{"quote":"Orca needs improvement in snoozing or dismissing specific alarms.","score":"8"}

Orca Security improved cloud security by enhancing visibility, reducing risks, and optimizing management with efficient, agentless threat detection.

<p>Orca Security offers agentless visibility and risk insight in cloud environments across AWS and Azure using its SideScanning technology, which demands minimal permissions. It prioritizes security tasks and gaps effectively, easing remediation. Orca leverages cloud APIs for efficient data collection without performance downsides. However, it needs improvements in alarm management and compliance scanning. Its downtime impacts usability, and expanding its malware detection library could enhance its security posture.</p>

I use Orca Security for managing cloud security posture, finding its flexible filtering and visualization valuable. While it effectively identifies vulnerabilities and compliance issues, it needs better management options for snoozing alarms and handling alerts with multiple files.

Users previously relied on network TAP devices like ExtraHop Networks, Lacework, Rapid7, AWS GuardDuty, Tenable, Qualys, and CrowdStrike. Traditional tools lacked comprehensive coverage, ranking, and actionable context. Users faced challenges with agent-based solutions, excessive false positives, visibility gaps, and high costs. Orca Security offered a new level of insight, filling critical gaps and consolidating tools, delivering time savings and improved efficiency across various environments, while offering better integration and ease of use.

Orca Security surpasses its competitors by providing comprehensive cloud security with agentless operation, unified visibility, and rapid deployment, ensuring seamless protection and compliance across multi-cloud environments, helping businesses detect vulnerabilities and mitigate risks efficiently.

<p>Orca could expand its automatic remediation options, including providing scripts for server hardening.</p><p>Orca could improve general compliance checks instead of only endpoint compliance.</p><p>Orca should enhance its alert system and provide a more customizable dashboard.</p><p>Orca needs to improve third-party vendor compatibility, enabling sanitized results sharing.</p><p>Orca requires improvements in anti-malware detection and the ability to auto-remediate threats.</p>

Orca Security's pricing structure is based on cloud workloads, offering a pay-as-you-use model with competitive rates compared to alternatives like Rapid7 and Prisma Cloud. Enterprises find its comprehensive package justifies the cost, though it may seem high initially. Discounts are available for strategic partnerships, and flexibility exists depending on assets and environments managed. Orca includes all necessary features in its base price, avoiding additional costs, and remains accommodating to various enterprise needs.

Users found Orca Security's initial setup quick and effortless. It requires minimal steps, often completed in minutes, due to its agentless design. Customers appreciated the simplicity of connecting accounts and the lack of maintenance needed. Orca Security's documentation and intuitive integration were highlighted as beneficial, saving time and reducing complexity. Users noted that setup involved just entering cloud provider credentials and the solution began scanning immediately, offering rapid deployment without the need for extensive configurations.

Orca Security's implementation is managed internally by users without third-party assistance. Customers complete setup due to the SaaS nature and lack of access to their cloud platforms. Deployment requires about an hour, involving a smooth onboarding with a three-step process on the Orca platform. While some users had support from Orca, the process typically fit within a few days from initial discussions to full setup, indicating user-friendly procedures and effective guidance.

Orca Security has responsive and helpful customer service, often praised for quick issue resolution. Despite sometimes being less frequently used, when engaged, support is prompt, usually addressing queries within hours. Occasional feedback is swiftly incorporated into their offerings. They maintain a shared Slack channel for real-time support. Ratings are mostly high, indicating satisfaction, though some users experience slower response times. Staff are knowledgeable and responsive, with support regarded as a key feature.

Orca Security significantly reduces expenses by replacing multiple tools and decreasing personnel overhead. Updates and new features come at no extra cost. Time to value is immediate, enhancing efficiency and simplicity. Cloud security engineers find it user-friendly, requiring minimal IT expertise. Orca saves hundreds of thousands annually in staffing, offering immense return on investment. Its lack of deployment hassles and swift time-to-value make it indispensable. Users affirm its worth and contribution to cloud operations.

Orca Security is highly scalable, deployed extensively across various environments. Many organizations integrate it from inception with no issues as they expand services and workloads. It can handle diverse setups, including AWS and Azure, managing extensive assets and cloud environments. Automation and agentless technology enable quick, effortless scaling across numerous accounts. Users appreciate its reliability and the ability to monitor large infrastructures efficiently, adapting to changes in cloud size and asset volume.

Orca Security's customer service and support is consistently rated positively, with a rating between 4 and 5 out of 5.

Users advise others to approach Orca Security skeptically but give it a try due to its ease of deployment and robust capabilities. It's recommended to conduct a proof of concept to gauge its value in handling cloud vulnerabilities and security issues effectively. The tool's agentless nature, detailed visibility, and prioritization are highly praised. People appreciate Orca for its continuous real-time analysis, integration with cloud providers, and valuable features, encouraging it as a primary choice for cloud security management.

Users consistently employ the Public Cloud model for deploying Orca Security.

Orca Security is frequently regarded as stable, with many experiencing no issues. Some noted brief downtimes, often unnoticed due to low activity at those times. Initial minor problems were addressed with updates, and their support is responsive. Occasional frontend issues occur, mainly during updates. Despite varying opinions, most agree it outperforms other tools. Numerous users are confident in its ability to manage their workload without concern. Stability ratings range from nine to ten.

Orca Security offers exceptional cloud visibility without needing agents, ranking critical vulnerabilities effectively. Its SideScanning feature simplifies deployment, providing in-depth insights. Users appreciate its agentless operation, container security, compliance reporting, and dashboard for multi-cloud environments. Automated scanning and real-time data protection enhance efficiency. Orca Security supports prioritizing tasks, allowing teams to focus on key issues. Its integration with CI/CD pipelines ensures robust early security. User-friendly design aids navigation and filtering, addressing vulnerabilities, CVEs, and misconfigurations comprehensively.

<p>Orca Security provides exceptional visibility into cloud environments, highlighting risks and vulnerabilities effectively.</p>
<p>Orca Security's SideScanning technology simplifies the assessment process by requiring only permissions, avoiding complex setups.</p>
<p>Orca Security ranks and contextualizes security gaps across environments, aiding in targeted and effective risk management.</p>
<p>Orca Security's cross-environment visibility through its Cloud Security Posture Management capability significantly enhances security oversight.</p>
<p>Orca Security supports compliance with standards such as PCI DSS, aiding organizations in meeting regulatory requirements without requiring network scanning or agents.</p>

Using Orca Security, organizations improve security programs by assessing and mitigating risks in a deterministic manner with agentless data collection from cloud configurations. They experience enhanced visibility, reduced performance concerns, and streamlined operations. Orca prioritizes critical issues, saving time and resources, while providing actionable insights and automated updates. By consolidating multiple security tools, Orca enhances cloud visibility, identifies unseen assets, and addresses vulnerabilities early, strengthening security posture across various cloud environments.

Orca Security needs better integration with third-party vendors and ticketing systems. Users desire enhanced dashboards, more intuitive interfaces, and improved alert management. Real-time risk assessment and anti-malware detection can be strengthened. Expansion into data centers and private clouds is necessary. Users suggest adding more automation and customization options. Effective user communication and education on features are requested. OC should offer more comprehensive compliance focus and integrations with security frameworks and report tools.

Organizations primarily utilize Orca Security for cloud security posture management. It identifies threats, vulnerabilities, and misconfigurations without requiring software installation, providing agentless data collection via API integration with cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP. Users benefit from Orca's ability to maintain security standards compliance, such as PCI and CIS, enhance visibility into their cloud environments, ensure regular updates, and manage security across applications, databases, and infrastructure elements, ultimately improving overall cloud security confidence.

Usage duration of Orca Security ranges from one year to more than two and a half years.

Users have considered alternatives like Palo Alto Prisma, Lacework, Wiz, Qualys, Dome9, Rapid7, Aqua, CrowdStrike, and Datadog. They highlight Orca's agentless approach, superior visibility, ease of deployment, and effective risk prioritization. Orca offers a mature ranking system and SaaS advantages over competitors. Users found Orca's ability to address false positives and negatives beneficial. Many have shifted to Orca from competing cloud security offerings due to its features and user-friendly experience.

{"quote":"Primavera appears to be more expensive than Microsoft Project but potentially less than Maximo.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"6"}

{"quote":"Our primary use case for Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management was during a period when we deployed it for five or six years.","quality_score":"6","sentiment_score":"7"}

{"quote":"There is a need for improvement in the interfacing and possibly better integration with other programs.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"3"}

{"quote":"The most valuable features were the cost breakdown structure and work breakdown structure.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"9"}

Oracle Primavera needs enhanced customization, integration, scalability, security, cost management, AI features, and UI improvements for project management.

Oracle Primavera is essential for managing mega projects, integrating budgets, and streamlining approvals despite its complex interface.

Oracle Primavera is scalable for various organization sizes, but database setup affects performance, especially for large data volumes.

Oracle Primavera setup is complex and time-consuming, often managed by IT, with varying ease depending on user expertise.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management support is good, with varying technical assistance quality, and some users prefer their own teams.

5.2

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management streamlines project control and collaboration with robust planning, tracking, and integration features for large projects.

Consider ongoing training, integration time, and costs with Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, recommending exploration of the cloud version.

{"quote":"Primavera appears to be more expensive than Microsoft Project but potentially less than Maximo.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"Whatever integrations we required at the time were well-handled.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"They supported us during the implementation phase.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"Oracle's customer service was good.","score":"7"}

Users' experience with Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management ranges from weeks to 20 years, highlighting its versatile usage duration.

Oracle Primavera is costly, with higher fees than Microsoft Project, but offers specialized project management for engineering.

{"quote":"It provided me with better control over tracking costs and ensured that tasks and milestones were properly managed by engineers.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"It seemed more suitable for large-scale projects compared to Microsoft Project.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"It was considered easy to integrate and secure.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"The most valuable features were the cost breakdown structure and work breakdown structure.","score":"9"}

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management streamlines large projects by integrating planning, tracking, and budget management for enhanced oversight and control.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is widely regarded as highly stable and reliable, consistently maintaining excellent performance.

{"quote":"The software could benefit from enhancements that make it more user-friendly for various tasks.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"There is a need for improvement in the interfacing and possibly better integration with other programs.","score":"9"}

<p>Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management excels in its project management and planning capabilities, offering features like contractor signature streamlining and delay analysis. The product's cost and work breakdown structures stand out, yet it needs ERP integration and enhanced reporting. Scalability and cost management features require improvement, alongside better AI integration. While valued for accuracy and robustness, the product could benefit from advancing these areas to meet tech buyer needs effectively.</p>

During our five to six years of using Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, we found its cost and work breakdown structures valuable for large-scale construction projects. While it offered better control and was more intuitive than Microsoft Project, it needed improved integration and user-friendliness.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is perceived as expensive, with costs being higher than Microsoft Project Server yet potentially lower than Maximo. Users note significant upfront and ongoing annual fees, typified by the $100,000 per year masking module. While some find the pricing justifiable due to its engineering project management specialization, others face potential integration expenses, such as API opening costs comparable to Oracle licenses. Companies often limit user numbers to manage software expenses.

<p>Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management surpasses its competitors by offering advanced analytics capabilities and seamless integration, empowering organizations to efficiently manage project portfolios, optimize resources, and drive strategic objectives with precision and agility.</p>

<p>Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management should work on integrating with ERP.</p><p>There is a need for more cost management features in Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management.</p><p>Scalability has room for improvement in Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management.</p><p>Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management should better integrate with other programs.</p><p>Multiple source reporting features are needed in Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management for project management improvement.</p>

<p>Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management has reliable tech support.</p>
<p>Its most valuable feature is its accuracy.</p>
<p>Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management streamlines the process of obtaining signatures from contractors.</p>
<p>Users appreciate Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management's planning capabilities, especially for large projects.</p>
<p>Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management includes key features like delay analysis and extension of time claims.</p>

Initial setup of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management varies in complexity. Some find it simple for a single person, while others cite multiple factors and extensive preparation. Deployment can take three to six months, mainly for learning. Entry-level users may struggle, whereas advanced users manage it independently. IT departments often handle the setup. During implementation, teams may use Primavera for project tracking after their preferred software choice.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management's customer service is consistently praised for its effectiveness, particularly during the implementation and integration phases. Technical support is generally reliable, with knowledgeable staff handling various issues, although resolution times can vary. Some organizations note that they rely on experienced users instead of Oracle's technical support. Overall, many users express satisfaction with the responsiveness and expertise provided by the vendor's team.

Organizations appreciate Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management for its scalability. Many users rate it highly for expanding to accommodate more users, with the potential to scale from small to large enterprises. Some note limitations, particularly regarding query performance with extensive data sets, which impacts scalability for asset management. On-premises versions are considered adequately scalable, but there is a trend towards upgrading to cloud offerings for enhanced scalability. In particular, engineering environments exhibit mixed adoption depending on existing tools.

Users advise others to ensure they have a solid understanding of project management when using Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, as learning requires hands-on experience. They note ongoing maintenance needs, including training and updates. Some suggest using the cloud version and emphasize the potential cost and integration challenges, particularly for larger enterprises. There's a desire to expand usage as companies grow, although some express hesitance due to the complexity and cost involved.

Many users express satisfaction with Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management's stability, often describing it as highly stable. Some users rate the stability as a nine and have no complaints. Primavera is frequently described as stable or pretty stable. One user mentions limited use, preventing them from assessing stability.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management requires enhanced field positioning flexibility, improved ERP integration, and better user interface design. Integration with non-Oracle systems, such as IBM Maximo, is costly and complex. The software has a steep learning curve and limited resources available for support roles. Cost management features could be expanded. The application also needs to address interface improvements and scalability issues, with a focus on developing user-friendly features and AI integration capabilities.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management's most valuable features include ease of use, integration capabilities, accuracy, and planning functionality. Users appreciate the streamlined process for contractor signatures, robust document control, contract management, change control, and cost control. The tool effectively handles multi-project environments, provides tracking for tasks and milestones, and supports baseline analysis and delay management. Users favor its cost and work breakdown structures, security, and suitability for large-scale projects over Microsoft Project.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management has been used for a range of a few weeks to approximately 20 years.

Companies primarily use Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management for managing critical infrastructure projects, including handling engineering document management for mega projects. They leverage it for project planning and management, especially when specified by clients, and benefit from its capabilities in managing capital expenditures and streamlining approvals. Though considered complex for early-stage professionals, it is valued for its comprehensive functionalities in construction and installation phases, utilized extensively without other tools for years.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management aids organizations in managing large engineering projects by facilitating project and portfolio management activities. It enables teams to plan effectively and track project progress and results. They benefit from integrated cost and work breakdown structures, allowing for efficient cost tracking and budget oversight while engineers manage tasks and milestones with files received from contractors in various countries.

Users favored Orca Security for its agentless design, risk prioritization, and ease over competitors like Wiz and Lacework.

Users evaluated various options such as Palo Alto, Wiz, Lacework, and Datadog before selecting Orca Security for its agentless approach, superior visibility, and effective risk prioritization. They sought alternatives like Dome9 and Rapid7, but Orca's robust vulnerability management and ease of deployment stood out. Considering Qualys, Tenable, and AWS GuardDuty, Orca provided comprehensive coverage and minimized false positives, offering a practical, cost-effective advantage in the ever-evolving security landscape.

D-Link Ethernet Switches are easily installed by users or small teams, often needing minimal configuration or consultant assistance.

Cisco favored for robustness, Juniper for backbone, D-Link chosen for affordability; preferences vary with demand and budget constraints.

{"quote":"I would recommend D-Link to other users, as it's a preferred choice for many designs, and I primarily work with D-Link switches.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"I would rate the overall solution as seven to eight out of ten.","score":"7"}

D-Link Ethernet Switches are easy to set up, offering plug-and-play functionality with comprehensive documentation for seamless integration.

Most users prefer on-premises deployment for D-Link Ethernet Switches, valuing control and security in local network environments.

{"quote":"For high-end switches, the price could be 5% to 10% cheaper. Improvements in the voltage facility, like increasing from 360 watts to 400 or 450 watts, would make them more competitive with other vendors.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"6"}

{"quote":"For high-end switches, the price could be 5% to 10% cheaper. Improvements in the voltage facility, like increasing from 360 watts to 400 or 450 watts, would make them more competitive with other vendors.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"4"}

{"quote":"There are no stability issues with D-Link Ethernet switches.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"10"}

8.75

7.166666666666667

D-Link Ethernet Switches offer flexibility and scalability for various businesses, accommodating hundreds with competitive pricing and reliable performance.

5.15

D-Link Ethernet Switches are reliable, yet regional support varies, with users often relying on online resources and importers.

D-Link Ethernet Switches connect workstations and servers, valued for affordability, ease of setup, and simplifying network configurations.

8.5

D-Link Ethernet Switch users have experience ranging from a few months to 25 years, indicating long-term reliability and familiarity.

D-Link Ethernet Switches offer cost-effective, energy-efficient, reliable solutions with flexible ports, comprehensive management, and strong security features.

D-Link Ethernet Switches are recommended for their cost-effective reliability in small to medium enterprises, despite potential security trade-offs.

{"quote":"Some networks implemented ten years ago are still operational without any need for upgrades.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"There are no stability issues with D-Link Ethernet switches.","score":"9"}

D-Link Ethernet Switches require upgrades for stability, security, manageability, port options, and improved pricing compared to competitors like Cisco.

{"quote":"Whenever there is an issue, the local technical team supports us, whether through physical presence or remotely.","score":"9"}

D-Link Ethernet Switches offer cost-effective, one-time purchase solutions without recurring fees, appealing to budget-conscious enterprise buyers.

{"quote":"D-Link's technical support is good.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The pricing is competitive in the market, making D-Link Ethernet switches a good option for both middle-end and high-end brands.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"There are no scalability issues.","score":"8"}

D-Link Ethernet Switches receive mixed stability feedback, with praise for reliability but issues like hanging, heat, and mounting options.

D-Link Ethernet Switches are cost-effective, achieving 90% resource savings and ROI in four years compared to Cisco and Huawei.

Cisco and Juniper excel in scalability; Ubiquiti stands out for unified features and wireless capabilities, unlike D-Link.

{"quote":"Overall, D-Link offers a good option.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"High-end switches should be slightly cheaper.","score":"9"}