Users evaluated various alternatives to OpenText Documentum including FileNet, SharePoint, IBM, Oracle, Box, and Nuxeo. They often considered SharePoint and FileNet for enterprise content management needs. Documentum stood out for its features, user-friendliness, compatibility, and scalability. Budget constraints led to exploring second-tier options, but Documentum was preferred for long-term value and tailored solutions. Comparisons often highlighted differences in compatibility with existing systems and language support.

Organizations achieved better compliance, streamlined document management, and transformation with OpenText Documentum. They automated processes, integrated with systems, enabled paperless operations, and improved security and tracking. Accessibility and user efficiency rose significantly. International document distribution and digital access were facilitated, enhancing productivity and reducing errors. Custom solutions allowed Docuentum's adaptability across different platforms. Documentum's role in corporate strategy boosted productivity by 20%-30%, aiding modernization journeys and supporting vast document repositories.

OpenText Documentum was chosen for its scalability, features, and security over competitors like SharePoint and IBM FileNet.

Users considered various options alongside OpenText Documentum including FileNet, SharePoint, IBM, and Alfresco. Documentum was favored for its robust document management capabilities and compatibility with other systems. It provides features like document retention and scalability, which were essential for large-scale implementations. SharePoint was often evaluated for collaboration, although it lacked comprehensive records management. Alfresco and Box were also explored, but Documentum's features and ease of management led to its selection.

{"quote":"The company I work for is trying to cut down on cost on software, so they are not going to increase the number of users because we use it for specific major projects.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"5"}

{"quote":"Primavera is very scalable.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"Learning the tool takes time, so you should spend hands-on time with it while developing your project management skills.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"You need to have a good understanding of project management before you build programs using P6.","score":"9"}

6.83

{"quote":"There is scope for development in integrating with some AI products.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"3"}

{"quote":"It is very, very good in planning for large projects.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"10"}

8.5

Understanding project management and training in Oracle Primavera is vital, with cost and complexity considerations for effective integration.

6.25

8.0

Oracle Primavera offers easy use, cost control, and effective project management with built-in integration, planning, and tracking features.

Opinions on Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management setup vary, from simple for experts to complex and lengthy for novices.

Oracle Primavera aids infrastructure firms in managing projects, with complex interfaces challenging newcomers despite its comprehensive features.

Oracle Primavera's customer service is praised for knowledgeable support, though technical support quality and issue resolution times vary.

Oracle Primavera is seen as scalable, but database setup and cloud migration significantly influence its effectiveness for large enterprises.

Oracle Primavera faces flexibility, integration, UI challenges, lacking AI and 4D support, needing enhancements in scalability and cost efficiency.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is costly due to fees and integrations, but offers specialized management justifying its price for some.

Oracle Primavera is rated highly for stability, with users expressing confidence and satisfaction in its reliable performance.

{"quote":"I would rate it eight out of ten.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"Primavera is very scalable.","score":"8"}

Users have reported experience with Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management ranging from a few weeks to about 20 years.

{"quote":"They are not going to increase the number of users because we use it for specific major projects.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Delay analysis and extension of time claims are some of the key features.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The company I work for is trying to cut down on cost on software.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"It is used to analyze the impact of changes in the project.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"I use many features, including baseline, which I use regularly.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"There is scope for development in integrating with some AI products.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"Right now, it is produced as an independent product and does not have any three-dimensional interface.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"It can be integrated for four-dimensional modeling, which is already happening with another company.","score":"9"}

<p>Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is known for good technical support and accuracy, praised for its planning capabilities. It streamlines contractor signature processes and features delay analysis and time claims. However, it needs better integration with ERP and improved scalability. Cost management and multiple source reports require development. A steep learning curve affects new support users.</p>

I am a project planner using Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management for major projects where required. I regularly use features like baseline for project analysis. There's potential for improvement in integrating 4D modeling and AI technologies.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is priced higher compared to Microsoft Project Server, with notable expenses including upfront costs and annual fees. While some users find it cost-effective for engineering project management, others highlight additional expenses linked to integration and specific modules, such as a $100,000 yearly masking module. Multiple users have focused on cost management, limiting user numbers, and controlling software expenses, acknowledging its specialized utility but recognizing the financial commitment involved.

<p>Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management surpasses its competitors by offering robust functionalities for strategic planning, risk management, and resource optimization, enabling organizations to align investments with business objectives efficiently.</p>

<p>Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management should improve integration with ERP systems.</p>
<p>Reporting capabilities could better support project management.</p>
<p>There is a significant learning curve for new support users.</p>
<p>Scalability is an area that requires improvement.</p>
<p>Oracle Primavera needs enhanced integration with other products and additional cost management features.</p>

Users advise others to continually train and update skills for Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management. Despite its cost challenges, they highlight the need for transparency in expenses and suggest considering the cloud version. They recommend a good grasp of project management for efficient use of the tool. While its implementation may be easier for smaller setups, larger organizations face integration challenges. Some express dissatisfaction due to complexity, while others find it valuable, giving it mixed ratings.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management's initial setup varies in complexity. Some describe it as simple, managed by a single person, while others highlight the need for multiple personnel and extensive preparation. Deployment time ranges from an hour to six months, with significant time learning new processes. Entry-level users may struggle with deployment, though advanced users can manage it independently. Business requirements add complexity, and IT departments often handle installation.

Users have utilized Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management for a range of a few weeks to approximately 20 years.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management's customer service is characterized by positive support and knowledgeable assistance. Users with experience do not frequently rely on Oracle technical support, yet those who do report varying response times. While some issues receive prompt attention, others may take up to two months to address. Vendor support generally demonstrates good service quality and insight into user needs.

Users consistently describe Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management as highly stable, with many assigning a high stability rating. Numerous users report using Primavera without issues, expressing satisfaction with its performance. Some users highlight that they have not had extensive experience to assess long-term firmness, but there's a general consensus about its reliability. Words like "highly stable" and "no complaints" reflect users' contentment, marking Primavera as a dependable choice for their needs.

<p>Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management offers good technical support.</p>
<p>Its most valuable feature is accuracy.</p>
<p>It streamlines the process of obtaining signatures from contractors.</p>
<p>Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management has strong planning capabilities.</p>
<p>Key features include delay analysis and extension of time claims.</p>

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management needs improved field positioning flexibility and inter-related custom fields. The integration with ERP and IBM Maximo is costly and challenging, and security features are limited. The tool's interface is cumbersome on tablets and has scalability issues. Users face challenges in sourcing qualified personnel, and the learning curve is steep. Enhanced cost management features and better compatibility with AI products are desired. More advanced reporting and cost-effective integration are significant needs.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management offers features like document control, contract management, change control, and cost control for multi-project handling. Users value its ease of use for engineering project management, planning capabilities, accuracy, integration with P6 schedules, and baseline analysis. They utilize Oracle Business Intelligence Publisher, Webservices API support, and time planning tools. Gantt chart, delay analysis, and streamlined signature processes enhance its appeal among teams managing complex projects and functions together effectively.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is utilized for portfolio management and engineering document management in large-scale projects. Infrastructure companies leverage it to manage critical projects and capital expenditures, streamlining signature flows with contractors. Engineering and construction entities employ it for project planning when clients require it. While well-engineered, the interface can be complex for early-stage professionals. Project planners find it useful for major projects, especially when specified by clients.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is often praised for its scalability, capable of supporting both small and large enterprises. Some groups rate its scalability highly, with plans to expand usage. Others highlight potential issues with database configuration and query performance for extensive data, particularly in asset management. While some prefer on-premise solutions, others consider transitioning to the cloud for enhanced scalability. However, a few mention limitations in scalability, reflecting diverse experiences.

{"quote":"However, I would not recommend it for banking sites as it might not be capable of monitoring everything.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"I would recommend PRTG Enterprise Monitor to others as it works well with Android devices, and you can try the free version before purchasing.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"We typically provide these solutions to enterprise-level companies, schools, colleges, offices, and multinational organizations.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"The solution could be improved by introducing security features similar to those available in Teams, as the current version only monitors devices and does not integrate IoT or OT devices.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"4"}

{"quote":"I would recommend PRTG Enterprise Monitor to others as it works well with Android devices, and you can try the free version before purchasing.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"8"}

7.5

PRTG Enterprise Monitor offers scalability, but opinions differ on its effectiveness and potential limitations in architecture and language.

8.0

PRTG Enterprise Monitor installation is quick and easy, though network complexity and team size can affect deployment time.

PRTG Enterprise Monitor's efficient support is less needed due to basic feature use, lacking an integrated ticketing system.

PRTG Enterprise Monitor is versatile for network monitoring with customizable features, ideal for SMEs but not all banking needs.

PRTG Enterprise Monitor offers easy installation and robust, agentless network monitoring with automatic anomaly detection and strong alerting features.

PRTG Enterprise Monitor helps organizations monitor networks, detect attacks, and manage resources for optimal performance and failure prevention.

PRTG Enterprise Monitor needs enhanced integrations, better support, improved alerts, increased security, and essential features like processing monitors and SMS notifications.

Users of PRTG Enterprise Monitor vary in experience, using it from six months to five years.

{"quote":"We occasionally have to download additional WIP files and synchronize our devices with PRTG, which can be challenging.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"The current version only monitors devices and does not integrate IoT or OT devices.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The solution's ability to monitor each and every aspect of our devices, such as memory utilization and port connectivity, is valuable.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The solution could be improved by introducing security features similar to those available in Teams.","score":"9"}

PRTG Enterprise Monitor is mostly stable with 99% availability, though some users prefer UNIX/Linux over Windows for better performance.

PRTG Enterprise Monitor pricing perceptions vary, with some finding it affordable and others considering it expensive, indicating complexity.

I deploy and manage PRTG Enterprise Monitor solutions for enterprise clients, appreciating its comprehensive device monitoring. However, improvements in security features and IoT integration are needed. I've previously used OpManager, ManageEngine, Cacti Graph, and SolarWinds for similar purposes.

<p>PRTG Enterprise Monitor is user-friendly, requiring no prior training. Its network analysis features are highly valued, offering extensive dashboard options and activity monitoring. It automates anomaly detection, supporting SNMP for diverse device monitoring. Buyers note it should adopt more features akin to SolarWinds and enhance support. Improved security, minimized false positives, and better alert accuracy are needed. Integration for unified monitoring also requires significant enhancement for optimal use.</p>

<p>PRTG Enterprise Monitor should add more functionalities similar to SolarWinds.</p><p>Support must be improved.</p><p>There could be more security features included in PRTG Enterprise Monitor.</p><p>Minimizing false positives and improving alert confirmations is necessary.</p><p>Integration needs significant improvement, and introducing a processing monitor with a language interface like Lua could enhance customization.</p>

PRTG Enterprise Monitor's pricing is perceived as both reasonable and expensive based on varied user experiences. Some users find the solution affordable and rate it positively, while others consider it costly. Several users lack firsthand knowledge of pricing due to their roles, relying on their sales teams for such details.

<p>PRTG Enterprise Monitor surpasses its competitors by offering scalable monitoring solutions with customizable dashboards, advanced analytics, and comprehensive reporting capabilities, ensuring seamless IT infrastructure management and enhanced network performance across large-scale environments with intuitive user interfaces.</p>

PRTG Enterprise Monitor's initial setup is straightforward, typically taking 10-15 minutes or up to three days depending on network complexity. Teams find it manageable with limited features, though challenges emerge with large teams creating sensors, leading to false positives. A focused group helps maintain quality control. For larger networks, setup could extend to six weeks as resources are distributed. Configuration is less complex than SolarWinds, requiring periodic fine-tuning by dedicated staff.

PRTG Enterprise Monitor should expand its features to include functionalities similar to SolarWinds and Datadog, enhance support through live chats and emails, and improve integration capabilities, particularly with SAP systems. More security features, automatic fault management, and SMS notifications are needed. Users would benefit from reducing manual configurations, introducing a processing monitor, and minimizing false positives in alerts. Integration with third-party applications and unified monitoring needs enhancement, along with support for IoT and OT devices.

PRTG Enterprise Monitor boasts fast and efficient technical support, although many users employ only basic features and rarely require it. There's an option for 24/7 assistance from a third party, with additional costs. There's no built-in ticketing system or integration, unlike OpManager, which integrates with ServiceDesk Plus for ticket management. Despite some users not utilizing support, those who do find issues addressed swiftly.

<p>PRTG Enterprise Monitor is recognized for its robust network analysis capabilities.</p>
<p>It offers comprehensive options for dashboard creation and the monitoring of environmental activities.</p>
<p>PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes effective real-time notifications for critical events such as low storage or RAM.</p>
<p>It features automatic anomaly detection and alerting, which enhances network monitoring efficiency.</p>
<p>PRTG Enterprise Monitor supports SNMP, an open standard protocol that facilitates monitoring across diverse network devices and operating systems.</p>

PRTG Enterprise Monitor is generally stable, rated between eight and ten out of ten for reliability. Availability is reported at 99%. Some users encounter issues, particularly on Windows systems, preferring UNIX or Linux implementations. There is interest in having probes on more operating systems. Stability may vary depending on company requirements.

Users advise others to implement PRTG Enterprise Monitor for network performance monitoring due to its versatile features like bandwidth monitoring, firewalls, and servers. Dashboards are customizable, enhancing operational efficiency, and SNMP is beneficial for network monitoring. The tool is user-friendly, providing alerts for 24/7 operations, and works well with Android. However, it may not be suitable for banking sites or large-scale companies needing high precision. Many find PRTG helpful overall, rating it between four and nine out of ten.

PRTG Enterprise Monitor's customer service and support are rated between 3 and 4 out of 5.

Users have employed PRTG Enterprise Monitor for a range of six months to five years.

PRTG Enterprise Monitor offers easy usability, requiring no IT background. Users value its network analysis, extensive library, and centralized creation capabilities. Automated email alerts preemptively address issues, enhancing efficiency. SNMP protocol support ensures wide compatibility. Its agentless design and adjustable refresh time improve response. Robust in monitoring memory and port connectivity, it occasionally requires additional file downloads. Organizations appreciate its comprehensive capabilities, variety of alerts, and reliable performance without slowing down.

PRTG Enterprise Monitor is primarily used for monitoring purposes by organizations. It tracks servers, services, and applications, detecting malicious attacks and network resource performance. Users monitor technical sensors like uptime, CPU load, memory use, and ping capabilities. Additionally, it checks for certificate expiry, internet connection, and mail service availability. Businesses deploy and manage these systems for clients, including enterprise-level companies, schools, colleges, offices, and multinational organizations, ensuring optimal functioning of network resources.

PRTG Enterprise Monitor has mixed feedback on scalability. Several users find it scalable for their needs, rating it between seven and eight out of ten. However, there are concerns, with some encountering scalability issues. It is noted that the platform is built on an older system which might hinder its ability to scale efficiently. Users suggest a modern reimplementation to improve its scalability features.

The shift to Huawei OceanStor was influenced by superior features and economics, affecting compatibility and documentation considerations.

Huawei OceanStor's setup is generally easy, but complexity varies; documentation praised, yet improvements in tools and support noted.

Huawei OceanStor deployment involves vendor specialists for hardware and software setup, typically taking six to fourteen hours.

Huawei OceanStor is primarily used on-premises, with fewer users opting for public, private, or hybrid cloud solutions.

Huawei OceanStor supports virtualization, database integration, and diverse IT applications across industries for storage and enterprise needs.

Huawei OceanStor service is mixed; effective for some, but faces issues with language barriers, slow support, and documentation gaps.

7.75

Huawei OceanStor is praised for its scalable storage solutions, extensive capacity, and network compatibility, despite potential cost concerns.

{"quote":"This could be due to political restrictions or embargoes.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"There may be potential issues with integration, especially with NVIDIA.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The main advantage of Huawei OceanStor is its aggressive pricing.","score":"8"}

8.5

Huawei OceanStor provides scalable, high-performance hybrid storage with features like SSD support, RAID 2.0, and flexible connectivity.

{"quote":"Huawei OceanStor is capable of scaling up to a few megabytes and is equipped to handle varied network protocols.","quality_score":"5","sentiment_score":"6"}