Qualys TotalCloud is highly rated for stability and reliability, ensuring smooth, consistent performance with prompt support for any issues.

{"quote":"Qualys TotalCloud scales well.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Qualys TotalCloud is very stable, and I have extensive experience with it, which has been positive.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"They recently launched a new product that captures AI aspects, but staying updated with more solutions would be beneficial.","score":"7"}

Qualys TotalCloud enhances security by streamlining risk management with automated insights, saving time and costs through integration.

{"quote":"With the growing integration of AI, I would like Qualys to enhance its service offerings to better accommodate AI-related risks.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Our partnership also provides us with additional benefits.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"Qualys TotalCloud offers good pricing that is affordable and competitive with the market.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Overall, it helps us identify and treat risks effectively.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"We can see from whom we are getting the risk and what we can do to mitigate a risk.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"We can see every detail of the risk.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The API licenses that we have are helpful in detailed risk analysis.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"TruRisk scores help us understand our security posture better.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Its dashboards are brilliant. It provides in-depth insights.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Web Application Scanning is valuable as it scans every system or application used by our employees and gives results quickly.","score":"9"}

We utilize Qualys TotalCloud for risk assessments, benefiting from features like Web Application Scanning and TruRisk scores. It significantly reduces our workload and risk level, saving 90% of our time. Improving AI-related risk management would enhance its offerings.

Many users previously used solutions like Rapid7, Nessus, Dome9 under Check Point, Zscaler, and native cloud security measures from Azure, AWS, and GCP before adopting Qualys TotalCloud. Others evaluated Prisma or utilized vulnerability management tools like Tenable, SecPoint, and Zoho ManageEngine alongside Qualys. Some chose Qualys based on familiarity or because of its comprehensive suite of modules, better extensibility, user experience, and faster deployment compared to competitors.

Deployment of Qualys TotalCloud is mostly straightforward and user-friendly, often requiring minimal maintenance. Some users faced challenges due to permissions and infrastructure setup, especially involving Azure or AWS. Larger setups took more time, sometimes involving multiple team members. In smaller environments or when admin rights were available, deployment was quicker, sometimes within days. GUI interface and clear documentation helped ease the process, with some users requiring little maintenance or support after initial setup.

Many users find Qualys TotalCloud pricing competitive and cost-effective, especially for organizations leveraging existing licenses. While some consider it expensive, others value its comprehensive functionality and licensing flexibility, which often justifies the cost. It is often integrated as part of broader enterprise solutions, aiding in managing expenses. Despite mixed perceptions on its affordability, most agree its offerings compensate for the price, making it an attractive option for enterprises seeking robust security solutions.

<p>Qualys TotalCloud's cloud licensing unit system is unclear as "units" aren't well-defined.</p><p>Qualys TotalCloud needs enhancement in scanning capabilities, specifically in resolving IPs to domain names.</p><p>The default built-in policies in Qualys TotalCloud can be misleading and should be customizable when creating dashboards.</p><p>Qualys TotalCloud could improve its patching process, as it doesn't cover prerequisites on servers or workstations, requiring reliance on SCCM for additional updates.</p><p>The support process for Qualys TotalCloud lacks efficiency and could benefit from offering instant call solutions with engineers and an improved ticketing system.</p>

Qualys TotalCloud surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive cloud security, unified visibility, and integrated compliance management, empowering businesses to efficiently safeguard their digital assets with real-time monitoring and automation capabilities, delivering unmatched protection and operational efficiency.

Qualys TotalCloud's customer service is generally rated highly, with quick response times and knowledgeable staff. Some users appreciate detailed issue resolution and proactive follow-up, while others find response delays and varying support quality frustrating. Availability and closure times can be inconsistent, affecting user satisfaction. Escalation options are available, and technical support is praised for its expertise. Service has improved over the years, though back-end consultations occasionally lead to delays. Customization assistance is well-received.

Several users successfully implemented Qualys TotalCloud internally, relying on senior team members and minimal external support. While some utilized three to six team members, it often required fewer for small-scale deployments. Many found the platform’s clear instructions facilitated easy implementation, although using a consultant could expedite the process for newcomers. Technical Account Managers assisted with resources and issue resolution. Maintenance was largely unneeded post-deployment, emphasizing Qualys’ efficient setup capabilities.

Qualys TotalCloud customer service and support is frequently rated positively, with a score ranging from 3.5 to 4.5 out of 5.

Qualys TotalCloud has enabled users to save significant time and resources, equating to the work typically done by several personnel. Its capability to remediate vulnerabilities before issues arise and the generation of daily reports have enhanced efficiency by over 50%. Users report a 40% reduction in both resources and time. Financial teams manage cost specifics, but indications point to beneficial ROI, with estimated savings of twenty to forty percent in expenses.

Most entities use Microsoft Azure for Qualys TotalCloud. A few utilize other providers, but no significant cloud platforms dominate aside from Azure.

The deployment models for Qualys TotalCloud are diverse. Users predominantly utilize Public Cloud and Hybrid Cloud, with several mentions for On-premises. Public Cloud is mentioned as often as Hybrid Cloud, indicating equal preference among users. Private Cloud is also referenced, though less frequently. This variety showcases flexibility in implementation across different environments.

<p>Qualys TotalCloud offers extensive vulnerability management, providing a clear understanding of security weaknesses. Features like FlexScan enhance security management for internet-facing VMs. The platform integrates seamlessly with IaaS and SaaS environments, delivering rapid benefits within 24 to 48 hours. Users praise its comprehensive features, though improvements in support services, clearer cloud licensing, and expanded tool integration for risk assessment are needed. The cost remains high and policy compliance requires streamlining.</p>

Users advise others to leverage trusted partners and Qualys Technical Account Managers when implementing Qualys TotalCloud. They recommend thorough understanding of cloud APIs and reading Qualys' comprehensive documentation. Frequent communication with Qualys support and community is encouraged. Familiarity with the platform's numerous features is essential, and asset management is crucial for effective utilization. Users praise Qualys TotalCloud's stability, scalability, and lack of maintenance requirements, acknowledging its commitment to continuous improvement and vulnerability management across diverse platforms.

Qualys TotalCloud is praised for its stability, often rated eight to ten out of ten. Users report it as extremely stable, with no major issues such as crashes or downtime. Occasional lag or minor bugs like report download errors are quickly resolved by support. Monitoring ensures reliability and security. It offers 99.9% uptime, making it a strong choice for users seeking a stable cloud experience, as it performs well consistently without significant issues.

Organizations favored Fortinet FortiClient for its flexibility, efficiency, cost reduction, and robust network security over other solutions.

<p>Qualys TotalCloud provides real-time protection and efficient vulnerability management with options for automated and custom remediation.</p>
<p>The platform enhances security postures by integrating with both IaaS and SaaS, making it cloud-native.</p>
<p>FlexScan, a feature designed for internet-facing VMs, automates data collection and scanning with minimal intervention, simplifying vulnerability management.</p>
<p>It offers a single, prioritized view of risks, vulnerabilities, and security postures, valuable for efficient risk management and leadership meetings.</p>
<p>Qualys TotalCloud includes a comprehensive suite of security features such as CSPM, Kubernetes, and container security, improving infrastructure security and compliance.</p>

Users have been utilizing Qualys TotalCloud for a timeframe ranging from two months to four years.

Fortinet FortiClient deployment varied in complexity and duration, with many teams managing installations internally, utilizing advanced skills.

Qualys TotalCloud requires improvements in cloud licensing clarity and IP scanning capabilities. Enhancing policy compliance features, such as disabling default policies and scheduled reporting, would be beneficial. Users seek Windows OS support for container security and better integration with on-premises systems. The user interface could be simplified, and vulnerability scanning for PaaS environments needs enhancement. Support services and cost competitiveness also need attention. Broader geographic compliance coverage and addressing AI-related risks would further enhance its offerings.

Qualys TotalCloud's most valuable features include automatic inventory detection, vulnerability management, real-time protection, dashboard visualization, daily reporting, extensibility, CSPM, FlexScan, IoT scanning, API integration, centralized platform management, security posture assessment, TruRisk insights, web application scanning, seamless integration, agent versatility, and automation. It provides comprehensive asset visibility, advanced risk analysis, streamlined patching, and remediation. Users find its user-friendly interface, powerful controls, and enhanced compliance capabilities particularly beneficial for efficient cloud security management.

Qualys TotalCloud effectively scales for businesses regardless of size, with most users rating its scalability between eight and ten out of ten. Organizations of various scales, from small teams to global enterprises with extensive deployments, report seamless adaptability and growth. Many have expanded their user base, locations, and managed assets without facing scalability issues, while some praise its capacity to handle thousands of web applications and increased cloud instance deployments effortlessly.

Organizations primarily use Qualys TotalCloud for cloud security and management across platforms like Azure, AWS, and GCP. It enhances vulnerability management, compliance, and security posture through automated workflows, tagging, and remedial actions. Features include Cloud Security Posture Management and vulnerability assessments to secure cloud and on-premises infrastructures, containers, and workloads, offering insights into security compliance and helping prioritize risk mitigation. Qualys eliminates the need for physical resources, utilizing cloud-based architecture for streamlined operations.

Microsoft Azure and Other are the top choices for Fortinet FortiClient users, with AWS being less popular.

Most users favor On-premises Fortinet FortiClient deployment, though Hybrid, Private, and Public Cloud options cater to different preferences.

7.375

Fortinet FortiClient is user-friendly and quick to deploy, though complexities may arise in large-scale or remote setups.

Qualys TotalCloud helps organizations identify vulnerabilities, guide remediation, and enhance security posture. It offers unified threat assessment for IaaS and SaaS, provides written remediation guidance, and leverages TruRisk for risk prioritization. Organizations save time and costs with centralized risk management, comprehensive reporting, and automated scans. Improved visibility and compliance rate, integration with tools like Power BI and ServiceNow. Regular updates improve functionality and offer a holistic view, leading to reduced vulnerabilities and improved security.

Fortinet FortiClient support receives mixed reviews, praised for helpful service but criticized for delays and competence issues.

{"quote":"Licensing costs are mid-range for us, considered as five on a ten-point scale.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"6"}

{"quote":"Scalability is rated as ten. We can add more licenses and Fortinet tokens, demonstrating excellent scalability.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"Regarding stability, I give it a rating of ten out of ten for our setup.","quality_score":"5","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"Sometimes users stay on the old version of FortiClient.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"3"}

{"quote":"I recommend FortiClient for all sizes of companies due to its cost-effectiveness, scalability, and reliability.","score":"9"}

Fortinet FortiClient is used for VPN connections, endpoint protection, seamless firewall integration, and safeguarding against cyber threats.

Fortinet FortiClient provides affordable, user-friendly security with VPN, antivirus, and seamless FortiGate integration, ideal for endpoint management.

Fortinet FortiClient is scalable and adaptable for varying company sizes, with straightforward licensing and generally smooth implementation experiences.

10

Fortinet FortiClient is recommended for its cost-effective VPN and endpoint protection but requires planning and consideration of limitations.

Users preferred Fortinet over Sophos, appreciated Intercept X's cloud control, and compared Palo Alto and Cisco for advanced features and VPNs.

Fortinet FortiClient needs better management, UI, integration, VPN stability, pricing, reporting, AI features, support, and endpoint security.

Fortinet FortiClient offers virus protection, secure access, and enhanced security, enabling remote work with stable performance and user-friendly interface.

10

{"quote":"Sometimes, they respond quickly, but there are delays depending on the priority we choose when contacting technical support.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Technical support can be logged on Fortinet's support portal.","score":"8"}

Fortinet FortiClient offers competitive pricing and value, with costs ranging from $1,500 to $3,000 for comprehensive features.

Users have interacted with Fortinet FortiClient for varying durations, from a few months to over ten years.

Fortinet FortiClient increased productivity and ROI with enhanced security and centralized control but faced implementation and pricing challenges.

{"quote":"We can add more licenses and Fortinet tokens, demonstrating excellent scalability.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Scalability is rated as ten.","score":"7"}

Fortinet FortiClient is highly stable and reliable, with minor bugs and connectivity issues rarely reported and often resolved.

{"quote":"Licensing costs are mid-range for us, considered as five on a ten-point scale.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"FortiClient is cost-effective since the client itself is free with the purchase of Fortinet.","score":"9"}

Organizations previously utilized Cisco, Microsoft RAS, AnyConnect, Symantec Endpoint Protection, ESET, Cisco, Sophos, Palo Alto, Malwarebytes, Trend Micro, McAfee, Kaspersky, Sophos Intercept X, OpenVPN, ISA Server 2006, Pulse VPN, Check Point, Ivanti, SonicWall, CrowdStrike, Windows Defender, WatchGuard, and Windows Defender. They transitioned to Fortinet FortiClient due to hardware upgrades, ease of use, flexibility, cost benefits, support, enhanced features, and integration with existing Fortinet infrastructure.

{"quote":"We appreciate its VPN capabilities and the features that offer extra security functionalities like antivirus and malware scanning.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"A valuable feature of FortiClient is that we can connect from anywhere if we have Fortinet access.","score":"9"}

We use FortiClient primarily for VPN, enjoying its robust security features like antivirus and malware scanning. However, compatibility issues with older versions can be challenging. We have tried other solutions like Cisco for VPN but prefer FortiClient's security capabilities.

<p>Fortinet FortiClient integrates strongly with various platforms, offering robust VPN for secure remote access, enhancing security. Installation is straightforward for large enterprises. Despite an excellent return on investment, some users report complex setup, compatibility issues, and expensive licensing. Support experiences are mixed with slow response times. While lacking AI features, Fortinet FortiClient efficiently meets enterprise demands but may require technical adjustments for optimal performance.</p>

<p>Fortinet FortiClient surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration with Fortinet's suite, strong threat detection, and a user-friendly interface that enhances network security while facilitating efficient endpoint management and VPN capabilities.</p>

Fortinet FortiClient offers flexible pricing, with a free version available, particularly for basic VPN services. For enhanced features like endpoint protection and network control, licensing costs can range from $500 yearly for a 25-user pack to several thousand dollars based on specific needs. Enterprise users find the pricing competitive compared to solutions like Cisco, often benefiting from bundled offers with FortiGate. Pricing is generally reasonable but perceived as costly by some, especially after recent increases.

<p>Fortinet FortiClient needs more next-generation features like AI and machine learning.</p><p>Pricing and licensing of Fortinet FortiClient require improvement.</p><p>Technical support quality and response time for Fortinet is lacking.</p><p>Compatibility with different versions and platforms, including macOS, is problematic for Fortinet FortiClient.</p><p>Fortinet FortiClient can enhance features such as endpoint detection and patch management.</p>

Many users handle Fortinet FortiClient deployment themselves, with internal teams managing the process. Some engage resellers or consultants for assistance. The complexity varies, with some finding it straightforward, while others describe it as intricate, requiring expert help from Fortinet support. Usually, one engineer can manage deployment and maintenance, although some teams involve multiple members. Configurations might involve advanced steps to ensure security and segregation, sometimes extending the process to two weeks.

Users found Fortinet FortiClient's initial setup mostly straightforward and easy, often completing it in under 30 minutes. While some experienced complexities, they note it's simpler than competitors. Deployment strategies varied, with manual installations for larger organizations. The software offers user-friendly features, not requiring specialized technical skills. Maintenance is minimal, sometimes supported by a few staff. Initial setup challenges included individual device installations and proxy configurations, but users appreciated the accessible documentation and resources.

Fortinet FortiClient's customer service and support receive mixed reports. Some find it helpful, responsive, and knowledgeable, with fast response times and quality assistance. Others experience delays, slow responses, and difficulties in escalating issues. Support quality varies, often depending on the support package purchased. Issues with response times and the complexity of reaching higher-level support are highlighted, indicating that improvements may be necessary to meet customer expectations consistently.

Fortinet FortiClient receives a customer service and support rating between 9 and 10 out of 10 based on positive feedback.

Fortinet FortiClient helped increase staff productivity by around 15% and had a reasonable return on investment due to its low cost and effective functionality. Users benefited from increased security, centralized management, and enhanced telecommunication capabilities. It enabled successful work-from-home setups, reducing reliance on office resources. Challenges included underutilization due to incomplete setup and difficulty in implementation, preventing some users from maximizing their investment. Despite some issues, the ROI was rated reasonably well by those integrating it thoroughly.

Most individuals utilize Microsoft Azure for Fortinet FortiClient, with several opting for Other providers, while a smaller portion favor Amazon Web Services (AWS).

On-premises deployment is predominant among users of Fortinet FortiClient, chosen by most. Hybrid Cloud is used by some entities. Public Cloud and Private Cloud options are less common but present. Organizations often prefer traditional setups over newer technologies. Public Cloud use appears steadily across multiple entities, indicating growing interest. But the majority still rely on in-house systems, reflecting the focus on maintaining control with substantial presence in private setups.

Users advise others considering Fortinet FortiClient to maximize endpoint functionality and ensure proper planning before deployment. Opinions vary, with many appreciating its security and recommending it as a cost-effective tool. Common suggestions include reading instructions and standardizing environments for the best use. Some highlight the need for improvements in stability and pricing structure. Fortinet's integration with other products and its EPP and EDR coexistence are viewed positively. Performance issues and user feedback can influence long-term adoption.

Fortinet FortiClient is highly stable with consistent performance. Users experience minimal issues, typically related to rare disconnections or VPN instability due to network disruptions. Most users rate its stability between eight and ten out of ten, reporting no bugs, glitches, crashes, or freezes. While stability concerns occasionally arise, especially with certain versions or specific environments, these are not widespread. Fortinet FortiClient is reliable, protecting networks effectively with satisfactory uptime and performance.

<p>Fortinet FortiClient offers robust security features including advanced malware protection, web filtering, and application firewall capabilities.</p>

<p>Users appreciate the VPN capabilities of Fortinet FortiClient, finding it especially valuable for secure and reliable remote connectivity.</p>

<p>Fortinet FortiClient integrates well with other Fortinet products, enhancing network security and management through its seamless connectivity with FortiGate and FortiAnalyzer.</p>

<p>The scalability of Fortinet FortiClient is highly rated, with its ability to accommodate an increasing number of users efficiently without performance loss.</p>

<p>Fortinet FortiClient is recognized for its excellent return on investment due to its low cost and effective functionality.</p>

Fortinet FortiClient needs improvements in management for easier configuration and better compatibility between versions, especially for upgrades. Next-generation features and multi-factor authentication options are requested. Users experience connectivity and stability issues, including slow connections and VPN errors. Pricing and support quality are areas of concern. Enhancements in the user interface, deployment in various environments, and integration with other tools are needed. Memory capacity in low-end firewalls and advanced reporting and antivirus features should be improved.

Usage of Fortinet FortiClient ranges from a few months to over ten years.

Fortinet FortiClient's most valuable features include VPN capabilities, robust antivirus protection, and seamless integration with FortiGate for centralized management. It supports Active Directory, offering easy deployment and configuration. Its web filtering enhances internet safety, and the EMS server provides centralized control. It is user-friendly, stable, and performs vulnerability scanning. Additionally, it offers two-factor authentication and ensures secure remote access, fitting well within budget constraints and providing high security in a single package.

Organizations primarily utilize Fortinet FortiClient for VPN access, enabling secure remote connections to company networks. It is also employed for endpoint protection, including antivirus and anti-malware functions. Fortinet FortiClient supports remote work by providing secure connectivity to internal resources and protecting devices from cyber threats. Many opt for its integration with existing Fortinet firewalls, facilitating easy deployment. Some report occasional connectivity issues, but it remains a popular choice for secure access and endpoint security.

Fortinet FortiClient enhances security with virus protection, secure remote access, and manages internet usage effectively. Users experience flexibility working remotely, especially during COVID, with improved organizational functionality. Provides useful incident logs and supports IoT device management. Criticized for VPN instability under poor network conditions but praised for integration with FortiGate Firewall, ensuring control over user policies. Transition from free to EMS server version proves beneficial, aiding efficient resource access and network connectivity.

Fortinet FortiClient is generally considered highly scalable, accommodating significant user expansion. Many users report ease in adding users, though scalability can depend on licensing and infrastructure. Some reviewers note it supports thousands of users seamlessly, while others highlight licensing as a bottleneck. Despite occasional performance challenges, Fortinet FortiClient efficiently integrates into various IT environments. Its user-friendliness and capacity to handle substantial growth make it suitable for diverse business sizes, offering robust scalability.

Users evaluated Symantec, ESET, FortiGate, Meraki, Cisco, OpenVPN, Sophos, Intercept X, ZTNA Zero-Trust Network Access, Microsoft, Check Point, Palo Alto, CrowdStrike, and Cyberoam alongside Fortinet FortiClient. Intercept X's cloud management and Sophos's cloud console stood out, although FortiGate's existing deployment influenced decisions. Fortinet was praised for its user experience and cost efficiency. Comparisons with Palo Alto highlighted its advanced features. Cisco was frequently mentioned, but Fortinet's compatibility and simplicity were noted.

Users chose Salesforce for flexibility and control despite evaluating alternatives and noting integration and customization limitations.

Users considered RightNow Technologies, Oracle CRM, Sage CRM, Microsoft Dynamics, HubSpot, Zoho CRM, Goldmine, SEIBEL, Symantec Compass, ServiceNow, Appian, Pega, Odoo, and others before selecting Salesforce Platform. Some explored building in-house systems. Microsoft Dynamics was noted for integration with existing tools. HubSpot offered comparable features but Salesforce provided superior control. Odoo required more customization than Salesforce. Excel sheets were also used before switching to Salesforce for its enhanced capabilities.

Users preferred Palo Alto Networks for performance and ease despite higher costs, over Fortinet, Cisco, and Check Point.

Users considered Check Point, Fortinet, and Cisco alongside Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. Many evaluated other options like Juniper, Dell EMC SonicWall, and Sophos. Despite Cisco's technical support, they found Palo Alto more manageable and intuitive. Fortinet was noted for cost-effectiveness, but Palo Alto's superior performance and user-friendly interface were decisive factors. Most favored Palo Alto for its enhanced security, centralized management, and comprehensive features, which led to its choice over alternatives.

Users favored Sophos XGS for ease, affordability, and features, while others preferred Fortinet and Palo Alto for performance.

Users explored Fortinet, Cisco, Palo Alto, SonicWall, and WatchGuard FortiGate offers too many options while Palo Alto's robustness suits larger companies Some preferred Sophos XGS for its user-friendly interface integration reporting cost-effectiveness Small to medium businesses found it fitting Sangfor, Meraki, CheckPoint Mikrotik, and Microfsoft mentioned in comparisons Decision factors included pricing support security values company size and application needs