8.75

{"quote":"The product is very stable, especially with the cloud version.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"It would be great if there was a smarter solution to address this issue.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Sometimes computers fail to receive patches, and we need to investigate why.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Remotely connecting to computers to address issues.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"It helps in deploying patches and software.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"ManageEngine Endpoint Central is straightforward to use and implement.","score":"9"}

Organizations previously utilized Altiris, SCCM, WSUS, Novell ZENWorks, Spiceworks, VMware, LANDesk Ivanti, GFI LanGuard, Scense, and Microsoft MBAM. Cost, features, ease of use, and better reporting were common reasons for transitioning. Some managed tasks manually or used trial versions of multiple software. ManageEngine Endpoint Central was preferred for cost-effectiveness, centralized management, and improved patching and reporting capabilities.

<p>ManageEngine Endpoint Central surpasses its competitors by offering robust endpoint management solutions with features like automated patch deployment, real-time analytics, comprehensive asset management, and remote troubleshooting, ensuring efficient IT operations and enhanced security for organizations.</p>

ManageEngine Endpoint Central is often praised for offering significant features comparable to larger competitors at a lower cost, making it an economical choice for enterprises. Pricing can vary based on the number of assets and selected editions, with additional charges for extra features or modules. While some users find licensing straightforward, others report complexity, especially with technician restrictions. Setup costs are minimal, and overall, it is viewed as a cost-effective solution compared to options like Intune or VMware.

<p>ManageEngine Endpoint Central boosts efficiency with software monitoring, automatic patch management, and robust remote maintenance. Its scalability supports growing IT demands, while inventory tracking enhances asset oversight. Although network usage monitoring is desired and the deployment scheduler needs improvement, more click-to-complete actions are also required. Stability in computer imaging is an issue, and Asset Explorer integration is recommended to improve asset management functions.</p>

<p>Deployment scheduling needs updates for various methods.</p>
<p>Proactive remediation features should be added.</p>
<p>Stability issues, particularly with massive patch deployments, need attention.</p>
<p>Java patch reporting accuracy should be improved.</p>
<p>The pricing structure requires improvement.</p>

Initial setup of ManageEngine Endpoint Central was generally simple and quick, with users finding it user-friendly and straightforward. Some noted complexity in specific areas or larger deployments, but overall, it required minimal technical support. Most users were able to deploy within a day to a couple of weeks, depending on organization size, and found it easy to customize and manage with little to no outside assistance.

Most users managed implementation in-house using existing knowledge, documentation, or active directory credentials. Deployments were straightforward, with minimal external assistance required. Challenges included managing patching and keeping repositories updated. Many found the process easy, using one-person teams even for large numbers of workstations. Some relied on professional support during setup. Organizations occasionally consulted support teams but often executed deployments independently. Maintenance levels varied, with some requiring regular attention and others being more self-sufficient.

ManageEngine Endpoint Central's customer service is praised for responsiveness and quick resolutions, although language barriers can be an issue. Many find the technical support team efficient, yet inconsistent experiences are noted, with occasional delays and reliance on tiered systems. Some users appreciate real-time chat availability, while others express dissatisfaction due to communication difficulties and documentation needing improvement. Support's ability to address feature requests and provide helpful resources is acknowledged, but technical assistance is sometimes deemed inadequate.

ManageEngine Endpoint Central significantly improved operational efficiency by automating tasks and reducing personnel needs. Organizations witnessed substantial returns within three to six months, including cost savings from retiring legacy systems and licensing. The deployment process accelerated, cutting weeks from initial timelines, and patch management improved, easing previous challenges. Though some experienced issues, overall sentiment indicates high returns through improved processes and significant cost reductions due to decreased human resource demands and remote management capabilities.

ManageEngine Endpoint Central's customer service and support is rated between 7 and 8 out of 10.

Most users are employing ManageEngine Endpoint Central in an on-premises deployment. A minor group utilizes the hybrid cloud model, and even fewer opt for public cloud.

Users report ManageEngine Endpoint Central as a highly stable platform with few issues. Many state it rarely crashes or freezes, even with large deployments. Minor bugs are promptly addressed by support. Some note occasional resource demands, but performance is generally reliable. Consistently positive feedback highlights stability, with ratings often above eight out of ten. While some experienced past hiccups, most appreciate its dependable functioning and express high satisfaction with its stability.

Users advise others to start with a demonstration and avoid Internet Explorer. They find ManageEngine Endpoint Central cost-effective and recommend trying it for 30 days. It is praised for being feature-rich and user-friendly, yet some find technical support lacking and updates monthly. Many emphasize its effectiveness for small IT departments and highlight its strengths in patch management, automation, and ease of deployment compared to competitors like Microsoft Intune. It's considered particularly beneficial for larger organizations.

Users have experience with ManageEngine Endpoint Central ranging from a few months up to thirteen years, with many utilizing it for about two to five years.

Many users believe that ManageEngine Endpoint Central should improve its software QA and testing, remote desktop capabilities, and support response times. Some express a need for better integration with other systems, more flexible reporting, and a reduction in deployment windows. Customization of dashboards, enhanced Linux support, and proactive remediation features are also desired. The licensing model and overall pricing can be more competitive, and there is room for improvement in OS deployment and patch accuracy.

<p>ManageEngine Endpoint Central enhances organizational efficiency by enabling monitoring and management of software installations and updates across desktops.</p>
<p>Patch management capabilities are highly valued for maintaining system security and software updates.</p>
<p>Remote management features allow IT staff to troubleshoot and manage systems without disrupting end-user activities.</p>
<p>The scalability of ManageEngine Endpoint Central meets the growing needs of businesses seamlessly.</p>
<p>Integration with other ManageEngine modules and capabilities for extensive asset and inventory management enhance operational continuity and oversight.</p>

ManageEngine Endpoint Central's most valuable features include patch management for OS and third-party applications, asset and inventory management, and centralized control over Windows, MacOS, and Linux. Its remote control capabilities simplify troubleshooting, while software deployment and mobile device management add significant value by allowing seamless integration and streamlined operations across an organization. The user-friendly interface and robust reporting features further enhance its utility in IT management.

Organizations primarily use ManageEngine Endpoint Central for patch management, OS deployment, remote control, and asset management. They utilize the platform for monitoring software installs, maintaining IT compliance, deploying software, managing mobile devices, and executing remote troubleshooting. It helps to centralize endpoint management, enabling consistent support across different systems and locations. Many utilize its capabilities for security policy standardization, remote access, and efficient application management across varied operating systems.

Users evaluated Microsoft SCCM, Jamf, Lansweeper, TriActive, FileWave, GFI LanGuard, Kasaya, SolarWinds, Intune, Citrix, VM Workspace ONE, TeamViewer, Sophos, and BatchPatch. Some found other options expensive or complex. Intune noted for cloud benefits but ManageEngine easier for package creation. Desktop Central considered user-friendly. Some users did not explore alternatives, opting directly for ManageEngine.

ManageEngine Endpoint Central is highly scalable, handling various user counts and deployment scenarios efficiently. Users report no significant issues regarding scalability and note seamless integration with additional applications. Scaling up is straightforward, requiring appropriate licensing and resources. It's adaptable to both on-premises and cloud environments, with consistent commendations on its scalability capabilities. Users frequently mention its capacity to manage large-scale deployments across diverse organizational structures. Scalability ratings are typically high, indicating strong user satisfaction.

ManageEngine Endpoint Central enables organizations to manage thousands of devices from a central console, automating software deployment, patch management, and asset tracking. IT departments experience improved efficiency, saving time and reducing required resources. It enhances security compliance by swiftly identifying and addressing vulnerabilities. Reports and dashboards provide detailed insights, while simplifying remote support and provisioning. Endpoint Central offers comprehensive device control and elevates operational workflow in companies, reducing labor by integrating various IT tools and functions.

Users switched to IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe for better pricing, performance, and reliability from various legacy systems.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe deployment involves certified partners for installation, configuration, and post-installation knowledge transfer, typically completed in two days.

{"quote":"I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"I advise others to thoroughly research and compare IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe with other vendors to ensure it is the best fit for their needs.","score":"9"}

Most users prefer on-premises deployment for IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe, while some opt for public or hybrid cloud models.

{"quote":"The initial setup was easy and not a big issue.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"7"}

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe enhances performance for diverse applications, supporting high IOPS across on-premises, public, and hybrid clouds.

{"quote":"I would rate the scalability a seven.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"5"}

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe support is mostly positive but has some issues with promptness, complexity, and self-resolution difficulties.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe offers easy setup and maintenance, despite potential data migration challenges with existing systems.

{"quote":"The solution's compression needs to be improved, as it's not the best.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"2"}

7.0

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe delivers speed, reliability, and scalability with streamlined management, advanced features, and high performance.

3.15

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe needs better scalability, affordability, integration, user-friendliness, security, and competitive pricing with enhanced features and support.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is highly scalable, suitable for medium to enterprise users, rated 7-10 for scalability.

Users praise IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe's performance and stability but recommend evaluating cost, features, and hybrid cloud support before purchasing.

7

{"quote":"The overall expectations were not met, making it difficult to get proper support.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"My experience with customer service, especially with the partner support, has not been good.","score":"8"}

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe pricing is competitive, lower than Dell, but OS licensing may increase initial costs.

Users have relied on IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe for storage solutions consistently, with usage spanning between three and eight years.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe offers reliable data reduction, cost-effective storage, 100% ROI potential, but has noted support challenges.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 was favored for ROI, simplicity, and performance over competitors like Pure Storage, Dell, and Huawei.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is praised for its reliability, stability, and efficiency, with minor rare challenges reported.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe boosts performance, reduces energy and space usage, and enhances efficiency in virtual and cloud environments.

{"quote":"The tool is expensive, though I do not know the specific licensing costs.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Support from the partner could also be improved as it's been difficult to get answers and the support is not of high quality.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The solution's compression needs to be improved, as it's not the best.","score":"8"}

Before IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe, various entities utilized systems like IBM V9000, A9000, EMC VMAX, IBM Storwize, DS8000, NetApp, Dell, HPE, and Hitachi. Transition to IBM FlashSystem was motivated by enhanced performance, pricing, reliability, and compression capabilities. NetApp support was considered superior. Integration involved multiple technologies, including NVMe for reduced operational costs. Decision-making relied on specifications and IBM's robust enterprise-grade infrastructure reputation.

<p>IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe pricing should be more competitive.</p><p>Replication functionality should be built directly into IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe.</p><p>IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe lacks an integrated file system, which is necessary for organizations' networks.</p><p>The process of connecting tape drives to IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is complex and requires additional equipment.</p><p>IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe compression needs improvement, and the lack of volume-based encryption is a disadvantage compared to competitors.</p>

<p>IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is valued for its high speed, reliability, and architectural advantages, enhancing performance in high-traffic environments. However, its lack of replication, file system, and volume-based encryption are drawbacks. The dependable four-year battery life contrasts with its high pricing, which limits accessibility. Improvements in compression and deduplication could boost efficiency. While beneficial for environments needing high availability, it requires additional devices for complete functionality.</p>

<p>IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe surpasses its competitors by delivering unprecedented efficiency and speed through all-NVMe architecture, offering superior storage performance, data reduction capabilities, and intelligent AI-driven management for optimized data handling and cost-effective solutions.</p>

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe offers competitive and reasonable pricing for enterprise buyers, with options ranging from mid to high-range, depending on requirements. The initial cost is often around $70,000 with additional three-year support for $25,000. It's cost-effective compared to cloud storage and other suppliers like Dell and Huawei. Licensing is usually straightforward, with basic bundles included, although additional costs may arise for extra features. The solution targets larger corporations with significant investment value.

IBM handles setup, while partners or vendors conduct enterprise implementations. Some deployments involve users themselves if they're experienced. The process requires connecting cables, configuring IPs, and setting storage settings. It usually involves two or three team members, including support executives and architects. Additionally, logical configurations need fewer people. Users note straightforward deployments with IBM's assistance but mention potential stability issues linked to specific setups. Maintenance typically involves at least one person per client.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe's initial setup is generally described as straightforward and easy, taking anywhere from a few hours to a day. Users appreciate the intuitive GUI, default settings, and clear documentation. While deployment is simple, data migration can be challenging, yet proactive maintenance features are highlighted. Ratings vary, with some considering it ideal for administrators but slightly complex for newcomers, though training improves manageability. The helpful installation wizard is also noted.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe customer service receives mixed feedback. Some report expert and responsive assistance, rating it between eight to ten out of ten. Others find the support complex and unreliable, with delays in resolving issues. Improvements have been noted, but problems like difficulty in product identification and lack of effective support during critical errors persist. Some users would like more predictable timelines for part replacements to better manage expectations.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe maintains stability during operations, upgrades, and maintenance with minimal downtime. Users note excellent reliability, praising its performance without bugs or glitches. Most users report no stability challenges except occasional data migration difficulties and isolated hardware failures. Stability is often rated highly, typically 8-10 out of 10. Users of StoreWise and FlashSystems experienced issues with snapshots, but improvements are noted. The system runs smoothly around the clock, ensuring continuous availability.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe faces challenges with high pricing, limited port options, and missing file system features. Users express a need for improved replication, security against ransomware, and better compression and deduplication. Scalability and backend connection limitations hinder upgrades. Users seek better integration with Microsoft Hyper-V and third-party products. Technical support and the GUI could be more user-friendly. Volume-based encryption and compression are lacking compared to competitors, while unified storage offerings are desired.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe's customer service and support is rated between 7 and 9 out of 10, with a majority expressing positive experiences.

Value for money is delivered, with effective control over failures enhancing peace of mind. Handling issues is challenging due to inadequate support. ROI consistently reaches a hundred percent thanks to data reduction technology. FlashSystem 9100 NVMe's compression enhances storage cost efficiency by enabling processing per disk with high-speed drives, making it cost-effective. ROI realization typically spans about three years in certain scenarios.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe offers high speed, superior performance, and reliability. Its ease of use is highlighted through straightforward administration via GUI or command-line interface. Unique FlashCore modules enhance architecture, providing robust support for handling high I/O operations. The system's maintenance cycle and ability to prevent outages due to engineered flash modules are praised. Features like HyperSwap, visualization, flash copy, and hardware compression, alongside predictive maintenance and encryption, are highly valued.

<p>IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe offers exceptional speed and steady performance, enhancing high-traffic operations.</p>

<p>Its high availability and reliability significantly improve system processes, with no reported failures in its flash modules due to unique architectural choices.</p>

<p>IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe features a predictable and reliable maintenance cycle, particularly in its flash module's four-year lifespan, contrasting with other technologies' unpredictability.</p>

<p>Snapshot capabilities are highly valued and utilized for managing storage requirements effectively.</p>

<p>Exceptional stability and performance have been proven over years, earning confidence in handling extensive I/O operations and maintaining operational consistency.</p>

Most organizations are opting for an on-premises deployment model of IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe. A minority are utilizing public or hybrid cloud models, but the predominant choice remains on-premises, highlighting its strong adoption in local settings.

Users advise others considering IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe to keep software updated for optimal use. They should carefully assess their sizing needs due to its cost. Comparing features with other options and ensuring ransomware protection is essential. IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe offers strong performance, scalability, and hybrid cloud support. However, it is recommended to evaluate its features depending on specific needs. Many suggest it as a reliable choice with high-performance capabilities.

Users have used IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe for a range of one to approximately eight years.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is used by organizations for various purposes including enterprise storage with high IOPS, hosting applications and databases, supporting core banking, and providing storage for VMware clusters. It serves industries like financial services, automotive, and retail for tasks such as virtual infrastructure and data storage in hybrid cloud environments. The system is favored for its performance, durability, and flexible deployment options across on-prem, public cloud, or hybrid setups.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is described as highly scalable by users from medium to large organizations. It supports both scale-up and scale-out options. While some note a limited number of slots, others appreciate its ability to accommodate thousands of users. Many users rate its scalability between seven to ten out of ten, highlighting its adaptability based on business needs, including storage capacity expansion and integration with different systems.

Users evaluated various storage options before choosing IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe. They tested Pure Storage, Huawei, Dell, and NetApp. Pure Storage was noted for stability; NetApp showed fluctuating performance. Dell and Huawei experienced declines during stress tests. Some highlighted IBM's reliability, high availability, security, and cloud integration. Others ranked IBM above EMC and Dell, citing advanced technology and support services. Market choices in Egypt focused on IBM and Dell due to dominant market presence.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe enhances performance with high IOPS and availability, reducing energy use by 85% and saving 80% space. It supports cloud scalability, offering three times more capacity, and cuts cloud costs by two-thirds. Users note improved data center efficiency with reduced heat and power needs. Applications in banking and virtual environments benefit from 60% faster response times. Its design minimizes repairs, increases productivity, and ensures cyber resilience.

{"quote":"There is room for improvement, especially in making it more user-friendly for newcomers or those new to AWS services.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Overall, IAM Identity Center is a great service, currently rated at nine out of ten.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"IAM Identity Center is a great service, currently rated at nine out of ten.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"I would rate the initial setup a seven, as there are repetitive tasks that need to be done if there are a lot of accounts to set up.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"5"}

{"quote":"Overall, IAM Identity Center is a great service, currently rated at nine out of ten.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

4.17

AWS IAM Identity Center setup is documentation-driven, straightforward for individuals but complex for businesses with existing systems.

{"quote":"I would like to see more flexibility in the features as sometimes it doesn't meet my expectations.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"4"}

AWS IAM Identity Center needs clearer UI, better group management, time-sensitive access control, and improved user management flexibility.

AWS IAM Identity Center scales efficiently, supporting numerous users, groups, and roles without performance issues, despite permissions management complexity.

10

AWS IAM Identity Center simplifies access management with centralized policies, templates, and role-based permissions for efficient multi-account security.

AWS IAM Identity Center centralizes identity management, integrates authentication, and manages access control across multi-account enterprise environments.

AWS IAM Identity Center is praised for simplifying permission management with pre-built policies, enhancing security, and being beginner-friendly.

AWS IAM Identity Center has been used by individuals for periods between two months and seven years.

8.5

<p>AWS IAM Identity Center allows central creation of permission templates known as permission sets, enhancing management through role-based permissions and existing templates. It ensures users have least required permissions, reducing risk of accidental deletions while offering configuration ease, especially for beginners. Duplicate names are not allowed, promoting organizational clarity. Though time-based user creation and feature flexibility are desired, IAM Identity Center remains valuable for security-conscious tech buyers seeking streamlined access control.</p>

AWS IAM Identity Center is highly reliable, boasting 99.96% uptime and consistently rated ten out of ten for stability.

AWS IAM Identity Center is praised for its affordable pricing, making it cost-effective for managing permissions and federations.

{"quote":"It can handle both a small number of users and a bigger number of users efficiently.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Scalability is really beneficial.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"I would rate it as a ten for stability.","score":"8"}