Webroot Business Endpoint Protection's standout features include its lightweight design, powerful cloud console, ease of deployment, AI functionality, superior performance, and low resource usage. Users value its web interface, effective endpoint security, and transparency in pricing. The platform offers automatic updates, minimal performance impact, and easy policy management, making it a top choice for maintaining protection and affordability. Its integration capabilities and efficient scanning enhance its appeal.

Users advise others to deploy two-factor authentication, explore Webroot alongside existing systems, and provide managerial clients access to consoles. They find setup easy with some missing features like reporting. Webroot is great for basic needs, but they suggest considering advanced protections for severe threats. Opinions vary from positive to some concerns after Carbonite's acquisition. Webroot suits small businesses but may need enhancements for broader security challenges.

<p>Webroot Business Endpoint Protection offers powerful cloud-based management and AI functionalities that ensure comprehensive endpoint security.</p>

<p>It is renowned for being lightweight, not consuming significant workstation resources, therefore not slowing down the systems while providing effective protection.</p>

<p>The installation process is straightforward, making it easy for users to set up and start protection quickly.</p>

<p>Webroot Business Endpoint Protection includes features like traffic security monitoring and strong ransomware protection, enhancing overall network safety.</p>

<p>It has shown scalability without issues, accommodating growth smoothly and effectively for various organizations.</p>

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection scales efficiently, with users adding licenses as they grow. Feedback indicates easy expansion for thousands of users without complications. Deploying and maintaining requires minimal resources. Users have reported no trouble with its scalability, making it highly adaptable and suitable for various organization sizes. The solution's scalability is rated highly, confirming its capability to support significant user bases effectively.

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs improvements in false positive reduction, faster connections, granular file scanning, and reporting features. Users request upgrades in threat management, interface design, and tech support. Better detection, prevention against ransomware, real-time analytics, and advanced threat control are desired. The system should enhance backups, DNS support, and overall threat capability. The interface speed is a concern, and there is a need for more intuitive setup, better customer support, and clear reporting tools.

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is utilized by managed service providers and businesses for endpoint security across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It integrates with Active Directory policies for site monitoring and is deployed as an antivirus and firewall solution. Users appreciate its cloud management capabilities for threat mitigation, malware prevention, and mobile security, with features like remote wipe and location tracking. They often combine it with other security components for enhanced protective layers.

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection enhances support operations, provides threat alerts, simplifies endpoint management, and protects against attacks. Companies enjoy seamless malware protection with no user impact, and customer complaints of infections decrease. Profile generation for business groups eases management of numerous endpoints. Cost-effective integration with RMM and easy-to-use interface facilitate deployment. Organizations benefit from managed antivirus offerings that are lightweight and affordable, with added DNS functionality for user access control.

Users evaluated Sophos, Trend, Symantec, Kaspersky, Norton, AVG, BitDefender, ESET NOD32, and Komodo. Sophos appeared commonly mentioned alongside Webroot Business Endpoint Protection. Users valued comparisons based on support, management, and functionality. Webroot was favored for integration with RMM solutions and deployment options. Some experienced issues with performance on older machines. However, despite evaluating alternatives, Webroot appeared favored for its comprehensive options.

Cynet is preferred for its simplicity, efficiency, transparency, ease of maintenance, and recognized advantages over previous security solutions.

Cynet simplifies IT deployment with quick installations, minimal personnel, and easy maintenance supported by regular updates and documentation.

3.0

{"quote":"I assign the task to our support staff and engineering team, typically involving one or two people who are system engineers or network administrators.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"5"}

{"quote":"I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"I would recommend Cynet to others, though I note that the onboarding process might be rocky as they figure out their approach with managed service partners.","score":"8"}

Cynet users predominantly choose Public Cloud for deployment, with Hybrid Cloud and On-premises also popular, but fewer select Private Cloud.

{"quote":"Their support for issues related to the portal or feature problems isn't great.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"3"}

{"quote":"The valuable aspects of Cynet are its EDR and XDR components, which are available at a reasonable price point.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"9"}

7.5

7.589085

Cynet provides highly rated 24/7 responsive support, with excellent SOC integration, though portal and feature support needs improvement.

Cynet's setup is quick, user-friendly, and requires minimal resources, though specific configurations may pose challenges for some.

Cynet provides endpoint protection and threat detection, offering comprehensive security solutions for diverse environments, including real-time monitoring and response.

8

Cynet offers user-friendly, scalable security with automated features, 24/7 support, and comprehensive ransomware and malware protection for all teams.

Cynet offers scalable security solutions across industries, supporting diverse environments with ease of expansion and seamless onboarding.

Cynet is praised for its effective threat prevention, ease of use, and value, especially for organizations without in-house security expertise.

6.75

Cynet needs improvements in mobile support, reporting, integrations, incident visibility, and support infrastructure, especially in Asia.

Cynet offers budget-friendly pricing with comprehensive security components, costing between $18,000 and $28,000 annually, plus per license fees.

{"quote":"Their SOC side support, when a threat is detected, is excellent.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Their support for issues related to the portal or feature problems isn't great.","score":"6"}

Cynet usage duration by individuals varies widely, spanning periods from a few months to several years.

Organizations report positive ROI from Cynet, enhancing cybersecurity and preventing viruses, with immediate threat mitigation observed post-deployment.

Cynet excelled in endpoint protection due to CyOps support, integration ease, and comprehensive features, attracting partnerships and confidence.

Cynet is highly reliable and stable, with consistent high ratings for efficiency and minimal resource usage compared to alternatives.

{"quote":"There are many changes happening on their back end as they pivot to a managed service partner channel, which affects the administrator interface.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Cynet is very scalable.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Their onboarding support is another area that needs improvement.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"There should be more options than deploying solely through group policy, as the assumption that GPO is working isn’t always the case.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"They need to provide plugins that integrate with these tools commonly used by most MSPs.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Their deployment needs some work, especially with integration with remote monitoring management systems like Datto AutoTask or ConnectWise Automate.","score":"9"}

Cynet provides centralized security with robust endpoint protection, timely alerts, and seamless integration to enhance threat management.

{"quote":"It's right in the middle compared to other solutions.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I think the pricing of Cynet is fair and one of the better options in the market.","score":"9"}

We use Cynet to protect our endpoints and value its EDR and XDR components for their reasonable pricing. However, improvements are needed in deployment, integration with RMM systems, and onboarding support. It's too soon to assess ROI.

{"quote":"The valuable aspects of Cynet are its EDR and XDR components, which are available at a reasonable price point.","score":"9"}

<p>Cynet requires less management and is user-friendly with ease of deployment and use. It offers robust threat protection, blocking malware and providing ransomware defense. While its support services are responsive, quicker response times are needed. Advanced detection and monitoring enhance security, but integration with systems like Datto AutoTask needs improvement. Cynet necessitates mobile protection, better app integration, and enhanced reporting customization, lacking URL filtering and mobile technology deployment.</p>

Organizations mentioned previous experiences with McAfee, Symantec, CrowdStrike, Cylance, Microsoft, Trend Micro, and others before transitioning to Cynet. Many appreciated Cynet for its simplicity, comprehensive coverage, lighter resource demand, and better visibility. CrowdStrike was a common choice but lacked some functions Cynet offered. SentinelOne was noted for bugs. Others valued the central dashboard and support offered by Cynet, favoring it over McAfee's older offerings and less intuitive products like Webroot.

Cynet offers competitive pricing with a flexible licensing structure that appeals to enterprise buyers. Users benefit from an affordable yet comprehensive solution that integrates multiple security features into one package, often at a lower cost than competitors like CrowdStrike. Licensing can be tailored to monthly, quarterly, or yearly plans, with many users noting its cost-effectiveness. While implementation involves significant investment, the overall price competitiveness and affordability make Cynet an attractive choice for large organizations.

<p>Cynet surpasses its competitors by offering an all-in-one cybersecurity platform with automated response capabilities, intuitive threat detection, and 24/7 monitoring, ensuring comprehensive protection and streamlined management for businesses seeking top-tier security solutions.</p>

<p>Technical support for Cynet could be improved, with a need for faster response and support centers in more regions like Asia.</p> <p>Cynet's integration with other security applications requires enhancement to better meet diverse business needs.</p> <p>The lack of comprehensive mobile device protection and URL filtering in Cynet limits its effectiveness.</p> <p>The reporting capabilities in Cynet are seen as weak and need more customization and detailed information.</p> <p>Deployment and integration with remote monitoring management systems like Datto AutoTask or ConnectWise Automate need further development.</p>

Cynet's initial setup is praised for its ease and efficiency, with many users noting rapid deployment across thousands of endpoints. Some installations take as little as a few minutes, while others span several hours. Users appreciate its straightforward process, requiring minimal resources for installation and maintenance. A few face occasional issues with unit-by-unit installations and documentation gaps, but once resolved, the setup becomes highly efficient and user-friendly, supported on both cloud and on-premises platforms.

Cynet demonstrates strong and responsive technical support with 24/7 availability, appreciated by many users for their quick responses and expertise. However, some users find specific areas lacking, such as regional presence and support for portal issues. The inclusion of a security operation center significantly enhances their service. Customers value the knowledgeable team and proactive engagement during emergencies. While most rate the support highly, a few mention areas for improvement in communication speed and technical proficiency.

Cynet’s implementation process is described as straightforward and quick, with many users deploying in-house or with minimal assistance. Minimal staff is generally sufficient, often involving IT professionals who are not security experts. Various reports note the ease of deployment across thousands of endpoints, supported by automation and scripting. Support and maintenance services from Cynet receive high praise, characterized as responsive and reliable, ensuring minimal complications during and after implementation.

Clients see an ROI from Cynet, though specific measurements aren't always shared. Many organizations praise Cynet's efficiency in preventing cyber threats, avoiding viruses for nearly two years, and halting attacks shortly after implementation. While evaluations from the first year indicate positive feedback, some believe it's too early to accurately assess ROI. Overall, Cynet quickly establishes its worth by effectively stopping several cyberattacks.

Cynet's customer service and support are rated between 9 and 9.5 out of 10.

Users predominantly choose Public Cloud for Cynet, though a significant number also opt for Hybrid Cloud and On-premises. Private Cloud is less frequently selected. Overall, Public Cloud is the most popular option, followed by Hybrid Cloud, On-premises, and Private Cloud, respectively.

Users advise others to consider Cynet under Cynet's guidance for efficient management without external security teams. They appreciate its efficiency and cost savings, recommending trials and comparisons with other systems. Enhancements for improved threat coverage and mobile support are suggested. Users recognize its strong security features but note the need for a skilled workforce. Positive experiences highlight its deployment ease, support, and updates. Some recommend white labeling for sensitive markets, and others commend Cynet's potential to prevent breaches and facilitate skill transfers.

Cynet is a stable option with minimal errors and reliable performance. Users report no bugs, crashes, or freezes over extended use. Its discreet operation is likened to being lightweight, causing no adverse effects on systems or applications. Generally, stability is rated highly, averaging around nine out of ten. Some initial false positives were resolved through easy blacklisting and whitelisting. Few issues have been noted, but updates tend to address these concerns effectively.

<p>Cynet requires minimal management, is easy to use, and has automated features that block malware threats effectively.</p>
<p>Cynet's customer support is highly responsive, providing immediate assistance and follow-up via calls and emails.</p>
<p>Cynet offers advanced detection and protection against ransomware and monitors internal networks and external firewalls efficiently.</p>
<p>Cynet integrates well with other systems and provides comprehensive coverage by combining endpoint data and network analytics for enhanced threat visibility.</p>
<p>Cynet provides robust stability and scalability, making it a reliable and flexible choice for cybersecurity needs.</p>

Cynet needs improved mobile support including an Android app, stronger technical assistance, and more comprehensive reporting. Customization in reports and dashboard enhancements, such as showing client endpoint counts, are desired. Users seek advanced threat detection and time zone flexibility. Easier management of false positives and better third-party integration are suggested. Enhanced automation, URL filtering, and AI capabilities are also needed. Users want improved network traffic checks, remote features, and quicker support response.

Cynet offers a reality graphical user interface, comprehensive support, autonomous malware threat blocking, user behavior analysis, and effective network monitoring. Their solution includes EDR and XDR, 24/7 SOC service, excellent visibility, and advanced deception tactics. Users praise its ease of use, flexible pricing, stability, and minimal management requirements. Cynet integrates incident response with a strong capability in zero-day exploit defense, rapid policy deployment, and automated threat responses, providing a holistic cybersecurity experience.

Cynet has been in use for periods ranging from a few months to approximately five years.

Organizations primarily use Cynet for endpoint protection and threat detection, utilizing its EPP, EDR, and XDR capabilities. It secures workstations, monitors threats, and maintains user functionality. Users apply it for continuous monitoring, zero-day threat defense, and network visibility. With features like NTA, UBA, NGAV, and SIEM, it adapts to diverse IT landscapes. Customers find it effective for real-time monitoring, endpoint detection, and response, using it in various sectors such as medical, commercial, and retail.

Many express confidence in Cynet's scalability, noting its ability to handle numerous endpoints and a range of organizational sizes from small businesses to large enterprises. Several mention seamless handling of large-scale deployments and various environments without performance issues. Comments indicate it supports rapid expansion needs across global clients, efficiently managing thousands of licenses without difficulties. A few observe no major limitations in scalability, while some suggest adding features for enhanced network visibility.

Users evaluated options like SentinelOne, CarbonBlack, CrowdStrike, Cybereason, VMware, Palo Alto, Cortex, Sophos EDR, Darktrace NDR, McAfee, and Trend Micro. Cynet stood out with a combination of network, host, file, directory, and user monitoring, offering easy management. Its cloud capabilities and proactive threat mitigation were highlighted. Price, deployment, and quality were key factors in decision-making, with consultants deeply involved in the selection process. Integration and ease with existing infrastructures increased its appeal.

Cynet helps organizations minimize concern over evolving threats, enabling effective monitoring and response through enhanced endpoint visibility. Its early alert system and integrated cybersecurity features such as EDR, XDR, and antivirus save recovery time. Users appreciate its ability to revert to previous states and block issues by default. They benefit from centralized cybersecurity systems, improved communication among teams, and streamlined threat management, ensuring robust protection and reducing disruptions.

Users evaluated various tools, choosing VMware for its user-friendliness, infrastructure compatibility, and economic log management over alternatives.

Users considered ELK, Runecast, Microsoft Hyper-V, Splunk, Elastic's X-Pack, Centreon, syslog-ng, and Nutanix Prism before choosing VMware Aria Operations for Logs. Some tested Runecast for additional reporting, found VMware's user-friendliness superior to Hyper-V, and transitioned from Splunk due to cost. Elastic's X-Pack was noted for similar functionality. Others relied on VMware’s existing ecosystem with vRealize Log Insight and syslog-ng for multi-vendor environments. Nutanix Prism was preferred for its user-friendly interface.

Users explored alternatives due to SCSM's limitations, favoring Ivanti for ease, while ServiceNow gained popularity for web-based tools.

Users explored various options including ServiceNow, BMC Helix ITSM, InfraStruXure Central, Ivanti, IBM BigFix, and others. Microsoft’s integration capabilities were a key advantage. Some preferred SCSM for its stability while others highlighted user interface and reporting limitations. Jamf and ManageEngine were noted for their custom features. Companies also considered tools like Tableau and VMware, switching from manual processes to automated solutions with varying degrees of success and preference.

Users preferred Postman for its user-friendly interface and free option despite considering many comprehensive testing tool alternatives.

Users considered options like SoapUI, JMeter, Katalon Studio, Selenium, ReadyAPI, Swagger, ADAPT Test, LoadRunner, Tricentis Tosca, UFT, and Fire something. Many preferred Postman for its user-friendliness and graphical support. Postman's accessibility, integration capabilities, and free tier were notable. Some found it lacking compared to ReadyAPI and struggled with ADAPT Test's stability. Despite alternatives for automating and load testing, Postman remains favored for API testing.

Webroot was preferred for its integration, speed, lightweight footprint, and adaptability over heavier alternatives like McAfee and Norton.

Users evaluated several options including Sophos, Kaspersky, Symantec, Trend Micro, BitDefender, and Norton before deciding on Webroot Business Endpoint Protection. Many alternatives like McAfee, AVG, and Pand were considered heavy on resources. Webroot provided better integration and management capabilities. Some used Komodo but found it resource-intensive. Webroot's lightweight nature, intuitive console, and integration with RMM solutions made it appealing, despite its limitations in mobile endpoint protection after March.

Cynet is preferred for its comprehensive features, ease of use, centralized management, and proactive service compared to competitors.

Users evaluated SentinelOne, CarbonBlack, CrowdStrike, Cybereason, VMware, and others, emphasizing Cynet's comprehensive integration, ease of use, and exceptional endpoint protection. They highlighted Cynet's capabilities in mitigation, transparency, and proactive threat management. Recognition by MITRE and the efficiency compared to solutions like Cortex and Trend Micro were significant factors in their choice. Cynet's minimal resource demand and excellent service and support were appreciated, along with its ability to meet unique client requirements.

Users compared AlienVault OSSIM favorably for usability over QRadar, ArcSight, and Splunk, with challenges noted in LogRhythm and TrueRider.

AlienVault OSSIM deployments varied, from individual efforts to teams of twenty, often requiring certification or external support.

AlienVault OSSIM setup ease varies with user experience, network configurations, documentation, third-party tool integration, and business size.

{"quote":"I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"My advice is to simply use it.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"There are somewhat more false positives with the user behavior analytics, which could benefit from an additional machine learning model to detect user patterns more rapidly.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"3"}

The majority of organizations prefer on-premises deployment for AlienVault OSSIM, with fewer opting for a hybrid cloud approach.

8.0

AlienVault OSSIM support varies, with paid users experiencing mixed resolutions, while many rely on community and self-solving.

{"quote":"The deployment process required four resources.","quality_score":"5","sentiment_score":"5"}

AlienVault OSSIM offers threat detection, log collection, and compliance monitoring for enhanced security across cloud and on-premises environments.

AlienVault OSSIM is free initially but may incur costs for enhancements, support, or transitioning to the paid version.

7.589054

AlienVault OSSIM is suitable for small to mid-sized businesses but faces scale challenges in large enterprise environments.

Consider AlienVault OSSIM for cost-effective, easy deployment in smaller networks; explore features and community resources, upgrade for scalability.

AlienVault OSSIM offers threat detection, asset discovery, and vulnerability assessment with easy integration, centralized dashboard, and network security capabilities.

8.5

AlienVault OSSIM faces challenges in scalability, integration, user interface, reporting, and stability, needing better threat detection and customization.

AlienVault OSSIM has been utilized by users for varying durations ranging from one month to over seven years.

Many users found ArcSight pricey and evaluated alternatives like ManageEngine, while others stuck with OSSIM for comprehensive features.

{"quote":"The integration capabilities, especially concerning log sources, need improvement for more flexibility and simplicity in integrating with nodes.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"There are somewhat more false positives with the user behavior analytics, which could benefit from an additional machine learning model to detect user patterns more rapidly.","score":"8"}

AlienVault OSSIM is stable on proper hardware but may have minor bugs and limitations with large infrastructures.