability for growing business needs.</p>

{"quote":"There are compatibility issues with certain Power over Ethernet (PoE) devices, which we would like to see resolved.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"One of the most valuable features of Meraki MS Switches is its precise traffic analytics capabilities, allowing us to query the system for any place at any time.","score":"10"}

We use Meraki MS Switches for centralized VLAN management and remote configuration, benefiting from precise traffic analytics. While facing some PoE compatibility issues, the centralized access outweighs the challenges, having considered and evaluated other options for effective remote management.

Organizations previously used a variety of networking equipment such as Dell, Cisco, Arista, Hewlett Packard, Aruba, Juniper, Huawei, Extreme Networks, Ubiquiti, Fortinet, SonicWall, Linksys, TP-Link, NETGEAR. They identified legacy systems like HP switches as outdated, requiring upgrades or replacements. Cisco's prowess in cloud management became a pivot point, leading to a preference for a unified dashboard experience with Meraki. Corporate decisions sometimes mandated these changes despite existing satisfactory equipment like Aruba or Catalyst switches.

Enterprise buyers have mixed experiences with Meraki MS Switches pricing. Some find it competitive and a good value, especially with long-term contracts that provide discounts. Others see it as expensive, often facing higher upfront costs compared to alternatives like HP or Avaya. Licensing fees are consistent, requiring yearly renewals, but they bundle support and updates, offering comprehensive benefits. Meraki's cloud-based management features add value, justifying the premium for many, despite budget constraints in small businesses.

<p>Meraki MS Switches surpasses its competitors by offering seamless cloud management, zero-touch provisioning, and intuitive troubleshooting, ensuring robust network performance and simplified scalability for businesses of all sizes.</p>

<p>Meraki MS Switches need more competitive pricing compared to other products in the market.</p><p>The subscription and licensing model of Meraki MS Switches could be improved to offer more options like one-time payment.</p><p>Cloud dependency of Meraki MS Switches poses a challenge in case of unstable internet connections, affecting functionality.</p><p>Meraki MS Switches lack enough scalability and integration with on-premises systems, which could hamper larger enterprise usage.</p><p>Meraki MS Switches can improve compatibility with Power over Ethernet devices and enhance Wi-Fi 6 support.</p>

Users typically manage installations internally, often without vendor support. Many handle deployment solo, although some seek external integration assistance. Expertise varies; some require guidance with configurations and IP schemes. Technical proficiency, like Cisco certification, doesn't always guarantee readiness. Typically, one knowledgeable technician suffices for setup, with remote assistance for racking equipment. A single individual can deploy a large number of switches swiftly. Maintenance demands depend on infrastructure scale, with larger deployments needing multiple personnel.

Meraki MS Switches' initial setup is often easy, featuring a straightforward process that is quick to complete. Many find the setup user-friendly and manageable without much technical expertise. Configurations can often be pre-set in the cloud, reducing on-site effort and allowing remote management. Deployment time varies, generally ranging from minutes to a few days depending on complexity, with simplicity making it accessible for many users without significant issues.

Meraki MS Switches offer excellent technical support, with users praising the knowledgeable and responsive team. However, some face challenges with contact methods and waiting times. Support is accessible 24/7, featuring various contact levels and detailed documentation. There are occasional delays, and users report needing more experienced staff for complex issues. Generally, users report help being clear, proactive, and satisfactory, with the ability for remote troubleshooting and quick device replacement.

The customer service and support of Meraki MS Switches would likely be rated between 6 to 8 out of 10 based on feedback sentiment.

Organizations experience varying ROI from Meraki MS Switches. Some note a two to three-year return, appreciating reduced headcount and management ease without needing additional tools. Others find slower returns, particularly when not fully cloud-integrated. Manageability improves with fewer staff needed, while network stability and troubleshooting time sees significant improvement. However, some companies did not achieve expected returns and faced high costs. Centralized, online configuration access and ease of use contribute to reduced support costs.

Users advise others considering Meraki MS Switches to research thoroughly and ensure it fits their requirements. Many appreciate its cloud management, ease of use, and security features. Some highlight the importance of having a reliable internet connection for optimal functionality. They recommend negotiating for discounts and considering the cost of licensing. Meraki MS Switches are praised for their integration capabilities, but some users mention limitations in scalability and pricing, advising potential users to weigh their options.

Users of Meraki MS Switches express a mix of preferences for cloud providers. Some opt for a less conventional provider, while others choose Microsoft Azure. It's evident that companies are split between various cloud types, with notable mention of Azure.

Organizations predominantly use an on-premises model when deploying Meraki MS Switches. A smaller number opts for Public Cloud and Private Cloud deployments, and some choose a Hybrid Cloud model. Public Cloud and Private Cloud options have a moderate presence among users.

Meraki MS Switches maintain high stability with minimal issues reported. Many users attest to their reliability, with few noting occasional minor bugs. Some experienced rare complications linked to environmental factors or firmware updates. Most rate stability highly, appreciating seamless operation and lack of disruptions. Despite some isolated challenges, performance remains consistent, with frequent updates ensuring reliability. Users rate stability highly, often giving nine or ten out of ten, reflecting their trust in Meraki's performance.

Meraki MS Switches are noted for high costs and limited performance compared to competitors. Many users express concerns about reliance on cloud functionality, which can be problematic when internet access is unstable. Licensing complexities and pricing models also prove challenging, especially for long-term subscriptions. Users desire improved technical support, enhanced interface capabilities, and expanded feature options. The switches often lack advanced functions, which limits configuration flexibility and scalability. Hardware limitations and customer service delays are also points of frustration.

Meraki MS Switches offer cloud management, making deployment and configuration straightforward. The centralized dashboard enables remote access, simplifying VLAN changes, monitoring, and visibility. Users appreciate the user-friendly interface, zero-touch deployment, and strong security features. The ability to manage multiple switches globally from one platform enhances efficiency. Users value the comprehensive APIs, technical support, and dynamic firmware upgrades. Meraki's integration with Azure and seamless switching, monitoring, and automation capabilities make it highly reliable and scalable for varied environments.

<p>Meraki MS Switches offer easy configuration, saving time and effort for IT management.</p>
<p>Cloud-based management allows for remote administration and monitoring from any location.</p>
<p>Setup is straightforward, typically requiring minimal personnel for deployment and maintenance.</p>
<p>The switches provide extensive visibility and control over network components through cloud-based analytics and reports.</p>
<p>Technical support for Meraki MS Switches is highly rated, enhancing the user experience and satisfaction.</p>

Users have utilized Meraki MS Switches for a range spanning from less than a month to over 12 years.

Organizations primarily use Meraki MS Switches for cloud management, simplifying network operations and connectivity. They connect access points, desktops, and remote offices. The switches are utilized in various environments, including small to midsize businesses, educational institutions, and multinational organizations. They provide cloud-based network management, supporting VLANs and remote configuration. Users appreciate their ease of use, centralized control, and integration with other Meraki devices for seamless infrastructure management.

Meraki MS Switches are considered scalable by most users, suitable for small to medium-sized businesses with growing capabilities. Some suggest limitations compared to larger enterprise solutions. Users appreciate its stackable nature, ease of expansion, and robust performance for various organizational sizes. Despite some concerns about core functionality and physical device constraints, many find Meraki MS Switches flexible, with positive feedback on bandwidth options and expansion capacity.

Users considered Arista, Juniper, Aruba, Cisco Catalyst, NETGEAR, Ubiquiti, Fortinet, and HPE alongside Meraki MS Switches. Meraki impressed many through peer demonstrations and familiarity, but others, like Extreme, offered cost-effectiveness and security. Cisco's Stealthwatch sensors interested some, while Huawei was praised for cost-performance. Users appreciated Meraki for remote management but noted that Cisco Catalyst was more expensive. They evaluated alternatives but often found Meraki's manageability and ease of use compelling.

Organizations leverage Meraki MS Switches for centralized management through a unified dashboard across multiple locations, automatic updates, and enhanced statistics. Cloud-managed efficiency simplifies device control, improves help desk operations, reduces downtime, and streamlines network management with PoE and remote capabilities. Security features are bolstered without requiring complex configurations while offering flexibility in deployment styles. Users benefit from ease of use, remote accessibility, and improved network reliability, ensuring high-quality service delivery to clients.

Users compared various SIEM solutions, considering price, familiarity, and on-premises preferences, ultimately noting AlienVault's community support.

Users considered options like ArcSight, ManageEngine, FortiSIEM, Wazuh, ELK Stack, Security Onion, QRadar, Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, and TrueRider before selecting AlienVault OSSIM. ArcSight was initially evaluated but excluded due to pricing and sales channel limitations in Egypt. QRadar and Splunk were compared for ease of use and cost. Wazuh was noted for its community focus. Microsoft Sentinel's case management system requires KQL, while TrueRider lacks a strong community.

Users opted for Meraki MS Switches over alternatives due to superior cloud management, ease of use, and remote capabilities.

Users considered various alternatives before choosing Meraki MS Switches including Cisco Catalyst, Juniper, Aruba, Ubiquiti, Fortinet, Huawei, and HP. Many evaluated NETGEAR and Cisco. Some preferred Meraki for its remote management, ease of use, and cloud-based capabilities. Others appreciated its integrated system and support. Certain users stayed loyal to Meraki due to its reliability and familiarity. Decisions often depended on factors like budget, stability, and network goals.

{"quote":"They act as an extension of our team, offering expertise that would be costly to have in-house.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"It's not a dollar figure but the security assurance that Arctic Wolf provides.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The peace of mind is the return on investment.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"They have been in this business for well over ten years, and they act as an extension of our team, allowing my small team to focus on their primary responsibilities without worrying about security issues.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"I believe you pay a premium for a SOC. The cost depends on the size of the organization, and I find it fair based on the size of our organization.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"6"}

{"quote":"With the Managed Risk feature, they offer a vulnerability report to us on a daily basis.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"7"}

5.65

{"quote":"My advice would be for them to improve their offerings by adding a patch management feature.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I would recommend Arctic Wolf Managed Risk to others for the value and peace of mind it provides.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The major area for improvement is the lack of a patch management feature to resolve some of the vulnerabilities detected.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"2"}

{"quote":"The customer support is incredible.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"10"}

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk identifies vulnerabilities, safeguards IT assets, enhances threat awareness, and bolsters security through network scans.

Users recommend Arctic Wolf Managed Risk for its seamless integration and peace of mind, suggesting enhancements like patch management.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk enhances cybersecurity by identifying vulnerabilities, providing detailed assessments, and supporting with alerts and industry ratings.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk can improve by prioritizing issues realistically, enhancing scanning, and adding patch management and scalability features.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk pricing is competitive, cost-effective, and accommodates organizational size with positive user feedback despite variability.

{"quote":"If there's something in question, they'll always answer it.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Their technicians and engineers are really knowledgeable and professional.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"They offer a white glove service.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The customer support is incredible.","score":"8"}

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk has been used by users for periods ranging from a few months to three years.

{"quote":"The cost depends on the size of the organization, and I find it fair based on the size of our organization.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I believe you pay a premium for a SOC.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"This addition would enhance their offerings and provide a more comprehensive service.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The major area for improvement is the lack of a patch management feature to resolve some of the vulnerabilities detected.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Their ability to identify and provide information on critical alerts is very valuable.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"This proactive approach to alert management ensures that if someone downloads something on a workstation that shouldn't be downloaded, they address it quickly.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"They are on top of the alerts, especially the critical ones.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The reporting is really good from what I've seen so far.","score":"8"}

With Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, I receive daily vulnerability reports allowing me to take prompt action. Despite lacking a patch management feature, their proactive alert management provides peace of mind and acts as an expert extension of our team.

<p>Arctic Wolf Managed Risk enhances cybersecurity by filling gaps left by other systems, identifying vulnerabilities and misconfigurations they miss. It provides detailed exposure reports, increases user awareness, and offers quarterly reviews with the team. Users praise its reporting effectiveness, though scalability and integration could be better. Implementing patch management and improving features like threat resolution tracking after patch application is recommended for further enhancement.</p>

<p>Arctic Wolf Managed Risk fills in security gaps by identifying vulnerabilities and misconfigurations not detected by standard patch management systems.</p>
<p>It provides valuable awareness of current exposures by alerting organizations to existing vulnerabilities.</p>
<p>This service has significantly enhanced end-user security awareness within organizations.</p>
<p>Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers quarterly reviews with their team to assess and improve security procedures.</p>
<p>The detailed reporting by Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is highly regarded for its clarity and usefulness.</p>

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk surpasses its competitors by offering real-time risk identification, comprehensive threat monitoring, and customized risk management strategies, ensuring optimal cybersecurity defense through unparalleled expertise and proactive measures that adapt to evolving security challenges.

Enterprise buyers report that Arctic Wolf Managed Risk pricing varies depending on company size. Generally, the service is perceived as reasonably priced in comparison to competitors and market conditions. Many organizations consider the costs fair, particularly when factoring in the premium for a Security Operations Center (SOC). The overall sentiment reflects satisfaction with the pricing structure, which aligns with the size and needs of individual organizations.

<p>Scalability could be improved.</p>
<p>Arctic Wolf Managed Risk should implement a patch management feature.</p>
<p>The scanning feature does not confirm when a threat has been addressed.</p>
<p>More integrations are needed.</p>
<p>Lack of a patch management feature to resolve detected vulnerabilities.</p>

Users advise others to stick with Arctic Wolf Managed Risk despite challenges. They recommend prioritizing critical issues due to the tool's capacity to uncover significant threats and suggest enhancing its features with patch management. They appreciate the integrated technology with CyberSOC and value the security and peace of mind it offers. Current users rate it between seven and ten out of ten, emphasizing its effectiveness and encouraging continued use without letting setbacks deter progress.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers unbiased insights, filling gaps in patch management by identifying vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. Its value lies in informing users of current risks, ranking issues, enhancing end-user awareness, and providing detailed vulnerability lists. Users appreciate proactive alert action, quarterly team evaluations, and effective support. The service excels in critical alert management, empowering organizations lacking in-house cybersecurity expertise through expert collaboration on scans and patches.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk needs to simplify its user interface by prioritizing critical issues rather than overwhelming users with all details. They could benefit from a patch management feature to address vulnerabilities effectively. Users note the scanning feature should confirm threats as resolved post-patching, yet this confirmation is lacking. More integrations could enhance the service. Overall, these areas need attention to improve user experience and functionality.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is utilized for scanning networks and external entries, identifying vulnerabilities, and offering real-time insights for necessary actions. Organizations benefit by securing IT assets and training users to recognize cyber threats. With scheduled scans on numerous servers and computers, it helps address potential risks effectively. Daily vulnerability reports enhance awareness and enable prompt action, aiding in safeguarding against potential cyber security threats.

Users have been utilizing Arctic Wolf Managed Risk for a range of a few months to three years.

Users report varied experiences with ManageEngine Password Manager Pro's scalability, noting both challenges and effective use in expanding data centers.

{"quote":"Previously, we were using a solution from Boomer, which was quite expensive. In comparison, ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is cheaper by more than 50%.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is cheaper than other products, such as BeyondTrust, and is more than 50% cheaper compared to the Boomer solution we used before.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"The initial deployment was fast, the overall configuration took about three to four months.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"5"}

7.25

5.85

7.5

{"quote":"ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is cheaper than other products, such as BeyondTrust, and is more than 50% cheaper compared to the Boomer solution we used before.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"8"}

{"quote":"The support for the PAM product is not very prompt.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"2"}