Meraki MS Switches are noted for high costs and limited performance compared to competitors. Many users express concerns about reliance on cloud functionality, which can be problematic when internet access is unstable. Licensing complexities and pricing models also prove challenging, especially for long-term subscriptions. Users desire improved technical support, enhanced interface capabilities, and expanded feature options. The switches often lack advanced functions, which limits configuration flexibility and scalability. Hardware limitations and customer service delays are also points of frustration.

Meraki MS Switches offer cloud management, making deployment and configuration straightforward. The centralized dashboard enables remote access, simplifying VLAN changes, monitoring, and visibility. Users appreciate the user-friendly interface, zero-touch deployment, and strong security features. The ability to manage multiple switches globally from one platform enhances efficiency. Users value the comprehensive APIs, technical support, and dynamic firmware upgrades. Meraki's integration with Azure and seamless switching, monitoring, and automation capabilities make it highly reliable and scalable for varied environments.

<p>Meraki MS Switches offer easy configuration, saving time and effort for IT management.</p>
<p>Cloud-based management allows for remote administration and monitoring from any location.</p>
<p>Setup is straightforward, typically requiring minimal personnel for deployment and maintenance.</p>
<p>The switches provide extensive visibility and control over network components through cloud-based analytics and reports.</p>
<p>Technical support for Meraki MS Switches is highly rated, enhancing the user experience and satisfaction.</p>

Users have utilized Meraki MS Switches for a range spanning from less than a month to over 12 years.

Organizations primarily use Meraki MS Switches for cloud management, simplifying network operations and connectivity. They connect access points, desktops, and remote offices. The switches are utilized in various environments, including small to midsize businesses, educational institutions, and multinational organizations. They provide cloud-based network management, supporting VLANs and remote configuration. Users appreciate their ease of use, centralized control, and integration with other Meraki devices for seamless infrastructure management.

Meraki MS Switches are considered scalable by most users, suitable for small to medium-sized businesses with growing capabilities. Some suggest limitations compared to larger enterprise solutions. Users appreciate its stackable nature, ease of expansion, and robust performance for various organizational sizes. Despite some concerns about core functionality and physical device constraints, many find Meraki MS Switches flexible, with positive feedback on bandwidth options and expansion capacity.

Users considered Arista, Juniper, Aruba, Cisco Catalyst, NETGEAR, Ubiquiti, Fortinet, and HPE alongside Meraki MS Switches. Meraki impressed many through peer demonstrations and familiarity, but others, like Extreme, offered cost-effectiveness and security. Cisco's Stealthwatch sensors interested some, while Huawei was praised for cost-performance. Users appreciated Meraki for remote management but noted that Cisco Catalyst was more expensive. They evaluated alternatives but often found Meraki's manageability and ease of use compelling.

Organizations leverage Meraki MS Switches for centralized management through a unified dashboard across multiple locations, automatic updates, and enhanced statistics. Cloud-managed efficiency simplifies device control, improves help desk operations, reduces downtime, and streamlines network management with PoE and remote capabilities. Security features are bolstered without requiring complex configurations while offering flexibility in deployment styles. Users benefit from ease of use, remote accessibility, and improved network reliability, ensuring high-quality service delivery to clients.

Users compared various SIEM solutions, considering price, familiarity, and on-premises preferences, ultimately noting AlienVault's community support.

Users considered options like ArcSight, ManageEngine, FortiSIEM, Wazuh, ELK Stack, Security Onion, QRadar, Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, and TrueRider before selecting AlienVault OSSIM. ArcSight was initially evaluated but excluded due to pricing and sales channel limitations in Egypt. QRadar and Splunk were compared for ease of use and cost. Wazuh was noted for its community focus. Microsoft Sentinel's case management system requires KQL, while TrueRider lacks a strong community.

Users opted for Meraki MS Switches over alternatives due to superior cloud management, ease of use, and remote capabilities.

Users considered various alternatives before choosing Meraki MS Switches including Cisco Catalyst, Juniper, Aruba, Ubiquiti, Fortinet, Huawei, and HP. Many evaluated NETGEAR and Cisco. Some preferred Meraki for its remote management, ease of use, and cloud-based capabilities. Others appreciated its integrated system and support. Certain users stayed loyal to Meraki due to its reliability and familiarity. Decisions often depended on factors like budget, stability, and network goals.

{"quote":"They act as an extension of our team, offering expertise that would be costly to have in-house.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"It's not a dollar figure but the security assurance that Arctic Wolf provides.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The peace of mind is the return on investment.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"They have been in this business for well over ten years, and they act as an extension of our team, allowing my small team to focus on their primary responsibilities without worrying about security issues.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"I believe you pay a premium for a SOC. The cost depends on the size of the organization, and I find it fair based on the size of our organization.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"6"}

{"quote":"With the Managed Risk feature, they offer a vulnerability report to us on a daily basis.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"7"}

5.65

{"quote":"My advice would be for them to improve their offerings by adding a patch management feature.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I would recommend Arctic Wolf Managed Risk to others for the value and peace of mind it provides.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The major area for improvement is the lack of a patch management feature to resolve some of the vulnerabilities detected.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"2"}

{"quote":"The customer support is incredible.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"10"}

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk identifies vulnerabilities, safeguards IT assets, enhances threat awareness, and bolsters security through network scans.

Users recommend Arctic Wolf Managed Risk for its seamless integration and peace of mind, suggesting enhancements like patch management.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk enhances cybersecurity by identifying vulnerabilities, providing detailed assessments, and supporting with alerts and industry ratings.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk can improve by prioritizing issues realistically, enhancing scanning, and adding patch management and scalability features.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk pricing is competitive, cost-effective, and accommodates organizational size with positive user feedback despite variability.

{"quote":"If there's something in question, they'll always answer it.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Their technicians and engineers are really knowledgeable and professional.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"They offer a white glove service.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The customer support is incredible.","score":"8"}

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk has been used by users for periods ranging from a few months to three years.

{"quote":"The cost depends on the size of the organization, and I find it fair based on the size of our organization.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I believe you pay a premium for a SOC.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"This addition would enhance their offerings and provide a more comprehensive service.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The major area for improvement is the lack of a patch management feature to resolve some of the vulnerabilities detected.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Their ability to identify and provide information on critical alerts is very valuable.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"This proactive approach to alert management ensures that if someone downloads something on a workstation that shouldn't be downloaded, they address it quickly.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"They are on top of the alerts, especially the critical ones.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The reporting is really good from what I've seen so far.","score":"8"}

With Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, I receive daily vulnerability reports allowing me to take prompt action. Despite lacking a patch management feature, their proactive alert management provides peace of mind and acts as an expert extension of our team.

<p>Arctic Wolf Managed Risk enhances cybersecurity by filling gaps left by other systems, identifying vulnerabilities and misconfigurations they miss. It provides detailed exposure reports, increases user awareness, and offers quarterly reviews with the team. Users praise its reporting effectiveness, though scalability and integration could be better. Implementing patch management and improving features like threat resolution tracking after patch application is recommended for further enhancement.</p>

<p>Arctic Wolf Managed Risk fills in security gaps by identifying vulnerabilities and misconfigurations not detected by standard patch management systems.</p>
<p>It provides valuable awareness of current exposures by alerting organizations to existing vulnerabilities.</p>
<p>This service has significantly enhanced end-user security awareness within organizations.</p>
<p>Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers quarterly reviews with their team to assess and improve security procedures.</p>
<p>The detailed reporting by Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is highly regarded for its clarity and usefulness.</p>

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk surpasses its competitors by offering real-time risk identification, comprehensive threat monitoring, and customized risk management strategies, ensuring optimal cybersecurity defense through unparalleled expertise and proactive measures that adapt to evolving security challenges.

Enterprise buyers report that Arctic Wolf Managed Risk pricing varies depending on company size. Generally, the service is perceived as reasonably priced in comparison to competitors and market conditions. Many organizations consider the costs fair, particularly when factoring in the premium for a Security Operations Center (SOC). The overall sentiment reflects satisfaction with the pricing structure, which aligns with the size and needs of individual organizations.

<p>Scalability could be improved.</p>
<p>Arctic Wolf Managed Risk should implement a patch management feature.</p>
<p>The scanning feature does not confirm when a threat has been addressed.</p>
<p>More integrations are needed.</p>
<p>Lack of a patch management feature to resolve detected vulnerabilities.</p>

Users advise others to stick with Arctic Wolf Managed Risk despite challenges. They recommend prioritizing critical issues due to the tool's capacity to uncover significant threats and suggest enhancing its features with patch management. They appreciate the integrated technology with CyberSOC and value the security and peace of mind it offers. Current users rate it between seven and ten out of ten, emphasizing its effectiveness and encouraging continued use without letting setbacks deter progress.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers unbiased insights, filling gaps in patch management by identifying vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. Its value lies in informing users of current risks, ranking issues, enhancing end-user awareness, and providing detailed vulnerability lists. Users appreciate proactive alert action, quarterly team evaluations, and effective support. The service excels in critical alert management, empowering organizations lacking in-house cybersecurity expertise through expert collaboration on scans and patches.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk needs to simplify its user interface by prioritizing critical issues rather than overwhelming users with all details. They could benefit from a patch management feature to address vulnerabilities effectively. Users note the scanning feature should confirm threats as resolved post-patching, yet this confirmation is lacking. More integrations could enhance the service. Overall, these areas need attention to improve user experience and functionality.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is utilized for scanning networks and external entries, identifying vulnerabilities, and offering real-time insights for necessary actions. Organizations benefit by securing IT assets and training users to recognize cyber threats. With scheduled scans on numerous servers and computers, it helps address potential risks effectively. Daily vulnerability reports enhance awareness and enable prompt action, aiding in safeguarding against potential cyber security threats.

Users have been utilizing Arctic Wolf Managed Risk for a range of a few months to three years.

Users report varied experiences with ManageEngine Password Manager Pro's scalability, noting both challenges and effective use in expanding data centers.

{"quote":"Previously, we were using a solution from Boomer, which was quite expensive. In comparison, ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is cheaper by more than 50%.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is cheaper than other products, such as BeyondTrust, and is more than 50% cheaper compared to the Boomer solution we used before.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"The initial deployment was fast, the overall configuration took about three to four months.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"5"}

7.25

5.85

7.5

{"quote":"ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is cheaper than other products, such as BeyondTrust, and is more than 50% cheaper compared to the Boomer solution we used before.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"8"}

{"quote":"The support for the PAM product is not very prompt.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"2"}

Setup of ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is user-friendly but may require vendor support and occasional maintenance for some users.

Most organizations prefer the on-premises model for ManageEngine Password Manager Pro to maintain in-house infrastructure control.

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro provides secure, user-friendly password management with strong features, direct machine login, and auditing capabilities.

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is a secure vault for storing and sharing privileged passwords, mainly used by infrastructure teams.

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro's support is responsive with knowledgeable staff, but PAM cases may experience delays.

We use ManageEngine Password Manager Pro for managing privileged accounts, appreciating its auditing feature for security. Although its support is slow, it’s more affordable than Boomer. Compared to competitors, its pricing is simpler and less expensive.

Conduct a pilot test for Password Manager Pro, a stable and feature-rich tool, optimizing licensing for cost efficiency.

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro needs user interface improvements and affordable pricing, catering mainly to tech-savvy users with limited support.

{"quote":"This is slower than other products from the same company, which offer remote assistance.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"However, the licensing of other products like those from BeyondTrust is more complex and expensive.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The support for PAM is not very prompt as it requires logging a case first and responses can take a day or two.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is cheaper than other products, such as BeyondTrust, and is more than 50% cheaper compared to the Boomer solution we used before.","score":"10"}

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro has been used by some for over two years, while others have used it for a decade.

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is cost-effective for enterprises, with a 25,000 rands fee, compared favorably to competitors.

Users find ManageEngine Password Manager Pro stable, reliable, easy to recover, and praise its performance and dependability.

{"quote":"This process is slower compared to other products from the same manufacturer.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Unlike other Manager products that provide remote assistance or support, for PAM, users have to log a case first and may receive a reply in one or two days.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The support for the PAM product is not very prompt.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"It ensures security by generating usage reports for accounts such as ADE or server administrators.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The auditing feature is particularly valuable as it makes privileged account usage auditable.","score":"9"}

<p>ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is recognized as a secure and reliable tool, featuring enhanced security measures and robust password protection, making it safe with no reported issues. While it offers valuable auditing capabilities and is designed for technically adept users, the tool's complexity could be reduced for broader usability. The responsive customer service is knowledgeable, although there remains room for improvement in support responsiveness and promptness.</p>

<p>It is a pretty technical offering.</p><p>It is designed for more technically inclined people.</p><p>There is room for improvement in making the offering more accessible.</p><p>Support for PAM is not very prompt.</p>

The majority of users choose to deploy ManageEngine Password Manager Pro on-premises.

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro offers a competitive pricing structure with a yearly license and support payment. Users find the price reasonable, rating it high on a cost-competitiveness scale. The solution is considered cost-effective compared to alternatives such as BeyondTrust and Boomer, with simpler and less expensive licensing. Organizations typically negotiate before finalizing the price to ensure affordability within their budgetary constraints. Pricing is a key factor in choosing ManageEngine Password Manager Pro.

<p>ManageEngine Password Manager Pro surpasses its competitors by offering robust password management, advanced access control, and seamless integration with IT systems, ensuring unparalleled security and efficient password management for enterprises of all sizes.</p>

<p>ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is very safe with no reported security issues.</p>
<p>Security features are highly enhanced, effectively safeguarding passwords.</p>
<p>Customer service is responsive and knowledgeable.</p>
<p>ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is secure, safe, reliable, and user-friendly.</p>
<p>Auditing features are valued for making privileged account usage auditable.</p>

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro's initial setup is generally user-friendly and straightforward, with minimal complexity reported. Some required in-house efforts, encountering occasional confusion, but most rated it positively. Deployment time varied, with some experiencing rapid implementation while others took months. Certain installations involved vendor assistance during procurement, while most executed it on their own. Maintenance is occasionally needed, but generally, users had favorable impressions of the initial configuration process.

Users advise others to conduct a pilot phase before purchasing a full license for ManageEngine Password Manager Pro. They recommend careful planning of user integration, especially for admins, due to licensing based on user count. The tool requires minimal staff for maintenance and is described as easy and stable. There is enthusiasm for its features and it comes highly recommended, with ratings mostly around seven or eight out of ten. Organizations are updating to the latest version regularly.

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro receives a mix of feedback on their support. Many users find the support responsive and knowledgeable, praising the timely assistance and extensive documentation. They often express satisfaction with the interactions, giving high ratings. However, some mention that the process for PAM can be slow due to the requirement of logging cases, leading to delays in responses compared to other offerings from the same company.

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro offers user-friendly interface requiring minimal IT knowledge, strong password authorization, and robust security. Users appreciate easy setup, reasonable cost, and features enhancing tasks for technical individuals. Password management allows direct machine login, password setting or generation, automatic resets, and compliance support. The tool is secure, safe, reliable, and includes valuable auditing for privileged account usage, ensuring security through detailed usage reports for account administrators.

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro stability is highly rated. Users report no issues, describing it as reliable and dependable. Any problems usually stem from external factors rather than the product itself. Setting up backups and recovery is straightforward, and users find it consistently stable. Many rate its stability highly, emphasizing the ease of quick fixes for minor issues and the absence of significant problems.

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro needs enhancements in information cycle management and a more intuitive user interface, as it can be complicated to navigate. Price reduction is suggested due to high costs. Users experience inconvenience when passwords are mismanaged and find support slower compared to other Manager products. Editing limitations in search and the complexity for non-technical teams are noted areas for improvement. Users expect easier update processes.

Usage of ManageEngine Password Manager Pro ranges from two to ten years.

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is primarily used as a password vault for IT teams to collaborate and share passwords, store privileged and service account credentials, and control access to sensitive information. It is utilized for system accounts and administrator applications, serving as a tool to manage passwords required for access. Users employ features for password randomization, activity auditing, and access granting, enhancing security without focusing on personal accounts.

Users mention mixed experiences with scalability. Some face challenges due to complex dependencies, while others find it meets their needs without issues. Expansion within multiple data centers and increased user numbers seem feasible for them. Organizations rate scalability highly and consider it suitable for any size. There are limited administrators, but the system handles current demands effectively. Many believe ManageEngine Password Manager Pro can accommodate an increase in technical users.

3.8333333333333335

{"quote":"As a very good partner of Infoblox, I recommend Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection despite the pricing issues encountered.","score":7}

{"quote":"The overall pricing of Infoblox is high, particularly for the Bangladesh market, and the licensing model is challenging.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"2"}

{"quote":"The overall pricing of Infoblox is high, particularly for the Bangladesh market, and the licensing model is challenging.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"4"}