Organizations using Infor LN report a significant return on investment. They experience enhanced efficiency due to automation of manual tasks, leading to reduced errors and operational costs. Users highlight the time saved for employees, increasing productivity. Infor LN provides a higher ROI compared to SAP. Long-term usage amplifies its benefits, although calculating ROI like a quick-payoff machine isn't straightforward. Proper and intensive use enhances its value, making it a valuable asset to businesses.

Organizations deploying Infor LN exhibit a preference for On-premises, with this choice being most frequent. Public Cloud is opted for by several users, demonstrating its appeal. Some embrace Hybrid Cloud, reflecting a certain level of adaptability. Private Cloud is chosen infrequently, suggesting more interest in other options. The data highlights varied deployment strategies, emphasizing a notable inclination towards On-premises setups across different implementations, followed by Public Cloud and Hybrid Cloud solutions to a lesser extent.

Users advise others to choose a knowledgeable implementation partner for Infor LN and ensure a clear understanding of its features. Engaging a dedicated team for implementation is essential. Companies should assess their needs and ensure alignment with Infor LN capabilities. Its robust features and user-friendly interface cater well to manufacturing industries, improving ROI and efficiency. Infor LN facilitates easy customization, integration with multiple applications, and offers valuable cloud suites. Consulting experts and setting clear objectives are recommended.

For Infor LN, users employ various cloud providers such as Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS), while others opt for different platforms.

Infor LN exhibits high stability when users are properly trained, with most praising its reliability and minimal issues. Stability can be affected by mismanaged resources or extensive customization. Baan IV, the earlier version, has been noted as stable. Users find few bugs or glitches, and it ranks highly in industry assessments. Most users report satisfactory support, although some mention challenges with database management and regional inconsistencies. Stability ratings generally vary between six and ten out of ten.

Infor LN requires improvements in user interface design and reporting functionality. Transitioning from legacy systems is complex and customer service is lacking. Integration with other systems needs enhancement, and existing HR capabilities are insufficient. Users find the system difficult to navigate, leading to complications in task management. Performance issues and high costs further hinder its effectiveness. There is a need for improved automation and supply chain processes to meet modern industry standards.

Infor LN offers ease of use, rich functionality, and extensive customization. Its manufacturing, distribution, order management, and planning modules are highly valued. Multisite capability and multicurrency support enhance global operations. Users appreciate its integrated project and document management, adaptability to various industries, and multicompany interfacing. It efficiently supports financial operations and provides robust production planning. Infor LN’s HTML5 web-based UI and comprehensive dashboard insights streamline complex business processes. Stability and scalability are frequently highlighted aspects. Pricing is considered reasonable.

Users have reported using Infor LN for a range of one to twenty-seven years.

Infor LN is primarily used for logistics, finance, manufacturing, procurement, sales, and CRM modules. Organizations in manufacturing, automotive, and high-tech industries rely on Infor LN to integrate and optimize business processes. It supports multi-site, multi-logistics, and multi-finance operations, enhancing financial management and providing advanced planning tools. These businesses utilize it for end-to-end processes like project management, vendor management, inventory, and more, emphasizing its versatility and comprehensive capabilities across sectors.

Infor LN improves data management, streamlining processes with centralized integration. Organizations enhance project cost control, manufacturing efficiency, and stock management. Real-time information aids decision-making while custom functionality supports needs without third-party dependence. Integrations with applications like Salesforce CRM and Crystal Reports are simple. Unified software across companies ensures efficient production planning and reporting. Enhanced process automation is achieved with robotic integration and real-time visibility into customers, suppliers, and conversion processes.

Infor LN is highly scalable, accommodating a broad user range from small to large enterprises. Users note its flexibility, especially in cloud environments, and its efficient integration capabilities. Regular updates and enhancements support scalability despite some complexities in setup. Few users encounter scalability issues, and the scalability is rated between eight and ten. Its ability to manage multi-site environments with minimal administration is advantageous, catering to medium and large-sized organizations effectively.

Users considered SAP, Oracle, and Made2Manage alongside Infor LN. S4 Hana, Oracle E-business Suite, and PeopleSoft were other options. Infor LN stood out for its complete package without needing additional purchases, superior manufacturing capabilities, and quick customization. While SAP had better financial features, its customizations were complex. SAP and Infor LN both offer strong cloud solutions but excel in different aspects. Infor LN is preferred for complex projects, supported by Gartner and Forrester findings.

Organizations chose Auth0 for unified authentication, security enhancements, and non-OAuth support over complex and limited alternatives.

{"quote":"I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"It really fulfills my requirements.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I recommend Auth0 to others.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The most important feature for me was the ease of use, as it needed to be easy to integrate into my platform.","quality_score":"10","sentiment_score":"10"}

Most organizations prefer the flexibility and ease of Public Cloud for Auth0, over Hybrid and Private Cloud models.

Auth0 provides seamless authentication for APIs, customers, and B2B, supporting SSO, identity management, and integration with multi-cloud services.

8.75

{"quote":"I find it surprising that there is no access to a standard user profile.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"4"}

Organizations show diverse preferences by choosing Auth0 with AWS or alternative providers for their cloud environments.

Auth0 support is valued for responsiveness and helpfulness, though engineer changes and outreach issues exist for smaller accounts.

8.0

Auth0's setup is user-friendly, supports various deployments, well-documented, and requires minimal maintenance, often involving engineers and developers.

7.8

Auth0 efficiently scales for large users, swiftly handling issues, though on-premise setups may need more detailed guidance.

Auth0 provides secure, scalable JWT-based authentication with easy integration, enterprise appeal, customization, and strong developer support.

Auth0 needs better documentation, customization, pricing clarity, multi-tenancy, advanced authorization, IoT integration, and robust MFA capabilities.

Users recommend careful evaluation of Auth0's customizations, scalability, and costs, emphasizing API integration understanding and feature assessment.

{"quote":"Their response was very helpful.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Their support is excellent.","score":"8"}

Auth0 users experience high ROI and efficiency, despite unclear development cost impacts and potential increased costs for transitioning to enterprise.

Auth0 users have varied experience, ranging from one month to eight years, showcasing its broad adoption and flexibility.

{"quote":"I have to implement these features myself if I want to include them.","score":7}

{"quote":"By default, the user profile does not contain the name, first name, or address, which I would expect.","score":9}

{"quote":"I find it surprising that there is no access to a standard user profile.","score":8}

Auth0 is praised for its stability, performance, strong integration, and support, with users rarely experiencing disruptions or issues.

Auth0's pricing is seen as generally cost-effective but can be confusing and costly, especially with extra features.

{"quote":"The cost of the solution itself was cost-effective enough that I didn't even need to compare it with EntraID.","score":"9"}

Auth0 praised for external management, Okta for enterprise; Cognito cheapest but unsuitable; Microsoft setup challenges during renewal.

{"quote":"The usual features such as social media integration are beneficial.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The most important feature for me was the ease of use, as it needed to be easy to integrate into my platform.","score":"9"}

Auth0 streamlines identity management, enhances security, reduces development time, and supports integration, improving efficiency and reducing costs.

<p>Auth0 enhances organizational efficiency by delivering secure login authentication for mobile apps and seamless integration across codebases, boosting developer productivity. It ensures compliance with regulatory certifications, offers scalability for user growth, and provides customization for authentication processes. Despite its high cost and pricing confusion, improvements in documentation for machine-to-machine flows and Salesforce integration can enhance user experience, though its administration structure lacks flexibility.</p>

I use Auth0 as an identity provider for my SaaS platform due to its ease of integration and beneficial features like social media integration. However, I am disappointed by the lack of a standard user profile with basic information.

Organizations previously used their own databases with regular OAuth, an on-prem open-source tool, another cloud provider's tool, in-house solutions, AWS Cognito, Keycloak, and Okta. Switching to Auth0 was driven by the need to outsource security to the cloud, improve customer experience, embrace advanced security protocols like SAML, and avoid maintaining on-prem systems. Some also utilized Google Authenticator and Duo for multi-factor authentication.

Auth0 pricing is viewed differently by users; some find it clear and cost-effective, particularly when considering the scale and features used, while others perceive it as confusing and high, especially for services like SAML integration and multifactor authentication. Various pricing tiers exist, such as B2B, B2C, and enterprise, with basic plans starting at around $1,500 monthly. Overall satisfaction varies, with some finding it cheaper compared to alternatives, though technical support incurs additional costs.

<p>Auth0 surpasses its competitors by providing a seamless authentication platform with robust security features, customizable login experiences, and easy integration, ensuring developers can efficiently manage user identities and access across various applications and environments.</p>

<p>Auth0 could improve its explanation on following an idiomatic approach beyond just validating JWT tokens.</p><p>The machine-to-machine authentication flow is not well documented and could be improved.</p><p>Auth0 pricing is seen as high and the pricing model could be clearer and more affordable.</p><p>The Management API could be made easier for retrieving user information.</p><p>Better documentation for Salesforce integration is suggested.</p>

Users found Auth0's initial setup easy and quick. Sample code generation and user-friendly features facilitated smooth deployment for various applications. Timeframes for deployment varied based on complexity, with many achieving integration rapidly. Migrating from competitors was managed efficiently due to Auth0's flexibility. Users employed cloud or on-premises options, often automating configuration processes. Comprehensive documentation and tools like SDKs enhanced the setup experience, enabling fast integration with existing systems and providing a seamless transition.

<p>Auth0 enhances organizational security and flexibility, providing robust authentication and authorization capabilities that support modern protocols like OIDC and OAuth 2.</p>
<p>It simplifies integration, allowing for seamless application with various codebases and facilitating secure server-side data processes without session persistence.</p>
<p>Auth0 supports compliance with regulatory standards, minimizing the need for companies to manage certifications independently.</p>
<p>The platform is adaptable, offering customization through authentication pipelines allowing for tailored security and user management processes.</p>
<p>Auth0 is scalable, supporting a growing number of users and adapting to company size and needs with ease.</p>

Auth0's customer service is generally well-regarded, with rapid, satisfactory responses and strong community support. Users appreciate premium support, with quick replies based on ticket severity. However, frequent changes in engineers require re-explaining issues, which some find frustrating. While enterprise support scores high, starter package support is rated slightly lower. Documentation and community forums are seen as helpful resources. Response times are praised, although access to dedicated forums can be challenging unless users hold larger accounts.

Auth0 provided a significant return on investment, reportedly 300% in monetary terms. Users saved development time and perceived benefits in not managing their own identity service. While licensing costs posed a challenge for growing enterprises, many found value in not handling emails or server maintenance. They noted potential reductions in customer support queries related to password issues and acknowledged security and efficiency improvements. The challenge lay in balancing cost with the benefits received.

Organizations utilizing Auth0 often choose Amazon Web Services (AWS) alongside other platforms. AWS appears favored by multiple users, but a notable portion opts for alternative providers as well. This diverse choice highlights an inclination towards flexibility and adaptability in cloud services for managing identity and access solutions.

Auth0 customer service and support are rated positively with a numerical range of 4-5 out of 5.

Users advise others to clearly define user numbers, transactions, and data requirements when working with Auth0 and emphasize the importance of understanding API call minimization. They highlight the strong developer support and multiple tool compatibilities. Evaluating multiple systems for compatibility with specific needs is recommended. Customizable features and strong security measures are praised. Auth0's scalability and intuitive management appeal to developers, though some note areas for enhancement in multi-tenancy and authorization.

Organizations predominantly employ the Public Cloud deployment model for Auth0. A few prefer the Hybrid Cloud approach, while others opt for the Private Cloud. Public Cloud usage significantly outnumbers other methods.

Auth0's most valuable features encompass simplified integration across diverse platforms ensuring strong security with multifactor options and compliance. Its flexibility supports custom social logins, robust APIs, and scalability. Users appreciate its ease of use in authentication processes, documentation clarity, and extensive identity provider support. The intuitive interface enhances user experience while built-in integrations simplify customer management. Its cloud deployment reduces infrastructure burdens, offering customization opportunities and global reach through region-specific hosting.

Auth0 enables Docker container management, reduces database dependency, and enhances efficiency through identity management. It aids ISO compliance, shortens development time, and saves costs. Users benefit from customizable user experiences and integration without dedicated teams. It simplifies security, supports efficient user management, and offers robust documentation. Features include hosted login techniques, single sign-on integration, and enhanced API security. Overall, Auth0 provides a high return on investment through extensibility and comprehensive support.

Users report that Auth0 is very stable, with no significant issues encountered. Many appreciate its high availability, highlighting just one major outage in the past three years. They consistently rate Auth0’s stability highly, often giving it a nine or ten out of ten. Documentation and support contribute to its reliability, and performance concerns are notably absent. Integration and testing are also executed without difficulty, reinforcing confidence in its use.

Auth0 documentation could be clearer on advanced usage after setup. Authorization should integrate group concepts. Administration needs more flexibility. Price is high and an improved model is recommended. Machine-to-machine authentication requires better documentation. New Universal Login’s customization is limited, affecting Organizations feature use. Multi-tenancy management and advanced authorization are areas for improvement. Management API needs enhancements for user data access. Improving IoT device integration and self-managed user tools is important. Multi-factor authentication needs mobile app support.

Some users experience scalability issues with Auth0, while others report it scales effectively. Many mention it handles increased user demand well and can accommodate large-scale operations. There are references to its flexibility in providing environments suited for user needs. Certain users have less extensive scalability evaluations due to smaller user bases. Feedback shows positive impressions of its ability to scale, but some suggest the potential for infrastructure improvements.

Individuals have been using Auth0 for a range of one month to approximately eight years.

Auth0 is primarily used for authentication and authorization across multiple platforms, including cloud and on-premises environments. It supports customer authentication, API security, single sign-on, and identity federation. Users deploy it in a multi-cloud setup, integrating with platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP. Companies utilize Auth0 for seamless log-in experiences, user management, and API integrations. It serves as an identity provider for SaaS platforms, focusing on ease of implementation and multi-tenancy capabilities.

Users evaluated alternatives to Auth0 such as Stormpath, Microsoft, Okta, AWS, GCP, Azure, Cognito by Amazon, Shibboleth, SuperTokens, Lock, and EntraID. Preference was given to Auth0 for external user-focused management, commitment to identity management, and pricing considerations. Some considered AWS hosting a drawback due to data center preferences. Microsoft was less user-friendly at renewal time, and Okta catered more to internal focus and didn't fit certain customer-facing needs.

<p>DataCore SWARM offers flexibility with ease of configuration, supporting S3 protocol for robust, scalable storage with versioning and immutability. Its enriched metadata with tags enhances search capabilities. A cluster architecture allows replication across different levels, integrating new hardware without complex administration. However, it requires numerous servers initially, has challenging installation and maintenance, pricing improvements, and network prerequisites limiting availability to larger customers.</p>

{"quote":"DataCore Swarm's pricing is reasonable. While the initial step is expensive, ramping up capacity is relatively affordable compared to alternatives.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"With DataCore Swarm, we have transitioned from tape-based backups, which were long, to Swarm, making the process more rapid and efficient.","quality_score":"10","sentiment_score":"9"}

DataCore Swarm provides scalable object storage for archiving, data immutability, and secure restoration, supporting diverse storage and backup needs.

7.595177

{"quote":"DataCore Swarm's pricing is reasonable.","score":"8"}

DataCore Swarm offers flexible, user-friendly management, scalability, and robust security with S3 compatibility, ensuring seamless hardware integration and data availability.

{"quote":"While the initial step is expensive, ramping up capacity is relatively affordable compared to alternatives.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The main issue currently is the hard installation process.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"3"}

7.595177

7.595177

DataCore Swarm's high cost, server needs, and complex setup limit its accessibility, requiring streamlined processes and lower volume licenses.

{"quote":"With DataCore Swarm, we have transitioned from tape-based backups, which were long, to Swarm, making the process more rapid and efficient.","score":"8"}

7.5

Users have experienced DataCore Swarm for over six months to a year, highlighting its reliability and user satisfaction.

{"quote":"They're proactive and assist even if there's no direct issue with DataCore Swarm.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The technical support by DataCore is always good.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Adding nodes is quite straightforward.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"We use two kinds of architectures, one with single nodes where disk addition is easy and another with a larger infrastructure.","score":"8"}

<p>DataCore SWARM is valued for its flexibility and easy configuration.</p>
<p>It supports S3 protocol compatibility, allowing for robust, scalable environments with features like versioning and immutability for compliance.</p>
<p>Object metadata can be enhanced through the addition of tags for improved filtering and searching capabilities.</p>
<p>Users can easily create domains, tenants, and buckets with various authentication methods optimized for different use cases.</p>
<p>The architecture supports the rapid integration of new hardware, ensuring high availability and scalability by simply adding disks or servers.</p>

{"quote":"We use it mainly for the immutable part for backups.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"DataCore Swarm is highly available.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Upgrading from CentOS to Rocky is not straightforward either, which needs improvement.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The main issue currently is the hard installation process.","score":"9"}

We utilize DataCore Swarm for backups, appreciating its high availability and immutability. Transitioning from tape backups improved our efficiency. However, the installation process is complex, particularly when upgrading from CentOS to Rocky. We also considered Huawei's Pacific, but it was expensive.

<p>Pricing could be improved.</p><p>A significant number of servers is required to start.</p><p>Network prerequisites make it available only to large customers.</p><p>License starts at 100TB.</p><p>The installation process is complex.</p>

<p>DataCore Swarm surpasses its competitors by offering seamless scalability, enhanced data protection, and rapid deployment, ensuring efficient content storage and delivery through its advanced object storage platform.</p>

Pricing and flexibility need improvement for DataCore Swarm, as it should offer objective storage for various files. Many servers are necessary at the start, limiting availability to large customers. An easier architecture with container-based solutions could help. Updates and upgrade processes from CentOS to Rocky are complicated, requiring enhancement. A more streamlined installation process would benefit users, and a simpler server requirement could aid smaller companies in adopting the technology.

DataCore Swarm's valuable features include flexibility, S3 protocol compatibility, scalability, and robust architecture. Users appreciate its ability to work with any hardware, user-friendly interfaces, and cluster replication. Its support for erasure coding ensures resilience, while object locking enhances data security. The platform's capability to scale efficiently by adding disks or servers and create domains, tenants, and buckets easily is highly regarded. Immutability and a self-healing system are key for data integrity and availability.

DataCore Swarm is used for customer archiving, immediate payments, autonomous cloud, and on-premise object storage. It supports immutable backup sets for IT production restoration during cyber attacks. It is coupled with other tools to offload archive folders to low-cost NL-SAS storage. Users implement file archiving and video storage services, using replicated clusters and dynamic archiving. They plan to expand with another DataCore to automatically archive old files.

DataCore Swarm has been used for a duration ranging from six months to over a year.

They utilized diverse technologies like Dell, IBM, Pure Storage, with Huawei favored for price-performance, influencing reseller shifts.

Huawei OceanStor Dorado setup varies; some users find it simple and smooth, others note complexities requiring larger teams.

{"quote":"Usually, only one person is needed to fully implement Huawei OceanStor Dorado.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"7"}