Qualys CSAM enhances security by managing assets, detecting vulnerabilities, ensuring compliance, and minimizing risk through comprehensive visibility.

{"quote":"We anticipate updates that will address these issues and optimize our use of the service.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"Enhanced functionality in these areas would increase the service's effectiveness and efficiency.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The Qualys CAPS service requires further exploration and improvement, particularly in its handling of protocols and reactivity with MAC and IP addresses for CAP agents.","score":"8"}

Opting for "Other" cloud providers for CSAM shows varied strategies in managing cybersecurity across different cloud platforms.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is highly rated for its scalability, effectively managing diverse environments and large asset quantities.

{"quote":"Our Technical Account Manager is very responsive and helpful in addressing any concerns that arise.","score":"8"}

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides comprehensive features for asset visibility, risk mitigation efficiency, and advanced integration capabilities.

{"quote":"We receive excellent support from Qualys.","score":"9"}

Utilize Qualys CSAM for comprehensive asset management, training, seamless inventory management, integration, automation, and enhanced asset visibility.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management needs improved CMDB support, interface simplicity, reporting, integration, efficiency, and learning materials for enhanced usability.

Qualys CSAM improved security by automating processes, enhancing visibility, and providing insights for efficient risk mitigation and remediation.

<p>Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management (CSAM) offers advanced end-of-life features for enhanced security, efficient asset tagging, and robust tracking using cloud agents. It ensures real-time visibility across environments and identifies policy gaps. While improvement is needed for CPU consumption, export functionalities, and scan frequency control, CSAM is exploring cost-effective measures and better integration with other agents. These comprehensive capabilities bolster asset security and streamline management processes.</p>

{"quote":"Seamlessly integrating new features as we have expanded from a few licenses to a much larger deployment.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management has proven to be a highly scalable solution for us over the past couple of years.","score":"9"}

Users have employed Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management for varying durations, spanning between one and nearly seven years.

{"quote":"The Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management pricing is well-aligned with our usage.","score":"9"}

Qualys CSAM boosts ROI with automation, cutting costs, reducing incidents, and driving business growth and contract acquisition.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is mostly stable with minor syncing issues, appreciated for updates, performance, and data management.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers transparent pricing perceived as cost-effective by large enterprises but expensive for smaller ones.

{"quote":"The tool's code aids in risk identification and mitigation.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The most valuable feature is the Management sensor, which helps identify gaps in policy agent availability, thereby improving agent utilization.","score":"10"}

We primarily use Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management for asset inventory and software library checks. The Management sensor's capability to identify policy gaps is invaluable. Improvements are needed in CAPS service protocols and agent reactivity for better functionality.

Prior to Qualys CSAM, they utilized solutions such as Tenable Nessus, Rapid7, Greenbone, Manage Engine, and BMC ADDM, facing limitations like inadequate monitoring, high CPU usage, and insufficient comprehensive management. Qualys offered enhanced user experience, vulnerability prioritization, asset tagging, and better security compliance. Its integrated features, ease of use, cloud infrastructure visibility, and robust support systems were key factors for their transition, outshining prior tools in usability and functionality.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management (CSAM) surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive asset visibility, real-time threat detection, and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure, ensuring robust, scalable, and efficient asset management for enhanced cybersecurity posture.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is perceived as both costly and competitively priced, depending on the organization size and needs. While some view it as expensive, especially as an add-on to VMDR, others appreciate its transparency and fair value. Larger enterprises with over 4,000 assets find the pricing suitable, whereas smaller organizations might find it less so. Flexible pricing options offer good value, with annual and monthly subscriptions available. Bundling with other services enhances its appeal.

<p>Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management could be more cost-effective by offering a lower price point or integrating with existing VMDR features.</p><p>The ability to filter which vulnerabilities and assets to export is lacking.</p><p>Improvements in the EASM module's scan frequency and reconfiguration options are necessary.</p><p>There are challenges in syncing with cloud devices during reporting.</p><p>Research and development are needed to enhance integration with other cloud agents and products, especially improving communication with external products and vendors.</p>

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management's support is praised for promptness and efficiency, especially with complex issues. Their technical team displays expertise and a willingness to help. Users benefit from quick responses, effective resolutions, and access to forums and documentation. While some experience delays due to multiple team redirections, technical account managers are commended for their responsiveness. Feedback mechanisms enhance interactions, contributing to an overall positive service experience with support rated highly by users.

Users found Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management's initial setup straightforward, especially when transitioning from VMDR. Existing VMDR users experienced minimal delays, while new implementations depended on team expertise. The process involved cloud agents and network teams, with Qualys handling maintenance. Documentation was crucial in addressing queries. Some experienced challenges with asset representation, but they appreciated the ease of installation and integration with VMDR. The transition to cloud was generally smooth, aided by timely support and informative resources.

Users predominantly choose other providers for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management. Some favor alternative options beyond public, private, or hybrid clouds. Their selection suggests a diverse approach, perhaps seeking unique features that these alternatives offer.

Deployment of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involved varying team sizes, with some instances requiring only one or two people, while others engaged up to ten members. Teams frequently collaborated with Qualys for configuration and integration support. Maintenance typically focuses on manual software tagging, handling whether certain applications remain approved.

Many users implement Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management via Public Cloud and Hybrid Cloud options. The Public Cloud option emerges as the most popular choice among users, followed by Hybrid Cloud deployments. A minority prefer utilizing On-premises infrastructure.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is praised for its reliability with occasional synchronization hiccups after updates and infrequent query crashes. Many assign stability ratings between seven and nine out of ten, noting smooth operations even under large data loads. A few report slowness or disconnections, possibly due to network factors. Numerous users find the platform's consistent performance noteworthy, often receiving timely updates and notifications about enhancements and any potential downtimes.

<p>Qualys CSAM offers features like end-of-life and end-of-service tracking, which enhance asset lifecycle management.</p>

<p>Dynamic tagging capabilities in Qualys CSAM allow for automated categorization and reduced manual effort.</p>

<p>Asset discovery through cloud agent or IP-based scanning is highly valued for effectively identifying organizational assets.</p>

<p>Comprehensive visibility into both hardware and software assets helps organizations maintain an up-to-date inventory.</p>

<p>Qualys CSAM provides critical application vulnerability insights, enabling prioritized remediation and enhanced security measures.</p>

Users advise others to utilize Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management (CSAM) for its comprehensive asset visibility and integration capabilities. They suggest taking advantage of its training program to navigate its complexity. They recommend leveraging dynamic tagging and API automation to enhance efficiency. New users should explore internal and external asset management for a holistic approach. They highlight CSAM's ongoing updates, stability, and scalability, emphasizing the importance of internal and external visibility and integration with tools like ServiceNow for improved results.

Organizations experienced a substantial ROI from Qualys CSAM, observing approximately 95% returns. Labor costs reduced by $109,000 annually and it saved around 45% of time. Costs decreased by 35% and new contracts added $99,000. Security incidents reduced, improving business growth by 150%. Qualys CSAM provided clarity on security infrastructure, improved efficiency in vulnerability management, and decreased resource needs through automation.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management (CSAM)'s customer service and support generally receive ratings ranging from 8 to 10 out of 10.

Organizations utilize Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management for managing technical debt, improving asset tracking, and ensuring security posture. It identifies end-of-life software, zero-day vulnerabilities, and unauthorized software while providing detailed asset information. CSAM enhances visibility across endpoints, supports license management, and ensures compliance. By offering insights into network assets and vulnerabilities, it helps optimize patch management, reduces security risks, and enhances cyber defenses, thereby safeguarding digital assets and maintaining compliance with industry standards.

Qualys CSAM requires improvements in pricing, CMDB integration beyond ServiceNow, scan frequency configuration, report customization, efficient resource usage, and integration with other platforms. Users desire a simplified interface, enhanced asset tagging, and more intuitive customization. Reporting and export functionality need flexibility, while the system should manage cloud asset updates better. Dynamic tagging, comprehensive software mapping, and expanded learning resources are needed. Additionally, faster response times and improved vulnerability context would benefit users significantly.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers valuable features such as real-time visibility into assets, end-of-life software insights, dynamic tagging, inventory management through cloud agents, and external attack surface management. It excels in asset discovery, vulnerability identification, and policy enforcement while providing integration with CMDB. Its management capabilities include discovering unmanaged assets and purging outdated servers. Users appreciate Qualys CSAM for its automated risk identification and efficient remediation capabilities, providing a comprehensive overview of cybersecurity posture.

Users have utilized Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management (CSAM) for a range from one to almost seven years.

Organizations benefit from Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management by enhancing asset visibility, identifying unknown external assets, and improving risk prioritization. Cloud agents provide real-time network detection, helping manage vulnerabilities. Qualys saves time through automation, reduces manual effort, and aids in asset lifecycle management. TruRisk Scoring aids in focusing on critical issues. Asset Purge Rule and dynamic tagging streamline processes. Integration with tools like ServiceNow eases vulnerability tracking, improving security posture and reducing time from discovery to remediation.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management efficiently handles scalability, catering to environments from hundreds to thousands of endpoints. Users report successful deployment in various countries with different infrastructure sizes, ranging from multiple locations to vast asset management globally. It is highly rated for its capacity to manage extensive data and integrate seamlessly as businesses expand. Users consistently rate its scalability as exceptional, emphasizing its adaptability across diverse organizations.

Users favored Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for its user interface, simplicity, pricing, and strong security over other alternatives.

Users evaluated alternatives like Cisco, Palo Alto, Juniper, Sophos, SonicWall, Silver Peak, WatchGuard, Aruba Cloud, pfSense, D-Link, Barracuda, Microsoft Azure. They noted Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for user-friendly GUI, competitive pricing, sandbox features, cybersecurity protection. Cisco offers strong networking but lacks security; Palo Alto is costly. Sophos is integrated for small to midsize. Ease of use and support favor Fortinet over competitors. Pricing and technical support were key factors in their decision.

Users favored JMeter for its cost-effectiveness, open-source nature, and ease of use over pricier alternatives.

Users considered NeoLoad and LoadRunner for their features but faced licensing costs. BlazeMeter offered bandwidth options. Alternatives like Silk Impact, SmartBear, Micro Focus, and Postman were explored for functionalities not in JMeter. Some preferred JMeter for its cost-effectiveness as an open-source option despite LoadRunner's reporting capabilities. In Canada, JMeter's popularity grew due to its affordability. Users recognized NeoLoad's advantages but noted its higher cost and resource challenges.

Wiz was preferred for its user-friendly interface, effective risk prioritization, and single pane of glass approach.

Users explored alternatives like Aqua Cloud Security Posture Management, Prisma Cloud, Orca Security, Ermetic, Rapid7, Cisco, Datadog Security, Lacework, and Tenable. Wiz was favored for its user-friendliness and effective risk prioritization. It excelled in providing contextual insights and a unified dashboard, unlike others that were costly or lacked in ease of use and automation capabilities. Organizations appreciated Wiz's straightforward interface and commitment to development, making it preferable over previous solutions.

<p>LiveWire surpasses its competitors by offering a seamless user interface, cutting-edge technology, and exceptional performance, ensuring unmatched efficiency and enhanced user experiences that set it apart in the tech world.</p>

<p>LiveWire significantly improves application development with its dynamic components and real-time updates, providing a seamless experience for developers aiming to increase efficiency and productivity.</p><p>LiveWire modernizes web development by enabling developers to create interactive applications without extensive JavaScript knowledge. Its real-time DOM updates and intuitive API allow a more streamlined software creation process. Growth opportunities could include enhancing performance optimization and expanding cross-platform support, making it even more appealing for developers seeking comprehensive solutions.</p><strong>What are the standout features of LiveWire?</strong><ul>
<li>Real-Time DOM Updates: Ensures immediate reflection of changes without refreshing the page.</li>
<li>Component-Based Structure: Offers a modular approach to development, improving code organization and reusability.</li>
<li>Intuitive API: Simplifies complex tasks, reducing the learning curve for developers.</li>
</ul><strong>What benefits should users evaluate in reviews?</strong><ul>
<li>Efficiency in Development: Saves time by minimizing the need for JavaScript expertise.</li>
<li>Reduced Complexity: Streamlines workflows, allowing faster delivery of applications.</li>
<li>Enhanced User Experience: Feeds improved interactivity into apps without sacrificing performance.</li>
</ul><p>Industries implementing LiveWire include e-commerce for dynamic inventory updates, education platforms for interactive learning modules, and healthcare applications requiring real-time data input. By leveraging its features, sectors can maintain competitiveness through improved system responsiveness and user engagement.</p>

LiveWire delivers real-time communication tools, valuable for teams needing instant messaging and collaboration. Key features include speed and ease of use. Some users suggest enhancements in customization options and integration capabilities to suit diverse business requirements.

Before SAP HCM, organizations used platforms like Oracle and Workday, transitioning for better integration and centralized solutions.

Organizations use consultants for SAP HCM deployment, with varying team sizes and timelines depending on company needs and preferences.

Many prefer On-premises for SAP HCM, with Public Cloud less popular, and Private and Hybrid Cloud least adopted.

{"quote":"SAP HCM is costly compared to other ERPs like Microsoft Dynamics or Oracle, and I would rate the cost as one out of ten.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"3"}

{"quote":"Technical support from SAP is very good, and I would rate it nine out of ten.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"8"}

{"quote":"Scalability is excellent, and I would rate it ten out of ten.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"I would rate the stability of SAP HCM as seven out of ten.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"6"}

SAP HCM setup complexity varies; deployment duration and customization depend on company needs, with SuccessFactors offering quicker implementation.

SAP HCM support is helpful but often slow, with varied response times and mixed satisfaction based on task complexity.

{"quote":"Small and medium enterprises may benefit from other flexible, user-friendly solutions like Oracle PeopleSoft.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"For small industries, it may not be suitable due to its high cost and complexity.","score":"8"}

SAP HCM streamlines HR management with payroll, talent management, and integration capabilities, supporting on-premises and hybrid cloud models.

{"quote":"SAP HCM is costly compared to other ERPs like Microsoft Dynamics or Oracle, and I would rate the cost as one out of ten.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"1"}

SAP HCM is scalable for global enterprises, efficiently handling diverse operations and adaptable to various organizational sizes.

5.65

{"quote":"Scalability is excellent, and I would rate it ten out of ten.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"10"}

7

SAP HCM enhances productivity with global payroll solutions, HR integration, and seamless SAP SuccessFactors performance management.

Select the right partners, plan integration, minimize customization, and ensure staff training for effective SAP HCM implementation.

3.15

9.0

SAP HCM struggles with outdated UI, integration issues, high costs, limited configurability, and lacking talent management, usability, and support.

SAP HCM boosts ROI by optimizing resources and aligning business processes, offering insights and reducing manual effort.

SAP HCM is costly yet valued for features; pricing varies by region and users, with extra costs for customization.

SAP HCM users have varying experience levels, ranging from beginner to experienced professionals with up to 23 years of use.

7.5

10

SAP HCM is praised for stability and reliability, particularly in cloud versions, despite occasional on-premises challenges.

Users favored SuccessFactors for flexibility, Oracle for cost-effectiveness, with interest in Odoo, despite SAP HCM integration issues.

SAP HCM streamlines HR processes, enhances productivity, supports compliance, and integrates systems for efficient payroll and data management.

{"quote":"Technical support from SAP is very good, and I would rate it nine out of ten.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"So far, the setup has been good across various modules.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"I would rate the stability of SAP HCM as seven out of ten.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"SAP HCM is costly compared to other ERPs like Microsoft Dynamics or Oracle, and I would rate the cost as one out of ten.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Documentation should be more readily accessible.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The UI could be more user-friendly.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"SAP HCM needs to be more customizable to fit unique organizational processes.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The integration provided by SAP between different modules is very good.","score":"8"}

We utilize SAP HCM for managing employee data within HR, apart from performance and goal management. Its integration across modules is excellent, but it could be more customizable and user-friendly. Documentation needs improvement. We briefly considered Oracle PeopleSoft as well.

Individuals previously utilized diverse platforms such as PeopleSoft, Oracle, Resourcelink, Agresso, SuccessFactors, Workday, and Oracle TIN before employing SAP HCM. Some made the transition to consolidate disparate systems into a unified global framework and address integration issues. Others highlighted Workday and SuccessFactors for specific functionalities, while some maintained manual operations initially. Financial constraints prompted some to consider local alternatives. Occasional transitions aimed for efficiency enhancements in HR management.

<p>SAP HCM surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive HR solutions with robust talent management, advanced payroll processing, and seamless integration capabilities, delivering enhanced efficiency and transformational workforce management for organizations across diverse industries.</p>

SAP HCM pricing is complex and varies significantly based on region, organization size, and specific needs. While considered expensive, especially for small to mid-sized businesses, larger enterprises often find the cost justified due to its robust features and customization options. Licensing structures differ from client to client, often requiring negotiation. Costs include annual or monthly licenses with potential hidden fees for maintenance and support. Comparatively, it's generally higher priced than alternatives like Oracle or Odoo.

<p>System usability is a challenge due to its non-intuitive nature and requires extensive end user training.</p><p>On the personnel administration side, performing custom development is challenging.</p><p>Implementing SAP HCM can be difficult and should be made more user-friendly and configurable.</p><p>Managing changes in applications can complicate testing and lead to longer testing phases, reducing time for productive work.</p><p>SAP HCM is hard to integrate with other third-party applications, and issues arise in payroll management when changing payroll areas within the same month.</p>

<p>SAP HCM provides comprehensive employee data management from hiring to retirement with tools for payroll, time management, and talent management. Integration across modules enhances functionality, supporting personnel administration and payroll. It is scalable for large and smaller companies but requires significant user training. There are challenges in custom development and third-party integration, especially with SAP SuccessFactors, and difficulties adapting to regulatory changes. Custom reporting aids decision-making and compliance management.</p>

The SAP HCM implementation often involves external consultants and partners due to its complexity. The deployment size dictates the number of engineers needed. Typical teams consist of functional and technical experts, project managers, and testers, ranging from six to twelve members. Factors such as company size, the number of modules, and geographical distribution influence the process. Deployment time varies based on organizational preferences for speed and thoroughness.

Opinions on SAP HCM's initial setup are varied, with some finding it straightforward, while others describe it as complex due to system requirements, customization needs, and expert involvement. Setup time ranges from a few months to over a year, depending on project size and organizational specifics. Those with consultant support or technical expertise generally experience a smoother process. While some mention the ease once familiar with the system, others highlight challenges tied to deployment and configuration.

SAP HCM customer service and support exhibit variability, with some reporting fast and effective assistance, while others find responses delayed, impacting productivity. Technical support receives positive feedback for their problem-solving abilities, achieving high ratings, but the responsiveness can depend on task complexity. Users appreciate the availability of different communication channels, although some note difficulty finding dedicated consultants. The support ecosystem requires enhancement, as understanding of features is crucial for client satisfaction.

Users reported that SAP HCM yields a significant return on investment by optimizing business processes and minimizing waste. It streamlines talent management, improving employee detection and resource allocation. Organizations note substantial progress over time, highlighting automation and centralized tasks as key advantages. Ease of access and efficient coordination across branches are emphasized. The return occurs typically within three to five years, though some see benefits as early as six to seven months.