{"quote":"VMware is expensive and rightly so.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"It consolidates our physical servers, giving us a lower physical server footprint and manages our infrastructure efficiently.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The workload will move to the adjacent load and continue operating.","score":"8"}

Check Point Harmony Endpoint's support is professional and knowledgeable but needs faster responses and clearer communication.

{"quote":"A failure of one of the hosts does not result in failure in services or the entire infrastructure.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"VMware vSphere ensures high resilience in the data center.","score":"8"}

We use VMware vSphere Foundation for data center virtualization and appreciate its high resilience and efficient infrastructure management. Although Broadcom's acquisition has affected support management, server consolidation and scalability improvements enhance our return on investment. Previously, we used VMware vSphere Enterprise Plus.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint is scalable and highly rated, but some face hardware challenges and deployment timeline issues.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint provides comprehensive endpoint protection, threat management, and integration for enhanced security across networks and devices.

VMware vSphere Foundation surpasses its competitors by offering robust virtual infrastructure management, efficient resource allocation, and high availability features that ensure operational continuity, making it a leader in virtualization technology solutions.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers robust security with ease of use, including advanced threat detection and centralized management features.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint is favored for security, ease of use, but may have setup, compatibility, and resource challenges.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint needs improved integration, user interface, resource efficiency, and affordability, addressing compatibility, deployment, and management challenges.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint's user duration ranges from under one year to around eighteen years, highlighting its broad usage span.

{"quote":"Rating based on the alone featureset is nine out of ten.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"With improved support, it could outperform competitors.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"We recommend Check Point Harmony Endpoint; however, support needs enhancement.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Pricing is a bit expensive but justified by the product’s features, capabilities, and scalability.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"5"}

{"quote":"Support needs improvement. Currently, support is primarily via email, which leads to longer response times.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"2"}

{"quote":"Endpoint protection is valuable. Stability is good, and the product is well-designed for security needs.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"9"}

Check Point Harmony Endpoint users report increased ROI through cost savings, improved security, and enhanced productivity from fewer security incidents.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint provides robust security with flexible licensing, despite higher costs compared to some alternatives.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint is praised for reliability, stability, easy integration, with few occasional glitches noted by users.

5.5

8.25

Check Point Harmony Endpoint was chosen for its competitive pricing, efficient features, and superior anti-ransomware and EDR capabilities.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint improves security, supports remote work, and boosts productivity with comprehensive threat detection and management capabilities.

5.4

{"quote":"Only email support is available, leading to delays in getting assistance.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Support service needs improvement.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Check Point Harmony Endpoint is scalable, suitable for both small and large companies.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"It is suitable for enterprises but can be challenging to position for small to medium customers.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Pricing is a bit expensive but justified by the product’s features, capabilities, and scalability.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Better technical support would enhance the product's competitiveness.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Fine-tuning for applications and better support from Harmony would be helpful, especially once the environment is hardened.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Currently, support is primarily via email, which leads to longer response times.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Support needs improvement.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"Since security is a major concern, we do not worry about the pricing as the product has features built-in.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"It is scalable and offers multiple features, which justify its pricing for enterprise customers.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Stability is good, and the product is well-designed for security needs.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Endpoint protection is valuable.","score":"9"}

We deploy Check Point Harmony Endpoint for SMEs and find its endpoint protection valuable, with excellent stability and scalability. However, the support needs improvement, as current email-only assistance leads to extended response times.

Previously, users employed Symantec, Fortigate, SonicWall, Cisco, McAfee, Sophos, Microsoft Defender, ESET, Trend Micro, Rapid7, AVG, WebSense DLP, SentinelOne, Cynet, CrowdStrike, and Palo Alto. They transitioned to Check Point Harmony Endpoint citing reasons like superior security, pricing benefits, advanced features, and ease of integration. Many solutions lacked necessary functionalities needed to combat modern threats such as ransomware, while Check Point offered the required protection and centralized management.

<p>Check Point Harmony Endpoint surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive threat prevention, advanced threat intelligence, and seamless device compliance integration, empowering organizations with robust data protection and endpoint security management capabilities.</p>

Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers multiple licensing models including basic, advanced, and complete, with fees typically yearly or for multi-year periods. Some initial licenses may be complimentary during onboarding. While the solution can be pricey compared to other options, its cost-effectiveness is noted for larger enterprises, especially with negotiated rates. Additional fees may apply for certain features such as encryption. Overall, it is valued for robust security and ease of management, despite licensing complexities.

<p>Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires more effective remote deployment tools and built-in deployment options to ease its management.</p>
<p>Enhanced integration with third-party products, such as SIEM solutions, and improved VPN functionality are necessary.</p>
<p>Check Point Harmony Endpoint's technical support and response times need significant improvement to enhance user experience.</p>
<p>There is a need for better documentation and more intuitive setup to simplify the deployment process for users.</p>
<p>Improved compatibility with a broad range of operating systems and offering comprehensive endpoint protection features are areas that require attention.</p>

Implementation teams frequently collaborate with vendors, in-house personnel, consultants, and partners for Check Point Harmony Endpoint. Deployments range from swift, within a couple of days, to more complex setups extending over weeks, involving detailed analyses and fine-tuning. Teams generally display high expertise, efficiently managing tasks with vendor support or independently. Experiences highlight a strong presence of knowledgeable staff, resolving integration challenges promptly and maximizing effectiveness and configuration processes.

Most users find the initial setup of Check Point Harmony Endpoint straightforward, citing ease due to cloud-based management. A few users note it can be challenging without training, especially in complex environments. Many appreciate the available documentation and support but some report insufficient documentation for specific configurations. Deployment times vary from minutes to days, depending on infrastructure size and familiarity. Several users rate the setup process highly, highlighting its simplicity compared to other solutions.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint customer service is generally praised for its rapid response, professionalism, and helpfulness. Many users appreciate the knowledgeable support team and quick ticket processing. While some users report delayed responses and suggest improvements, others commend the expert assistance on complex issues. Training offered by Check Point improves user experience, although updates and system transitions occasionally require added support. Overall, reviews indicate support is reliable but acknowledge room for improvement in response time and communication methods.

<p>Check Point Harmony Endpoint enhances security with features like threat emulation and real-time threat prevention. It offers centralized management for seamless policy administration. Integration with Check Point firewalls provides unified monitoring. Its cloud-based deployment ensures easy scalability, while forensic analysis enhances threat response. However, significant resources are required, and remote deployment and integration need improvement, as does documentation and support service for better efficiency and compatibility.</p>

Check Point Harmony Endpoint's customer service and support consistently earns ratings between 7 and 9 out of 10, with mostly positive feedback.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint has shown varying levels of ROI for different users. Some report measurable improvements, like reduced malicious attacks and man-hours saved. Others mention that ROI is hard to quantify, but appreciate increased security and cost-effectiveness. Many have noted positive financial impacts through enhanced protection and improved performance, while a few are still assessing its benefits. Generally, it has helped organizations protect their assets and achieve cost savings.

Most users utilize unspecified choices for Check Point Harmony Endpoint. A smaller number choose Amazon Web Services, with fewer opting for Microsoft Azure. Google is selected by a minimal portion of individuals.

Most users of Check Point Harmony Endpoint use an on-premises model. Some opt for public cloud deployment. A smaller group choose private cloud or hybrid cloud models. On-premises is clearly preferred among these organizations, while public cloud is a significant secondary choice. Hybrid and private clouds are utilized less frequently.

Users advise others to consider Check Point Harmony Endpoint for its robust security features and ease of deployment. It provides strong anti-malware and ransomware protection, making it suitable for medium to large organizations. Users highlight its capability for integration with other platforms and cloud management benefits. However, they note the need for competitive pricing and better hardware compatibility. Most find it efficient and highly recommend it, though some suggest considering budget constraints and resource requirements.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint demonstrates strong stability, as many report no issues or downtimes. Users find it reliable, with seamless performance and minimal impact on device operation. Some rate its stability between 7 to 10 out of 10, citing its effectiveness against cyber threats. While a few encountered minor glitches, the general consensus is positive. Its robust design and security features contribute to a stable and secure user experience.

Users have engaged with Check Point Harmony Endpoint for a range extending from just a few months to over fifteen years.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint faces challenges in compatibility and integration with various systems, including Unix and third-party software. Users find the remote deployment tools lacking and desire built-in deployment features. Technical support requires improvement, with concerns about response times and process complexity. Performance issues, particularly high resource consumption, are reported, alongside concerns about price and the absence of certain features like full-disk encryption and two-factor authentication. Improvements in documentation, training, and support for more platforms are desired.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in ease of use and upgrade, effective threat emulation and extraction, zero-day protection, anti-ransomware capabilities, centralized management, and seamless integration with firewalls. It offers real-time scanning, strong anti-phishing, comprehensive security across devices, and supports multiple configurations. Users commend its intuitive dashboard, efficient deployment, and powerful anti-malware detection, appreciating the detailed forensic reports and customizable policies. Scalability and stability are consistently praised.

<p>Check Point Harmony Endpoint provides comprehensive threat prevention, including zero-day attack protection and sophisticated forensics and sandboxing capabilities.</p>

<p>The software ensures robust anti-ransomware support, effectively halting attacks promptly to protect data integrity.</p>

<p>It enhances operational efficiency by allowing centralized management of security policies and remote endpoints, simplifying administrative overhead.</p>

<p>Check Point Harmony Endpoint boosts network security through advanced encryption techniques and threat detection mechanisms, significantly reducing the possibility of malware penetration and data breaches.</p>

<p>Its flexible deployment options, coupled with intuitive cloud-based management, streamline overall security operations for organizations of various sizes and needs.</p>

Check Point Harmony Endpoint is primarily used for endpoint protection, antivirus and anti-malware capabilities, and enhancing anti-ransomware measures. Organizations utilize it for endpoint security, monitoring, and threat detection, supporting both remote and on-site infrastructure. Harmony Endpoint helps safeguard against cyber attacks, provides real-time monitoring, and integrates seamlessly with existing systems, making it adaptable for varied environments like mobile and cloud networks. It is widely deployed across several industries globally.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint demonstrates strong scalability, accommodating expansions and a range of user counts effectively. Many organizations find it easy to manage and scale with cloud functionality, central management, and low resource requirements. It efficiently handles diverse environments and requirements, integrating well into existing setups. Although deployment can be cumbersome when rapid hardware upgrades are needed, most users are satisfied with its scalability. It fits varying business sizes, making it versatile and adaptable.

Many switched to VMware vSphere for better stability, features, scalability, and manageability from technologies like Citrix XenServer and Hyper-V.

Users evaluated various alternatives to Check Point Harmony Endpoint, including Kaspersky, Symantec, Fortinet, Barracuda, McAfee, Cylance, Sophos, Bitdefender, Microsoft Defender, Cisco Secure Endpoint, CrowdStrike, Panda Security Adaptive Defense, Trend Micro, Broadcom, VMware Carbon Black, Palo Alto, ESET, ZScaler, Norton, FireEye. They considered factors like pricing, features, integration, anti-ransomware capabilities, and existing relationships before choosing Check Point Harmony Endpoint. Some found Check Point's ransomware protection and price competitive advantages compared to other options.

VMware vSphere implementation depends on in-house expertise with mixed results from external consultants and local resellers.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint improved security by detecting and blocking malicious activity, reducing ransomware incidents, and enhancing network visibility. It supports remote work by securing endpoints against modern threats, maintaining business continuity, and ensuring compliance. Centralized management simplifies policy enforcement and threat mitigation. Reports and analytics help assess risk exposure and tailor security training. Integration with other systems boosts threat intelligence, and features like encryption, VPN, and malware prevention provide comprehensive protection.

Companies implemented Camunda in-house quickly with small teams, using DevOps practices and minimal external support or maintenance effort.

Organizations switched to Camunda from various BPMs for open-source benefits, scalability, cost-effectiveness, and compliance adaptability.

Most users prefer VMware vSphere on-premises, with some choosing private, hybrid, or public cloud setups for their needs.

Amazon Web Services is the preferred choice for VMware vSphere in various cloud setups, with significant usage on Microsoft Azure.

{"quote":"The initial setup can be difficult, with a rating of seven on a scale from one to ten. While not very hard, some features present challenges.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"4"}

{"quote":"Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically. I would rate its scalability a ten out of ten.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"Camunda is quite stable, and I would rate its stability around eight to nine out of ten. There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"8"}

Most users prefer on-premises Camunda deployment, followed by public cloud, hybrid cloud, and finally, private cloud as the least favored.

Camunda streamlines business processes through workflow management, automation, and integration, providing flexibility and open-source benefits for various industries.

Camunda users mostly prefer Microsoft Azure, with others choosing different platforms, and fewer opting for Amazon Web Services.

{"quote":"Camunda is the best among similar solutions like JBPM and Activiti.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"For anyone considering using Camunda, it is essential to understand your workflow clearly.","score":"9"}

Camunda setup is generally easy, but complex configurations may require support or documentation; completion time varies by expertise.

VMware vSphere's setup is straightforward with compatible hardware, but complex configurations may require technical knowledge or professional help.

Camunda's support is helpful but inconsistent, with enterprise users benefiting more, while smaller businesses face pricing and support challenges.

{"quote":"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation. More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"3"}

5.25

{"quote":"Camunda is the best among similar solutions like JBPM and Activiti.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"10"}

8.75

Camunda offers scalability with technologies like Spring Boot and Docker, though database dependencies and auto-scaling improvements remain challenges.

3.5

10

Camunda requires Java knowledge, a proof of concept, community support, with benefits for small enterprises despite integration complexities.

Camunda offers lightweight, flexible BPMN 2.0 compliance, open-source access, microservices orchestration, and user-friendly tools for process automation.

{"quote":"There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"They provide better support for the enterprise edition.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"I would rate its stability around eight to nine out of ten.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Camunda's community is medium-sized, offering reasonable support.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Camunda is quite stable.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I would rate its scalability a ten out of ten.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.","score":"9"}