{"quote":"Strong winds can disrupt its functionality, and the opening and closing mechanism can be awkward in tight spaces.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The product can only shield a small area, making it less effective for larger spaces or multiple users.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Cisco Umbrella can be improved in terms of limited coverage and wind vulnerability.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Customers choose Cisco Umbrella for its DNS layer security, policy management, and mobile device support.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The firewall and integration capability with other security solutions are valuable for effective security management.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"It provides threat protection by blocking threats before they reach the user's device.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Cisco Umbrella offers DNS layer security, a secure web gateway, and cloud access security broker functionality.","score":"9"}

I use Cisco Umbrella primarily for DNS layer security, a secure web gateway, and cloud access security broker functionality. While it enhances cybersecurity and provides ROI, it requires improvement in coverage and is susceptible to wind disruption. Infoblox was our alternative.

<p>Cisco Umbrella offers DNS layer security to block threats like malware and phishing before reaching the network, with features such as content filtering and a secure web gateway. It is praised for ease of setup, contributing to productivity through stability. While providing visibility over internet activity, it lacks DNS support in some regions, requires better integration with external feeds, and has high pricing. Improved malware protection and product integration are needed.</p>

Users previously utilized diverse tools before Cisco Umbrella, including Wild West personal devices, Cisco 819, Cradlepoint, iPrism, Websense, Barracuda, Zscaler, Bluecoat ASG, Infoblox, OpenDNS, Sophos, Zscaler, and firewalls from Palo Alto and Fortinet. Many found Cisco Umbrella advantageous for its cloud-based flexibility, ease of management, proactive defense, and comprehensive security integration, making it well-suited for modern networks and cybersecurity needs.

Pricing and licensing of Cisco Umbrella is generally seen as fair, though some find it expensive or confusing. Organizations appreciate the subscription model and flexibility in licensing options, but potential buyers should be aware of extra fees for additional features. Enterprises may face challenges due to the high costs associated with scalability and integration. Pricing varies based on use case and region, with discounts available for educational sectors and larger purchase agreements. Overall, negotiating directly with Cisco often results in better deals.

<p></p>

<p>Cisco Umbrella requires better integration with external threat feeds to enhance scoring.</p><p>It needs to improve its DNS services, including IPv6 query support and better management of bandwidth reports.</p><p>The pricing is high, and licensing terms are often unclear to many users outside of the USA.</p><p>Cisco Umbrella's technical support response times can be slow, impacting user experience.</p><p>Better integration with Cisco products and third-party tools is needed to improve ease of use.</p>

Most implementations were conducted internally, often described as straightforward, intuitive, or requiring minimal external assistance. Teams recommend in-house setup if possible, with some noting assistance from Cisco partners or consultants was useful. Key recommendations include notifying users before changes, automating procedures on domain networks, and considering DNS needs. Some teams emphasize the importance of involving proper teams and maintaining clear documentation, ensuring effective management without frequent intervention.

Many users found Cisco Umbrella's initial setup straightforward, with quick deployment possible for those with basic networking knowledge. Documentation and support enhanced ease of use, though integration and policy fine-tuning could introduce complexity. The setup process, often rated highly for simplicity, varied based on individual infrastructure and specific requirements. Some users experienced faster implementations through cloud services, while others required more time for complex integrations or large deployments.

Cisco Umbrella's customer service and support are very good, with users frequently highlighting responsive technical support and helpful sales engineers. The knowledge base aids self-troubleshooting, while efficient response times enhance the experience. Some complexities remain, such as visibility into solutions and occasional slow responses, but users appreciate rapid resolutions and professional assistance. Communication through phone calls is often preferred, with high ratings given for overall service satisfaction.

Users primarily operate Cisco Umbrella on the Public Cloud. Significant numbers adopt On-premises and Private Cloud models, while less frequently opting for Hybrid Cloud setups. This indicates a predominant preference towards cloud-based approaches, with intermittent use of other environments like Private and On-premises.

Cisco Umbrella provided a noticeable return due to increased security, time savings, and reduced malware incidents. Clients observed cost reductions, enhanced productivity, and improved application performance. Customers appreciated Umbrella's cloud-based access and eliminated the need for extensive on-site infrastructure. Many noted the proactive network protection from threats like ransomware and bots. Metrics revealed the frequency of blocked malicious sites, and reduced support time showed financial benefits. The pricing was found minimal for the security provided.

Customer service and support of Cisco Umbrella is rated between 8 and 10 out of 10.

Cisco Umbrella is frequently regarded as stable and reliable by users, with minimal issues reported. Stability is often rated highly, with many citing consistent uptime and minimal disruptions. Although hiccups occur occasionally, they are typically linked to external factors rather than Cisco Umbrella itself. Users appreciate the ease of maintaining network connectivity. Frequent mentions of excellent stability indicate Cisco Umbrella's robustness, with many users experiencing no significant outages or downtimes over extended periods.

Users advise others to ensure Cisco Umbrella aligns with their security needs, emphasizing proper planning for deployment and configuration. It's praised for ease of use, seamless integration, DNS protection, and useful for both small and large enterprises. They recommend leveraging Cisco Umbrella's powerful API for integration and testing before full implementation. Regular fine-tuning is necessary. While highly rated, users still suggest evaluating costs and feature fit, considering other solutions for complete DNS management.

Many respondents prefer other cloud providers over well-known options for Cisco Umbrella. While Amazon Web Services is mentioned, the majority lean towards unspecified alternatives.

<p>Provides extensive DNS visibility that improves security through blocking of malware, phishing, command and control servers, and more.</p>
<p>Centralized, device-agnostic management allows for streamlined control over internet experiences across various devices.</p>
<p>Feature-rich, including DNS-based protection, web filtering, and the ability to quickly adapt and block new threats.</p>
<p>Deploys easily and provides strong cybersecurity with minimal operational disruption, enhancing user productivity and network safety.</p>
<p>Utilizes granular content filtering and threat intelligence to enhance security posture efficiently and effectively.</p>

Cisco Umbrella users desire improved WHOIS information, better reporting and filtering options, enhanced integration with tools like third-party DNS services and SIEM products, and more security features such as malware and DDoS protection. They seek ease in licensing and policy creation, streamlined user interfaces, local data centers, and efficient customer support. Users also express dissatisfaction with configuration complexity, high costs, limited feature set for larger organizations, and inadequate granularity for user-specific rules and analytics.

Cisco Umbrella is highly scalable, accommodating diverse user bases without performance issues. Companies find it straightforward to add users, sites, or endpoints. It's cloud-based, handling varied environments globally. Admins appreciate its ease of deployment and flexibility, supporting seamless growth and scale. Licensing options cater to different needs, allowing effortless expansion. The tool's structure efficiently supports small and large organizations, with no significant limitations in scaling, ensuring robust scalability across various user demands.

Cisco Umbrella's valuable features include powerful query options, reliable DNS-based protection, customizable web content filtering, and malware blocking. The user interface is intuitive, enabling easy deployment and integration with existing systems. Umbrella excels in providing single-pane management, enhancing security posture without impacting user experience. Cisco Umbrella's efficient DNS security allows organizations to maintain network connectivity, ensuring threat detection and reporting capabilities with minimal administrative overhead. Security policies are adaptable, supporting compliance and hybrid environments.

Users have been utilizing Cisco Umbrella for a range of a few months to over 16 years.

Cisco Umbrella's primary use case is providing DNS layer security for malware protection and content filtering. Organizations utilize it for cloud-based security services to guard against DNS-based threats, ensuring safe internet browsing. It supports remote workers by securing endpoints and allows detailed control over internet access. Companies rely on Cisco Umbrella's capabilities for providing significant security measures, integrating with existing systems, and managing network traffic efficiently.

Users considered alternatives like Linux-based proxy servers, pfSense, OpenDNS, Symantec PGP, CyberArk, Cyberwatch, Skybox, Fortinet, Zscaler, Palo Alto, Trend Micro, Akamai, Area 1, Prisma, Infoblox, and Palo Alto. They preferred Cisco Umbrella for ease of deployment and management, seamless integration, and existing compatibility. Umbrella's user-friendly interface, global network footprint, and advantageous licensing options appealed to many. Lack of interest in complex alternatives also influenced decisions favoring Cisco.

Cisco Umbrella enhances security by blocking malicious domains and preventing threats like malware and phishing. It boosts productivity through web content filtering, reduces IT workload by managing daily threats, and supports hybrid work setups. It provides visibility into internet usage, integrates with cloud services, and enables remote work security. Cisco Umbrella's centralized management allows efficient threat response, ensuring user protection in diverse environments. Its seamless operation maintains network security while reducing manual interventions.

Users chose Cisco Umbrella for easy deployment, integration, cloud features, and security, despite some considering alternatives due to cost.

Users explored alternatives to Cisco Umbrella, including OpenDNS, Zscaler, Fortinet, Palo Alto, and pfSense. Many prioritized integration ease with existing infrastructure, simplicity in deployment, and financial considerations. OpenDNS attracted users for its cloud infrastructure, while Zscaler drew attention for scalability. Compatibility with Cisco ecosystems, ease of use, and global network presence were significant factors. Other options like Infoblox, Symantec, and CyberArk were considered, but many favored Cisco Umbrella's comprehensive features and efficient management.

{"quote":"Avolution ABACUS allows for flexible enterprise architecture analysis.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"8"}

Avolution ABACUS customer service is exceptional in Australia but less responsive in Europe and the Middle East.

Avolution ABACUS setup time varies from hours to weeks, influenced by customization needs, with strong support and minimal maintenance.

Avolution ABACUS is used on-premises for enterprise architecture, supporting BPM modeling, EA tools, and project analysis.

Avolution ABACUS offers powerful customization but requires careful planning, technical support, and training for successful implementation.

Avolution ABACUS requires optimization in integration, usability, and intelligence, alongside improved UI, dashboards, and mobile capabilities.

Users transitioned to Avolution ABACUS for its cost-effectiveness and ease, preferring it over previous complex and costly tools.

{"quote":"While Avolution ABACUS is flexible, it can be complex to work with as it requires knowledge of specific configurations to customize the product.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"2"}

Avolution ABACUS installation is straightforward with documentation, needing minimal vendor help, though integration requires vendor-supported APIs.

{"quote":"The focus should be on implementing and understanding enterprise architecture concepts rather than the specific tool.","score":"9"}

Most entities prefer on-premises deployment of Avolution ABACUS, emphasizing control and security over traditional infrastructure models.

7.25

Avolution ABACUS is viewed as scalable, but users note complexities and limitations for non-Windows systems and large organizations.

Avolution ABACUS provides customizable meta-models, strong catalog management, impact analysis, 3D modeling, and integration for enhanced enterprise architecture.

{"quote":"It would be beneficial to have seminars or other methods to educate companies on the advantages of enterprise architecture concepts.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Avolution ABACUS is flexible, it can be complex to work with as it requires knowledge of specific configurations to customize the product.","score":"8"}

Users have engaged with Avolution ABACUS for durations spanning from six months to a decade.

Avolution ABACUS offers substantial value for $2000 annually, justified by its robust features despite higher prices than alternatives.

{"quote":"This helps identify potential improvements and facilitates the creation of roadmaps for implementation.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"It supports evaluating architecture through corporate objectives, business processes, and IT infrastructure.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Avolution ABACUS allows for flexible enterprise architecture analysis.","score":"8"}

Avolution ABACUS is stable, with minor issues resolved quickly, leading to good user experiences without major problems.

Avolution ABACUS offers EA Repository insights, cost-tracking, scenario planning, and evaluation tools to optimize organizational strategy and operations.

Users evaluated ARIS, MEGA, Troux, System Architect, and others for enterprise architecture, noting ARIS's alignment with architecture concepts.

Before Avolution ABACUS, ProVision was utilized, evolving through acquisitions by Metastorm and OpenText. ARIS, LeanIX, IBM, MEGA HOPEX, and QualiWare were also explored. ProVision faced development stagnation under OpenText. ARIS was noted for its reliable support and stability compared to ABACUS's occasional crashes. LeanIX, Essential Cloud, and Essential Docker offered alternatives for diagramming and enterprise architecture needs, with cost considerations impacting choice. QualiWare faced criticism for complexity and lack of decision support capabilities.

I evaluated enterprise architecture at the European Court in Luxembourg, using Avolution ABACUS for flexible analysis. While it provides valuable features for architecture assessment, customizing it can be challenging without specific knowledge. Comparing it with ARIS Process Governance shows overlapping concepts.

Avolution ABACUS is priced at approximately $2000 annually for enterprise licensing, including maintenance. While not the cheapest option, it is perceived as reasonable compared to competitors, especially for its comprehensive features. The tool is server-based, offering enhanced capability and analysis. Subscriptions are offered annually, sometimes with special discounts for extended terms. Its cost-effectiveness becomes apparent with sustained use, despite being pricier than some alternatives like Essential or Deltek, due to its robust diagramming and metamodel capabilities.

<p>Avolution ABACUS cannot run on a Mac or Linux, which imposes limitations.</p> <p>There are integration issues with Microsoft Office and other software.</p> <p>Regional support and flexibility in model selection need improvement.</p> <p>It requires designing dashboards, lacking built-in intelligence.</p> <p>Technical support in certain regions, especially Europe, needs enhancement.</p>

Avolution ABACUS surpasses its competitors by offering robust modeling and analytics capabilities, advanced collaboration tools, and comprehensive frameworks that streamline enterprise architecture management processes, delivering exceptional insights and efficiency for organizations across various industries.

<p>Avolution ABACUS is customizable and scalable, providing valuable traceability and enterprise architecture analysis with a meta-model, messaging, and simulation features. Despite limitations on Mac or Linux and a need for improved technical support, ABACUS offers responsive assistance and detailed solutions. Customization requires specific configurations, adding complexity. Regional support challenges exist. Despite these, Avolution ABACUS remains a versatile tool for businesses requiring detailed enterprise analysis capabilities.</p>

Experiences with Avolution ABACUS's initial setup vary. Some find it straightforward, especially for individual use, while others note complexity in customization and enterprise deployment. It can range from taking a few hours for simpler setups to weeks for comprehensive ones involving customization. Vendor support and documentation are often utilized. Deployment ease can depend on user resources and project scope, with some requiring significant initial preparation and others achieving faster, efficient installation.

Consultants found Avolution ABACUS documentation helpful for installation on websites. Deployment is self-sufficient, though vendor support helps. Maintenance requires planning and training for new users and administrators to manage the metamodel. Integration involves APIs and vendor assistance. Training is recommended for designers, architects, and developers. A project in Luxembourg was executed with Deloitte's partnership.

Avolution ABACUS customer service is praised frequently, with many noting quick response times and effective solutions. Some feedback suggests room for improvement in Europe and the Middle East, mentioning occasional delays and knowledge gaps. Users have reported positive interactions, especially in North America and Australia, though response times can vary. Many appreciate the comprehensive support materials provided. Compared to LeanIX or Essential Cloud, some note fewer forums and longer response times.

Users advise others to consider both technical support and tool stability while evaluating Avolution ABACUS. They emphasize its customization and flexibility but note integration limitations and high costs. Improvements are needed in the user interface and customer support. It's crucial to train users and maintain a clear methodology. Avolution ABACUS is praised for its enterprise architecture capabilities but fits different budgets and needs based on its use case.

<p>Avolution ABACUS can be dynamically customized to meet changing business needs.</p>
<p>It offers valuable traceability features, allowing objects to be interconnected and relationships easily displayed.</p>
<p>Technical support for Avolution ABACUS is responsive and provides detailed answers.</p>
<p>Avolution ABACUS is scalable and stable for roadmapping and modeling, featuring comprehensive dashboards and portfolio management.</p>
<p>It allows for flexible enterprise architecture analysis and features like simulation and messaging.</p>

Avolution ABACUS requires enhancements in flexibility for analysis parameters and improved BPM capabilities. Its user interface and integration features, including those with third-party tools and Microsoft Office, need refinement. Dashboards are missing, limiting management's ability to view results. Support for UML, regional presence, and pricing are drawbacks. The software is resource-intensive and lacks automated updates for architecture diagrams. Users often need additional support for customization and the creation of dashboards.

Most users choose an on-premises deployment model for Avolution ABACUS, indicating a preference for maintaining infrastructure within their own facilities. A smaller segment opts for a private cloud setup, highlighting a trend towards leveraging cloud environments while ensuring control and security. The evident inclination towards on-premises suggests a significant number of organizations prioritize direct management of their systems.

Avolution ABACUS is largely stable according to users. Many have not encountered problems, reporting very good stability. However, some experience technical issues such as the need for restarts, occasional slowness, and crashes when handling numerous records. These problems typically resolve with vendor support. Despite these issues, many attest to its reliability, noting it doesn’t frequently crash or have glitches. Stability seems to improve with increased user familiarity and efficient technical assistance.

Avolution ABACUS' most valued features include its customizable meta-model, analytical and simulation engines, traceability, and predefined components. Users appreciate its flexibility in dynamic customization, comprehensive impact analysis, and 3D modeling capabilities. It supports multiple frameworks, offering easy integration and model management. Extensive catalog and diagramming tools, along with automatic link generation, enhance usability. It excels in portfolio management with efficient dashboards and role-based permissions for seamless report generation and architecture evaluation.

Organizations primarily use Avolution ABACUS for enterprise architecture, focusing on on-premises deployments. It serves various needs such as enterprise architecture planning, application domain architecture, and EA tool demonstration for clients in different sectors, including banking and consultancy. Users highlight its capabilities in modeling enterprises using frameworks like Zachman, supporting BPM modeling, and providing tools for analysis, reporting, identifying project lags, and managing architectural overlaps and gaps.

Users have been employing Avolution ABACUS for about six months to ten years.

Avolution ABACUS offers scalability with versatile features and enterprise versions giving business intelligence views. Users report mixed experiences, with some encountering limitations on platforms like Mac or Linux and the necessity of both client and server components. Others note acceptable performance in complex environments and effort-free scalability by purchasing additional licenses. Organizations utilize built-in repositories and plan expanded usage for large teams, finding the tool suit various needs from enterprise architects to broader IT teams.

Users considered ARIS, MEGA, Troux, and System Architect. They also looked into MEGA HOPEX and Archi. MEGA and Archi appeared alongside other tools in the upper right quadrant of Gartner Magic Quadrant. ARIS Process Governance aligns with enterprise architecture concepts. Avolution ABACUS was preferred.

Avolution ABACUS significantly enhances EA Repository and analysis capabilities. Users gain better operational insights and understand project impacts efficiently. It helps them manage IT landscape costs, covering components, databases, licensing, and operating expenses. Tracking budget plans aids transformation roadmaps. Scenario planning and forecasting are heavily utilized. Teams conduct evaluations to pinpoint improvements and propose roadmaps for upcoming projects and implementations, offering a competitive edge compared to other tools.

AWS Step Functions is preferred for versatility, while other systems face challenges with support, cost, or outdated functionality.

{"quote":"The cost is average, provided it is configured correctly. AWS charges for active usage periods.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"6"}

{"quote":"AWS Step Functions is serverless and can be configured manually using JSON files or via an interface, making it straightforward like other AWS services.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"7"}

AWS Step Functions customer service is generally helpful and responsive, but can vary and may lack dedicated support for smaller organizations.

{"quote":"AWS Step Functions offers advanced workflows that save time and enhance efficiency by reducing delays and ensuring consistent orchestration among various services.","quality_score":"10","sentiment_score":"10"}

AWS Step Functions setup is quick and generally easy, though beginners may face initial complexity with connectors and features.

Most organizations prefer AWS Step Functions in the Public Cloud, with minimal adoption of on-premises deployment.

7.25

7.8

Consult experts on AWS Step Functions for effectiveness, UI familiarity, cost considerations, and compare with alternatives for requirements.

AWS Step Functions is praised for its scalability by both startups and large organizations, supporting varying demand and remote work.

AWS Step Functions orchestrate workflows, manage data pipelines, and optimize cost-efficiency by connecting serverless services in parallel.

AWS Step Functions offer seamless AWS integration with a user-friendly interface for efficient workflow orchestration and debugging.

AWS Step Functions needs improvements in pricing, integrations, data limits, IDE support, and adaptive coding capabilities for enterprises.

AWS Step Functions is flexible but potentially costly; proper configuration is key to managing expenses and predicting costs.

AWS Step Functions has been utilized for durations varying from several months to a decade for different applications.

Users commend AWS Step Functions for stability, rating it highly for reliability and consistent performance without encountering issues.

AWS Step Functions integrates services for adaptable workflows, enhancing manageability and efficiency while significantly reducing infrastructure costs.

{"quote":"AWS charges for active usage periods.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The cost is average, provided it is configured correctly.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"It provides a graphical design interface that allows easy configuration, which improves process efficiency by managing workflows and ensuring there are no inconsistencies or delays.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"AWS Step Functions offers advanced workflows that save time and enhance efficiency by reducing delays and ensuring consistent orchestration among various services.","score":"9"}

I find AWS Step Functions to be an effective orchestration tool, especially with AWS services. Its graphical interface simplifies workflow management and boosts efficiency, though I see no immediate areas needing improvement compared to solutions like Airflow.

Before using AWS Step Functions, they used Apache Airflow but faced challenges with debugging and its Python-only limitation. Zapier and Appian were explored but proved costly for higher workloads and unsuitable for secure environments. Camunda was deemed outdated. Azure Workflow was tried for visual workflows without automation. Vonage was also used. AWS Step Functions was chosen due to its flexibility, popularity, and functionality similar to Airflow for orchestration within AWS services.