<p>Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide comprehensive visibility into network traffic, enhancing application control and allowing detailed monitoring.</p>
<p>They offer robust threat prevention and advanced features such as WildFire and DNS Security, efficiently identifying and blocking threats.</p>
<p>Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are highly scalable, supporting business growth with stable performance and no downtime.</p>
<p>Their deep integration capabilities allow for seamless operation with other systems and a unified management platform with Panorama.</p>
<p>Machine learning is embedded in the core of Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls to provide real-time attack prevention, keeping security measures advanced and proactive.</p>

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls demonstrate both strengths and limitations in scalability. While they excel in virtual and cloud environments, offering ease of deployment and growth, their hardware-centric design can pose challenges for scaling physical devices. They cater well to different business sizes, providing scalable options, yet higher-end models can be costly for smaller enterprises. Users report the need for careful planning due to hardware limitations, making advanced models necessary for larger networks.

Users evaluated alternatives like Cisco, Juniper, Check Point, Fortinet, Sophos, SonicWall, and Meraki before selecting Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. Factors like performance, ease of use, security features, centralized management, and price influenced their decision. Cisco and Fortinet were common considerations but had challenges in configuration or lacked certain next-gen features. Palo Alto's intuitive interface, reliability, and comprehensive feature set were frequently praised. Evaluation often involved detailed comparisons and proof of concept trials.

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls enhance network security by providing visibility into traffic, blocking threats like malware and intrusions, and integrating machine learning for real-time attack prevention. They simplify management through a unified platform, reduce reliance on multiple security tools, and support VPN and cloud integrations. Their ability to manage policies across the network helps guard against data breaches, offering comprehensive protection for diverse organizational environments.

Sophos XGS was chosen for its affordability, ease of integration, flexibility, user-friendly interface, and centralized security features.

Sophos XGS is easy to deploy, typically involves small teams, and offers variable support with distributor and partner assistance.

Sophos XGS is mainly used on-premises, though some use it in cloud or hybrid environments for flexibility.

Sophos XGS setup is user-friendly, with quick deployments, though complex configurations may need careful planning and extra time.

Organizations prefer diverse cloud providers for Sophos XGS, with Amazon Web Services mentioned, indicating no dominant provider trend.

Opinions on Sophos XGS support vary, with some praising responsiveness and others citing slow response times and delays.

Sophos XGS is a versatile firewall solution offering advanced threat protection, web filtering, and seamless integration for secure networks.

Sophos XGS offers fast processing, robust security features, easy management, and seamless integration, ensuring effective protection and scalability.

Sophos XGS is scalable with varied user support, though some users note hardware limitations and mixed opinions on scalability.

Consider Sophos XGS for SMEs due to cost-effectiveness, integration, ease of use, but evaluate needs and support quality.

{"quote":"I recommend Sophos XGS because it is easy to use, more secure, and scalable.","quality_score":"10","sentiment_score":"10"}

{"quote":"I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"All the security features could be better.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"1"}

{"quote":"I recommend Sophos XGS because it is easy to use, more secure, and scalable.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The deployment was done in-house by three to four people.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"8"}

Sophos XGS requires better directory integration, SD-WAN, reporting, interface, support, pricing, security features, performance, automation, and marketing.

10.0

Users of Sophos XGS range from less than a year to over fifteen years, highlighting its broad usage duration.

Sophos XGS provides cost-effective, competitive pricing for SMEs with flexible licensing, often more affordable than Fortinet or Palo Alto.

Sophos XGS offers efficient security with effective ransomware prevention, providing good returns and protection for smaller businesses.

7.5

Sophos XGS is stable and efficient but experiences slowdowns when overcapacity, with room for improvement in support and firmware.

Sophos XGS was favored for usability and cost-effectiveness over Fortinet and Palo Alto, especially for small to medium businesses.

10

Sophos XGS strengthens security with advanced threat management, bandwidth optimization, AI integration, and centralized operations, improving compliance and reducing costs.

10

{"quote":"The pricing of Sophos XGS is not very high or very low; it's medium.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"I also like the dynamic roles, application visibility, and policy test.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I find DLP, API, IP, SDK, and web control to be valuable features.","score":"9"}

They used multiple solutions before Sophos XGS, including Palo Alto, Fortinet, Cisco, CheckPoint, SonicWall, WatchGuard, Cyberoam, and MikroTik. They appreciated Sophos XGS for its affordability and ease of use, especially its integrated web application firewall. While Fortinet offered better stability, Sophos XGS stood out for its user-friendly interface and cost-effectiveness. Certain locations migrated entirely to Sophos XGS due to positive experiences. Additionally, they valued Sophos for bundling features cost-effectively.

<p></p>

Sophos XGS pricing varies by region and usage. Users note it is more affordable than some competitors but can still be costly in certain markets like Nigeria and Bolivia. Licensing is often renewed every three years, with costs depending on the model and additional features. Many users find the price reasonable for small to medium-sized enterprises, appreciating the balance between cost and functionality. Discounts and promotions are available, enhancing its competitiveness.

<p>Sophos XGS needs better integration with Active Directory and Azure AD.</p><p>Reporting and telemetry data in Sophos XGS require significant improvements for detail and accuracy.</p><p>Sophos XGS faces issues with VPN capabilities, lag during updates, and handling threshold values.</p><p>The performance of SD-WAN, NAC, and high availability configurations in Sophos XGS is subpar compared to competitors.</p><p>Pricing of Sophos XGS is high and can be improved for better competitiveness.</p>

<p>Sophos XGS is easy to set up and manage, featuring effective threat management and intrusion detection. Known for cost-effectiveness and strong security features like synchronized security, it offers scalability across various enterprise sizes. The VPN, although capable, requires better inspection and troubleshooting. Active Directory and Azure AD integration are areas for improvement, alongside enhancing report generation speed and technical support. Pricing is high compared to competitors.</p>

Implementations of Sophos XGS are handled in various ways, with many relying on in-house teams often comprising two to four members. Some seek assistance from partners or third parties, especially for initial setups. Deployments are frequently managed remotely, allowing for easy oversight after setup. Many users express satisfaction with the efficiency and manageability of implementations, while some depend on external support contracts, occasionally experiencing challenges with service quality. In-house deployments are commonly straightforward and efficient.

Sophos XGS's initial setup is often described as easy and straightforward. Many find deployment manageable, even for small setups, requiring minimal time and manpower. However, complexities may arise with custom configurations or larger environments. Users appreciate the availability of assistance and resources, like guides and templates. Some instances of difficulty are noted, particularly for those with less experience or during migrations from older systems. Overall, the ease varies based on configuration complexity and user expertise.

Sophos XGS often receives mixed feedback about its customer service and support. While many find the technical support responsive and knowledgeable, others note delays and inadequate initial assistance. Some users appreciate the local support in their regions, though issues in language-specific assistance persist. Many highlight the need for quicker response times, especially with urgent matters. Some report excellent service, while others point out that escalations and complex issues require improvement, affecting small to medium businesses.

Users advise others to select Sophos XGS for small to medium businesses due to its ease of use, integration capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. They emphasize the importance of having technical expertise for setup and configuration. Sophos XGS is preferred for its application filtering, IDS/IPS, and stability. While it may be complex initially, it offers robust threat intelligence and scalability. Consider its cloud management feature and ensure software compatibility, especially with updates, before purchase.

Sophos XGS is considered a wise choice for long-term use, especially by smaller businesses valuing its speed and efficiency. Its effectiveness in preventing ransomware offers significant value. Users generally find the return on investment satisfactory and view Sophos XGS as successful. Although calculating exact ROI can be challenging for security appliances, its role in preventing attacks is acknowledged. Users rate its ROI as average and are content with its performance in meeting their security needs.

Based on the feedback, customer service and support of Sophos XGS are rated between 7 and 9 out of 10.

Organizations often adopt Amazon Web Services (AWS) for using Sophos XGS, with others opting for alternative providers.

Sophos XGS exhibits high stability. Reviews indicate a reliable performance without bugs, crashes, or freezes, even surpassing previous XG models. Some users mention occasional stability issues when max capacity is hit, requiring updates or restarts. Compared to other devices, it may not always match competitors like Palo Alto or Check Point. Most users rate its stability between eight to ten out of ten, with few reports of significant issues impacting operation.

Users predominantly favor on-premises deployment for Sophos XGS, with a few opting for public cloud and some choosing private cloud or hybrid cloud setups.

Sophos XGS requires improvements in various areas, including integration with Active Directory and Azure AD, more intuitive configuration, enhanced SD-WAN and NAC capabilities, and better customer support. Users encounter issues with firmware stability, scalability for large organizations, and a complex user interface. There are also suggestions for incorporating signature filtering, hybrid cloud support, and improved reporting. Improved hardware capabilities, increased automation features, and cost-effective pricing are desired for better performance and competitiveness.

Sophos XGS is highly valued for its ease of use, strong performance, and wide range of security features, including VPN, threat management, intrusion prevention, content filtering, application control, synchronized security, and effective web and bandwidth management. Its centralized management and reporting capabilities enhance network security, integrating seamlessly with endpoints. The platform is stable and cost-effective, with a user-friendly interface, efficient firewall capabilities, and reliable technical support.

<p>Sophos XGS offers fast and easy setup and scalability, making it ideal for businesses of various sizes.</p>
<p>It features synchronized security, enhancing its efficiency by allowing endpoints to communicate and respond to threats dynamically.</p>
<p>The VPN, threat management, and web application security are highly valued features that provide robust protection.</p>
<p>Sophos XGS is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and powerful security features such as IPS and application control.</p>
<p>Support for Sophos XGS is prompt and responsive, improving reliability and user satisfaction.</p>

Usage duration of Sophos XGS varies from a few months to over 15 years.

Sophos XGS is primarily used as a firewall for network protection, web filtering, and VPN management across multiple environments. It supports security features like intrusion prevention, application control, and unified threat management. Organizations utilize Sophos XGS for endpoint security, threat analysis, and access control. It is deployed both on-premises and in the cloud, serving various industries such as education, government, and enterprises. Sophos XGS integrates well with smaller teams, requiring minimal maintenance.

Sophos XGS is often praised for being scalable with both physical and virtual options. Users note varying levels of capability based on models and configurations, with different capacities for users and performance. While some manage large networks effectively, others report limitations requiring hardware upgrades. High availability and expandability across enterprises are common highlights, though some face challenges in surpassing model-specific constraints. Many appreciate flexibility and the ability to accommodate enterprises across various sizes effectively.

Users evaluated Fortinet, Cisco, Palo Alto, SonicWall, WatchGuard, MikroTik, CrowdStrike, and Sangfor. Sophos XGS is noted for its powerful interface and reporting, often favored for small to medium-sized setups. Some find Fortinet and Palo Alto more secure. Sophos XGS is chosen for integration, management, ease in configuring VPN access, and cost-effectiveness. Some prefer Sophos due to existing setups or client requirements. Certain features like EDR seen in competitors are not available in Sophos XGS.

Sophos XGS accelerates functionality with Xstream processors enhancing security against spoofing, ransomware, and cyber threats. Utilized in banking systems, it offers daily attack reports, improved bandwidth management, and accurate setup for directing traffic. Customers experience increased visibility and efficient web filtering. It manages licenses, threat diagnostics, and integrates operations, reducing security costs. Customers benefit from synchronized security functions, understanding its intricacies. Sophos XGS efficiently scans vulnerabilities improving organizational safety.

4.833333333333333

VirusTotal offered superior threat detection compared to Kaspersky, Bitdefender, and others, with various tools and sandboxes previously utilized.

{"quote":"I'd also suggest adding a file selection feature for analysis, an area where other tools provide more options.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"I recommend focusing on the Analysis part, which is very good in VirusTotal.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"VirusTotal provides 95% to 98% accurate information.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

VirusTotal's customer service is praised for support options, though response times and specific issue handling vary among users.

{"quote":"VirusTotal provides 95% to 98% accurate information. The Details feature shows the most valuable information.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"8"}

{"quote":"I would like to see improvements in the score consistency and accuracy.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"3"}

VirusTotal offers easy setup and integration as a SaaS, supported by detailed manuals and dedicated customer support.

Users prefer diverse alternatives over traditional cloud environments for VirusTotal, indicating a demand for flexibility and unique features.

VirusTotal helps analyze malware, scrutinize threats, and verify file legitimacy, aiding cybersecurity in retail and FinTech sectors.

VirusTotal offers scalable solutions, though satisfaction varies due to resource limitations, quotas, and free version constraints.

The majority use Public Cloud for deploying VirusTotal, while a smaller group chooses On-premises solutions.

Users recommend VirusTotal's desktop app, extensions, and APIs for effective file analysis, emphasizing ease, affordability, and support features.

VirusTotal delivers robust threat detection and analysis with integration of 70+ scanners, API systems, and detailed threat intelligence.

VirusTotal should improve its interface, API functionality, AI integration, threat intelligence, and offer more features in non-paid versions.

VirusTotal pricing varies based on needs; some find it economical, others expensive, with options for free trials and negotiations.

VirusTotal users have varied experience levels, ranging from just six months of use to as long as 15 years.

VirusTotal users praise its excellent stability and reliable performance, despite infrequent minor glitches and occasional responsiveness issues.

{"quote":"The addition of a file selection option to analyze files would also enhance the service.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"VirusTotal should add more details like those from competitors such as URL Void or Symantec URL Checker, which show the category of websites.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"I would like to see improvements in the score consistency and accuracy.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Compared to others, it provides comprehensive details, such as the first creation, first submission, and last analysis dates.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The Details feature shows the most valuable information.","score":"7"}

I work in incident response, using VirusTotal daily for accurate security alerts analysis. It excels in detail but needs improved score consistency and more features like competitors. I’ve used URL Void and Symantec URL Checker for similar tasks.

{"quote":"VirusTotal provides 95% to 98% accurate information.","score":"8"}

<p>VirusTotal is a leading tool for inspecting hashes, malware, files, domains, IPs, and URLs, achieving 95% to 98% accuracy while offering detailed suspicious IP information. Despite comprehensive global malware data and dark web scanning for compromised emails, it requires Google Docs knowledge due to lacking documentation and involves manual efforts. VirusTotal's API needs clarity, and it should enhance promotion in the Middle East and improve score consistency.</p>

Users previously utilized diverse tools such as Kaspersky, Bitdefender, Intezer, Check Point ThreatCloud, IP Quality Score, IBM, Microsoft, LogRhythm, JU Sandbox, AnyRun, URL Void, and Symantec URL Checker. They noted VirusTotal's superior detection capability, affordability, and ease of use via API. They appreciated its comprehensive IP and hash reputation information and integrated VirusTotal into their toolkit alongside custom sandboxes and other platforms for threat monitoring.

For enterprise buyers evaluating VirusTotal, users report mixed experiences: some find it economical, while others consider it expensive. It is regarded as reasonable compared to competitors. A one-week free trial is available, allowing potential buyers to discuss needs with VirusTotal’s team. Costs may be negotiated post-trial. Some utilize free licenses with account management to minimize expenses. Pricing seems to depend heavily on specific organizational requirements, making direct discussions beneficial.

<p>VirusTotal is hard to understand due to the need for Google Docs knowledge to create queries and a lack of documentation.</p><p>VirusTotal requires significant manual effort due to predefined reports.</p><p>VirusTotal's API parameters are sometimes unclear and need improvement.</p><p>VirusTotal lacks recognition in the Middle East and needs better promotion.</p><p>VirusTotal's score consistency and accuracy require enhancements.</p>

<p></p>

Users found VirusTotal's initial setup to be straightforward and easy. The process varies based on API usage for websites, apps, or systems, with help available through user manuals and support. Onboarding can take up to a week with minimal personnel. They appreciate the web-based app's ease of use and the SaaS nature of VirusTotal. Some APIs may need clearer instructions, but cloud and API functionalities are extensive. Deployment involves integrating endpoints like PCs and servers.

VirusTotal's customer service and support are generally rated positively, with good technical assistance. However, there are noted delays in handling some cases and concerns about the lack of a solid structure. Support is accessible through email, with separate lines for commercial and technical inquiries, although issues with support numbers and API token delays have been mentioned. Customized packages and performance-based contracts are available, with community support addressing numerous queries. Some users manage support internally without contacting VirusTotal.

Users consider VirusTotal highly stable, rating it ten out of ten. Stability is generally praised as quite good with readily available services. Though a few glitches occur, most of them report consistent performance without significant disruptions. There are some isolated instances of non-responsiveness, but VirusTotal maintains steady operations, unaffected by external input. Many experience reliable stability with no major issues, mentioning consistent stability and effectiveness in its operations.

VirusTotal's customer service and support is rated between 4 to 5 out of 5.

Responses indicate a diverse range of cloud models being employed for VirusTotal, with participants mentioning "Other" consistently. This suggests that companies are leveraging varied cloud environments distinct from the typical public, private, or hybrid options. These unique solutions might cater to specific organizational needs or industry requirements, emphasizing customization and adaptability. Each entity strategically selects a cloud model that aligns with its operational demands, security protocols, and overall infrastructure goals.

Users advise others to utilize VirusTotal effectively by focusing on its desktop application, browser extensions, and API scripts. They recommend skipping the mobile app until improved and emphasize the usefulness of the VirusTotal bot, ChatGPT. VirusTotal is praised for its affordability, ease of use, and detailed information. Users highlight the importance of understanding one's environment and goals, particularly in automation and scalability. They suggest focusing on VirusTotal's Analysis and considering pricing for full integrations.

Most users are implementing VirusTotal in a Public Cloud environment, indicating a strong preference for this deployment model. However, a smaller group opts for an On-premises setup.

VirusTotal excels in its worldwide malware information database, malware detection, IP and URL reputation analysis, and file inspections. Users appreciate its ability to analyze large files, utilize APIs for automation, and provide detailed threat insights, including MD5 and SHA-256 signatures. The community feature offers valuable threat intelligence, while integration with over 70 antivirus scanners enhances threat data collection and privacy. Its detection accuracy and comprehensive details on suspicious activities and behaviors are highly regarded.

<p>VirusTotal boasts a comprehensive worldwide malware information database.</p>
<p>The platform supports detailed checks for hashes, malware, files, domains, IPs, and malicious URLs.</p>
<p>VirusTotal can conduct dark web scans to determine if an email ID has been compromised.</p>
<p>The service provides detailed information about suspicious IPs.</p>
<p>VirusTotal offers the ability to view MD5 or SHA-256 signatures of files, as well as file composition by segments.</p>

VirusTotal needs an improved user interface and better documentation for query creation. The integration of AI models and more API connectors is lacking. Enhancements in threat correlation and reduction of false positives are needed. The platform should provide more accessible features in the non-paid version and expand advertisement efforts, especially in the Middle East. Advanced features like first-level protection and increased endpoint security are also areas needing attention.

Users have utilized VirusTotal for a range of six months to 15 years.

Organizations primarily utilize VirusTotal for malware analysis, cybersecurity investigations, and monitoring suspicious activities. They employ it to check hashes, IP addresses, and URLs for malicious intent. It aids in analyzing samples, detecting phishing attempts, and creating alerts for regional cyber threats. Users value its API for determining IP maliciousness and its private scanning feature for confidential file examination. VirusTotal is integral to enhancing security processes and uncovering information about potential threats.

Organizations using VirusTotal express satisfaction with its scalability, though some mention areas for improvement, especially regarding quotas and file size limits. Integration with other tools and custom APIs enhances scalability. While not extensively tested in very large environments, it is generally applicable to various setups. Limitations appear in the free version related to file size and batch scanning, but users with appropriate contracts manage without significant issues. Some praise its capability to deliver necessary details.

8.65