Huawei OceanStor Dorado's initial setup is generally straightforward and easy, often taking a few hours. Users found it manageable with varying levels of complexity depending on the environment. Initial deployment is quick, with efficient setup supported by intuitive tools. Some experienced complexity due to integration with specific systems or additional features, yet assistance was readily available. The process typically requires minimal staff and training while partner resources enhance ease. Performance ratings are consistently high.

Huawei OceanStor Dorado customer service is often described as responsive, effective, and quick. Many users find technical support helpful with prompt response times. Support may vary based on language, with a preference for Chinese speakers in some regions. Local support varies, often being non-native language speakers. Customers appreciate on-site assistance and communication improvements. However, there is a need for more specialized partners and support professionals globally. Users rate the support positively, though areas for improvement exist.

<p>Huawei OceanStor Dorado offers a competitive price-performance ratio that is highly valued by customers.</p>

<p>It features advanced data management capabilities including deduplication that efficiently increases storage capacity.</p>

<p>Customers appreciate the straightforward setup and ease of management that simplifies IT operations.</p>

<p>It includes high availability features such as clone grouping and SmartMigration that enhance data handling and disaster recovery.</p>

<p>The comprehensive feature set extends to security measures, offering ransomware protection and integration with existing security management frameworks.</p>

Huawei OceanStor Dorado offers a strong return on investment with low total cost of ownership compared to competitors. Users find it cost-effective and time-saving, with fewer issues and no need for downtime during updates due to multiple controllers. While some perceive it as expensive, many regard it as a worthwhile investment because of its reliability and the efficient mesh connectivity and load balancing it provides. Overall, it surpasses other brands in affordability and effectiveness.

Huawei OceanStor Dorado's customer service and support is rated predominantly positive with a score range of 8 to 9 out of 10.

Users advise others that Huawei OceanStor Dorado is highly rated, known for reliability, performance, and integration capabilities. They recommend it for its low latency, ease of use, strong features like HyperReplication and Smart Migration, and consider it a good investment despite some preference for non-Chinese alternatives. Many find it suitable for both NAS and SAN needs, suggesting future improvements for automation support. It is praised for being competitive and compatible with various systems.

Huawei OceanStor Dorado is praised for its high stability and reliability, often rated nine or ten out of ten. Users report no significant issues like crashes or freezes and appreciate its performance dependability. A few users mention that while its stability is generally excellent, certain parts might be less reliable compared to competitors. Many users did confirm positive results from tests and minimal downtime, reaffirming a strong preference for Huawei's stability in various environments.

Most users deploy Huawei OceanStor Dorado on-premises, indicating a strong preference for this type of deployment. A small number choose a hybrid cloud setup, but the majority favor maintaining their systems on-premises.

Huawei OceanStor Dorado needs improvements in NAS capability and disk speed. Integration with VMware VVols 2.0 and management of non-Huawei systems could be enhanced. There are compatibility issues with some operating systems, AIX connectivity problems, and incomplete cloud integration. The user interface could be more user-friendly, and there are challenges with data compression and deduplication. Pricing is complex with over 12 licenses, and security features against ransomware could be improved.

Huawei OceanStor Dorado is utilized for data storage and management, primarily within virtualized environments and VMware systems. Users employ it for production, disaster recovery, database storage, and data backups. Companies in sectors like banking, healthcare, and telecom rely on it for high IO performance, storage migrations, and financial services operations. It supports applications in Oracle, SQL, and IBM AIX Power servers and assists in deploying, automating, and securing data from storage tools.

Huawei OceanStor Dorado impresses with NVMe all-flash performance, low latency, and high IOPS. Users appreciate the cost-effective pricing, deduplication, compression, and efficient storage management reducing space needs. It offers simplicity with a user-friendly GUI, scalability, and stability. Features like HyperMetro, SmartMigration, and group cloning enhance reliability. Its multi-controller architecture ensures seamless operations during maintenance. Support and security are highly valued. The high availability design and Flash technology integration boost performance and storage capabilities.

Users have been working with Huawei OceanStor Dorado for a range of two months to ten years.

Huawei OceanStor Dorado is praised for its robust scalability, accommodating businesses of all sizes. Users report easy expansion, supporting both small and large-scale environments. It supports scaling up and out efficiently, with capacity for numerous users and controllers. Many find the scalability straightforward due to its unified storage approach, offering flexibility and adaptability. The architecture allows for significant growth, evidenced by consistent positive ratings, making it suitable for growing storage demands.

Users considered Dell EMC, Hitachi, IBM, HPE, EMC, Pure Storage, Nexenta, and NetApp. Most preferred Huawei OceanStor Dorado for its high performance and scalability. While some found Pure Storage to have an easy interface, Huawei's supportive on-site presence and feature-cost balance were appealing. Dell and HPE were primarily viewed as choices for hyper-converged solutions and servers. Users consistently found Huawei's strengths more compelling compared to other evaluated options.

Huawei OceanStor Dorado simplifies deployment with attractive pricing and efficient features. Management and storage are streamlined. File servers and services include ransomware protection, though without website blocking. Batch processing duration drops significantly, improving accessibility. Initially, processing could take up to 80 hours, now reduced to four hours. Speed and storage efficiency have greatly improved.

Infor LN is preferred over SAP for engineering and manufacturing due to cost-effectiveness, complete packages, and customization speed.

Users considered SAP, Oracle, and various legacy systems besides Infor LN. SAP was often evaluated for its financial strengths but noted for its complexity and additional costs for CRM. Infor LN was praised for its completeness, cost efficiency, superiority in manufacturing, particularly for complex and customized processes, flexibility, and cloud capabilities. Oracle and Made2Manage were also options but were less frequently mentioned.

Users chose Auth0 for its focus on external identity management and ease of deployment over other evaluated alternatives.

Users considered options like Stormpath, Microsoft, Okta, AWS Cognito, GCP, Azure, Shibboleth, Keycloak, EntraID, and internally developed systems before selecting Auth0 due to its focus on external identity management and customer-facing authentication. Microsoft and Okta were evaluated but did not align with some specific requirements. AWS hosting and on-prem security management were concerns for some, leading them to prefer a SaaS model with Auth0.

Huawei was chosen for its performance, scalability, and support, outperforming competitors like Dell and HPE in storage solutions.

Users considered alternatives including Dell EMC, Hitachi, IBM, HPE, Pure Storage, Fujitsu, Cisco, and NetApp. Dell EMC was often linked with hyper-converged infrastructures, while Huawei was selected for its price-performance ratio. Nexenta was noted as unavailable. Pure Storage was appreciated for ease of management. Fujitsu, Cisco, Dell, Lenovo, and IBM technologies were also explored. Huawei OceanStor Dorado was preferred for its balance of capabilities and support, surpassing many competitors in evaluations.

Users transitioned to Pega Platform for its flexibility, integration, and ease of development but considered cost alternatives.

Pega Platform implementation involves in-house or external experts, requiring skilled teams for successful integration and management based on scale.

Pega Platform users choose from Public Cloud, On-premises, Private, and Hybrid Cloud models to meet diverse operational needs.

AWS is popular for Pega Platform, though users also choose unspecified providers based on organizational needs.

Pega Platform setup varies; cloud-based is quicker, on-premise is complex, requiring skilled admins and Pega support helps.

Pega Platform's support is mostly positive, noted for responsiveness and expertise, despite occasional delays with complex issues.

{"quote":"Top banks in the world, such as the government's HMRC in the UK, see the return on investment with Pega Platform as they use it at an enterprise level.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"Pega Platform is comparable to SAP in terms of its dominance in digital process automation and business process management.","score":"8"}

Pega Platform streamlines business processes and automation across industries, enhancing operations through integration, customization, and real-time data management.

{"quote":"In the Middle East and Africa region, Pega was not very strong from the user experience standpoint.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"3"}

{"quote":"If you're looking for a solution at the enterprise level with comprehensive features, then Pega is suitable.","score":"9"}

Pega Platform scales effectively with high user volumes, requiring proper hardware and capacity planning for optimal performance.

Ensure skilled architects, clear processes, understanding of Pega capabilities, and collaboration for enterprise-level adoption to maximize effectiveness.

Pega Platform offers rapid deployment, low-code development, robust UI design, workflow automation, and seamless integration with AI and APIs.

Pega Platform requires enhancements in customization, pricing, integration, cloud performance, complexity, and advanced AI capabilities for better usability.

Pega Platform boosts ROI by enhancing efficiency, automating tasks, and improving processes, leading to significant business benefits quickly.

User experience with the Pega Platform varies widely, spanning from a few months to almost two decades.

Pega Platform is costly but offers extensive features and flexibility, providing good ROI despite expensive upgrades.

Pega Platform is reliable for complex tasks with minor glitches, high scalability, and user stability ratings of seven to nine.

Pega Platform is favored for customization and cost-effectiveness; alternatives like UiPath appeal to smaller businesses.

8.0

Pega Platform enhances productivity by automating workflows, improving integrations, reducing coding time, and optimizing legacy system integration.

{"quote":"I never needed support from the platform standpoint, but if additional features are required, we have regular meetings with the product team for feedback.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"I haven't contacted Pega for support unless it is a product issue or a new feature issue.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Pega introduced Constellation, which allows a user to build a more engaging visual experience.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"In the Middle East and Africa region, Pega was not very strong from the user experience standpoint.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"It allows for a unified platform with features like case management, BPM, service orchestration, low-code development, digital process automation, CRM, and decision-making, all integrated into a single platform.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Pega Platform is excellent for enterprise-level solutions with integrations to entire systems, including case management, service orchestration, CRM, decision-making capabilities, digital process automation, and AI-driven functionalities.","score":"9"}

Pega Platform serves as a versatile enterprise solution for various ministries in the Middle East, integrating case management and decision-making functionalities. While user experience initially faced challenges, improvements with Constellation enhance engagement. Pega is preferred over alternatives for comprehensive features.

Users have previously utilized Savvion BPM, IBM VPN, Appian, Bizagi, TIBCO, Camunda, jBPM, Microsoft .NET, Newgen BPM, OutSystems, WorkFusion, and Kofax before adopting Pega Platform. Some started directly with Pega Platform. Others highlighted the platform's features, integration, flexibility, and adaptability as reasons for the switch. Appian and IBM are mentioned as competitors, primarily chosen for cost reasons. Pega Platform's business orientation, agility, and performance were appealing factors.

<p>Pega Platform significantly reduces coding time, boosts productivity, and integrates robustly with services for comprehensive case management. It enhances business process management, aiding decision-making and rapid application deployment. While offering specialized functionalities and centralizing processes, buyers should consider its high cost, performance scalability issues, and potential delays in technical support. Additionally, a scarcity of experienced resources may result in a steep learning curve for some users.</p>

<p>Pega Platform surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive automation, robust scalability, and AI-driven insights, enabling seamless business process management and enhanced customer engagement, helping organizations quickly adapt to changing market demands with agility and efficiency.</p>

Pega Platform's pricing is generally seen as expensive, with costs based on the number of users or cases. Licensing is offered for both on-premise and cloud, with yearly fees that can be negotiated. Small to medium companies benefit from the cloud option for reducing setup time and costs, while large enterprises often prefer on-premise for better control. Additional expenses may include developer certifications. Prices vary globally and depend on specific agreements.

<p>Business-specific functionality is needed, and the implementation is challenging due to handling code.</p><p>Pega Cloud early adoption requires refactoring and redesign of some services, contributing to long upgrade processes.</p><p>There are performance scalability issues when increasing the number of users, and diagnosing problems is challenging.</p><p>The pricing model is too expensive, and the licensing cost is high.</p><p>The low code features are not as user-friendly as claimed, and extensive training is required to utilize all features.</p>

Many companies utilized their own experienced teams for Pega Platform implementation, while others partnered with consultants or Pega professionals. Deployment approaches varied from client-managed to consultant-assisted setups, with some preferring in-house resources. Expertise in Pega architecture and integration is crucial. Although some projects required external support, many organizations completed implementations themselves, with resource needs differing based on project scale. Most found the implementation manageable with skilled personnel.

Pega Platform's initial setup varies in complexity. On-premises deployment can be challenging, requiring administrative expertise, while cloud-based setups are simpler. The cloud option simplifies infrastructure handling and reduces deployment time. Complexity depends on project requirements, user expertise, and desired features. Installation documentation and support are beneficial. Some users find initial deployment straightforward, especially with cloud assistance, while others encounter challenges in configuring specific features and integrations, making skilled resources essential for efficient setup.

Pega Platform's customer service is generally responsive and helpful, with quick solutions often provided. Users appreciate the technical support team's expertise but note that complex issues may experience delays. Support quality varies, affected by individual contacts and licenses. Communities provide additional resources. Some report satisfaction and easy contact processes, while others highlight room for improvement, especially in response times and unique problems. Users frequently rely on Pega's support for technical issues, finding it knowledgeable and beneficial.

Users report that Pega Platform enhances efficiency and customer satisfaction by delivering faster solutions and reducing costs. The platform aids in automating processes, resulting in time-saving scenarios and improved business operations. Organizations frequently experience an ROI, ranging from 30% to 80%, within a brief period. Although Pega is not the cheapest option, its impact, such as increased revenue and improved call handling, justifies the investment. Users see substantial benefits, especially top financial institutions and enterprises.

Pega Platform's customer service and support is rated between 3.5 to 4.5 out of 5.

Most users utilize Public Cloud for Pega Platform, displaying a strong preference for this deployment model. On-premises follows with notable usage among groups, showcasing a significant adherence to traditional setups. Private Cloud is employed by a moderate number while Hybrid Cloud sees a smaller, yet distinct, adoption. The diverse selection of deployment strategies indicates varied needs and infrastructures, with Public Cloud clearly standing out as the favored choice for many.

AWS is frequently chosen for Pega Platform in public or hybrid cloud scenarios. Many opt for alternatives, relying on their specific needs. Although several individuals express satisfaction with AWS, others prefer different providers without specifying names, indicating custom or lesser-known choices. Some find AWS impressive, while others lean towards non-mainstream options, showcasing a wide range of preferences in provider selection. This reflects varied requirements and strategic decisions in cloud selection for Pega Platform.

Users advise others to engage skilled architects and implementation partners when using Pega Platform. It's important to fully understand the desired features and processes before commencing, as licenses can be costly. Customization requires expert knowledge. Pega is lauded for powerful case management, scalability, and integration, but its pricing and complexity may not suit smaller enterprises. Opting for cloud deployment can save on maintenance. Considering user needs, testing through proof of concept is recommended for optimal outcomes.

Pega Platform exhibits high stability across various deployment models. While some teams mentioned occasional glitches and issues with scalability at high usage levels, regular updates and proper design significantly enhance its dependability. Users highlight its capacity to handle large volumes and appreciate its adaptability for both cloud and on-prem environments. They note its consistent performance and efficiency in business technology use, rating its stability between a seven and nine on a scale of ten.

Pega Platform is primarily used for business process management and case management. Users apply it in various industries including insurance, banking, healthcare, and government for tasks like claims management, customer onboarding, digital transformation, underwriting, and workflow automation. Many leverage its out-of-the-box integrations, low-code capabilities, and adaptability for streamlining operations, automating processes, and enhancing customer experiences across internal and external business functions, often acting as consultants or partners with diverse client portfolios.

Many users feel that Pega Platform could improve its user interface and cloud capabilities, noting that integration with other platforms can be challenging. The complexity of the pricing model is a point of concern, with some suggesting a need for better cost efficiency. Users find the learning curve steep, which complicates adoption for new users. Enhanced AI and RPA functionalities and more streamlined low-code features would enhance its competitiveness against other platforms.

<p>Pega Platform supports rapid prototyping and quick releases, enhancing productivity and decreasing development times.</p>

<p>Pega Platform offers powerful business process management features, including robust case management and streamlined workflow automation.</p>

<p>Pega Platform is highly configurable, allowing for adaptation to specific organizational needs with minimal time and effort.</p>

<p>Pega Platform fosters effective integration with existing systems and supports a unified architecture across different functionalities.</p>

<p>Pega Platform is efficient in scaling to accommodate organizational needs without sacrificing performance or stability.</p>

Users have been utilizing Pega Platform for a range of a few months to almost 20 years.

Pega Platform's standout features include ease of implementation, quick setup, and flexibility. Its powerful case management, integration services, and user-friendly interface are valued. It supports a low-code/no-code environment, allowing rapid application development. Users appreciate its robust workflow automation, seamless integration with other tools, and strong UI design. The architecture is unified, making it adaptable for various industries. It excels in supporting enterprise-level cases integrating AI and decision-making capabilities.

Pega Platform demonstrates strong scalability, supporting organizations with varying user counts, from hundreds to thousands. Users highlight its adaptability across industries like finance and healthcare. While generally praised for handling high volumes and multiple integrations, some users report challenges with performance at larger scales, indicating that implementation and hardware decisions significantly impact its scalability. Despite these challenges, many find Pega highly capable of accommodating increasing demands when properly managed.

Users evaluated Appian BPM, Activiti BPM, IBM BPM, Salesforce, Camunda, Colfax, Oracle, Kofax, WorkFusion, SAP BPM, WaveMaker, UiPath, and OutSystems alongside Pega Platform. Comparisons highlighted different features and needs; Appian and Pega were popular among financial sectors. Some found UiPath and Camunda suitable for smaller projects. Pega Platform was noted for addressing complex customization in large-sized companies. User experience and ease of use varied among options evaluated.

Pega Platform enhances organizational efficiency through quick development and integration, streamlines processes, automates workflows, supports forecasting, reduces manual tasks, and improves decision planning. Users report significant time savings, flexibility in operations, and increased productivity. It facilitates consolidating data, improving business processes, and capturing requirements with AI capabilities. Licensing allows flexibility across diverse sectors, and automation optimizes client engagements, saving costs and integrating legacy systems, leading to faster project completion.

Users switched to Check Point NGFW for advanced security features, better management, and integrated threat prevention over previous solutions.

Organizations transitioned to SAP HCM for its integration and centralized management, exploring Workday for analytics and user-friendliness.

Teams experience varied Check Point NGFW implementation, relying on in-house expertise or vendor support; complexity depends on deployment size.

SAP HCM implementation often needs external expertise, involving integrators and consultants for tailored deployment based on project requirements.

{"quote":"By implementing this tool, we now have a twenty-five percent utilization time in India, which we did not have before.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"The implementation depends on the complexity of the project and generally takes six to eight months.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"5"}

{"quote":"The customer support from SAP is reasonable, yet I would rate it five out of ten.","quality_score":"5","sentiment_score":"4"}

{"quote":"I support more than thirty applications, and we are now doing analytics and human experience, which we were not getting earlier.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"8"}

Most prefer on-premises SAP HCM, while others choose public or private cloud, with few adopting hybrid clouds.

{"quote":"I feel SAP HCM is very competitive and worth the investment given its capability to integrate modules and provide comprehensive value.","quality_score":"10","sentiment_score":"10"}

SAP HCM setup complexity varies; it requires expertise for alignment and compliance, impacting deployment from three months to a year.

SAP HCM customer service is varied; support ranges from excellent to needing improvement, with communication complexity impacting efficiency.

{"quote":"I feel SAP HCM is very competitive and worth the investment given its capability to integrate modules and provide comprehensive value.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The customer support from SAP is reasonable, yet I would rate it five out of ten.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"4"}

SAP HCM manages HR processes, integrates with finance, automates tasks, and supports analytics and cloud deployment for organizational efficiency.

6.5

SAP HCM efficiently scales for various enterprise sizes, offering global adaptability and compliance but with some configuration limits.

{"quote":"Major support is provided by SAP itself.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"We have our own internal team that supports the deployment process.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I would rate it five out of ten.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"The customer support from SAP is reasonable.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Optimizing some processes was challenging, and initially, some change management needed to be included.","score":"7"}

Most users prefer on-premises deployment for Check Point NGFW, while fewer choose hybrid or public cloud environments.

{"quote":"We are able to optimize a lot of processes but there is always room for improvement.","score":"8"}

SAP HCM needs interface updates, better integration, and lower costs, with improvements in talent management and support for technology changes.

Avoid heavy SAP HCM customization, select suitable modules, ensure skilled consultants, integrate well, and prepare for complexities.

SAP HCM offers automation, integration, scalability, and user-friendly dashboards for efficient HR operations, payroll, and talent management.

I work with SAP HCM, focusing on employee control and payroll while collaborating with HRBP and CHRO. It's a comprehensive tool supporting global processes, though some process optimizations were initially challenging. I didn’t use any other solution previously.