Pure Storage FlashBlade is praised for its stability. Users report it as stable, reliable, and impressive, with minimal downtime and smooth hardware upgrades. Many highlight zero downtime during their hardware operations over years of usage. There are rare issues with one system requiring multiple maintenance visits. Most rate stability highly, often ten out of ten, emphasizing the dependability and performance of the hardware without crashing or freezing.

A majority of entities are utilizing Pure Storage FlashBlade with an on-premises deployment model, showcasing a preference for this approach. A small number have opted for deployment in a private cloud environment, highlighting some diversity in deployment choices. However, the prevalence of on-premises deployment is significant among users.

Pure Storage FlashArray offers high-performance, low-latency storage for enterprise workloads in virtualized, primary, and backup environments.

<p>Pure Storage FlashBlade simplifies storage with easy setup and transparent dashboards, aiding capacity management and provisioning. Enhanced performance speeds reduce ownership costs by up to 20%. Reliable data replicas ensure safety, and integration with VMware enhances scalability. Challenges include Pure Storage Orchestrator feature development, unmet deduplication rates, and delayed technical support. Pricing and licensing fees are concerns, with users desiring better cost efficiency and improved integration with public clouds and hybrid solutions.</p>

Pure Storage FlashArray offers scalable, efficient storage with non-disruptive upgrades, ideal for large enterprises despite high costs.

Pure Storage FlashBlade users point out several areas for improvement. There is a need for better integration with public clouds and enhancement in hybrid solutions. Many call for increased deduplication and improved SMB support. They desire stronger cloud integration, expanded protocol support, and improvement in storage analytics. Technical support has declined, and pricing needs adjustment. Configuration should be simplified, and the documentation should be more comprehensive. Expanding features like Snapshots and enhancing the SOS API are also requested.

Users have reported using Pure Storage FlashBlade for a range of three months to five years.

Pure Storage FlashBlade offers ease of use, fast performance, replication capabilities, and seamless scalability. It simplifies storage management with a user-friendly interface and predictive analytics. Provides exceptional speed and low latency supports high throughput data transfer and effective deduplication. Features include seamless integration, cost efficiency, easy installation, and active disaster recovery. Ensures data safety with Safe Mode and boasts reliable stability. Additionally, its object storage is beneficial, enhancing overall operational efficiency.

Pure Storage FlashArray excels in data reduction, performance, scalability, ease of use, and integration with major platforms.

<p>Pure Storage FlashBlade offers straightforward initial setup and self-managed system integration, contributing to operational efficiency.</p>
<p>Deployment and management simplicity lead to reduced total cost of ownership and optimized capacity planning. </p>
<p>Performance enhancements include fast backup, reliable recovery, and seamless scalability.</p>
<p>Disaster recovery, metro clustering, and immutable blades fortify data security and ensure continuous service. </p>
<p>Integration with systems like VMware enhances functionality, while features like replication and active DR support critical data operations. </p>

Pure Storage FlashBlade is primarily utilized for scalable storage in on-premise environments. It is extensively used for data center consolidation, video editing, database testing, cloud-based solutions, high-performance enterprise workloads, NAS systems, object storage, backup, and replication. Users in media, entertainment, and banking sectors leverage FlashBlade for high throughput and data management. Resellers employ it for improved storage capacity, cost-effectiveness, and performance in critical data environments. แขsuggestions are made for mutable data storage and Big Data analytics tasks.

Users recommend starting with a proof of concept for Pure Storage FlashArray, praising its performance, simplicity, and support.

Users considered alternatives such as HPE 3PAR, Dell EMC XtremIO, NetApp, Isilon, Nimble, IBM, and VAST Data. Choices were influenced by cost per terabyte, customer demand, ease of use, politics, performance, and support models. Pure Storage FlashBlade was favored for its interface, training, security features, and the vendor's proactive approach. Some migrated from Dell EMC to Pure due to evolving storage needs and the desire for higher performance within their ecosystems.

Pure Storage FlashArray requires scalability, improved analytics, better integration, cost efficiency, enhanced support, and additional functionalities.

Many users find Pure Storage FlashBlade to be highly scalable, often rating its scalability between eight and ten out of ten. It allows for seamless expansion with minimal downtime, making it suitable for various industries like banking, media, and IT. Some mention ease in scaling up by integrating additional blades, while others find it beneficial for both large and medium-sized enterprises. Users appreciate its performance, although capacity and deduplication could improve.

Pure Storage FlashBlade simplifies storage management, enhances efficiency, and improves performance. Organizations experience reduced latency, higher data security, and significant cost savings. FlashBlade's scalability and ease of use decrease reliance on traditional storage methods. It offers reliable backup capabilities, better data reduction, and energy efficiency, leading to a smaller environmental footprint. With features like predictive analysis and encrypted data management, organizations achieve robust cybersecurity and improved data accessibility, benefiting from noticeable time savings and operational improvements.

{"quote":"We began seeing benefits two to three weeks after we deployed.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"8"}

{"quote":"You don't need 15 years of experience to work on this. It can be easily handled by someone with five years.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"Even individuals with five or six years of experience can handle it.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"8"}

{"quote":"The Pure1 storage management lets us see the details about utilization and everything else for all 40 storage boxes in one place.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"9"}

Pure Storage FlashArray has been used by users for time periods ranging from one to five years effectively.

{"quote":"I recommend FlashArray. It protects your data and has low downtime.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"I rate Pure Storage FlashArray nine out of 10.","score":"7"}

Pure Storage FlashArray boosts efficiency and cost-effectiveness through automation, energy savings, and excellent data compression, enhancing ROI.

{"quote":"You don't need 15 years of experience to work on this. It can be easily handled by someone with five years.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"We have seen a return on investment as the solution has reduced resource requirements, allowing less experienced personnel to manage the storage.","score":"8"}

Pure Storage FlashArray's pricing is higher, but justified by performance, ease of use, and features, making it competitive.

{"quote":"The cost of Pure FlashArray is a bit high compared to peers, but its sustainability and features justify the price.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

Users praise Pure Storage FlashArray for its stability, reliability, high availability, ease of management, and minimal downtime.

Users favored Pure Storage FlashArray for its performance, innovation, simplicity, and the advantages of the Evergreen Program.

Pure Storage FlashArray enhances performance and cost-efficiency with reduced latency, improved productivity, and seamless VMware integration for organizations.

9

8.15

9

7.5

Users chose Pure Storage FlashBlade for cost-effectiveness, ease of use, performance, and support over HPE, Dell, NetApp, and others.

Users explored options including HPE 3PAR, Dell EMC XtremIO, NetApp, Isilon, IBM, and VAST Data. NetApp was found complex Dell EMC representatives influenced migration intentions Nimble had latency issues prompting a switch. They appreciated Pure Storage FlashBlade's interface, lower cost per terabyte, ease of use, and performance. Its out-of-the-box functionality, modernization, and enhanced speed convinced them alongside favorable customer demand and a supportive model. Political decisions influenced some choices

Users chose Pure Storage FlashArray for its performance, cost efficiency, and support, surpassing competitors like Dell EMC and NetApp.

9

{"quote":"I rate FlashArray's scalability nine out of 10.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The cost of Pure FlashArray is a bit high compared to peers, but its sustainability and features justify the price.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"I would like FlashArray to add reports that help us forecast our predicted resource needs based on current usage.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"If you're using FlashArray for critical databases, this is a crucial feature.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The Pure1 storage management lets us see the details about utilization and everything else for all 40 storage boxes in one place.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The Direct FlashArray stands out as one of the best features in the market.","score":"8"}

Before using Pure Storage FlashArray, users explored various options including Dell EMC, NetApp, IBM, and HPE SAN. They experienced issues like performance limitations, high costs, and lack of flash storage. Some users preferred Pure Storage FlashArray for its all-flash capabilities, simplified management, higher performance, better cost-effectiveness, and exceptional customer support. Transition was driven by the need for improved performance, stability, and modern features such as replication, deduplication, and compression.

<p>Pure Storage FlashArray offers extremely low latency and high IOPS with VMware integration, boosting performance with effective inline deduplication and compression. It supports non-disruptive updates, enhancing operational continuity and scalability. However, customers report Purity's compatibility issues with VMware ESXi and concerns regarding setup complexity and costs. Users face scalability challenges and unmet expectations in data reduction on specific workloads, despite the array's consistent sub-millisecond latency.</p>

<p>Pure Storage FlashArray surpasses its competitors by delivering unmatched performance and reliability with effortless, non-disruptive upgrades and seamless integration, ensuring businesses benefit from consistent high-speed data access and exceptional storage efficiency.</p>

Pure Storage FlashArray is perceived as costly compared to some competitors, yet users find the pricing fair considering its high performance and feature set. The all-inclusive pricing model simplifies budgeting, covering needed features without additional licenses. Many appreciate the Evergreen Storage subscription, offering upgrades every three years. While some highlight areas for pricing improvement, others feel its ease of use, reliability, and support justify the investment. Generally, the pricing is competitive in the flash storage market.

<p>Pure Storage FlashArray's initial setup is complex and users often require help to correct issues as they arise.</p><p>Data reduction rates anticipated with Pure Storage FlashArray are lower than expected, contingent upon workloads, which poses a challenge.</p><p>Issues with VMware integration, especially with vCenter, have been observed, including problems with deduplication reporting and plugin compatibility.</p><p>Price is a recurring concern, with costs often described as prohibitive, particularly when compared to other flash storage options.</p><p>Pure Storage FlashArray could benefit from better cloud integration and multi-cloud support to enhance its capabilities.</p>

Pure Storage FlashArray implementation is often completed by vendor teams, integrators, or resellers. Most installations are straightforward and praised for their simplicity and efficiency. Skilled engineers ensure a seamless process, sometimes needing minimal in-house assistance. Users appreciate the expertise and responsiveness of Pure's team and partners. Many choose in-house deployment due to the ease of setup, often guided or completed with Pure's professional services or local partners.

Users consistently emphasize the simplicity and speed of Pure Storage FlashArray's initial setup. Many report completing the process in under an hour, highlighting the intuitive interface and minimal hardware requirements. Some mention that deployment is so straightforward that even sales personnel can manage it. A few note minor challenges in complex environments but still find the setup more efficient than other brands, often requiring less than a day for full deployment.

Pure Storage FlashArray customer service is exceptional, consistently knowledgeable, proactive, and responsive. Support quickly resolves issues, often detecting and addressing problems before they arise. Customers praise frequent communication, expertise, and swift resolutions, rating support highly. Account teams and technical support collaborate to ensure seamless problem-solving. Users appreciate the thoroughness, with many sharing positive experiences during critical situations, such as hardware upgrades or unexpected technical challenges. This reputation for excellence contributes to user satisfaction.

Pure Storage FlashArray reduces total cost of ownership and enhances performance. With streamlined management, fewer resources are needed, saving companies time and labor. Speed improvements allow tasks to be completed more efficiently. Data compression saves storage space. The Evergreen Storage subscription offers continuous upgrades, providing long-term value. Pure Storage's reduced latency and increased user satisfaction contribute to its strong return on investment, despite initial costs being higher than some competitors.

Pure Storage FlashArray's customer service and support is frequently rated between 4.5 and 5 out of 5.

Users advise others to conduct a proof of concept to assess Pure Storage FlashArray’s fit for their environment due to its performance, simplicity, and ease of use. It is praised for reliability, speed, and excellent support, though some note the high cost. Testing deduplication and compression is recommended. It is recognized for making storage management easier and reducing latency. Many recommend the FlashArray for its robust features, including integration with VMware and seamless upgrades.

A large majority of users employ an on-premises deployment model for Pure Storage FlashArray. Several opt for a hybrid cloud approach, with very few utilizing a private cloud setup. This preference indicates a strong inclination towards traditional on-site infrastructure among users.

Pure Storage FlashArray is highly stable and reliable, with many users experiencing no downtime or issues. Clients report excellent performance, ease of upgrades, and robust support. Although some encountered minor upgrade-related concerns, these were swiftly addressed. Users find it efficient, with high uptime and minimal interaction needed post-deployment. Many praise its simplicity and stability compared to competitors, noting significant improvements in operations and reduced downtime. Compatibility and performance are also highlighted positively.

Usage of Pure Storage FlashArray generally spans from less than one year to over five years.

Pure Storage FlashArray requires improvements in scalability and data deduplication. Enhanced support for NAS storage, better performance analytics, and improved cloud integration are needed. The reporting features lack detail, and some find the UI and documentation less intuitive. Many find pricing high. Users desire more seamless VMware integration and smoother upgrades. Troubleshooting, internal data management, and support experiences could be enhanced. More granular control and increased competitiveness in the market would benefit users.

Pure Storage FlashArray is valued for its exceptional speed, ease of use, and robust data reduction technologies. Users appreciate its seamless scalability, low latency, high IOPS, and intuitive interface. The all-flash architecture offers consistent performance improvements, while features like deduplication, compression, and non-disruptive upgrades simplify storage management. The strong support, seamless VMware integration, and predictive performance analytics enhance its appeal, allowing efficient handling of complex workloads and reducing the overall data footprint.

<p>Pure Storage FlashArray provides high performance with low latency, ensuring quick response times across various applications and workloads.</p>

<p>It features non-disruptive upgrades allowing for continuous operations without system downtime during maintenance.</p>

<p>Pure Storage FlashArray offers excellent data reduction through deduplication and compression, optimizing storage utilization and cost-effectiveness.</p>

<p>It enhances reliability and stability, evidenced by minimal reports of downtime or performance issues from users.</p>

<p>Pure Storage FlashArray supports extensive scalability, enabling easy expansion to accommodate growing data needs without complex restructuring.</p>

Organizations primarily utilize Pure Storage FlashArray for high-performance storage needs, focusing on virtualized environments, databases, and critical applications. It supports VMware, Oracle, SQL environments, efficiently handling high IOPS and providing data deduplication benefits. Companies benefit from its all-flash storage for application optimization, cloud integrations, and disaster recovery tasks. It's favored for enterprise-level storage, enabling efficient management, replication, and storage allocation for diverse workloads across various industries.

Pure Storage FlashArray is generally seen as highly scalable and modular. Most users appreciate its ease of scaling, expansion capabilities, and minimal disruption during upgrades. It can handle various workloads efficiently with features like data reduction, though some mention limitations with larger deployments. There is consistent satisfaction with its ability to meet growing demands, even in large enterprise contexts. Users find it beneficial for expanding storage needs seamlessly.

<p>Users evaluated several options including EMC, Dell EMC, NetApp, HPE, Oracle, and Hitachi. Many explored XtremIO, Nimble, and SolidFire. Others considered Kaminario, Tegile, Tintri, IBM, and Cohesity. Some opted for Pure Storage FlashArray due to its performance, ease of use, cost efficiency, and customer feedback. Factors influencing their decision included innovation, support, all-flash capabilities, and the Evergreen Program. Pure Storage FlashArray was often chosen for speed, manageability, and advanced features.</p>

Pure Storage FlashArray enables organizations to effectively utilize space, reducing storage requirements and cost through deduplication and compression. Performance improves noticeably, optimizing application speed and productivity. Organizations experience quick, reliable access to data with minimal management effort. Scalability and flexibility benefit companies managing virtual environments. FlashArray's intuitive interface simplifies administration tasks. Organizations appreciate reduced latency, increased response times, and significant cost savings. FlashArray aids consolidation, enabling better resource allocation and efficient server management.

Users considered options like XtremIO, EMC, Dell, HP, IBM, NetApp, Nimble, SolidFire, Oracle, and Kaminario instead of Pure Storage FlashArray. They highlighted factors like cost, performance, ease of use, and innovation as important decision drivers. Many users found that Pure Storage FlashArray offered advanced features such as automation, flexibility, and speed, outperforming others in key aspects like latency and deduplication. Evergreen storage features and positive user feedback were also influential in their decisions.

8.8

6.9

{"quote":"We have 25 people in our organization who use BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance.","quality_score":"5","sentiment_score":"6"}

{"quote":"BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance delivered exceptional ROI, recouping three years of investment costs within the first year of implementation.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"Downtime is extremely costly, with every ten minutes equating to a ten million dollar loss. Thanks to BlueCat, we have not experienced any downtime in the past two years.","quality_score":"10","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"We would like BlueCat to integrate AI functionality that can provide predictive insights, such as forecasting the percentage of downtime we might experience over the next three months.","quality_score":"5","sentiment_score":"5"}

{"quote":"The initial deployment was straightforward and took five days to complete. Two people were involved in the deployment.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"7"}

10

6.85

{"quote":"It saves costs, reduces downtime, and streamlines business processes.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"I recommend BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance to businesses of all sizes.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance requires minimal maintenance.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"These tools provide comprehensive monitoring capabilities, tracking various performance counters and facilitating effective context management.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"We use several monitoring tools, including Grafana, Dynatrace, SolarWinds, and Plastic.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"I would rate BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance nine out of ten.","score":"8"}

7.0

7.5

8

{"quote":"Thanks to BlueCat, we have not experienced any downtime in the past two years.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"10"}

{"quote":"BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance does not support all network security devices.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"3"}

{"quote":"BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance delivered exceptional ROI, recouping three years of investment costs within the first year of implementation.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"It would be beneficial to have a package that integrates Grafana with BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance, as we currently utilize Grafana in our backend systems.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"We would like BlueCat to integrate AI functionality that can provide predictive insights, such as forecasting the percentage of downtime we might experience over the next three months.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"We currently use BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance on-premises, but it lacks the AI capabilities that are becoming increasingly common in modern security products.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance does not support all network security devices.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Its real-time visibility is a valuable feature for maintaining network health and stability.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance provides excellent analytic capabilities for early problem detection, offering beneficial diagnostic information and actionable remediation steps.","score":"9"}

BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance (BCIA) surpasses its competitors by offering automated monitoring, real-time analytics, and comprehensive network visibility, ensuring optimal performance, security, and compliance for IT infrastructures across diverse environments.

Organizations preferred Red Hat Enterprise Linux for its stability, enterprise support, cost-effectiveness, and open-source advantages over previous systems.

RHEL implementation teams are in-house, leveraging Unix/Linux skills, maintaining with automation tools, occasionally using Red Hat support.

Most users prefer on-premises RHEL deployment, with hybrid cloud also popular; private cloud usage is minimal.

Most respondents use AWS for RHEL, followed by Azure, some choose other providers, and few depend on IBM.

RHEL's setup is straightforward, with helpful documentation and tools, praised for flexibility and quick deployment in varied infrastructures.