Visual Studio Test Professional excels in integration, coding capabilities, and community support, enhancing usability and efficiency in development.

7.5

{"quote":"The integrated unit testing and extensive search features have made things easier.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"9"}

7.166666666666667

Users recommend Visual Studio Test Professional for its integration, stability, comprehensive features, and suggest enhancements despite the cost.

8.5

Enhancements needed for Visual Studio Test Professional include stability, integration, user-friendliness, automation, performance, cost-effectiveness, and improved compatibility.

People have used Visual Studio Test Professional for timeframes ranging from one month to over 30 years.

Visual Studio Test Professional boosts efficiency, saves time and money, enhancing product quality and offering notable ROI for users.

Enterprise users consider Visual Studio Test Professional flexible yet costly, with valuable tools and a cost-effective Community edition option.

Many users prefer Visual Studio Test Professional for C# automation over alternatives like Alteryx, Tricentis Tosca, and SmartBear TestComplete.

8.75

Visual Studio Test Professional is highly rated for stability, with minor performance issues often due to hardware, not software.

Organizations use Visual Studio Test Professional for efficient test management, issue tracking, and enhancing web portal quality with automation.

{"quote":"The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit.","score":"8"}

<p>Visual Studio Test Professional delivers robust features such as code testing, SSIS reports, and deployment models, ensuring ease of setup and integration with Microsoft tools. It supports C# and .NET with IntelliSense and ReSharper, yet faces challenges like high cost per user, disjointed Git integration, and resource intensity. While it offers strong technical support and stability through updates, its engagement with Jenkins and Microsoft documentation could be improved for greater efficiency.</p>

Users employed third-party tools and solutions like Selenium Java, Selenium C#, SmartBear, UI pod, Blue Prism, and Bucket Bot before opting for Visual Studio Test Professional. They used previous Microsoft Visual Test Studio versions, including 2008 and 2010, transitioning to Visual Studio Test Professional for enhanced features and integration. Utilizing BoundsChecker in the past, they sought similar performance. They switched from the community version for scalability and support. Various development tools were selected based on language requirements.

Visual Studio Test Professional surpasses its competitors by offering robust test management, seamless integration with Azure DevOps, and comprehensive test planning capabilities, enabling teams to enhance their productivity and streamline the software development lifecycle efficiently.

Enterprise users find Visual Studio Test Professional expensive, with an annual licensing fee and monthly subscriptions available. Costs can reach $1,300 per user or $6,000 yearly for five users, which is lower compared to some alternatives. Despite a high price, the tool delivers substantial value, enabling comprehensive development with fewer additional purchases. Options include a free community version, offering flexibility for various requirements and budgets, making it a viable choice for different enterprise needs.

<p>Visual Studio Test Professional is considered too expensive with a per-user pricing model.</p><p>The integration with Git and continuous integration tools like Jenkins needs improvement for better usability.</p><p>Performance issues such as slow startup and high resource consumption are noted, making the software cumbersome to use compared to lighter alternatives.</p><p>The documentation available through Microsoft's website is criticized for being unhelpful, limiting the ease of use and learning curve.</p><p>There is limited support for testing modern applications, including microservices and cloud-based solutions, necessitating a more modern approach.</p>

Users describe Visual Studio Test Professional's initial setup as straightforward and user-friendly, although some found setting up test agents and controllers more complex. Installation varies from quick, taking less than an hour, to requiring a week depending on project complexity. Microsoft technology familiarity aids deployment. Experienced teams find it seamless, often needing minimal team involvement. Some note that additional components can prolong setup time, but installation tasks are manageable without external assistance.

Many users deploy Visual Studio Test Professional in-house, relying on their own teams. Commonly, developers and administrators handle the deployment, which varies from ten minutes to a few hours, depending on setup requirements. Ensuring compatibility with hardware and a fast internet connection enhances the experience. Users prefer not using vendors for deployment, highlighting the software's simplicity for in-house management by skilled IT professionals and developers.

Customer service of Visual Studio Test Professional receives mixed feedback, with ratings varying around seven out of ten. Technical support is generally satisfactory, with ease of communication and clear documentation highly praised. Many utilize online resources or community forums for assistance. Some users find official documents difficult to navigate, while others report needing fewer direct interactions due to robust self-help options. Support is considered knowledgeable with prompt, but sometimes slow, responses from the team.

Visual Studio Test Professional's customer service and support is positively rated at 4 to 5 out of 5.

Visual Studio Test Professional provides a return on investment as it enhances developers' efficiency and reduces development time. Users report improved productivity, leading to time and cost savings. The integrated development environment is richer compared to others, contributing to better and more stable environments and higher quality products. While some note minimal financial returns, others highlight the benefits of increased efficiency and workflow improvement, making it valuable regardless of purchase cost.

Users advise others to consider Visual Studio Test Professional for its integration capabilities and support for complex projects. They emphasize its value in tracking and linking data across projects, suggesting that users familiarize themselves with its offerings. Many experienced developers suggest exploring tutorials for a better grasp of the tool. Although concerns over cost and version upgrades exist, the tool remains highly recommended, particularly for projects involving .NET. The majority rate it highly, often between eight and ten out of ten.

Most individuals choose on-premises deployment for Visual Studio Test Professional. Some opt for public or private cloud, with very few selecting a hybrid cloud arrangement. On-premises remains the dominant choice among users.

Visual Studio Test Professional is generally considered stable, with many users rating its stability highly. Some note occasional slowness, crashes, or resource demands, suggesting that hardware might influence performance. Users experience rare bugs and performance-related issues, some related to third-party systems. Many believe these issues will be resolved in future updates. Visual Studio Test Professional often receives stability ratings between eight and ten out of ten from different users, with frequent updates contributing to improved stability.

Users of Visual Studio Test Professional have engaged with it for a range from a few months to over 30 years.

<p>Visual Studio Test Professional offers robust technical support and extensive online resources for team training and development.</p>
<p>Code testing, IntelliSense, and ReSharper are highlighted as its most valuable features.</p>
<p>It integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft tools, enhancing its utility for comprehensive .NET and C# project development.</p>
<p>Visual Studio Test Professional is noted for its stability, ease of use, and scalability.</p>
<p>Its compatibility and direct integration with GitHub streamline development processes.</p>

Visual Studio Test Professional requires better integration with Visual Studio and other tools, improved stability, and enhanced performance. Users suggest more intuitive interfaces and visuals, more automation options, and expanded platform support. Pricing concerns need addressing, and more documentation is requested. Scalability and compatibility with continuous integration tools need enhancement. The interface could be more user-friendly, and the application is perceived as resource-heavy and complex for some users.

Visual Studio Test Professional offers valuable features like seamless integration with management data, test cases, and user stories. It supports C# and .NET, offers customization and ease of use, and integrates with GitHub and other Microsoft tools. Users appreciate its user-friendly interface, debugging capabilities, and automation features. IntelliSense, NuGet package manager, and code testing are highlighted. The tool is scalable, supports memory analysis, and facilitates efficient testing and development processes for diverse programming languages.

Visual Studio Test Professional is primarily used for custom software development, coding, debugging, and integration of applications. Many users employ it for developing web and desktop applications, running tests in .NET environments, automating workflows, and performing functional and security testing. It supports C#, Java, and C++ environments and aids in ensuring quality and reliability in coding standards and security procedures. Test-driven development and continuous integration processes are commonly executed using the platform.

Visual Studio Test Professional is widely acknowledged for excellent scalability. Many users, including engineers and developers, utilize the tool, indicating strong performance and capacity for growth. Several organizations report using it with up to 1,000 users without encountering significant issues. Costs related to licensing are a concern for some. User ratings for scalability often range from seven to ten out of ten. Different companies have experienced smooth expansion and effective handling of bandwidth without problems.

Visual Studio Test Professional enhances organization efficiency by securely storing sources with Source Control and tracking issues via TFS. Automation scripts link with manual tests using MTM to improve testing. Quality of web portal products increases with automated testing, achieving nearly no regression. Pre-built templates reduce development time, offering automation for unit and stress testing. CI/CD compatibility eliminates reliance on Visual Studio. Flexibility in building from scratch and integration of unit testing simplifies processes.

Users evaluated various options alongside Visual Studio Test Professional. Alternatives considered included automation tools supporting C#, Alteryx, Tricentis Tosca, and SmartBear TestComplete. Microsoft-related projects primarily relied on Visual Studio Test Professional. Most users didn’t explore other tools extensively. Integration and cost were significant factors influencing decisions. Some users anticipated using GitHub Copilot but continued with Visual Studio for testing purposes.

Organizations chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security for its efficiency, advanced features, competitive pricing, centralized management, and AI capabilities.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security implementations involve internal teams or external partners, with varying deployment approaches and support options.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security users mainly prefer on-premises, with some choosing hybrid and public cloud for added flexibility.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security users choose diverse cloud providers, with significant preferences for Microsoft Azure and AWS.

Trend Vision One's setup is easy, cloud options are simpler, but larger or on-premises setups require more time and effort.

Trend Vision One support is mixed; praised for local service but criticized for slow global response and language issues.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security provides comprehensive antivirus and antimalware protection with centralized management and machine learning threat detection.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is scalable, meeting diverse organizational needs and rated highly for supporting growth without infrastructure changes.

Trend Vision One excels in endpoint security with user-friendly management, advanced threat detection, integration, and efficient multi-environment handling.

{"quote":"The implementation of Playbooks and automation led to a reduction in manpower, as everything was automated.","quality_score":"10","sentiment_score":"8"}

{"quote":"I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.","quality_score":"1","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"I have not needed much technical support except during the uninstallation issues, which took some time to resolve.","quality_score":"2","sentiment_score":"3"}

{"quote":"The scalability of the solution is good, and I would rate it around eight out of ten.","quality_score":"1","sentiment_score":"6"}

{"quote":"The stability of the solution has been rated as eight out of ten.","quality_score":"1","sentiment_score":"6"}

{"quote":"20% to 30% of endpoints faced difficulty in cleaning or uninstalling the software, and we required additional documentation and technical support.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"4"}

Evaluate Trend Vision One Endpoint Security for seamless integration, threat detection, budget needs, and performance impact before implementation.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires firewall upgrades, better Linux support, streamlined management, enhanced integration, and improved technical support.

{"quote":"The solution offers great visibility into their IT infrastructure and uses industry-leading threat intelligence strategies.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"There were challenges in uninstalling the Trend Micro solution from certain endpoints.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"2"}

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has been employed for periods ranging from one to six years by users.

Users of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report varying ROI, with notable savings from reduced threats and costs.

6.5

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers competitive annual pricing around $50,000, with straightforward setup and no hidden fees.

Users evaluated antivirus and security solutions based on integration, pricing, features, and flexibility, focusing on enhanced endpoint security.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is stable and reliable, with minor bugs but overall high user satisfaction.

8.15

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security enhances protection, reduces threats, and boosts productivity with advanced detection and integrated management solutions.

6.75

8

8.85

8

{"quote":"I would rate technical support around six point five.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"I have not needed much technical support except during the uninstallation issues, which took some time to resolve.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"We required additional documentation and technical support.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"20% to 30% of endpoints faced difficulty in cleaning or uninstalling the software.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"There were challenges in uninstalling the Trend Micro solution from certain endpoints.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The integration of ML and AI provides complete visibility, suggests responses, detects threats, and includes integration into XDR, which covers email security, endpoint security, cloud security, among other aspects.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"The solution offers great visibility into their IT infrastructure and uses industry-leading threat intelligence strategies.","score":"9"}

<p>Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers seamless integration and ease of deployment, providing advanced malware and ransomware protection with behavior monitoring. Its scalability supports business growth while cloud-based management offers real-time updates. Machine learning enhances threat detection, yet improvements are needed in Active Directory management, technical support, and DLP features. High resource consumption and reporting require optimization for better insights, ensuring security efficiency for tech buyers.</p>

Before using Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, users employed a range of options including Sophos, Symantec, McAfee, Kaspersky, Carbon Black, CrowdStrike, AVG, SentinelOne, and Microsoft Defender. Many switched for improved features, better central management, or competitive pricing. Some users had a long history with Trend Micro, transitioning through different versions. Others moved from Symantec after its acquisition by Broadcom, or from Kaspersky due to high resource usage.

<p>Trend Vision One Endpoint Security surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat detection, real-time monitoring, and AI-driven analytics, ensuring comprehensive protection and swift response to security threats.</p>

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers competitive pricing aligned with market standards, with costs typically determined by the number of users and features needed. The yearly licensing fee ranges from moderate to expensive, depending on the package and location. Some organizations find the pricing higher than alternatives but acknowledge the comprehensive features included. While the setup process is streamlined, additional costs for third-party implementation or integration with other solutions may arise. Overall, its pricing structure is generally regarded as fair and justified for the features provided.

<p>Trend Vision One Endpoint Security faces challenges with high resource utilization, particularly memory and CPU usage, during scanning processes.</p><p>There is a need for improvement in technical support, with customers noting slow response times and limited language options.</p><p>Reports generated by Trend Vision One Endpoint Security are not detailed enough and lack timely delivery, making it difficult to analyze security incidents effectively.</p> <p>Integration capabilities require enhancement, as users face difficulty in seamlessly connecting with platforms like Active Directory and Microsoft 365.</p> <p>Trend Vision One Endpoint Security experiences issues with false positives in ransomware detection and other threat alerts, affecting reliability.</p>

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is implemented by various teams, including in-house staff, vendors, and partners. Integrators often assist, but many opt for self-deployment with two or three engineers. Some prefer reseller support. Maintenance is either automated or handled by dedicated teams. Client setups range from small internal teams to collaboration with Trend Micro and third-party providers. Techniques vary, with some using remote tools or managing via a systems integrator, with different levels of external assistance.

Most users found Trend Vision One Endpoint Security's initial setup straightforward and easy. Deployments varied in duration based on company size, with smaller setups taking minutes and larger ones extending to several months. While cloud installations were faster, some complexities arose in on-premises setups and policy configurations. Generally, the setup required minimal maintenance and was manageable by a small team, although larger enterprises occasionally needed additional resources.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security's customer service and support receive mixed feedback. Users find support knowledgeable and helpful, often providing quick responses. However, others mention slow response times and a lack of local language support. Some indicate a need for improvement in handling complex issues. The availability of 24/7 service and knowledgeable local teams is appreciated, but clients desire faster, more consistent assistance to address specific requirements. Some users report delays and challenges in problem resolution.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security customer service and support is rated between 3 to 5 out of 5.

Users have observed varying degrees of ROI with Trend Vision One Endpoint Security. They report cost savings by eliminating unnecessary tools and reducing malware and virus incidents by 60-70%. For some, the transition led to reduced licensing fees and optimized overall costs. Others highlighted the significance of server protection and time-saving benefits. Although some found exact ROI difficult to quantify, they noted improved operational efficiency and better performance compared to alternatives like Symantec.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is primarily utilized on Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure by several entities. Amazon Web Services is chosen more frequently, while Microsoft Azure is also a popular option. Many entities prefer different services categorized as "Other," highlighting varied selections in cloud platforms.

A significant number choose on-premises for Trend Vision One Endpoint Security with others preferring public cloud. Hybrid cloud is also a popular choice reflecting diverse preferences. Private cloud is used less frequently. On-premises remains the dominant choice among users while public and hybrid cloud options show substantial interest.

Users advise others considering Trend Vision One Endpoint Security to focus on its capabilities and compare it with other options. They highlight the importance of consulting actual users rather than relying on marketing. Productivity and feature set are beneficial, with positive ratings between seven and ten. Some users mention room for improvement in interface design and integrations. They emphasize strong protection against malware, ease of administration, and the need for knowledgeable staff. Integration with other Trend Micro products is praised.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is generally stable with high performance. Users experience minimal issues, though some report occasional instabilities, often related to updates or new versions. It typically doesn't crash or freeze and isn't resource-intensive. Many rate its stability between seven to nine out of ten, expressing satisfaction. There are isolated cases of needing patches but users recognize it as reliable, reporting no major persistent problems. It operates smoothly across various environments.

<p>Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is noted for its ease of use and simple deployment, making it accessible without extensive technical knowledge.</p>
<p>It is highly scalable and stable, supporting a variety of environments with minimal downtime.</p>
<p>Features like behavior monitoring, vulnerability protection, and DLP are particularly valuable for comprehensive security management.</p>
<p>The cloud-based management system allows for efficient remote policy updates and reduced administrative overhead.</p>
<p>Its effectiveness in protecting against zero-day threats and integration with other security products enhances overall security posture.</p>

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers valuable features such as virtual patching, behavior monitoring, and zero-day threat protection. Its centralized management console enhances ease of use and visibility. The platform integrates machine learning and AI for effective threat detection and mitigation. Users benefit from real-time updates, scalability, and a user-friendly interface. Understanding threats is facilitated through a single console, reducing administrative overhead and response times by simplifying endpoint protection management.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security needs improvements in firewall management, Linux compatibility, and a unified dashboard. Enhanced AI, data-loss prevention, integration with third-party tools, and improved technical support are desired. Users experience high resource consumption and performance impacts during scanning, driver compatibility issues, and complex policy setups. They suggest better malware detection, faster updates, and more user-friendly interfaces. Improved reporting, centralized management, and cost-effectiveness are also areas identified for enhancement.

Usage of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security ranges from less than a year to nearly fifteen years.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is primarily used for endpoint protection, encompassing antivirus and antimalware capabilities. Organizations leverage it for securing client systems, managing network threats, deploying both on-premises and cloud environments, and providing data protection. It blocks ransomware, malware threats, and unwanted device connections, ensuring robust security measures. The solution is adopted widely across various sectors, helping to monitor, prevent attacks, and provide a stable environment for clients, including those with significant economic impacts.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is highly scalable, accommodating small to large user bases across various environments. Users appreciate its ability to scale efficiently, whether on-premises or cloud-based, without significant infrastructure changes. Licensing is flexible, enabling straightforward expansion and management. Many users find the scalability effective, often allowing for seamless operations even with varying endpoint numbers. The overall scaling capability receives positive feedback, highlighting ease of use in expanding capacity and maintaining performance.

Users evaluated McAfee, Sophos, Symantec, Silence, Carbon Black, CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender ATP, XDR, FireEye, Kaspersky, Cloud Proxy, Avira, Windows Defender, Cynet, ESET NOD32, and Trellix alongside Trend Vision One Endpoint Security. They considered integration capabilities, cost, feature set, and compatibility with existing systems. Some did not evaluate alternatives due to satisfaction with Trend or budget considerations. Trend Vision One was chosen for its manageability and log storage capability.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security enhances organizational security by detecting and blocking malware, ransomware, and web threats, reducing responses to vulnerabilities. The consolidation of endpoints into a single platform simplifies threat management and reporting tasks. Machine-learning capabilities adapt to emerging threats, improving data protection. The centralized console enables easier threat detection and investigation, streamlining IT operations. Organizations experience increased efficiency and resource savings, significant threat reduction, improved productivity, and decreased administrative workload.

5.15

Users preferred One Identity SPS for cost, CyberArk for Microsoft compatibility, and SonaSecura for performance over WALLIX Bastion.

{"quote":"CyberArk is not completely stable as it depends on internet connection and architecture.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"5"}

WALLIX Bastion customer service is praised for knowledgeable 24/7 support, despite occasional imprecision and lengthy resolution times.