{"quote":"Infoblox is a DDI solution that offers more than just DNS security, providing unique protection for IT management and DSCP.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"8"}

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection integrates and secures DNS services, crucial for cybersecurity and compliance, enhancing server security environments.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is primarily deployed on-premises, with a preference for local control over hybrid cloud solutions.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection receives mixed reviews on support; some users praise it, while others find it lacking.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection setup is straightforward but requires DNS knowledge; praised for ease of installation, management, and low maintenance.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is praised for its scalability, ease of expansion, and capability to handle various user needs.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection provides robust DNS security, centralized management, API integration, and user-friendly interface for network reliability.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection requires better integration, intuitive UX, improved features, distinct enterprise handling, and simplified pricing.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is praised for stability and scalability, ideal for SMBs, though it is expensive.

Infoblox's Advanced DNS Protection pricing is expensive, offering perpetual and subscription licenses with multiple tiers, affecting customer adoption.

Users have relied on Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection for durations ranging from six months to 15 years, ensuring security.

Infoblox is preferred for its advanced DDI technology, despite cautiousness, over BlueCat, F5, Akamai, and Cisco Umbrella.

<p>Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection enhances network security by mitigating DNS attacks through protocols and queries. It integrates DNS security with IPAM systems, providing robust IP management and automatic responses to malicious domains. Centralized management of DNS, DHCP, and IPAM simplifies network service management, while high availability technology ensures resilience. Despite offering advanced granularity, the solution is costly and lacks frequent updates. Logging capabilities could be improved, and it requires expert users to manage effectively.</p>

{"quote":"The architectural design required a lot of work, and an additional block is needed for reporting.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The overall pricing is quite high, which poses a challenge when selling this product to the customer.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The overall pricing of Infoblox is high, particularly for the Bangladesh market, and the licensing model is challenging.","score":"8"}

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is stable for general use but may face issues with advanced features under heavy traffic.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection strengthens security by mitigating attacks, offering analytics, but faces criticism for delayed support responses.

{"quote":"The automation feature is also noteworthy, although I have not implemented it yet.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Infoblox is a DDI solution that offers more than just DNS security, providing unique protection for IT management and DSCP.","score":"9"}

I am a partner with Infoblox, working for a service integrator company. Infoblox offers comprehensive DDI solutions beyond DNS security, yet its high pricing and complex licensing pose challenges. Though alternatives exist, Infoblox remains unique in our market.

<p>The technical documentation and administration of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection could be improved.</p><p>High query logging is not supported, and there are limitations regarding syslog capacity, necessitating external storage or integration, especially for high traffic volumes.</p><p>Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection requires users to be subject matter experts due to a steep learning curve, impacting user-friendliness.</p><p>Frequent updates for the on-premises version of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection are needed.</p><p>Pricing is high, particularly challenging in the Bangladesh market, with a complex licensing model that complicates cost estimation.</p>

<p>Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection surpasses its competitors by offering automated attack detection, integrated threat intelligence, and real-time analytics, ensuring robust security and continuous DNS services that protect against the widest range of DNS-based attacks.</p>

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is considered expensive, with some users mentioning costs around $100,000 annually. Users rate pricing low to moderate, with some indicating it's higher than other vendors. The solution offers different licenses, including perpetual and subscription, dependent on service needs, with tiers based on query volume and domain count. No additional costs are noted beyond standard licensing. The pricing complexity can pose challenges for enterprise buyers evaluating this solution.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection's initial setup is typically straightforward and user-friendly for those with technical expertise. While not complex, some basic DNS knowledge is necessary for effective deployment, taking about one to two weeks for proficiency. Deployment time varies from an hour to a few days, depending on resources like servers and environment. It generally requires a small team for administration and maintenance, with scalability considerations influencing future use decisions.

Users advise others to explore Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection's documentation before implementation. It effectively manages IP addresses and DNS, offering robust security. This premium feature set is ideal for small to medium enterprises and requires DNS knowledge for optimal use. Stable and scalable, the deployment is straightforward, and updates are automatic. It is considered a market leader and fits well into larger cybersecurity strategies, though price concerns exist. Overall, users consistently rate it highly.

<p>Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection ensures network reliability through high availability technology, supporting failover, recovery, and seamless maintenance.</p>
<p>Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection allows centralized management which significantly simplifies and automates network and services operations.</p>
<p>The system is known for its robust security features, effectively mitigating DNS attacks and enhancing overall network safety.</p>
<p>Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection integrates DNS security with IP address management, providing comprehensive control and automation capabilities.</p>
<p>Performance and visibility are highlighted as the most valuable features of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection, emphasizing its efficiency.</p>

Most users implement Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection using an on-premises model, indicating a preference for localized control and management. While the majority lean towards on-premises, others opt for a hybrid cloud approach, showing some interest in combining traditional systems with cloud advantages. This distribution highlights that among varied deployment methods, on-premises is the dominant choice within their organizational infrastructure for Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection receives mixed feedback for customer service and support. While many users find the technical support helpful, rating it highly, others report dissatisfaction, citing delayed responses as a concern. Some have never needed to contact the support, expressing satisfaction with the service they receive through partners. Despite varying experiences, a substantial number of users appreciate the level of support provided, often grading it between eight and ten out of ten.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection requires improvements in technical documentation and integration capabilities, especially with Cisco APIs. Users find the deployment phase challenging due to insufficient documentation and a steep learning curve. Enhancements in console configuration, alert systems, and dashboard information are needed. Pricing is seen as high, and the solution's logging and performance under attack need refinement. There is a call for expanded product offerings and better integration with carrier-grade needs.

Usage of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection ranges from six months to approximately 15 years.

Centralized management of DNS, DHCP, and IPAM enhances automation and simplifies network services. Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection provides robust DNS security, with advanced threat protection and malicious domain blocking. Its performance and grid interface ensure reliability and protection from threats. Features like dashboards, reporting, API usage, and ansible scripts add value. It integrates with IPAM for comprehensive management. Users appreciate its ease of management, superior visibility, traffic logging, and threat intelligence capabilities.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is generally reported as very stable, with many users highlighting its robustness and reliability. However, some users note that when additional features are added, particularly in high-traffic environments, instability may occur. Issues include limitations when handling large volumes of traffic with added features such as threat analytics and responsibility zones. Most experiences remain positive, rating stability high, though specific configurations may impact performance.

Organizations primarily use Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection for integrating and managing DNS and DHCP services, IP management, and enhancing DNS security. It serves as a firewall and detects DNS attacks, helping secure user requests and applications. Companies deploy it to maintain domain management, support internal and external DNS needs, and strengthen cybersecurity strategies. Infoblox plays a key role in ensuring compliance with IT standards and complements other security systems.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection enhances DNS security by mitigating attacks through DNS protocols, offering better filtration and control compared to traditional firewalls and IPS. Users report improved performance and security decision-making due to robust reporting and analytics capabilities. However, many experience dissatisfaction with support services and issue resolution, noting delays in addressing specific fixes. Organizations benefit from improved internal environment protection but face challenges in support responsiveness and timely issue resolution.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is consistently described as scalable, suiting a range of customer requirements from small to large deployments. Organizations have successfully handled substantial user volumes without scalability problems. As long as capacity assessments are conducted properly, performance can be maintained by adding appliances if necessary. Some have not tested its limits due to limited infrastructure load, yet still express confidence in its scaling capabilities, utilizing it extensively across various user bases and operations.

<p>Users evaluated BlueCat, F5, Akamai, and Cisco Umbrella. They considered Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection due to its advanced DDI technology. Testing of Akamai is in the initial phase, indicating perceived stability and skilled support. Some were not involved in the decision process but were assigned to Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection. Infoblox stands out as a distinct option, as nothing comparable currently exists in their country.</p>

Organizations switched to Fortinet FortiSwitch for cost efficiency and integration, suitable for SMBs, unlike enterprise-preferred Cisco.

{"quote":"The pricing is considered high due to the currency exchange changes in our region. It has increased by about two hundred percent over the past three years.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"4"}

{"quote":"My approach ensures that I install any new devices in about fifteen minutes.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"8"}

Fortinet FortiSwitch installations varied in complexity, with technicians or service providers handling setups and policy configuration challenges.

8.23

7.85

{"quote":"I recommend FortiSwitch for its integration, single interface management, and efficiency in managing network environments.","score":"9"}

The majority prefer on-premises deployment for Fortinet FortiSwitch, with minimal interest in hybrid cloud deployment.

Fortinet FortiSwitch support receives mixed reviews, with varying response times and effectiveness, often compared to Cisco's superior service.

Fortinet FortiSwitch setup ranges from quick plug-and-play to complex configurations, with success reliant on user experience.

{"quote":"The powerful integration capabilities allow us to manage all devices from a single interface through the firewall.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

Fortinet FortiSwitch enables secure network connectivity and management, integrating with FortiGate for centralized control across various sectors.

8.5

Fortinet FortiSwitch offers adaptable network solutions, ideal for varying enterprise sizes, but pricing may limit large-scale scalability.

7.589036

Fortinet FortiSwitch is praised for cost-effectiveness and reliability, though technical support and features could improve for SMBs.

Fortinet FortiSwitch users cite high pricing, limited features, slow support, and desire better scalability, integration, and documentation.

Users have relied on Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access for varying durations, ranging from one month to ten years.

Fortinet FortiSwitch offers cost-effective, secure access but trails leaders, suitable for larger setups with straightforward deployment.

Fortinet FortiSwitch is seen as costly yet feature-rich, with mixed affordability reviews and flexible licensing options.

{"quote":"My local support is working fine, and I have my connection with my account manager in the public company of Fortinet.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"After reinstalling the firmware, it worked fine.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"I experienced a power issue once due to unstable electricity input, not the fabric.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"The stability has been good overall.","score":"8"}

Fortinet FortiSwitch is stable and reliable, delivering robust performance and strong security despite some minor configuration issues.

Users prefer FortiSwitch for its affordability, ease of use, and integration over Cisco's costly licenses and complexities.

{"quote":"For enterprise solutions, it's extendable easily with options for edge connectivity or stackable devices.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The scalability is based on the type or model you are using.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"It has increased by about two hundred percent over the past three years.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"The pricing is considered high due to the currency exchange changes in our region.","score":"9"}

<p>Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access offers high scalability and stability with seamless integration into Fortinet environments, supporting FortiGate, FortiAP, and FortiClient centralized management. It is recognized for strong security and network management but lacks SDN support. While technical support is prompt, some users find troubleshooting difficult. The initial cost is low with no extra licensing, yet pricing affects small and medium businesses. Firmware requires manual updates, and third-party integration is limited.</p>

{"quote":"The powerful integration capabilities allow us to manage all devices from a single interface through the firewall.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"It's easy to be configured and powerful in terms of performance.","score":"8"}

I use Fortinet FortiSwitch for my retail business to manage voice switches and access points. It's easy to configure, powerful, and integrates well, enhancing device management. It improved our IT budget and business stability compared to alternatives like Cisco and Aruba.

Previously used Cisco, HP, Ubiquiti, and Aruba before Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access. They preferred Fortinet due to integration, ease of management, lower costs, operational simplicity, and compatibility with FortiGate and FortiAPs. They valued Fortinet for pricing and ease of installation, especially for small or medium businesses, while Cisco remained trusted for enterprises. They recognized Fortinet's superiority in management and affordability compared to Cisco and Aruba, transitioning from legacy equipment to Fortinet's unified approach.

<p>Fortinet's technical support can be improved, as it often requires manual troubleshooting with limited direct assistance.</p><p>The feature set could be expanded, including enhancements in security features, support for SDN, and better segmentation.</p><p>There are limitations in network infrastructure capabilities, such as the inability to use fiber cables in smaller models and the lack of stackability.</p><p>Pricing and cost can appear high, especially for renewals and licensing, and this can be an obstacle for small and medium-sized businesses.</p><p>Improving Fortinet FortiSwitch's integration capabilities with other platforms and devices would increase usability and interoperability in various environments.</p>

<p>Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access surpasses its competitors by offering seamless security integration, robust performance, and centralized management, ensuring optimal network efficiency and protection for businesses of all sizes.</p>

Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access is considered by users to be expensive but justified by its functionality and reliability. Licensing costs are annual, covering support and warranty, with various contract lengths available. Prices are generally seen as mid-range compared to competitors like Cisco, but higher than Huawei. Although the structure can seem complex, the overall consensus is that Fortinet provides good value, especially as it avoids a subscription-based model common in other brands.

Most organizations implement Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access using in-house teams, with a mix of official partners, integrators, and managed service providers. Typically, one technician is enough. Deployment durations vary, ranging from 25 minutes to a few hours. For initial setups, professional assistance is common, with complexities like 802.1x authentication. While the task is manageable, maintenance incurs significant costs, and a structured approach with templates is common for smooth operation.

Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access installation is generally straightforward and user-friendly, often taking minutes to a few hours, depending on experience and network complexity. Many users find it simple, especially with Fortinet's video resources, though some encounters require CLI activation. Experience with Fortinet products simplifies the process, while transitioning from non-Fortinet networks can increase complexity. Deployment duration varies, from rapid deployments in small networks to extended phases in larger environments, sometimes due to external factors like ISP issues.

Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access customer service and support receive mixed opinions. Some users appreciate the fast, knowledgeable assistance once contacted. Others find technical support slow, particularly in the mornings or when time zone differences arise. Many report needing to navigate language barriers. While some praise the overall service quality, others wish for faster response times, especially for simple issues. Generally, support is rated favorably, but users suggest improvements are needed to match competitors like Cisco.

Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access offers significant cost savings compared to Cisco and other competitors, despite not fully matching their capabilities. Users have observed benefits in operational expenses and ease of deployment. Security enhancements have contributed to peace of mind, and a 10% ROI has been noted. The use of Fortinet with a VPN is perceived as more financially beneficial than Cisco with a dedicated ISP. Businesses find an improvement in IT budget management and network stability.

Customers consistently rate customer service and support of Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access positively, with a score of 5 out of 5.

<p>Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access allows centralized management of multiple components such as FortiAP, FortiClient, and FortiGate through one console reducing the need for additional licenses.</p>

<p>It offers high scalability, easy setup and deployment which can usually be completed within minutes.</p>

<p>Fortinet support for FortiSwitch - Secure Access is rated highly for its efficiency and effectiveness.</p>

<p>The tool has good integration abilities with FortiGate, providing unified management and enhanced security.</p>

<p>Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access is acknowledged for its strong security capabilities, ensuring robust network protection.</p>

Users advise others that Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access offers strong security features and easy management, especially when used with FortiGate. It is suitable for small to medium businesses, integrating well with other Fortinet systems through a single interface. Despite challenges with some technical aspects and needing continuous updates, it provides cost-effectiveness and reliable network performance. It's essential to keep pace with firmware updates and ensure compatibility with existing systems for optimal functionality.

Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access offers seamless integration with FortiGate for superb monitoring and reporting, ease in managing network components, detailed visual interface for device isolation, simple setup, and centralized management through a single console. Its user-friendly interface, security fabric, and low total cost of ownership make it reliable and effective in providing top-tier network management. Features like VLAN setup, SD-WAN support, and robust connectivity enhance its comprehensive network capabilities.

Most entities deploy Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access using an on-premises model. A minor portion adopts a hybrid cloud approach.

Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access faces challenges in pricing, management integration with FortiGate, and lacks some features like SDN and stacking. Technical support response is slow. Users report issues with firmware updates and complexity in configuration. Improved scalability and security features, better central management, and enhanced integration with other platforms are desired. Pricing structure for licensing and annual renewals is cumbersome, and users want a more intuitive interface with clearer documentation.

Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access is widely praised for its stability. Many highlight its reliability and smooth operation without major issues. Users appreciate its straightforward functionality, though some mention configuration complexities and learning curves. Occasional concerns about external factors like power interruptions are noted, but these don’t appear widespread. Several ratings indicate it performs well, often scoring between eight to ten out of ten. Small configuration-related challenges exist but are typically manageable with guidance.

Usage of Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access spans from one month to ten years.

Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access is primarily used for access-level connectivity in diverse sectors such as banking, education, and healthcare. Clients integrate it with FortiGate for centralized network management and enhanced security. It offers seamless connectivity, uniformizes equipment, and supports various devices like phones and computers. Users appreciate its cost-effectiveness and ability to fulfill specific security requirements, such as complying with regulations. The product facilitates connectivity in campus environments and serves as a gateway for FortiGate firewalls.

Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access is known for its scalability, supporting diverse network architectures and user groups. It is praised for ease in expanding through FortiGate management, with many finding it effective for small to large businesses. Users report it manages well to scale, although hardware upgrades may be necessary. While opportunities for scaling are noted, some observe limitations compared to other options. Ratings generally range from seven to nine out of ten, indicating strong scalability.

Users evaluated options like Cisco, Sophos, Draytek, Aruba, HP, and Juniper. Comparisons highlighted that Cisco offers better features but with higher ongoing costs. Cisco's interface and pricing complexity were concerns. Fortinet FortiSwitch is noted as more affordable and easier to manage without needing additional licenses. Easy integration within Fortinet ecosystem was preferred. Users found Cisco's support excellent but expensive. FortiGate's user-friendly nature contributed to the decision, despite some functionality limitations.

Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access enhances operational efficiency and cyber defense by offering streamlined management and rapid policy deployment from a singular interface. It provides comprehensive network insights, seamless integration with Fortinet Security Fabric, and efficient virus scanning. Users experience improved network visibility, cost-effective resource allocation, and robust threat identification. Its integration reduces personnel needs, ensuring scalable solutions suitable for varied environments, including educational sectors, offering reliable network performance and compliance monitoring.

Users switched to KerioControl for its user-friendly interface, scalability, pricing, and superior management compared to other systems.

KerioControl is easily deployed with IT expertise, often in-house, offering customizable configurations for diverse client requirements.

KerioControl's support is responsive yet sometimes delayed, with users desiring faster response times and fewer additional charges.

On-premises is the predominant deployment model for KerioControl, with fewer users choosing Hybrid, Public, or Private Cloud options.

KerioControl setup is user-friendly but may require adjustments for complex configurations, with varying deployment and maintenance times.

{"quote":"About three engineers typically participate in maintaining and implementing the solution.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"If you have an issue, it can be resolved in about half an hour with backup and recovery.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"8"}

{"quote":"KerioControl has met some of the network infrastructure needs yet could improve in terms of scalability, which I rate four out of ten.","quality_score":"5","sentiment_score":"3"}

{"quote":"I would rate the overall stability of KerioControl as eight out of ten.","quality_score":"5","sentiment_score":"7"}