{"quote":"Pricing is competitive.","score":"8"}

D-Link Ethernet Switches boost network efficiency with varied options, though some clients encounter issues despite initial success.

{"quote":"Improvements in the voltage facility, like increasing from 360 watts to 400 or 450 watts, would make them more competitive with other vendors.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"For high-end switches, the price could be 5% to 10% cheaper.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"It's especially valuable because Cisco and other products function similarly, but for smaller networks where high transfer rates aren't necessary.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"People use it for VLAN and sometimes for routing.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"The most valuable feature is VLAN.","score":"8"}

I find D-Link Ethernet switches valuable for VLAN and routing in smaller networks. They're budget-friendly compared to Cisco, though slightly cheaper pricing and improved voltage would enhance competitiveness against other vendors. They're often used for CCTVs and access points.

Previously used options include Cisco, TRENDnet, Netgear, Juniper, Nortel, HP, Meraki, UniFi, and Huawei. Cisco was favored for robustness despite higher cost, while TRENDnet, Netgear, and HP were chosen for budget constraints. They shifted to D-Link for affordability and availability. Juniper used for complex, stable networks and Cisco for government clients. Meraki preferred for user-friendly interface, UniFi considered for business needs, and Huawei used before adopting D-Link.

<p></p>

D-Link Ethernet Switches offer competitive pricing and affordability compared to brands like Cisco and Juniper, ranging from $65 to $1,000 for a one-time purchase. Users appreciate the absence of licensing fees and find the unmanaged models particularly cost-effective. Enterprise buyers highlight the cost-effectiveness and reasonable pricing as a compelling factor, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious organizations. The lack of recurring costs adds to its appeal in the Ethernet switch market.

<p>D-Link Ethernet Switches should have improved stability and security.</p>

<p>Centralized management and cloud integration are lacking in D-Link Ethernet Switches.</p>

<p>D-Link Ethernet Switches need better local support and technical customer service.</p>

<p>The switching capacity of D-Link Ethernet Switches is low and needs enhancement.</p>

<p>D-Link Ethernet Switches require better quality control across different regions.</p>

<p>D-Link Ethernet Switches are easy to install with user-friendly setup and plug-and-play capabilities. They offer affordability, reliability, and features like VPN and quality of service but need better stability compared to Cisco. Expansion potential is good, yet improvements are necessary in cloud integration and centralized manageability. Technical support and security features on managed devices need enhancement, while switching capacity and competitive pricing for high-end models remain concerns for tech buyers.</p>

Multiple users mention that D-Link Ethernet Switches are easy to deploy, often requiring minimal time and effort. Many perform the deployment themselves or with a small team, sometimes involving network engineers for speedy execution. Several rely on suppliers or outside consultants for assistance, while some note the process as mostly plug-and-play. Maintenance typically involves just one or two people, highlighting the switches' simplicity and efficiency in various office environments.

Users achieved ROI with D-Link Ethernet Switches in four years, noting it was worth the investment. Its strong return significantly saved resources, up to 90%. Compared to Cisco and Huawei alternatives, D-Link offers similar features and functionality at a lower cost.

Many users experience minimal need for technical support with D-Link Ethernet Switches. While support varies by region, technical teams often resolve issues independently. Users in regions like Africa rely on their own technical teams or replace equipment, while support in other regions could be faster. Some note D-Link support as comparable to other brands like Cisco, although most find D-Link user-friendly and manage issues through online resources or local support teams.

Users find D-Link Ethernet Switches' initial setup easy and user-friendly. Installation is quick, often taking around 10-40 minutes depending on network size. It's mostly plug-and-play, requiring minimal configuration. Instructions are clear, and many handle deployment without additional help. A management tool simplifies the setup, especially for large networks. Training technicians enhances ease, but even inexperienced users manage well with guidance. The setup integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure when executed by trained personnel.

<p>D-Link Ethernet Switches are very easy to install with no configuration needed and offer plug-and-play convenience.</p>
<p>They are highly scalable, making them suitable for varying business sizes and needs.</p>
<p>The initial setup of D-Link Ethernet Switches is straightforward and user-friendly, appreciated by many users.</p>
<p>D-Link Ethernet Switches are noted for their stability and reliability with very low fault frequency.</p>
<p>They offer good VPN features and quality of service, enhancing overall network performance.</p>

D-Link Ethernet Switches face challenges in stability, security features, and integration with cloud services. Their CLI lacks direct command options for port binding with IP and MAC. Users noted issues with cost, low throughput, and poor manageability. The range of models is limited, making certain configurations hard to find. Additionally, they struggle with heat management and lack high-end options comparable to competitors like Cisco. Enhanced local support and central management are desired.

Users predominantly implement D-Link Ethernet Switches through on-premises deployment. This consistent choice is made by all respondents, indicating a strong preference towards maintaining control and direct oversight of their network infrastructure. The selection highlights an inclination for an internal setup that allows for direct management and possibly enhanced security measures. Organizations therefore lean towards a deployment model where hardware is hosted and utilized within their own facilities.

D-Link Ethernet Switches generally exhibit strong stability. Most users report no issues, bugs, or crashes, rating stability between eight and ten out of ten. Some experience occasional hanging or heating, with stability affected over ten years. Small switches may fail due to varied import quality. Downtime is minimal, and long-term networks remain functional. Users find them reliable with good performance, though improvements are possible in size options and mounting provisions.

Users advise others that D-Link Ethernet Switches are reliable for small to medium businesses, offering great value for money. They emphasize the importance of easy configuration and suggest they are best for VLAN segregation, network security, and high-speed data transfer. While many recommend them for budget-conscious buyers, they note some prefer other brands like Cisco for advanced features. Overall, they highlight D-Link’s usability, scalability, and fair pricing.

D-Link Ethernet Switches are praised for their easy setup and configuration. Users appreciate their cost-effectiveness, stability, and reliable performance. Features like VLAN configuration, green technology for power saving, and integration with other network technologies are highly valued. The user-friendly graphical interface and a range of port options cater to various network sizes. Troubleshooting is simplified with LED signals, and the switches support advanced features like QoS, remote management, and smart ports. Pricing is competitive compared to alternatives.

Network administrators primarily use D-Link Ethernet Switches for connecting workstations, servers, access points, routers, and other LAN devices. Companies integrate these switches within their internal networks, offering connectivity for surveillance cameras, Wi-Fi, and local LAN in retail environments. Deployment occurs in small to medium-sized businesses. They are chosen for their affordability and ease of configuration. Some users leverage them for network expansion across different departments using fiber connections or to manage surveillance, VPN, and general networking tasks.

Usage of D-Link Ethernet Switches ranges from a few months to 25 years.

D-Link Ethernet Switches have increased network efficiency with options like smart and fully managed types. They offer 10 Gigabit connectivity and segmentation capabilities, including VLANs, core, and access switching. Users appreciate the plug-and-play unmanaged switches and competitive pricing. Despite some complaints about features, they have enhanced network performance with backbone speed advantages and various switch types like DHCP, core, and access switches. Organizations benefit from improved network flexibility and efficiency.

D-Link Ethernet Switches are considered scalable by users, with flexible growth potential. They are used in various industries, such as hotels and engineering, supporting hundreds of users across organizations. Clients appreciate the competitive pricing and adaptability for medium-sized and large enterprises. While some users suggest scalability could be improved, others report no issues and find the switches reliable and suitable for expanding usage across multiple locations.

Users evaluated ASUS and TP-Link. Cisco Switches were also considered, along with comparisons to Juniper for scalability and advanced features. Ubiquiti was noted for its unified switches, contrasting with D-Link. Ubiquiti and Cisco were considered for wireless needs.

8.5

AWS CodeCommit setup is quick for most users, with easy migration and maintenance, but depends on AWS familiarity.

{"quote":"Overall, I would rate AWS CodeCommit an eight out of ten.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"I would recommend third-party tools like GitHub, Bitbucket, or GitLab to those considering starting fresh since AWS CodeCommit is deprecated for new customers.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"AWS CodeCommit is free, and there are no additional charges for using it.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket.","quality_score":"7","sentiment_score":"3"}

AWS CodeCommit offers a less user-friendly interface than Bitbucket, needing better features and documentation for an improved experience.

7.25

7.5

{"quote":"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent.","quality_score":"10","sentiment_score":"10"}

8.75

7.5

AWS CodeCommit support is highly praised for its fast response, excellent service, and consistently meeting user expectations.

AWS CodeCommit serves as a private code repository and version control system supporting CI/CD pipelines for integrated workloads.

AWS CodeCommit is user-friendly, affordable, offers integration with AWS services, robust security, and supports versioning and multiple environments.

AWS CodeCommit is highly scalable and flexible, efficiently handling various team sizes and storage needs with competitive pricing.

AWS CodeCommit is secure and integrates well, but lacks features like online forking and direct Bitbucket integration.

AWS CodeCommit users have varying engagement durations, with usage spanning from one month to eight years.

<p>AWS CodeCommit is noted for being a simple, cost-effective version control system, requiring just an AWS account. It efficiently handles code installation from various projects and integrates with AWS CodeGuru for reviews. While offering GitHub-like versioning, it lacks Bitbucket's options, such as online repository forking and reviewer additions. Though cheaper at one dollar per month per user, AWS CodeCommit could benefit from beginner resources, especially for pricing clarity.</p>

AWS CodeCommit pricing is storage-based, considered reasonable by many, with details available online for effective cost comparison.

{"quote":"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent.","score":"8"}

AWS CodeCommit is praised for its reliable performance, strong security, and high dependability as part of AWS.

{"quote":"AWS CodeCommit is free, and there are no additional charges for using it.","score":"10"}

{"quote":"CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket.","score":"8"}

{"quote":"There are no issues with security or compliance, and it scales easily.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up.","score":"8"}

We utilize AWS CodeCommit for clients already integrated with it, appreciating its user-friendly interface, security, and scalability. However, for new clients, we prefer alternatives like GitHub and GitLab due to the interface limitations of CodeCommit.

<p>Some options in Bitbucket are not available in AWS CodeCommit, such as adding a code reviewer.</p><p>AWS CodeCommit lacks the ability to fork repositories online, a feature present in Bitbucket.</p><p>Jira offers a debugging option not found in AWS CodeCommit.</p><p>While AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket, it does not offer as many features.</p><p>AWS CodeCommit could benefit from video or documentation for beginners, including detailed pricing information similar to Bitbucket's.</p>

AWS CodeCommit offers competitive pricing, generally seen as reasonably priced compared to competitors. Enterprises noted that pricing is largely based on storage use, with detailed cost structures available on AWS's website. Notably, some users found substantial cost savings due to management tasks being handled by AWS. However, others perceived the solution as expensive. It's noted that CodeCommit does not incur additional charges for usage, which contributes to its appeal among enterprises.

<p></p>

<p>AWS CodeCommit is easier to use than Bitbucket, requiring only an AWS account password and username.</p>
<p>AWS CodeCommit is simple and cost-effective.</p>
<p>It supports integration with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews.</p>
<p>Versioning is a highly valued feature of AWS CodeCommit.</p>
<p>AWS CodeCommit acts as a code repository with features for code versioning and approval, similar to those on GitHub.</p>

AWS CodeCommit customer service and support receive high praise for their effectiveness and rapid response. Users frequently express satisfaction, describing the technical support as good to excellent. Support is considered dependable, with expectations often exceeded. Feedback highlights the speed and efficiency of AWS support teams, resulting in high ratings with users noting its reliability. Services are separate, depending on the signed support level, yet consistently appreciated for meeting or surpassing user requirements.

AWS CodeCommit's initial setup is often described as easier than Bitbucket and Azure, with a setup time ranging from one minute to two hours, depending on experience with AWS. Most find it straightforward and simple, achieving installation with resources like YouTube videos. Some encountered issues when integrating with other tools, such as VS Code. Its ease of maintenance and migration is frequently highlighted, with many rating their experience highly.

AWS CodeCommit is consistently described as stable and dependable. Users express that they have not encountered any stability issues, highlighting its flexibility and secure environment. AWS's shared responsibility for security is appreciated, and no complaints have been made regarding its performance. Users rate its stability highly, with an example rating of eight out of ten.

AWS CodeCommit is recognized for its excellent scalability, accommodating adjustments as needed. Users appreciate its support for numerous developers without issues, partly due to its S3 backing. Cost-effectiveness compared to competitors is noted, with users highlighting seamless up or down scaling capabilities. There have been no bottleneck experiences, leading to high ratings for scalability. Businesses have switched to AWS CodeCommit, moving away from alternatives like Bitbucket and GitLab, thanks to its suitability for various team sizes.

Users advise others to use AWS CodeCommit if integrated deeply within AWS due to its seamless integration, security, and ease of use. It supports basic Git functionality and works efficiently with CI/CD pipelines. However, drawbacks include the lack of integration with services like Bitbucket and the inability to fork online or manage code reviewers. Despite its deprecated status for new customers, users appreciate its good documentation and recommend it for those who extensively use AWS.

AWS CodeCommit lacks certain features available in Bitbucket such as adding a code reviewer and forking repositories online. It also fails to provide a debugging option like Jira. Migration processes need improvement and more user-friendly design enhancements are necessary. Documentation for beginners would be beneficial, providing details on pricing since current information is limited. Although AWS CodeCommit is cost-effective, it does not match Bitbucket in functionality. Cross-account access and CICD pipelines could also be simplified.

AWS CodeCommit offers ease of use and cost-effectiveness. Users appreciate versioning capabilities, code validation, and push features for different environments. Integration with AWS CodeGuru enhances the review process. The user interface is intuitive and security compliance is robust. Acts as a reliable code repository with features akin to GitHub, eliminating the need for personal passwords with simple AWS account logins. Scales effectively to meet user needs.

AWS CodeCommit is primarily used as a private code repository and for version control. Organizations utilize it to store data, create instances, and work on them. It's employed for Git purposes and to deploy EC2 tools. They use CodeCommit for continuous integration and development, pushing code into production environments like S3 or EC2 through a CI/CD pipeline. Existing customers continue using CodeCommit, although alternatives like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab are preferred for new customers.

Users have been utilizing AWS CodeCommit for a range spanning from a few months to eight years.

Users chose D-Link for affordability and simplicity over Cisco's and Juniper's advanced features and scalability in complex networks.

Users evaluated alternatives like Cisco, Ubiquiti, Juniper, ASUS, TP-Link, TRENDnet, and Netgear. Cisco was noted for its robustness but higher cost. Ubiquiti and Juniper offered scalability and advanced features. Netgear and TRENDnet were considered for price and reliability. Meraki was highlighted for having a user-friendly interface. Huawei and HP were briefly used, while UniFi was seen as serving different purposes. Preferences often depended on client requirements and budget constraints.

{"quote":"It happens from time to time that my model stops responding, but it is rare.","score":"5"}

{"quote":"It is usually not an issue with Sparx.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"Occasionally, it may be a network connectivity problem.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"I have not really experienced major troubles with it.","score":"7"}

{"quote":"I’ve been quite satisfied with the stability.","score":"8"}

Users switched to Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect for cost-effectiveness, ease, flexibility, and comprehensive features, enhancing collaboration and functionality.

Organizations mainly handled implementation internally, using external vendors sparingly for complex needs or additional expertise.

Most users prefer on-premises deployment for Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, with fewer opting for public, private, or hybrid clouds.

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is easy to set up, but complex configurations require technical skills and DB knowledge.

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect's customer service is praised for stability, quick email support, and useful community resources, despite some local concerns.

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is used for UML diagramming, enterprise architecture, business modeling, and documentation, despite usability challenges.

{"quote":"We typically work with models that involve up to 50 modelers and as many as 10,000 elements and 20,000 relationships without significant difficulties.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"8"}

{"quote":"We are producing quite large models, with over 10,000 elements and relationships.","quality_score":"8","sentiment_score":"7"}

8.33

{"quote":"I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.","score":"6"}

{"quote":"For specific domains, it would be useful if Sparx could ensure designs conform to metamodel requirements, especially for public sector clients adhering to strict modeling standards.","score":"9"}

{"quote":"The integration of Sparx with some AI features could be beneficial.","score":"7"}

Enterprise Architect offers strong scalability for various team sizes, integrating well with tools, despite some performance issues.

{"quote":"The solution allows us to quickly present designs and concepts to customers and get their feedback, thereby moving the project forward step by step.","quality_score":"10","sentiment_score":"9"}

{"quote":"Whenever I begin a new project with Sparx, I have to spend time training people on how to use it since it is not straightforward.","quality_score":"9","sentiment_score":"2"}

Invest in training, leverage resources, assess needs, and configure carefully for Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect's complex capabilities.

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect supports UML 2, enhances collaboration, and offers flexible, affordable, customizable modeling and documentation tools.

7.0

Enterprise Architect needs improved usability, expanded resources, better performance, enhanced features, and simplified learning for non-technical users.

3.5

7.8

Enterprise Architect users have experience ranging from under a year to over 15 years, showcasing diverse expertise levels.

Enterprise Architect enhances productivity with quick cost recovery and improves project management, architecture insights, and documentation efficiency.

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect offers affordable, feature-rich modeling tools with flexible licensing, making it appealing for enterprises.

Users prefer Sparx Systems for cost-effectiveness, features, and usability, though some choose alternatives for specific needs.