Red Hat Enterprise Linux excels in scalability and integration, efficiently handling workloads across hybrid, multi-cloud, and virtualized environments.

Users recommend Red Hat Enterprise Linux for stability and support, suggest automation tools, and emphasize training for effective use.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux provides stability, security, and flexibility with built-in tools, making it ideal for scalable enterprise environments.

5.725

{"quote":"The subscription-based pricing can be costly, particularly for smaller deployments.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"5"}

{"quote":"The team consists of two or three people. We cannot migrate directly from one system to another.","quality_score":"5","sentiment_score":"5"}

{"quote":"I rate Red Hat support seven out of 10. We have only opened one or two cases with technical support, but we've had good experiences.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"We get more frequent patch releases from the vendor weekly, monthly, and quarterly.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"7"}

7.78

RHEL requires better documentation, user-friendliness, pricing, support, security, and integration, with streamlined licensing and improved GUI features.

{"quote":"Setting up clusters can be challenging for new users who don't have hands-on Linux experience without vendor assistance.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I recommend new users get some training on the platform because installations and migrations can be complex.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"I rate Red Hat Enterprise Linux eight out of 10.","score":"7"}

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is used by a diverse user base, ranging from recent adopters to long-time users.

{"quote":"It also has a steep learning curve for employees unfamiliar with Linux, and it demands a skilled team or a dedicated service center to operate effectively.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"3"}

Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers cost savings and efficiency through reliability, scalability, integrated support, and automation capabilities.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers robust support and cost-effectiveness, appealing to enterprises despite its relatively high pricing.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is lauded for its stability, long lifespan, and minimal downtime, excelling in critical applications.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux was chosen for its superior support, cost-effectiveness, stability, security, and enterprise compatibility over alternatives.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux boosts stability, security, productivity, and efficiency while supporting critical applications and hybrid cloud strategies.

7.59375

8.25

{"quote":"We use the knowledgebase to resolve issues as often as we can, but we contact support if we get stuck and can't find the solution.","score":8}

{"quote":"It stays updated about new things coming to our region and provides lots of articles about the products.","score":8}

{"quote":"Red Hat's Knowledgebase is an excellent support resource.","score":8}

{"quote":"They respond immediately based on the SLA level.","score":9}

{"quote":"I rate Red Hat support seven out of 10.","score":7}

{"quote":"It does not have issues with crashing or substantial downtime.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers great stability and performance compared to other operating systems.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"It may be considered expensive compared to other solutions like CentOS or Ubuntu, which offer some of the same features without additional costs.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"The more subscriptions you have, the easier it is to see a return on investment because it helps larger organizations more.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The subscription-based pricing can be costly, particularly for smaller deployments.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The web console is useful for people without Linux backgrounds who lack experience working with the command prompt.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"We use Image Builder to create a Golden Image for our CICD pipelines.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"We use another Red Hat product called Ansible to automate patching tasks and infrastructure deployment.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"We have third-party solutions that provide more in-depth solutions for our cloud and on-premises infrastructure.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"In addition to Linux's built-in security tools, it has Red Hat Enterprise Linux configuration features that provide robust security controls.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"It also has strong security features, is OIS and FIPS certified, and has built-in Linux security configurations.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"We get more frequent patch releases from the vendor weekly, monthly, and quarterly.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The most significant advantage is that it is more stable and secure than other operating systems.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"It also has a steep learning curve for employees unfamiliar with Linux, and it demands a skilled team or a dedicated service center to operate effectively.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The solution operates on a subscription-based model, which may not provide immediate return on investment for small to medium-sized organizations.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Red Hat Enterprise Linux licensing is a bit complex.","score":"7"}

Users have experienced various operating systems before switching to Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Many utilized Linux flavors like CentOS, Ubuntu, SUSE, Debian, Oracle Linux, and Solaris. Others moved from proprietary systems such as Windows, AIX, and HP-UX. Factors influencing the switch included RHEL's enterprise support, stability, cost efficiency, and compatibility with open-source technologies. Many appreciated Red Hat's extensive support options, package management, and performance, ultimately favoring RHEL for its reliability and comprehensive features.

<p>Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) surpasses its competitors by offering robust security features, reliable performance, and comprehensive support, making it an ideal choice for enterprise environments seeking stability and scalability.</p>

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) pricing is perceived as high among users, particularly for small businesses, with support being a significant factor in its cost structure. Many users highlight that bulk licensing offers better value, making it a feasible choice for larger enterprises. The subscription model simplifies management, though it can confuse some due to its complexity. Educational and government sectors commonly seek discounts. Overall, RHEL offers stability and support, which justifies its pricing for enterprise needs but is challenging for budget-constrained organizations.

<p>Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) offers comprehensive support, enhancing user experience and ensuring efficient problem resolution. It is known for exceptional stability and reliability for critical applications. Robust security measures help meet compliance requirements. Integration capabilities allow seamless interoperability. RHEL reduces total cost of ownership by streamlining operations with easy management and automation tools. However, pricing, documentation, and upgrades need improvement, and there is limited support for older versions and complex licensing.</p>

<p>Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) has a documented need for improvement in its upgrade policies between major versions, making the transition less cumbersome.</p> <p>The pricing and licensing models are considered high and complex, with room for making the system more accessible to small and medium-sized businesses.</p> <p>The documentation supports, such as technical papers and online resources, require refinement to make them more comprehensive and user-friendly.</p> <p>There is a demand for better integration and support for open-source tools and application servers like JBoss and Tomcat.</p> <p>Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) could benefit from enhanced patch management to ensure system consistency and minimize disruptions.</p>

Implementation of Red Hat Enterprise Linux varies across organizations, with many deploying and maintaining it in-house, utilizing teams ranging from a few individuals to several dozen. Some utilize Red Hat's professional services or consultants for initial deployment and ongoing support, while others handle upgrades, patching, and maintenance independently. In some cases, integration with existing systems involves vendors or third-party partners, using tools like Ansible for automation and infrastructure management.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux's customer service and technical support receive positive feedback for being responsive, knowledgeable, and effective in resolving issues. Response times can vary, and the initial support tier may not always provide immediate solutions. Customers appreciate the documentation and community resources, though improvements in navigability and direct support are suggested. Red Hat's support is considered superior to many vendors, especially in complex situations, with many users rating it highly.

RHEL's initial setup is generally straightforward, often described as easy and efficient. Many users leverage automation tools like Ansible and Kickstart, speeding up deployment. Those with experience find it intuitive, while newcomers may face a learning curve. Documentation is viewed as helpful, aiding in overcoming challenges. Deployment duration varies, from minutes to weeks, based on configuration complexity and infrastructure. Organizations frequently use scripts and templates, integrating RHEL into various environments, such as cloud and on-premises.

Many users deploy Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) on Amazon Web Services (AWS), with a significant portion opting for Microsoft Azure. A smaller number choose IBM, Google, or other cloud platforms.

Based on the responses, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is mostly rated between 8 and 9 out of 10 for its customer service and support.

RHEL delivers strong ROI through reduced licensing costs, reliability, and security. Organizations save time and money due to its stability and ease of management. Users highlight cost-effectiveness, scalability, and low maintenance needs, contributing to operational savings. The platform’s consistent performance and skilled support alleviate staffing needs. These factors allow teams to focus on innovation and enhance productivity, with significant savings recognized over competitors like AIX and VMware. Users value its community and ecosystem, further enhancing ROI.

Most users are deploying Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) primarily on-premises. There is significant usage of hybrid cloud as well. Some have opted for public cloud or private cloud. It appears that on-premises remains the most preferred option, while hybrid cloud sees considerable adoption. Public cloud follows in preference, with private cloud being less popular. Collectively, these methods indicate diverse deployment practices among users exploring different models to match their requirements.

Users advise others to utilize Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) for its stability, robust security, and excellent enterprise support. They highlight the effectiveness of its built-in tools for learning and recommend trying Kickstart for installations. RHEL’s extensive documentation and community support are praised, making it ideal for both virtualized and bare-metal environments. Users suggest considering RHEL when transitioning from other systems and emphasize its compatibility with open-source applications for containerization and automation.

RHEL has consistently demonstrated exceptional stability across various environments. Users report it operating for extended periods without crashes or significant issues, including configurations with high workloads and business-critical applications. RHEL's stability is often highlighted as superior to other operating systems, maintaining availability with minimal downtime. Despite occasional third-party software compatibility challenges, its robust performance remains reliable, making it a preferred choice for many organizations relying on stable, long-term OS solutions.

The use of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) ranges from a few months to over 25 years.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux needs improvements in areas like documentation, support services, pricing, and ease of use. Users report issues with outdated software versions, complicated upgrade processes, and inefficient patching. There is demand for enhanced training resources, better integration, and more user-friendly interfaces. Security features and subscription management require attention, alongside increased flexibility in licensing and more developer-friendly options. Enhanced cloud services and automation features are also desired.

The most valuable features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux include stability, security, reliability, and enterprise support. Its robust security and update features provide essential protection. The system is user-friendly with efficient package management and automation through tools like Ansible. It offers strong integration with cloud and virtualization platforms, seamless application deployment, and high availability. RHEL's extensive community support enhances its value, making it a preferred choice for deploying critical applications across diverse environments.

<p>Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers enterprise-level stability and resilience, running continuously without failure and providing robust network management tools without the need for frequent reboots.</p>

<p>Security features, combined with comprehensive documentation, enable effective and immediate vulnerability management, keeping the system compliant and protected against threats.</p>

<p>Patch management and Red Hat Satellite integration facilitate streamlined updates and system management across various environments, enhancing operational efficiency and automation processes.</p>

<p>Support services are highly responsive and knowledgeable, providing quick resolution to issues and access to a wealth of information through Red Hat’s documentation and customer support channels.</p>

<p>Its compatibility with numerous hardware vendors and scalability options make it a prime choice for diverse computing environments, from virtualized systems to physical deployments, with commendable performance and optimized resource utilization.</p>

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is used for a wide range of purposes, including website hosting, server management, virtualization, database hosting, and application development. Organizations utilize it for cloud and on-premises deployments, with use cases in sectors like telecommunications, finance, and government. Its stability, security, and support are valued for various applications, from transaction processing and automation to SAP migrations and high-performance computing. Versions 6 to 9 are commonly used across different environments.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux exhibits exceptional scalability, handling a range of capacities and workloads without issue. Whether scaling horizontally or vertically, it performs efficiently across cloud and on-premises environments. Users report seamless adaptation to increased demands, supporting various applications and thousands of users effortlessly. With flexible deployment options, RHEL maintains stability and efficiency in diverse infrastructure settings. Its robust performance in managing resources makes it a reliable choice for growing infrastructures.

Organizations using Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) report stability, improved uptime, and enhanced security for business-critical applications. RHEL centralizes development, enabling smoother automation and integration with tools like Ansible and Satellite. The open-source nature provides flexibility, reducing vendor lock-in and lowering total cost of ownership. RHEL's security features ensure compliance and risk reduction, while integration capabilities enhance deployment speed and operational efficiency across hybrid and cloud environments.

Users assessed alternatives like SUSE, Ubuntu, CentOS, and Oracle Linux. SUSE and Ubuntu were considered less reliable or hard to manage compared to RHEL. CentOS had support issues; Oracle Linux had mixed feedback. Evaluations highlighted RHEL's better support, cost-effectiveness, stability, and compatibility with corporate environments. Open-source capability and technical guidance were crucial. Although alternatives were evaluated, RHEL's consistent support and corporate alignment were decisive factors.

{"quote":"Our return on investment with ThreatLocker is about 20%.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"ThreatLocker Protect has reduced our help desk tickets by about 40%, as every software they use is approved by me before use, limiting unauthorized installations.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"I would rate ThreatLocker Protect an eight out of ten.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"7"}

ThreatLocker Protect's integration was smooth, supported by expert teams, thorough processes, and continuous guidance from solution engineers.

{"quote":"Its deployment took about a week.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"5"}

{"quote":"I would rate their support a five out of ten. It could be better, especially with response times.","quality_score":"5","sentiment_score":"3"}

{"quote":"I would rate scalability a seven out of ten. We have one location but multiple departments. Overall, we have 25 users.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"6"}

{"quote":"I would rate stability a six out of ten.","quality_score":"5","sentiment_score":"4"}

They switched to ThreatLocker for its robust features and ease of management, replacing Webroot, SentinelOne, and AppLocker.

{"quote":"I would rate ThreatLocker Protect an eight out of ten.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"It helps manage user access and secures the system efficiently.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"I would recommend ThreatLocker Protect to other users as it is a very important tool for IT administrators like me.","score":"8"}

8.75

{"quote":"ThreatLocker Protect has improved my organization greatly.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"10"}

ThreatLocker Protect enforces zero-trust security by allowlisting applications, preventing unauthorized software on servers, workstations, and endpoints.

ThreatLocker Protect's setup is easy, with strong support, efficient deployment, minimal issues, and effective scaling and management.

{"quote":"The support could be quicker.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"2"}

4.75

ThreatLocker Protect is deployed via Public Cloud, Private Cloud, On-premises, and Hybrid Cloud, with cloud options being preferred.

Users recommend thorough planning, training, and support consultation for effective ThreatLocker Protect deployment and optimal security results.

ThreatLocker Protect's customer support is fast, efficient, highly rated, but occasionally offers hasty responses needing further clarification.

3.75

7

ThreatLocker Protect offers effortless access and management with strong security features, training, and support to meet cybersecurity standards.

7.5

ThreatLocker Protect excels in scalability, adapting to various business sizes and efficiently managing numerous endpoints with reliable performance.

ThreatLocker Protect needs improved training, support, integration, customization, and flexibility to enhance user experience and network efficiency.

Organizations benefit from ThreatLocker Protect with better security, increased client trust, higher revenue, and rapid return on investment.

ThreatLocker Protect users have varied usage durations, ranging from four months to six years, highlighting its widespread adoption.

{"quote":"If it aligns with the work they do, I approve it.","score":"6"}

ThreatLocker Protect is stable with rare, quickly resolved issues, and appreciated for minimizing downtime and enhancing stability.

{"quote":"Once I get a request, I go over to the application they need to install.","score":"5"}

{"quote":"I know which applications each user is supposed to use and what they need.","score":"5"}

{"quote":"Overall, we have 25 users. Our company is small.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"We have one location but multiple departments.","score":"6"}