Organizations benefit from faster restores, optimized backups, reduced storage needs, and lower costs with HPE StoreOnce. They experience enhanced disaster recovery, improved data management, and increased reliability. Deduplication allows for extended retention times and space savings while eliminating physical tapes. The integration provides cost-effective consolidation and efficiency. It boosts backup speed, reduces backup windows, and ensures easier management. Automation minimizes manual tasks, improving overall operational continuity. Storage footprint and energy costs are decreased.

HPE StoreOnce is generally considered scalable, with users citing easy expansion and adaptability for various enterprise needs. While some report issues when reaching capacity limits, many highlight HPE StoreOnce's seamless upgrades and expansion options for storage. Users often praise the modularity and scalability for both SMEs and large-scale applications, though costs may rise with high-end scaling. The platform's ability to adjust storage aligns with evolving business requirements, making it a favored choice for diverse organizations.

Users often compared HPE StoreOnce with alternatives like EMC Data Domain, Dell, IBM, NetBackup, and Quantum Symantec. Many selected HPE StoreOnce for cost-effectiveness, integration with existing infrastructure, reliable support, and vendor relationships. Some favored benefits like deduplication and total cost of ownership. Despite evaluating options like Microsoft Storage Server and Synology, users found HPE StoreOnce aligned better with their needs due to pricing, support, and compatibility. Users occasionally mentioned partnerships influencing their choice.

Users switched from various platforms to Adobe Experience Manager for its integration, multilingual features, and user-friendly interface.

Adobe Experience Manager is easily deployable with minimal assistance, requiring a small team for simpler installations and larger applications.

{"quote":"This makes your implementation smoother and more successful.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Adobe Experience Manager provides assurance that the system will work within five to ten years, ensuring stability for big companies.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"8"}

{"quote":"The system should fit into your IT environment and also align with your business strategy.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"For any investment, it's important to understand what you want to do and what your targets are.","score":"8"}

7.5

4.85

{"quote":"Adobe's technical support is so-so.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"2"}

Adobe Experience Manager support is skilled but slow, varying by company size, focusing on base issues over custom code.

3.85

Adobe Experience Manager offers ease of use, integration with Adobe Marketing Cloud, and robust tools for digital asset and content management.

Adobe Experience Manager enhances content management, digital marketing, and analytics, favored for web development in e-commerce and enterprises.

Adobe Experience Manager efficiently scales for large enterprises, handling load stress, easy customization, and smooth cloud migration post-transition.

{"quote":"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

Adobe Experience Manager is generally user-friendly, but complex integrations and customizations require Java expertise and increase complexity.

7.5

8.75

Adobe Experience Manager is deployed in varied environments with a preference for hybrid or localized setups, meeting diverse needs.

Adobe Experience Manager faces criticism for its high cost, complexity, limited documentation, inefficient support, and challenging integration with Microsoft.

Start small with Adobe Experience Manager, prioritize objectives, ensure knowledgeable staff, and integrate gradually for enterprise success and usability.

{"quote":"You rarely have a direct contact with Adobe and often work through suppliers.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"They are attentive to big companies but tend to be negligent towards mid-sized companies.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Adobe's technical support is so-so.","score":"7"}

Users selected Adobe Experience Manager for its comprehensive capabilities and reputation, despite considering alternatives like Drupal and WordPress.

Adobe Experience Manager is expensive with variable licensing, but efficient for large websites and offers a one-month free trial.

Adobe Experience Manager users have varying experience levels, ranging from one year to over twenty-five years of use.

Adobe Experience Manager provides a positive ROI through ease of use, efficient updates, analytics leadership, and flexible content modification.

{"quote":"For large enterprises, the cost is often comparable with other major CMSs.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The pricing is opaque and not a key factor when considering the dimensions of the solution.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The licensing model is opaque.","score":"8"}

Adobe Experience Manager is stable and secure, with cloud version benefits, despite some setup and integration issues.

Adobe Experience Manager streamlines content management, enhances branding consistency, improves security, and optimizes traffic and cross-channel synchronization.

<p>Adobe Experience Manager excels in web security, content management, and supports comprehensive digital asset management. With connections to Adobe Target and Adobe Analytics, it offers robust analytics for data-driven insights. However, improvements are needed in cloud deployment, backend connectivity, and delete recovery. Additionally, its pricing model is expensive, and technical support responsiveness could be better. Despite these challenges, it remains a versatile tool aiding in collaboration across teams.</p>

{"quote":"It's similar to a heat map used on the fly.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive.","score":"9"}

Various users transitioned to Adobe Experience Manager from other platforms like Magnolia, Joomla, SharePoint, WordPress, Liferay, and OpenText TeamSite. They found AEM easier to use due to its multilingual capabilities and integration with marketing tools. Traders sought a distributed environment, moving content, analytics, and other components to specialized platforms. Users previously relied on tools like Pencil or Sketch and opted for AEM for its extensive features. Some also used in-house tools.

<p>Adobe Experience Manager's programming model is criticized as a monolithic solution in need of improvement.</p><p>The system lacks proper versioning and backend connectivity, making it less competitive compared to other CMS products.</p><p>Recovery options in case of accidental deletions are problematic, often requiring technical support to restore the entire instance.</p><p>Pricing and licensing models are noted as expensive and opaque, with room for improvement.</p><p>Technical support, especially for smaller companies, is seen as inadequate in responsiveness and effectiveness.</p>

<p>Adobe Experience Manager surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration with Adobe's suite, a powerful content management system, robust personalization tools, and real-time data insights, enabling businesses to deliver exceptional customer experiences across all digital channels.</p>

Adobe Experience Manager is often perceived as expensive, with costs varying based on usage, sites, and users. Pricing may be high, especially for large, dynamic sites or user-data-based campaigns. Licensing is not always clear, and careful architecture can reduce unnecessary costs. Multiple license levels are available, with an initial free trial month. Yearly fees apply, and pricing is generally on the higher side compared to other content management systems but considered valuable for large enterprises.

Adobe Experience Manager's customer service receives mixed feedback. While some find support responsive and helpful, others highlight slow response times and complexity in resolving issues. Many appreciate dedicated support based on client contracts, although challenges arise when communicating through intermediaries or dealing with specific geographical regions. Experiences vary based on company size and the nature of the issue, with larger enterprises often receiving more attentive service compared to mid-sized businesses.

Implementers of Adobe Experience Manager found the process straightforward, aided by comprehensive documentation and resources available online. They reported needing three people for deployment: a developer, an Adobe Experience Manager assistant, and a business person. For large applications, at least ten experts are necessary for maintenance. The involvement of technical suppliers is crucial.

Users find Adobe Experience Manager's initial setup straightforward, often describing it as easy with a quick deployment process. However, they note it can be complex for those new to relevant technologies. Familiarity with Java, content management systems, and planning for integration is essential. Some say customization poses challenges. Others highlight the user-friendly setup when adopting AEM as a Cloud Service, where Adobe manages much of the process. Proper guidance and preparation facilitate a smoother experience.

<p>Adobe Experience Manager is feature-rich, offering robust web security and versatile content management that allows for updating content anytime and on any platform, including mobile devices.</p>
<p>Adobe Experience Manager includes an analytics dashboard to monitor traffic sources, clicks, and impressions, enhancing digital marketing effectiveness.</p>
<p>Adobe Experience Manager supports asset management and enables different departments within a company to access and update content according to specific team needs.</p>
<p>Native applications like Adobe Target, Adobe Analytics, and Adobe Experience Platform facilitate easy connection and reporting on website performance and visitor engagement.</p>
<p>Adobe Experience Manager offers a multiple publisher feature and is based on powerful open-source technology like Apache Sling and JCR, simplifying content exposure across various applications.</p>

Adobe Experience Manager's most valuable features include its ease of use for content authors, seamless integration with Adobe Marketing Cloud, and robust Digital Asset Management (DAM). Its support for OSGi bundles and reusability of page components enhances flexibility. Users appreciate the real-time analytics dashboard, user-generated content integration through Livefyre, and powerful design capabilities. It also excels in content management across platforms, providing comprehensive targeting and segmentation tools while maintaining a user-friendly interface.

Adobe Experience Manager is utilized for content management, digital marketing, and user experience design. Companies prefer it for web development, hosting features, and integrating tools like Analytics and Target. It aids in synchronizing third-party data, offers commercial support, and provides unified data visualization for quick decisions. Businesses engage with it for versatile needs such as e-commerce across mobile, web channels, and managing user-specific data analytics. Users appreciate its robust capabilities for large-scale applications.

Users advise others to start with small objectives and avoid replicating existing solutions when using Adobe Experience Manager. Emphasize having knowledgeable consulting partners and clear communication with IT divisions. Prior experience with similar tools is beneficial. The experience is enhanced by understanding features, creating tailored strategies, and ensuring that AEM aligns with existing IT environments. Users find it essential to maintain the system and appreciate its effective digital marketing capabilities and seamless integration with other Adobe products.

Users choose a mix of deployment models for Adobe Experience Manager. Many opt for on-premises setups, reflecting a preference for in-house management. Some embrace the flexibility and scalability of the public cloud, while others opt for private cloud deployments, balancing control with cloud benefits. The diverse deployment choices highlight no clear consensus on a preferred setup, indicating varied organizational needs and strategies regarding Adobe Experience Manager implementation.

Adobe Experience Manager's customer service and support are often rated between 3 to 5 out of 5.

Users have experienced a positive ROI with Adobe Experience Manager, appreciating its ease of use and capability for website content management. Adobe stands out as a leader in the market, delivering strong analytics and significant returns, particularly in applications with numerous users. Its feature for altering content without needing deployments is especially advantageous. Many consider it a worthy investment due to its efficiency in maintaining large-scale user interactions.

Adobe Experience Manager is highly scalable and customizable, supporting worldwide use and large user bases. It easily adapts to cloud environments and efficiently manages web content, minimizing server requirements. While transitioning to the cloud can present challenges, it offers flexibility by enabling horizontal scaling. Organizations appreciate its design and development capabilities, proving suitable for enterprise-level needs. Combining customization with scalability, it handles significant user traffic and diverse content management efficiently.

Users considered alternatives like Drupal, Joomla, WordPress, IBM, ContentSquare, Sitecore, Storyblok, and Typos3. Though Adobe Experience Manager is noted for its expense, its reputation and comprehensive features were preferred over simpler systems. Drupal, Joomla, and WordPress were evaluated mainly for Web Site and Content Management. IBM's tool has been used but Adobe Experience Manager offered more features, leading to its selection due to advantages in handling various aspects integrally.

Adobe Experience Manager is generally stable with quick response times, high performance, and strong security features. Challenges include memory leaks, rapid storage consumption with Mongo setup, and integration issues with other Adobe Marketing Cloud products. Stability can be influenced by custom code and server specifications. Users find the cloud version to be somewhat stable but lacking full feature support. Many have observed improvements since migrating to AEM as a Cloud Service.

Adobe Experience Manager struggles with poor documentation and support, inefficient integration with other Adobe Marketing Cloud products, and complex pricing models. Users report issues with coding standards in the API, synchronization challenges, and inadequate recovery options. It demands skilled developers, high costs, and specific IDE support like IntelliJ and NetBeans. The programming model and Cloud Service support response times need enhancement, while transitive JavaScript dependencies and reusable component functionality further add to users' frustrations.

Organizations benefit by using Adobe Experience Manager to create consistent web pages without new development, saving time and resources. It enhances brand consistency by standardizing page types and assists in content management, analytics, and multi-platform applications. Adobe Experience Manager's high security and efficient traffic management improve operational performance. It supports content synchronization across channels and helps manage multiple sites and divisions efficiently. Agencies also find it valuable for consultancy and implementation in diverse settings.

Users have utilized Adobe Experience Manager for a range of about one to 25 years.

Users switched to Qualys VMDR for its efficiency, flexibility, and better pricing compared to Nessus, Rapid 7, and McAfee.

Organizations deployed Qualys VMDR using internal teams, sometimes with vendor support, ensuring effective management and infrastructure adaptation.

Organizations favor public and hybrid clouds, valuing flexible configurations, showing strong interest in cloud-based Qualys VMDR solutions.

Qualys VMDR users prefer AWS over Microsoft Azure, but various public cloud providers are chosen, showcasing diverse cloud preferences.

Qualys VMDR setup is quick, often completed in hours, with support aiding minor complexities for smooth integration.

Qualys VMDR customer service is responsive and helpful, but some users suggest improvements in support speed and resolving complex issues.

Qualys VMDR offers comprehensive vulnerability management, continuous monitoring, and compliance across diverse IT environments including cloud and on-premises.

Qualys VMDR is scalable and reliable, efficiently managing large networks with customizable features and seamless cloud-based expansion.

Qualys VMDR excels in vulnerability management with cloud-based deployment, user-friendly dashboard, continuous monitoring, and comprehensive reporting.

{"quote":"I would recommend Qualys VMDR to the other stakeholders because it already has its place in the market, and it's very reliable.","score":"8"}

Qualys VMDR users seek improvements in reporting, ease of use, integration, support, asset management, pricing, and operating system support.

{"quote":"The response time of technical support takes a while.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"4"}

Qualys VMDR is recommended for its effectiveness in vulnerability management despite high costs and slow technical support.

{"quote":"Using this product, we now have a vulnerability management cycle wherein VMDR plays a major role.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

7.85

5.75

Users have utilized Qualys VMDR for periods varying from several months to over 15 years, indicating long-term reliability.

Qualys VMDR is valuable for reducing cyber risks, improving security, efficiency, visibility, asset management, and offering significant ROI.

Qualys VMDR pricing varies by company size and features, often higher than competitors like Tenable and Nessus.

Qualys VMDR is reliable and stable, praised for consistent performance and quick vulnerability detection despite minor reporting issues.

Users evaluated tools like Qualys VMDR, opting for its automation, ease, and cost over Nessus, Tenable, and others.

Qualys VMDR enhances security by automating vulnerability management, improving asset discovery, and streamlining risk management for efficient resource use.

9

5.5

7.5

{"quote":"The response time takes a while.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"My rating for the technical support for Qualys is six out of ten.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The response time of technical support takes a while.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"I like the automated report generation and vulnerability report generation.","score":"8"}

<p>Qualys VMDR provides comprehensive vulnerability management with continuous monitoring and prioritized remediation, featuring automated assessments and seamless integrations like ServiceNow. While it enhances security operations, potential buyers should note concerns about its cloud-based nature, reporting capabilities, and patch management, especially for older systems. Technical support and vulnerability reporting accuracy need improvement, with issues of false positives and inconsistencies. Despite these challenges, it's instrumental for improving organizational security posture through automated remediation workflows.</p>

Users have previously utilized Nessus and Rapid 7 Nexpose but found them costly, slow, and less feature-rich compared to Qualys VMDR. They also employed McAfee Vulnerability Manager, Lansweeper, and Symantec, switching due to scalability issues and feature limitations. Tenable IO and Microsoft's offerings were considered, but Qualys VMDR was preferred for better reporting, ease of management, and reduced costs. Some began with Qualys directly without prior usage of alternate options.

Qualys VMDR pricing is perceived as high but flexible, with varying costs based on asset numbers and features. Discounts are available, especially for annual licenses, and larger enterprises often benefit from partnerships and volume deals. Prices are competitive yet can be higher than alternatives, with some users reporting annual costs exceeding $100,000 without discounts. The solution’s comprehensive feature set, including vulnerability management and patching, often justifies the expense for medium to large enterprises.

<p>Qualys VMDR surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive vulnerability management, real-time threat intelligence, and integrated patch deployment, ensuring efficient and proactive security measures in a unified platform.</p>

<p>Qualys VMDR has cloud-based limitations that concern some users, especially regarding data storage and computing.</p><p>Improvements are needed in the reporting capabilities and functionality to ensure accurate and comprehensive data output.</p><p>Integration with other platforms like ServiceNow and support for different operating systems is complicated and could be more efficient.</p><p>The vulnerability management system sometimes struggles with false positives and requires multiple scanners for comprehensive coverage.</p><p>Handling of vulnerabilities and related technical support needs enhancement to improve response times and effectiveness.</p>

The initial setup of Qualys VMDR is considered straightforward by many users. With proper understanding of the network layout, configuring the solution involves straightforward tasks like deploying agents, setting up scanners, and defining parameters. Some users appreciate that it is uncomplicated with the SaaS, cloud-based nature facilitating simple deployment. However, for larger environments, complexities can arise involving multiple teams or requiring customization, though comprehensive documentation and support are often helpful in navigating these challenges.

The implementation team for Qualys VMDR varied, with most using in-house resources. Many relied solely on their internal teams while some received assistance from vendors or Qualys support. Organizations like using a mix of in-house efforts and third-party guidance. A few provided feedback about the vendor's excellence. Multiple administrators and technical staff managed the deployment, with some leveraging support from Qualys in Singapore and other vendors for ongoing maintenance.

Customers acknowledge high customer service levels with responsiveness and quick resolutions. However, some experience slower support and suggest improvements. Though some rarely interact with technical support due to stability, feedback indicates good expertise and willingness to help, often through forums. While satisfaction is evident with fast responses and helpful forums, suggestions include faster support and better training access. Ratings vary, with some expressing the need for comprehensive involvement and direct interaction improvements.

Users of Qualys VMDR primarily employ Public Cloud and Hybrid Cloud models, with a significant number utilizing On-premises. A distinct group prefers Private Cloud. Public Cloud appears to be favored widely, indicating a robust adoption. Hybrid Cloud shows versatility, bridging other models. On-premises deployment reflects traditional preferences, with several users opting for Private Cloud, ensuring control and security. The broad range of deployment methods indicates diverse usage scenarios among different users.

Qualys VMDR significantly enhances vulnerability management, enabling frequent scans that lower cybersecurity risks and improve overall safety. It increases awareness of security measures, leading to better asset protection and compliance, while patch capabilities streamline network upgrades. The tool offers substantial cost savings by reducing time and preventing service disruptions, with ROI estimates ranging from twenty to thirty percent. Organizations appreciate its value through clearer asset visibility and risk mitigation without direct revenue impact.

Customer service and support of Qualys VMDR are rated positively between 6 to 9 out of 10.