Users considered ELK, Runecast, Microsoft Hyper-V, Splunk, Elastic's X-Pack, Centreon, syslog-ng, and Nutanix Prism before choosing VMware Aria Operations for Logs. Some tested Runecast for additional reporting, found VMware's user-friendliness superior to Hyper-V, and transitioned from Splunk due to cost. Elastic's X-Pack was noted for similar functionality. Others relied on VMware’s existing ecosystem with vRealize Log Insight and syslog-ng for multi-vendor environments. Nutanix Prism was preferred for its user-friendly interface.

Users explored alternatives due to SCSM's limitations, favoring Ivanti for ease, while ServiceNow gained popularity for web-based tools.

Users explored various options including ServiceNow, BMC Helix ITSM, InfraStruXure Central, Ivanti, IBM BigFix, and others. Microsoft’s integration capabilities were a key advantage. Some preferred SCSM for its stability while others highlighted user interface and reporting limitations. Jamf and ManageEngine were noted for their custom features. Companies also considered tools like Tableau and VMware, switching from manual processes to automated solutions with varying degrees of success and preference.

Users preferred Postman for its user-friendly interface and free option despite considering many comprehensive testing tool alternatives.

Users considered options like SoapUI, JMeter, Katalon Studio, Selenium, ReadyAPI, Swagger, ADAPT Test, LoadRunner, Tricentis Tosca, UFT, and Fire something. Many preferred Postman for its user-friendliness and graphical support. Postman's accessibility, integration capabilities, and free tier were notable. Some found it lacking compared to ReadyAPI and struggled with ADAPT Test's stability. Despite alternatives for automating and load testing, Postman remains favored for API testing.

Webroot was preferred for its integration, speed, lightweight footprint, and adaptability over heavier alternatives like McAfee and Norton.

Users evaluated several options including Sophos, Kaspersky, Symantec, Trend Micro, BitDefender, and Norton before deciding on Webroot Business Endpoint Protection. Many alternatives like McAfee, AVG, and Pand were considered heavy on resources. Webroot provided better integration and management capabilities. Some used Komodo but found it resource-intensive. Webroot's lightweight nature, intuitive console, and integration with RMM solutions made it appealing, despite its limitations in mobile endpoint protection after March.

Cynet is preferred for its comprehensive features, ease of use, centralized management, and proactive service compared to competitors.

Users evaluated SentinelOne, CarbonBlack, CrowdStrike, Cybereason, VMware, and others, emphasizing Cynet's comprehensive integration, ease of use, and exceptional endpoint protection. They highlighted Cynet's capabilities in mitigation, transparency, and proactive threat management. Recognition by MITRE and the efficiency compared to solutions like Cortex and Trend Micro were significant factors in their choice. Cynet's minimal resource demand and excellent service and support were appreciated, along with its ability to meet unique client requirements.

Users compared AlienVault OSSIM favorably for usability over QRadar, ArcSight, and Splunk, with challenges noted in LogRhythm and TrueRider.

AlienVault OSSIM deployments varied, from individual efforts to teams of twenty, often requiring certification or external support.

AlienVault OSSIM setup ease varies with user experience, network configurations, documentation, third-party tool integration, and business size.

{"quote":"I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"My advice is to simply use it.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"There are somewhat more false positives with the user behavior analytics, which could benefit from an additional machine learning model to detect user patterns more rapidly.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"3"}

The majority of organizations prefer on-premises deployment for AlienVault OSSIM, with fewer opting for a hybrid cloud approach.

8.0

AlienVault OSSIM support varies, with paid users experiencing mixed resolutions, while many rely on community and self-solving.

{"quote":"The deployment process required four resources.","quality_score":"5","sentiment_score":"5"}

AlienVault OSSIM offers threat detection, log collection, and compliance monitoring for enhanced security across cloud and on-premises environments.

AlienVault OSSIM is free initially but may incur costs for enhancements, support, or transitioning to the paid version.

7.589054

AlienVault OSSIM is suitable for small to mid-sized businesses but faces scale challenges in large enterprise environments.

Consider AlienVault OSSIM for cost-effective, easy deployment in smaller networks; explore features and community resources, upgrade for scalability.

AlienVault OSSIM offers threat detection, asset discovery, and vulnerability assessment with easy integration, centralized dashboard, and network security capabilities.

8.5

AlienVault OSSIM faces challenges in scalability, integration, user interface, reporting, and stability, needing better threat detection and customization.

AlienVault OSSIM has been utilized by users for varying durations ranging from one month to over seven years.

Many users found ArcSight pricey and evaluated alternatives like ManageEngine, while others stuck with OSSIM for comprehensive features.

{"quote":"The integration capabilities, especially concerning log sources, need improvement for more flexibility and simplicity in integrating with nodes.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"There are somewhat more false positives with the user behavior analytics, which could benefit from an additional machine learning model to detect user patterns more rapidly.","score":"8"}

AlienVault OSSIM is stable on proper hardware but may have minor bugs and limitations with large infrastructures.

AlienVault OSSIM detects network threats, analyzes IPs, integrates threat exchange, and is ideal for media sector operations.

<p>AlienVault OSSIM provides a comprehensive suite of security tools with threat alerts and network traffic analysis, supported by a strong community. Its stability compares favorably to Qradar and Splunk, offering cost-effective solutions. However, users report delays in threat alerts and difficulties with configurations. While praised for its price-performance ratio, integration with cyber intelligence systems could improve. AlienVault OSSIM also faces challenges in reducing false positives and enhancing real-time threat detection.</p>

{"quote":"Improving user behavior analytics.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The vulnerability assessment feature could be enhanced with more AI features.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Network traffic analysis is highly efficient.","score":"9"}

AlienVault OSSIM serves as our primary SIEM system, focusing on internet access and enhancing security monitoring. While network traffic analysis is efficient, user behavior analytics and integration capabilities require improvement. We evaluated Wazuh and TrueRider before selecting AlienVault.

<p>AlienVault OSSIM takes time to provide alerts for malicious traffic and has delays in incident reporting.</p><p>Integration with cyber intelligence systems and other environments is lacking, affecting real-time reporting capabilities.</p><p>AlienVault OSSIM is expensive and the cost is considered high compared to other options.</p><p>Initial setup and configuration are complex, requiring extensive reading and are not intuitive.</p><p>AlienVault OSSIM produces many false positives, particularly in user behavior analytics, indicating a need for improved detection models.</p>

Organizations previously used QRadar, ArcSight, Splunk, LogRhythm, Sentinel, Wazuh, and TrueRider before adopting AlienVault OSSIM. QRadar and ArcSight are praised for their user-friendly interfaces and features. Splunk differs mainly in price, requiring custom queries. LogRhythm presented technical challenges. Sentinel offers pre-configured systems. Wazuh is focused on intrusion detection. TrueRider is less community-based. AlienVault OSSIM's functionality led to broad adoption across different settings.

<p>AlienVault OSSIM surpasses its competitors by integrating essential cybersecurity functions like asset discovery, threat intelligence, intrusion detection, and vulnerability assessment into a single platform, providing comprehensive security management and effective threat prevention solutions for organizations.</p>

AlienVault OSSIM is predominantly free as it is an open-source solution, with the Community Edition available at no cost. However, licensing fees apply for the premium versions, offering additional features. These fees are charged annually and can sometimes be considered high compared to competitors like Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk. While the solution offers a strong price-performance ratio, enterprises often need to pay extra for support, and costs can range significantly depending on the version and additional services required.

Users' experiences with AlienVault OSSIM's initial setup vary. Some find it straightforward and quick, likening it to installing a Windows program. Others report complexities due to integration challenges, outdated documentation, or lack of team expertise. Network size and infrastructure scale affect deployment time, ranging from minutes to months. Integration with third-party tools and custom configurations for certain network devices may also extend implementation time, especially in large environments.

Several users managed the implementation of AlienVault OSSIM independently, often utilizing online resources and personal expertise. Some relied on internal teams, with a mix of infrastructure and security engineers. A few involved external consultants or occasionally consulted AlienVault's team. Typically, setups were handled by certified engineers, with deployment requiring varying degrees of resources.

<p>AlienVault OSSIM's customer service and support receive mixed feedback. Paid support shows prompt but occasionally delayed responses. Users note good technical assistance, although many handle challenges independently due to sufficient skills or community resources. Documentation is considered lacking, often requiring self-research or community support. The community version lacks formal support, while paid versions suggest significant improvement. AT&amp;T's focus on cloud services impacts the on-premise documentation and support experience. Overall, users appreciate responsiveness but identify room for improvement.</p>

<p>AlienVault OSSIM provides useful threat alerts that indicate harmful code and monitor network traffic.</p>
<p>AlienVault OSSIM has a supportive open source community that aids in resolving issues through online resources.</p>
<p>Compared to competitors like Qradar and Splunk, AlienVault OSSIM is noted for its stability.</p>
<p>AlienVault OSSIM offers an all-in-one functionality, integrating various security tools into a single platform.</p>
<p>AlienVault OSSIM offers effective threat detection and helps in identifying suspicious activities such as logins from multiple countries.</p>

Users advise others to use AlienVault OSSIM for small or medium environments that do not require handling more than 1,000 events per second. It is appreciated for its simplicity and ease of installation. People recommend considering the commercial version for better support, especially for business settings. The tool's asset discovery and integration with other tools are notable features, though challenges exist with scalability and compatibility. Overall, it is recommended for those starting in cybersecurity.

Most users find AlienVault OSSIM stable, often comparing its performance favorably to Qradar and Splunk. It operates reliably on Linux, without crashing or bugs, provided infrastructure limits are respected. The newest version shows improved performance, though older versions may experience occasional crashes. Stability ratings vary, ranging from moderate to excellent. Some users highlight stability issues with UMS and older versions but newer iterations are deemed highly reliable with proper server configurations.

Most users implement AlienVault OSSIM in an on-premises environment, with a significant number opting for this model. A smaller segment utilizes a hybrid cloud approach.

AlienVault OSSIM faces challenges with integration, scalability, and user interface complexity. It struggles with handling large deployments and high traffic, has outdated features, and provides insufficient integration with new tools. The system is complex to configure, requires expert knowledge, and offers limited customization options. The threat response time is slow, impacting compliance for sectors like banking. Additionally, improvements are needed in log management, dashboards, and security analytics capabilities. Pricing is also considered high for some users.

AlienVault OSSIM's strengths include threat alerts, asset discovery, logging capabilities, vulnerability assessment, data correlation, and network traffic analysis. Its integration with various tools and ease of use are praised, as are its user-friendly dashboard and advanced threat policies. Free usage is a major benefit. The architecture and reporting capabilities are appreciated, along with self-paced training. Users value the built-in IDS, threat intelligence, and investigation features for enhancing network security and visibility.

AlienVault OSSIM is primarily used for monitoring and threat detection, log collection, incident management, and compliance with industry standards. Users implement OSSIM for securing traffic, analyzing events, vulnerability scanning, and network visibility. It helps identify malicious activities, provides a comprehensive SIEM system, and supports user and network analysis. Businesses use its features such as event correlation, local action, and IDS capabilities in both on-premise and cloud environments for enhancing cybersecurity posture.

Users considered ArcSight but found it too expensive and lacking sales channels in Egypt. Some evaluated ELK Stack, Security Onion, Wazuh, ManageEngine, FortiSIEM, and TrueRider. Several users didn't compare others because AlienVault OSSIM met their needs for modules like vulnerability scanners and IDS systems, and was free. Some explored alternatives for selling to customers, while others were interested in a fully-featured SIEM with UBA.

Users have utilized AlienVault OSSIM for a range between one month and over seven years.

AlienVault OSSIM exhibits varying scalability levels, managing different setups efficiently, from mid-size businesses to small networks. Users highlight its flexible architecture and capability to connect multiple sources, with specific limits noted for enterprise demands. Some experience challenges integrating it with network devices or retaining logs. Others mention its suitability for smaller environments, citing its role as a data collector. While many agree it's scalable, opinions differ on its effectiveness under extensive expansion.

AlienVault OSSIM assists media organizations by identifying critical vulnerabilities such as brute force and web attacks. Users find threats like WannaCry and malicious IPs through integration with Open Threat Exchange, enabling them to block threats via firewalls. Its open-source nature allows deep IP investigation and log analysis, maximizing network security. Organizations benefit from asset discovery based on traffic signatures and cost savings.

Organizations switched to Meraki for its cloud management and integrated dashboard, moving from older solutions or integrating with existing brands.

Meraki MS Switches are user-friendly, enabling quick deployment, though some clients may require integrator support for complex configurations.

Meraki MS Switches offer responsive support, with some challenges in response times; users appreciate their knowledgeable and helpful teams.

Many users prefer on-premises Meraki MS Switches, while public and private cloud usage is evenly split, with fewer hybrid solutions.

Organizations using Meraki MS Switches prefer various cloud providers, including Microsoft Azure, tailored to specific needs.

Meraki MS Switches offer simple setup, quick deployment, and cloud management, requiring minimal expertise and personnel.

Meraki MS Switches enable cloud-based network management for easy connectivity in various environments, ideal for small to mid-sized businesses.

Meraki MS Switches provide centralized management, ease of use, scalability, and efficient troubleshooting through a cloud-based dashboard.

Meraki MS Switches are scalable for SMBs, easily expandable, suitable for mid-market, but may face enterprise limitations.

{"quote":"Additionally, we rely on 100% remote configuration.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"One of the most valuable features of Meraki MS Switches is its precise traffic analytics capabilities, allowing us to query the system for any place at any time.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"8"}

Users appreciate Meraki MS Switches for user-friendliness and reliability, highlighting flexibility, internet needs, pricing, and feature suggestions.

Meraki MS Switches face high pricing, cloud dependency, limited features, and users want better scalability, support, and customization.

{"quote":"I would recommend using Meraki MS Switches as it is good equipment, sturdy, and works well.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"There are compatibility issues with certain Power over Ethernet (PoE) devices, which we would like to see resolved.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"4"}

{"quote":"One of the most valuable features of Meraki MS Switches is its precise traffic analytics capabilities, allowing us to query the system for any place at any time.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"8"}

7.589053

Meraki MS Switches provide network stability and management cost savings, but return times vary due to cloud transition challenges.

Meraki MS Switch usage spans from one month to twelve years among users.

Meraki MS Switches provide strong cloud management but may be costly for small businesses due to subscription-based licensing.

8

Meraki MS Switches are praised for their stability, reliability, and performance, with occasional minor issues during updates.

Users favored Meraki MS Switches for their stability, manageability, and reputation over more affordable alternatives like Huawei or Extreme.

{"quote":"We faced issues following firmware updates, which we now handle by performing updates outside of working hours.","score":"8"}

Meraki MS Switches optimize network efficiency with centralized management, improved security, remote access, and automatic updates for organizations.

{"quote":"The solution is stable, but there is always room for improvement.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Cisco's tech support is pretty good, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.","score":"7"}

<p>Meraki MS Switches offer easy setup, cloud-based management, and exceptional technical support, enhancing user confidence and network control. They streamline operations and IT administration, yet reliance on a stable internet connection and high pricing might deter some users. The need for annual licensing and limitations in high-end functions affect their appeal for larger enterprises. Scalability issues persist, especially in distribution switches and PoE models, despite adaptability for growing business needs.</p>

{"quote":"There are compatibility issues with certain Power over Ethernet (PoE) devices, which we would like to see resolved.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"One of the most valuable features of Meraki MS Switches is its precise traffic analytics capabilities, allowing us to query the system for any place at any time.","score":"10"}

We use Meraki MS Switches for centralized VLAN management and remote configuration, benefiting from precise traffic analytics. While facing some PoE compatibility issues, the centralized access outweighs the challenges, having considered and evaluated other options for effective remote management.

Organizations previously used a variety of networking equipment such as Dell, Cisco, Arista, Hewlett Packard, Aruba, Juniper, Huawei, Extreme Networks, Ubiquiti, Fortinet, SonicWall, Linksys, TP-Link, NETGEAR. They identified legacy systems like HP switches as outdated, requiring upgrades or replacements. Cisco's prowess in cloud management became a pivot point, leading to a preference for a unified dashboard experience with Meraki. Corporate decisions sometimes mandated these changes despite existing satisfactory equipment like Aruba or Catalyst switches.

Enterprise buyers have mixed experiences with Meraki MS Switches pricing. Some find it competitive and a good value, especially with long-term contracts that provide discounts. Others see it as expensive, often facing higher upfront costs compared to alternatives like HP or Avaya. Licensing fees are consistent, requiring yearly renewals, but they bundle support and updates, offering comprehensive benefits. Meraki's cloud-based management features add value, justifying the premium for many, despite budget constraints in small businesses.

<p>Meraki MS Switches surpasses its competitors by offering seamless cloud management, zero-touch provisioning, and intuitive troubleshooting, ensuring robust network performance and simplified scalability for businesses of all sizes.</p>

<p>Meraki MS Switches need more competitive pricing compared to other products in the market.</p><p>The subscription and licensing model of Meraki MS Switches could be improved to offer more options like one-time payment.</p><p>Cloud dependency of Meraki MS Switches poses a challenge in case of unstable internet connections, affecting functionality.</p><p>Meraki MS Switches lack enough scalability and integration with on-premises systems, which could hamper larger enterprise usage.</p><p>Meraki MS Switches can improve compatibility with Power over Ethernet devices and enhance Wi-Fi 6 support.</p>

Users typically manage installations internally, often without vendor support. Many handle deployment solo, although some seek external integration assistance. Expertise varies; some require guidance with configurations and IP schemes. Technical proficiency, like Cisco certification, doesn't always guarantee readiness. Typically, one knowledgeable technician suffices for setup, with remote assistance for racking equipment. A single individual can deploy a large number of switches swiftly. Maintenance demands depend on infrastructure scale, with larger deployments needing multiple personnel.

Meraki MS Switches' initial setup is often easy, featuring a straightforward process that is quick to complete. Many find the setup user-friendly and manageable without much technical expertise. Configurations can often be pre-set in the cloud, reducing on-site effort and allowing remote management. Deployment time varies, generally ranging from minutes to a few days depending on complexity, with simplicity making it accessible for many users without significant issues.

Meraki MS Switches offer excellent technical support, with users praising the knowledgeable and responsive team. However, some face challenges with contact methods and waiting times. Support is accessible 24/7, featuring various contact levels and detailed documentation. There are occasional delays, and users report needing more experienced staff for complex issues. Generally, users report help being clear, proactive, and satisfactory, with the ability for remote troubleshooting and quick device replacement.

The customer service and support of Meraki MS Switches would likely be rated between 6 to 8 out of 10 based on feedback sentiment.

Organizations experience varying ROI from Meraki MS Switches. Some note a two to three-year return, appreciating reduced headcount and management ease without needing additional tools. Others find slower returns, particularly when not fully cloud-integrated. Manageability improves with fewer staff needed, while network stability and troubleshooting time sees significant improvement. However, some companies did not achieve expected returns and faced high costs. Centralized, online configuration access and ease of use contribute to reduced support costs.

Users advise others considering Meraki MS Switches to research thoroughly and ensure it fits their requirements. Many appreciate its cloud management, ease of use, and security features. Some highlight the importance of having a reliable internet connection for optimal functionality. They recommend negotiating for discounts and considering the cost of licensing. Meraki MS Switches are praised for their integration capabilities, but some users mention limitations in scalability and pricing, advising potential users to weigh their options.

Users of Meraki MS Switches express a mix of preferences for cloud providers. Some opt for a less conventional provider, while others choose Microsoft Azure. It's evident that companies are split between various cloud types, with notable mention of Azure.

Organizations predominantly use an on-premises model when deploying Meraki MS Switches. A smaller number opts for Public Cloud and Private Cloud deployments, and some choose a Hybrid Cloud model. Public Cloud and Private Cloud options have a moderate presence among users.

Meraki MS Switches maintain high stability with minimal issues reported. Many users attest to their reliability, with few noting occasional minor bugs. Some experienced rare complications linked to environmental factors or firmware updates. Most rate stability highly, appreciating seamless operation and lack of disruptions. Despite some isolated challenges, performance remains consistent, with frequent updates ensuring reliability. Users rate stability highly, often giving nine or ten out of ten, reflecting their trust in Meraki's performance.