{"quote":"Since we use Kubernetes on-premises, the costs are related to our expertise and the personnel we hire.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Although we face issues when migrating to new versions of Kubernetes, such as misunderstandings on using new features or integration with proxy services, these issues can be addressed with proper preparation.","score":"8"}

<p>Kubernetes offers excellent scalability and container orchestration with auto-repair and self-healing capabilities, supporting various tools and cloud integrations for enhanced application portability. Despite its versatility, Kubernetes presents complexities, requiring specialized skills, and has limited in-built security features. Users note challenges in native integration and high pricing, affecting its appeal for smaller workloads. However, its robust system management and reliability make it a powerful choice for cloud-native development.</p>

We utilize Kubernetes for orchestrating our data science machine learning platform and data pipelines. Fast storage classes and file system storage are essential. While version migration poses challenges, these can be managed with adequate preparation. Estimating ROI is complex.

Various technologies were utilized before Kubernetes, including Docker, VMware, Rancher, Marathon Mesos, and Cloud Foundry. Portainer, Azure App Service, Nokia, and VMware Tanzu were explored. Docker Swarm was compared to Kubernetes, but it was considered less stable. Challenges with Apache Hadoop prompted consideration of alternatives. Deployments shifted from ClearCase, JSON Container Systems, and IBM containers to Kubernetes, influenced by cloud migration and improved management needs with Oracle, Azure, and AWS.

<p>Kubernetes surpasses its competitors by offering robust container orchestration, automatic scaling, and seamless deployment, providing a flexible platform for managing containerized applications efficiently across clusters, ensuring high availability and scalability, and integrating effortlessly with existing infrastructure.</p>

<p>Kubernetes can be complex and requires skilled specialists, especially for users not familiar with Linux, leading to a steep learning curve.</p><p>Many users find Kubernetes to be heavy, not easy to deploy, and with limited ROI for small organizations due to the need for a control plane, worker nodes, and multiple VMs.</p><p>Kubernetes has scalability issues, and there is dissatisfaction with its consistency across different deployment types, with performance varying between VM and PaaS services.</p><p>There are ongoing issues with the stability and availability of Kubernetes, particularly regarding high loads causing worker nodes to be unavailable.</p><p>Security is an area of concern in its infancy, requiring enhancements, especially with existing RBAC management across multi-clusters and API security features.</p>

Kubernetes is open-source, eliminating licensing fees, but enterprise users must consider setup, operational, and support costs. While infrastructure expenses vary by cloud provider, managed services incur additional fees. Organizations highlight affordability at scale, yet smaller companies may find it pricey. Technical support and specialized personnel can increase operational expenses. Pricing competitiveness depends largely on deployment scale and configuration. Some users leverage cloud-specific solutions like Google Kubernetes Engine for simplified pricing models, paying primarily for infrastructure usage.

Kubernetes deployment and maintenance often rely on in-house teams, with some using third-party consultants. Teams are generally small, with one to two members needed for deployment and several for ongoing maintenance. Efforts vary in complexity based on integration requirements and tooling. Automation features make deployment more efficient, while responsibilities include managing infrastructure, network, cloud-native tooling, and security. Experience with scripts and templates can expedite the process for teams familiar with the platform.

Kubernetes customer service and support vary widely. Many rely on community resources, extensive documentation, and blogs. Some face challenges with official support responsiveness and rely on third-party solutions like Red Hat or Rancher. Cloud providers, such as Microsoft or AWS, often provide reliable assistance. Users frequently resolve issues internally rather than contacting support, leveraging internal teams or vendor guidance when necessary. Generally, the community aspect is highly valued for providing helpful insights and troubleshooting.

The initial setup of Kubernetes varies in complexity. Managed services simplify the process, while manual deployments require experienced DevOps personnel. Companies frequently mention the need for skilled professionals to handle networking and configurations, especially for on-premises scenarios. Cloud implementations tend to be straightforward, taking minutes to a few hours. Documentation understanding and Helm proficiency are crucial. Smaller setups are easier, but production-ready configurations demand expertise and extended effort for effective deployment and maintenance.

Some found ROI through stability, quick deployment, and container efficiency, while others did not see savings or struggled with maintenance costs. Kubernetes enabled fast-paced application modernization, reduced downtime, and infrastructure savings. It offered a platform for multiple development projects and had good ROI potential, although realization varied depending on team expertise and cloud transformation progress. Some organizations focused on AI and robotics, seeing Kubernetes ROI at 36-40%.

Kubernetes customer service and support is rated between 7 and 9 out of 10.

In the context of Kubernetes deployment, many opt for Amazon Web Services (AWS). Microsoft Azure is also a popular choice among users. A smaller group prefers other providers. Both AWS and Azure frequently appear as leading choices, with AWS slightly more favored than Azure for this purpose.

Users advise others to prefer managed services for Kubernetes due to its complexity and cost. Training is essential before deployment to understand Kubernetes architecture and containerization. Adoption of hybrid infrastructure is recommended. Users note that Kubernetes excels in scalability and flexibility, suitable for complex workloads. Upgrades, dashboard features, and support need improvement. Choosing the right provider and conducting a proof of concept is crucial to successful implementation. Most users rate Kubernetes highly, between seven and ten out of ten.

Most opt for Public Cloud as their Kubernetes deployment choice, followed by a significant number selecting Hybrid Cloud. On-premises implementation is fairly common, with a smaller portion utilizing Private Cloud.

Kubernetes demonstrates high stability attributed to its maturity and significant development. Most users report it as stable, with issues often related to configurations or external platforms like Azure or AWS. Managed services can face version update challenges, but these are typically addressed with custom scripts. Stability varies with deployment and setup, but under properly configured environments, Kubernetes performs reliably, managing workloads efficiently and benefiting from wide community and enterprise support.

<p>Kubernetes offers excellent scalability and automation, allowing effortless management of containerized applications and microservices with features like auto-scaling and zero-touch operations.</p>

<p>It enhances infrastructure efficiency through powerful auto-repair functionalities and seamless failovers, ensuring high availability and stability.</p>

<p>Kubernetes is closely integrated with Docker, providing robust container orchestration which simplifies the deployment and management of applications.</p>

<p>It benefits from strong community support, extensive documentation, and a rich ecosystem of tools like Helm, which facilitate integration and operation.</p>

<p>Kubernetes supports a variety of deployment environments and strategies, making it versatile for both cloud-native and traditional applications.</p>

The usage of Kubernetes ranges from three months to eight years.

Kubernetes users express a need for improved user-friendliness, especially in the dashboard and interface, which are seen as outdated and complex. They seek better security and integrated management tools, as reliance on third-party solutions is common for ease of use. Scalability and network monitoring could also see enhancements. Those with less Linux experience find the learning curve steep, and greater stability with built-in support and more regular updates are desired.

Kubernetes excels in scalability, auto-repair, and orchestration. Its auto-scaling and self-healing enhance resource management. Kubernetes supports multiple cloud platforms like AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure. Container management and deployment are simplified, with high availability and flexibility. It integrates well with Docker and CI/CD tools, offering automation and monitoring. The open-source nature provides robust community and enterprise support. Its architecture ensures efficient microservices deployment and resource utilization.

Kubernetes offers strong scalability, handling diverse workloads for both small and large organizations. Users appreciate its ability to scale vertically and horizontally, supporting cloud environments and varied enterprise needs. While manual scaling is generally straightforward, automated scaling is also available. Most users find scaling manageable with assistance from cloud service providers. Challenges can occur, but many emphasize the impressive scaling features of Kubernetes across industries, accommodating numerous users effectively.

Kubernetes is primarily utilized for container orchestration in microservices architectures. Organizations across sectors use it for deploying applications, managing infrastructure, and hosting services. It supports cloud-native development, auto-scaling, and ensures high availability. Kubernetes operates on-premises and cloud environments like AWS and Azure, facilitating deployment, security, and scalability. Users highlight its ability to modernize IT landscapes and efficiently handle diverse applications, from banking to digital advertising, while supporting emerging technologies like machine learning and data science frameworks.

Users considered Docker Compose, Rancher 2, Elastic Kubernetes Service, Google Cloud Platform, Amazon's ECS, OpenShift, and KubeVirt. Google and OpenShift offered appealing features but faced support challenges. Kubernetes was chosen for its flexibility, ease of deployment, and unification. OpenShift's graphical interface and Google Cloud's integration capabilities were highlighted. Cost considerations in cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP, particularly in scaling, were also noted. Kubernetes' multi-platform nature and automatic deployment were valued.

Organizations achieve automation, scalability, and cost-efficiency by transitioning to Kubernetes. They benefit from seamless integration across cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Kubernetes enhances DevOps and FinOps practices, supports advanced features such as auto-scaling and self-healing, and simplifies deployment with reduced operational effort. It enables faster time-to-market, ensures consistent management between environments, facilitates application updates without downtime, and streamlines application deployment and scaling processes.

Users transitioned to Check Point NGFW for better features, security, management, and support compared to other firewall solutions.

Check Point NGFW implementations vary in complexity, requiring diverse expertise, with strong training and support contributing to positive experiences.

Most users choose On-premises for Check Point NGFW, while others select Hybrid, Public, or Private Cloud options.

Microsoft Azure and AWS are preferred for Check Point NGFW, with many users opting for diverse, unspecified cloud providers.

Check Point NGFW setup is user-friendly with training, but complexities arise from configurations, documentation, and hardware compatibility.

Customer service for Check Point NGFW is inconsistent, with variances in responsiveness and effectiveness across regions and support models.

Check Point NGFW offers perimeter security with VPN, intrusion prevention, and advanced threat features for data centers and branches.

Check Point NGFW offers high scalability and hyperscaling with Maestro, suitable for cloud and on-premise enterprise environments.

Check Point NGFW provides centralized management, robust security features, and flexible integration, ensuring comprehensive protection against diverse threats efficiently.

Understand Check Point NGFW features, plan carefully, consider expert help, and utilize demos for effective security implementation.

Check Point NGFW needs better stability, third-party integration, user interface, support, and improvements in antivirus, VPN, and licensing.

Check Point NGFW has been utilized for varying durations, ranging from a few months to over 25 years.

Check Point NGFW provides cost-effective security, consolidating tools for reduced costs, minimized downtime, and enhanced productivity, ensuring user satisfaction.

Check Point NGFW offers robust security with a complex, negotiable pricing model, often seen as costly but competitive.

{"quote":"I would absolutely recommend this solution to others for its robust security and scalability.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Our implementation team comprised about thirty individuals, including supervisors for each stage, to manage testing, validation, staging, and production.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"8"}

Check Point NGFW is reliable with improved stability in newer versions, though some users report occasional connectivity issues.

{"quote":"I would absolutely recommend this solution to others for its robust security and scalability.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"9"}

Users chose Check Point NGFW for cost efficiency and features, despite initial evaluations of competitors like Cisco, Sophos, and Fortinet.

Check Point NGFW enhances security and efficiency with advanced threat protection, centralized management, and support for remote work and cloud.

7.5

6.5

{"quote":"Allowing us to resolve any potential issues effectively.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The support team we engaged was knowledgeable and well-versed with the application.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Customer support quality depends on the person you interact with.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"It is generally satisfactory in its current form.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"The graphical user interface (GUI) could benefit from some updates.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"We found the pricing reasonable, ensuring the product was not overpriced.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"It provides robust security across classified and nonclassified applications and integrates well with our existing infrastructure.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"One of the most valuable features is the ability to whitelist and blacklist sources to control access to our ecosystem, ensuring secured SaaS application access.","score":"9"}

We use Check Point NGFW for whitelisting and blacklisting, identity management, and monitoring classified and nonclassified applications. While the GUI could be improved, the high ROI and seamless integration with our infrastructure made it an optimal choice over previous costly solutions.

Organizations previously used Cisco ASA, Fortinet, SonicWall, WatchGuard, and Palo Alto. Issues like outdated technology, poor support, limited features, and high costs prompted switches to Check Point NGFW. Check Point offered advanced features like central management, threat prevention, and user-friendly interfaces. Some faced stability concerns but appreciated improvements in security and management capabilities. The market position, local support, integration, and advanced feature set were key deciding factors for adopting Check Point NGFW.

<p>Check Point NGFW surpasses its competitors by offering robust threat prevention, seamless integration with cloud environments, and a user-friendly management interface, ensuring comprehensive security and efficiency for enterprises of all sizes.</p>

Check Point NGFW's pricing is generally perceived as high compared to competitors, with many users finding it expensive. Despite this, some users acknowledge the cost is justified due to its features, reliability, and security capabilities. Licensing can be complex, although straightforward for others. There are different licensing models available based on requirements. Users often negotiate prices, finding Check Point responsive to budget needs. Setup costs are relatively low, but support and module additions can increase expenses.

<p>Check Point NGFW offers robust central management with advanced security functionalities like threat prevention, antivirus, and antispam, ensuring comprehensive network protection. It is praised for scalability and detailed logging but has stability issues requiring frequent resets. Protection is updated against emerging threats, yet antivirus effectiveness lags behind competitors. Hardware compatibility and support challenges exist, especially in Africa, and pricing is seen as expensive and complex, with slow technical support resolution.</p>

<p>Check Point NGFW experiences stability issues, with frequent reboots and unreliable tunnels.</p><p>Integration with third-party vendors is limited, causing challenges in interoperability with other systems like ArcSight and RSA.</p><p>The pricing of Check Point NGFW is considered high, with suggestions for more competitive structuring to accommodate different market segments.</p><p>Technical support is criticized for being slow and lacking in efficiency, particularly in regions like Africa and India.</p><p>Users find the initial setup process complex, requiring expert knowledge and additional training.</p>

Implementation of Check Point NGFW often involves a mix of in-house teams and vendor assistance. Many use Check Point partners for deployment, while others rely on internal expertise. Vendor teams generally display high competence and professionalism. Some deployments are straightforward, while others face challenges requiring external support. A range of professionals, including engineers and consultants, contribute, with deployments taking from a few hours to weeks, depending on complexity.

Check Point NGFW's initial setup is often described as straightforward and simple by most users, especially for basic configurations. Experiences vary, with some finding it more complex, particularly in large environments or when integrating multiple features. The setup process benefits from experience and training, and while some encounter challenges requiring additional expertise, others achieve rapid deployment with minimal issues. External support and planning are frequently utilized to streamline the setup process.

Check Point NGFW support has mixed responses. Many find it knowledgeable, responsive, and helpful, with quick resolutions provided by skilled engineers. However, some users experience delays and feel initial support isn't as effective. Vendor dependency and third-party involvement sometimes lead to slower response times. Overall, higher partnership levels seem to yield faster responses, but lower-tier support may face longer wait times. Users appreciate the knowledgeable support when meaningful interactions occur.

Check Point NGFW's customer service and support are generally rated highly, with most scores ranging from 8 to 10 out of 10.

Check Point NGFW provides strong ROI, with increased security and cost savings seen across organizations. Users report reduced operational costs and improved security capabilities, consolidating devices and streamlining management. Multiple customers achieved high return on investment within 12 months, noting enhanced productivity through features like centralized management and threat prevention. Peace of mind, reduced downtime, and minimized security breaches are highlighted benefits. Though ROI is challenging to quantify, overall satisfaction is evident among organizations.

Organizations use a variety of cloud providers for Check Point NGFW. Many prefer "Other" cloud providers, indicating a broad range of choices. Microsoft Azure is also frequently chosen by users, representing a significant part of the market. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is another popular option, being selected by multiple organizations. While there is a preference for diverse cloud solutions, others consistently choose Microsoft Azure, signaling its importance as a cloud provider for deploying Check Point NGFW.

Users advise others to carefully plan and research before implementing Check Point NGFW, considering specific needs and infrastructure. They suggest thorough training to grasp its complex features and emphasize investing in premium support for efficient problem resolution. Many highlight the importance of testing through a Proof of Concept and utilizing professional services for optimal setup. While its capabilities and security are praised, users wish for simpler licensing, improved management, and swift support.

Most users of Check Point NGFW utilize on-premises deployment. Some also adopt hybrid cloud environments while a smaller portion favor private or public cloud models.

Many users find Check Point NGFW stable, appreciating its robustness and minimal downtime. However, some experience intermittent issues, particularly with newer versions, requiring workarounds or updates. HA deployments and redundancy help maintain uptime. Users emphasize the importance of frequent patches and responsive support to address occasional bugs. While past stability concerns were noted, current software is generally rated positively, often citing strong performance and reliable operation even in high-load environments.

Check Point NGFW needs to address stability and compatibility issues, especially with Mac systems. Enhancements in technical support speed and training availability are crucial. Simplifying the policy installation process and integrating features into a single management console would improve user experience. Better interoperability with third-party solutions and frequent antivirus updates are essential. The cumbersome initial setup and licensing complexities need attention to reduce operational challenges and costs. The user interface requires improvements for ease of use.

Check Point NGFW is valued for its robust VPN capabilities, ensuring secure remote access and seamless connectivity. Its management console offers centralized, intuitive control, boosting policy management efficiency. Features like IPsec VPN and application control enhance security and ease of use. The integrated deep packet inspection and intrusion prevention system protect against threats. Comprehensive logging aids in diagnostics, while scalability supports expanding network demands, making it a dependable choice for organizations.

Most users have used Check Point NGFW for a range of one to ten years.

Check Point NGFW is primarily used as a next-generation firewall, providing perimeter security, VPN access, and network segmentation. It handles IPS, URL filtering, and application control, securing internal networks and data centers. Organizations utilize it for threat prevention, antivirus, and intrusion detection. It supports secure connectivity through VPNs and protects against advanced threats. Users appreciate its centralized management and effective security features, making it suitable for diverse environments, including data centers and branch locations.

Check Point NGFW is widely regarded for its scalability, offering robust options including the Maestro platform for both small and large enterprises. The ease of upgrading, integration with cloud environments, and flexibility to add hardware or virtual systems support growth across varied infrastructures. Some challenges exist with older hardware models and competition, yet many users find managing extensions straightforward, ensuring high performance and adaptability for expanding network needs.

<p>Check Point NGFW features centralized management, enabling configuration and updates across multiple firewalls simultaneously.</p>

<p>The system enhances security with deep packet inspection and threat prevention capabilities, protecting against both known and zero-day threats.</p>

<p>IPsec VPN, advanced IPS, and application control enhance network security and compliance by regulating and monitoring traffic thoroughly.</p>

<p>Configuration and deployment processes for Check Point NGFW are straightforward, and the management console facilitates quick policy deployment.</p>

<p>The SmartEvent feature and detailed logging capabilities greatly assist in fast and effective troubleshooting and network management.</p>

Check Point NGFW enhances organizations by offering robust security, centralized management, and improved network performance. It strengthens threat prevention with advanced features like intrusion detection, URL filtering, and application control. NGFW supports compliance needs, enabling secure remote access and efficient bandwidth management. By reducing vulnerabilities and providing detailed insights, it helps mitigate cyber threats and eases management workloads, ultimately contributing to a safer and more efficient IT environment.

Users evaluated alternatives like Cisco Firewalls, Fortinet FortiGate, SonicWall, Palo Alto, Sophos, and Juniper. Many found Check Point NGFW attractive due to cost benefits, value, and features such as advanced threat prevention and a cost-effective pricing model. Check Point provided ease of management and user-friendly interfaces compared to others. Some cited budget constraints with Palo Alto, and Cisco ASA requiring additional services. Most preferred Check Point over other options despite some limitations.

{"quote":"Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management has helped by making processes such as calculating costs, accessing inventory information quickly, validating offers, and extracting data easier.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management offers comprehensive accounting and supply chain solutions, supporting multi-company and multi-location operations.

Sage Business Cloud is cost-effective for SMEs, costing 30%-40% less than SAP or Oracle despite additional fees.

{"quote":"Integration with other tools like BOM or Cisco BlueQ could be improved.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"3"}

{"quote":"We have not extensively tested the scalability as currently, only around 120 people are using it.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"5"}

{"quote":"The stability is seven out of ten. It tends to have some glitches and occasional crashes, but these are infrequent.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"5"}

6.5

<p>Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management excels in providing customizable, efficient business operations management with accounting, procurement, and business intelligence modules. Its workflow notifications and cloud analysis capabilities are strengths, though deployment is straightforward, implementation complexity may arise. The software lacks functionalities compared to Oracle, including payroll and HR, and could improve API architecture and search functionality. Integration enhancements with tools like BOM or Cisco BlueQ are also recommended for tech buyers.</p>

Sage Business Cloud setup complexity varies widely, requiring expertise for success; timelines range from four to six months.

Sage Business Cloud is ideal for complex operations but may require a switch as smaller businesses grow.

4.933333333333334

Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management is stable for small businesses but less so for larger enterprises, rated 7-8 out of 10.

6.25

Sage Business Cloud struggles with limited modules and integration, requiring customization and facing challenges with corporate needs and efficiency.

Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management offers robust accounting, procurement, flexibility, strong analytics, and management efficiency with rich interface features.

Sage Business Cloud is mainly used via public cloud for scalability, with some on-premises and private cloud options.

Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management support is stable but decentralized, causing delays despite covering setup and global assistance.

Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management is scalable and suitable for medium enterprises, though satisfaction varies by specific features used.

{"quote":"The pricing of Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management is high compared to other solutions like Bitrix.","score":"9"}

Users have engaged with Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management for periods ranging from one year to 15 years.

{"quote":"The interface is rich in features, allowing efficient management of business operations.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I really like the features in Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management: margin calculations, quick access to stock information, and the ability to validate offers by pushing a button.","score":"9"}